Dynamic behaviour of aluminium alloy plates with surface cracks subjected to repeated impacts

References

• Atas C, Dogan A. 2015. An experimental investigation on the repeated impact response of glass/epoxy composites subjected to thermal ageing. Comp Part B. 75:127–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balcı O, Çoban O, Bora MÖ, Akagündüz E, Yalçin EB. 2017. Experimental investigation of single and repeated impacts for repaired honeycomb sandwich structures. Mater Sci Eng A. 682:23–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayatfar A, Khedmati MR, Rigo P. 2014. Residual ultimate strength of cracked steel unstiffened and stiffened plates under longitudinal compression. Thin Walled Struct. 84(0):378–392.
   Google Scholar
• Burak Can Cerik. 2017. Damage assessment of marine grade aluminum alloy-plated structures due to air blast and explosive loads. Thin Walled Struct. 110:123–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho SR, Truong DD, Shin HK. 2014. Repeated lateral impacts on steel beams at room and sub-zero temperatures. Int J Impat Eng. 72:75–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dac DT, Hae-Jung J, Hyun KS, Cho SR. 2017. Response of low-temperature steel beams subjected to single and repeated lateral impacts. Int J Naval Archit Ocean Eng. doi:10.1016/j.ijnaoe.2017.10.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dündar H, Ayhan AO. 2015. Three-dimensional fracture and fatigue crack propagation analysis in structures with multiple cracks. Comput Struct. 158:259–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haddad MJ, Alihoseini F, Hadi M, Hadad M, Tehrani AF, Mohammadi A. 2010. An experimental investigation of cylindrical wire electrical discharge turning process. Int J Adv Manuf Tech. 46:1119–1132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haris S, Amdahl J. 2012. An analytical model to assess a ship side during a collision. Ships Offshore Struct. 7(4):431–448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He JZ, Wang GZ, Tu ST, Xuan FZ. 2018. Prediction of creep crack initiation behavior considering constraint effects for cracked pipes. Eng Fract Mech. 190:213–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He WT, Liu JX, Tao B, Xie D, Liu JY, Zhang M. 2016. Experimental and numerical research on the low velocity impact behavior of hybrid corrugated core sandwich structures. Compos Struct. 158:30–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong L. 2009. Simplifed analysis and design of ships subjected to collision and grounding [PhD thesis]. Trondheim: NTNU.
   Google Scholar
• Huang ZQ, Chen QS, Zhang WT. 2000. Pseudo-shakedown in the collision mechanics of ships. Int J Impact Eng. 24(1):19–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones N. 1973. Slamming damage. J Ship Res. 17(2):80–86.
   Google Scholar
• Jones N. 1977. Damage estimate for plating of ships and marine vehicles. In: International Symposium Practical Design in Shipbuilding (PRADS). Tokyo: Society of Naval Architects of Japan. p. 121–128.
   Google Scholar
• Jones N. 2012a. Structural impact. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 584 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Jones N. 2012b. Impact loading of ductile rectangular plates. Thin Walled Struct. 50:68–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones N. 2014a. Dynamic inelastic response of strain rate sensitive ductile plates due to large impact, dynamic pressure and explosive loadings. Int J Impact Eng. 74:3–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones N. 2014b. Pseudo-shakedown phenomenon for the mass impact loading of plating. Int J Impact Eng. 65:33–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu JF, Guo YB. 2016. Thermal modeling of EDM with progression of massive random electrical discharges. Procedia Manuf. 5:495–507.
   Google Scholar
• Liu JX, He WT, Xie D, Tao B. 2017. The effect of impactor shape on the low-velocity impact behavior of hybrid corrugated core sandwich structures. Compos Part B. 111:315–331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margaritis Y, Toulios M. 2012. The ultimate and collapse response of cracked stiffened plates subjected to uniaxial compression. Thin Walled Struct. 50(1):157–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paik JK, Satish Kumar YV, Lee JM. 2005. Ultimate strength of cracked plate elements under axial compression or tension. Thin Walled Struct. 43:237–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paik JK. 2007a. Practical techniques for finite element modeling to simulate structural crashworthiness in ship collisions and grounding (part I: theory). Ships Offshore Struct. 2(1):69–80.
   Google Scholar
• Paik JK. 2007b. Practical techniques for finite element modelling to simulate structural crashworthiness in ship collisions and grounding (part II: verification). Ships Offshore Struct. 2(1):81–85.
   Google Scholar
• Paik JK, Won SH. 2007. On deformation and perforation of ship structures under ballistic impacts. Ships Offshore Struct. 2(3):217–226.
   Google Scholar
• Paik JK. 2008. Residual ultimate strength of steel plates with longitudinal cracks under axial compression–experiments. Ocean Eng. 35(17–18):1775–1783.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paik JK. 2009. Residual ultimate strength of steel plates with longitudinal cracks under axial compression–nonlinear finite element method investigations. Ocean Eng. 36(3–4):266–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quang TD, Teguh M, Hyun KS, Cho SR. 2018. Dynamic lateral mass impact on steel stringer-stiffened cylinders. Int J Impact Eng. doi:10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2018.02.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahbar-Ranji A, Zarookian A. 2015. Ultimate strength of stiffened plates with a transverse crack under uniaxial compression. Ships Offshore Struct. 10(4):416–425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satish Kumar YV, Paik JK. 2004. Buckling analysis of cracked plates using hierarchical trigonometric functions. Thin Walled Struct. 42(5):687–700.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seifi R, Khoda-yari N. 2011. Experimental and numerical studies on buckling of cracked thin-plates under full and partial compression edge loading. Thin Walled Struct. 49(12):1504–1516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi XH, Zhang J, Guedes Soares C. 2017. Experimental study on collapse of cracked stiffened plate with initial imperfections under compression. Thin Walled Struct. 114:39–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storheim M, Amdahl J. 2017. On the sensitivity to work hardening and strain-rate effects in nonlinear FEM analysis of ship collisions. Ships Offshore Struct. 12(1):100–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang G, Tang S, Shin Y. 2002. Direct calculation approach and design criteria for wave slamming of an FPSO bow. Int J Offshore Polar Eng. 12:297–304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang G, Wiernicki C. 2006. Using nonlinear finite element method to design ship structures for ice loads. J Marine Tech. 43(1):1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Xu MC, Garbatov Y, Guedes Soares C. 2014. Residual ultimate strength assessment of stiffened panels with locked cracks. Thin Walled Struct. 85:398–410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Lie ST, Zhao HS. 2018. Fracture behavior of clad pipeline containing a canoe shape surface crack subjected to large bending moment. Mar Struct. 58:92–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang M, Liu JX, Hu ZQ, Zhao Y. 2018. On resistance of a rectangular thin plate under lateral indentation by a wedge indenter. Ships Offshore Struct. doi: 10.1080/17445302.2018.1441618
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu L, Faulkner D. 1996. Damage estimate for plating of ships and platforms under repeated impacts. Marine Struct. 9(7):697–720.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu L, Guo KL, Li YG, Yu TX, Zhou QW. 2018. Experimental study on the dynamic behavior of aluminum foam sandwich plates under single and repeated impacts at low temperature. Int J Impat Eng. 114:123–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar