An interval type-2 fuzzy QUALIFLEX approach to measure performance effectiveness of ballast water treatment (BWT) system on-board ship

References

• Abdullah L, Najib L. 2014. A new type-2 fuzzy set of linguistic variables for the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. Expert Syst Appl. 41(7):3297–3305. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2013.11.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akyuz E. 2015. A hybrid accident analysis method to assess potential navigational contingencies: the case of ship grounding. Saf Sci. 79:268–276. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2015.06.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akyuz E, Celik E. 2018. A quantitative risk analysis by using interval type-2 fuzzy FMEA approach: the case of oil spill. Maritime Policy Manage. DOI:10.1080/03088839.2018.1520401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akyuz E, Celik E. 2015. A fuzzy DEMATEL method to evaluate critical operational hazards during gas freeing process in crude oil tankers. J Loss Prev Process Ind. 38:243–253. doi: 10.1016/j.jlp.2015.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akyuz E, Celik E. 2016. A modified human reliability analysis for cargo operation in singlepoint mooring (SPM) off-shore units. Appl Ocean Res. 58:11–20. doi: 10.1016/j.apor.2016.03.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akyuz E, Celik E, Celik M. 2018. A practical application of human reliability assessment for operating procedures of the emergency fire pump at ship. Ships Offsh Struct. 13(2):208–216. doi: 10.1080/17445302.2017.1354658
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baykasoğlu A, Gölcük İ. 2017. Development of an interval type-2 fuzzy sets based hierarchical MADM model by combining DEMATEL and TOPSIS. Expert Syst Appl. 70:37–51. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2016.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [BWM] Ballast Water Management Convention. 2004. The international convention for the control and management of ships ballast water ballast water and sediments. London: IMO. 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Celik E. 2017. A cause and effect relationship model for location of temporary shelters in disaster operations management. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. 22:257–268. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.02.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Celik E, Akyuz E. 2016. Application of interval type-2 fuzzy sets DEMATEL methods in maritime transportation: the case of ship collision. Intrn J Maritime Eng. 158(Part A):359–371.
   Google Scholar
• Celik E, Akyuz E. 2018. An interval type-2 fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS methods for decision-making problems in maritime transportation engineering: the case of ship loader. Ocean Eng. 155:371–381. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2018.01.039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Celik E, Bilisik ON, Erdogan M, Gumus AT, Baracli H. 2013. An integrated novel interval type-2 fuzzy MCDM method to improve customer satisfaction in public transportation for Istanbul. Transp Res E Logistics Transp Rev. 58:28–51. doi: 10.1016/j.tre.2013.06.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Celik E, Gul M, Aydin N, Gumus AT, Guneri AF. 2015. A comprehensive review of multi criteria decision making approaches based on interval type-2 fuzzy sets. Knowl Based Syst. 85:329–341. doi: 10.1016/j.knosys.2015.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cha HG, Seo MH, Lee HY, Lee JH, Lee DS, Shin K, Choi KH. 2015. Enhancing the efficacy of electrolytic chlorination for ballast water treatment by adding carbon dioxide. Marine Pollut Bull. 95(1):315–323. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2015.03.025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Champ MA. 2002. Marine Testing board for certification of ballast water treatment technologies. Marine Pollut Bull. 44:1327–1335. doi: 10.1016/S0025-326X(02)00316-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen SM, Lee LW. 2010. Fuzzy multiple attributes group decision-making based on the interval type-2 TOPSIS method. Expert Syst Appl. 37(4):2790–2798. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2009.09.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen TY. 2014. An ELECTRE-based outranking method for multiple criteria group decision making using interval type-2 fuzzy sets. Inf Sci (Ny). 263:1–21. doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2013.12.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen TY, Chang CH, Rachel Lu JF. 2013. The extended QUALIFLEX method for multiple criteria decision analysis based on interval type-2 fuzzy sets and applications to medical decision making. Eur J Oper Res. 226(3):615–625. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2012.11.038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• David M, Gollasch S, Leppakoski E. 2013. Risk assessment for exemptions from ballast water management – The Baltic Sea case study. Marine Pollut Bull. 75:205–217. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2013.07.031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dereli T, Baykasoglu A, Altun K, Durmusoglu A, Türksen IB. 2011. Industrial applications of type-2 fuzzy sets and systems: a concise review. Comput Ind. 62(2):125–137. doi: 10.1016/j.compind.2010.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deveci M, Demirel NÇ, Ahmetoğlu E. 2017. Airline new route selection based on interval type-2 fuzzy MCDM: a case study of new route between Turkey-North American region destinations. J Air Transp Manag. 59:83–99. doi: 10.1016/j.jairtraman.2016.11.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghorabaee MK, Amiri M, Sadaghiani JS, Goodarzi GH. 2014. Multiple criteria group decision-making for supplier selection based on COPRAS method with interval type-2 fuzzy sets. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 75(5–8):1115–1130. doi: 10.1007/s00170-014-6142-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghorabaee MK, Amiri M, Zavadskas EK, Turskis Z. 2017. Multi-criteria group decision-making using an extended EDAS method with interval type-2 fuzzy sets. Econ Manage. 2017( č. 1, s):48–68.
   Google Scholar
• Ghorabaee MK, Zavadskas EK, Amiri M, Esmaeili A. 2016. Multi-criteria evaluation of green suppliers using an extended WASPAS method with interval type-2 fuzzy sets. J Cleaner Prod. 137:213–229. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernandez MR, Johansson ML, Xiao Y, Lewis MA, MacIsaac HJ. 2017. Modeling sampling strategies for determination of zooplankton abundance in ballast water. Marine Pollut Bull. 115(1–2):80–85. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.11.050
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hua J, Hwang WH. 2012. Effects of voyage routing on the survival of microbes in ballast water. Ocean Eng. 42:165–175. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2012.01.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang CL, Yoon K. 1981. Multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications. Berlin/Heidelberg/New York: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Jing L, Chen B, Zhang B, Peng H. 2013. A hybrid fuzzy stochastic analytical hierarchy process (FSAHP) approach for evaluating ballast water treatment technologies. Env Syst Res. 2(1):2–10. doi: 10.1186/2193-2697-2-10
   Google Scholar
• Karahalios H. 2017. The application of the AHP-TOPSIS for evaluating ballast water treatment systems by ship operators. Transp Res D. 52:172–184. doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2017.03.001
   Google Scholar
• Liu TK, Chang CH, Chou ML. 2014. Management strategies to prevent the introduction of non-indigenous aquatic species in response to the ballast water convention in Taiwan. Marine Policy. 44:187–195. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2013.08.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maglic L, Zec D, Francic V. 2016. Ballast water sediment elemental analysis. Marine Pollut Bull. 103(1–2):93–100. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2015.12.042
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mamlook R, Badran O, Abu-Khader MM, Holdo A, Dales J. 2008. Fuzzy sets analysis for ballast water treatment systems: best available control technology. Clean Technol Environ Policy. 10:397–407. doi: 10.1007/s10098-007-0130-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCollin T, Quilez-Badia G, Josefsen KD, Gill ME, Mesbahi E, Frid CLJ. 2007. Ship board testing of a deoxygenation ballast water treatment. Marine Pollut Bull. 54(8):1170–1178. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2007.04.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendel JM, John RI, Liu F. 2006. Interval type-2 fuzzy logic systems made simple. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst. 14(6):808–821. doi: 10.1109/TFUZZ.2006.879986
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreno-Andres J, Romero-Martinez L, Acevedo-Merino A, Nebot E. 2017. UV-based technologies for marine water disinfection and the application to ballast water: does salinity interfere with disinfection processes? Sci Total Environ. 581–582:144–152. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.12.077
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nosrati-Ghods N, Ghadiri M, Früh W-G. 2017. Management and environmental risk study of the physicochemical parameters of ballast water. Marine Pollut Bull. 114:428–438. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.09.062
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paelinck JHP. 1976. Qualitative multiple criteria analysis, environmental protection and multiregional development. Papers Reg Sci Assoc. 36:59–74. doi: 10.1007/BF01944375
   Google Scholar
• Pam ED, Li KX, Wall A, Yang Z, Wang J. 2013. A subjective approach for ballast water risk estimation. Ocean Eng. 61:66–76. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2012.12.045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perrins JC, Cooper WJ, Van Leeuwen JH, Herwing RP. 2006. Ozonation of seawater from different locations: formation and decay of total residual oxidant—implications for ballast water treatment. Marine Pollut Bull. 52(9):1023–1033. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2006.01.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quilez-Badia G, McCollin T, Josefsen KD, Vourdachas A, Gill ME, Mesbahi E, Frid CLJ. 2008. On board short-time high temperature heat treatment of ballast water: A field trial under operational conditions. Marine Pollut Bull. 56(1):127–135. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2007.09.036
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soner O, Celik E, Akyuz E. 2017. Application of AHP and VIKOR methods under interval type 2 fuzzy environment in maritime transportation. Ocean Eng. 129:107–116. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2016.11.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang Z, Butkus MA, Xie YF. 2006. Crumb rubber filtration: a potential technology for ballast water treatment. Mar Environ Res. 61(4):410–423. doi: 10.1016/j.marenvres.2005.06.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsolaki E, Diamadopoulos E. 2010. Technologies for ballast water treatment: a review. J Chem Technol Biotechnol. 85:19–32. doi: 10.1002/jctb.2276
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waite TD, Kazumi J, Lane PVZ, Farmer LL, Smith SG, Smith SL, Hitchcock G, Capo TR. 2003. Removal of natural populations of marine plankton by a large-scale ballast water treatment system. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 258:51–63. doi: 10.3354/meps258051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright DA, Dawson R, Cutler SJ, Orano-Dawson CE, Graneli E. 2007. Naphthoquinones as broad spectrum biocides for treatment of ship’s ballast water: Toxicity to phytoplankton and bacteria. Water Res. 41(6):1294–1302. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2006.11.051
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zadeh LA. 1975. The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning-1. Inf Sci (Ny). 8:199–249. doi: 10.1016/0020-0255(75)90036-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar