Analysis of hull girder ultimate strength for cruise ship with multi-layer superstructures

References

• Alie MZM, Sitepu G, Juswan, Wahyuddin, Nugraha AM, Alamsyah. 2016. The influence of superstructure on the longitudinal ultimate strength of a RO-RO Ship. In: The 26th International Ocean and Polar Engineering Conference; Jun 26—Jul 2; Rhodes.
   Google Scholar
• Andrić J, Žanić V. 2010. The global structural response model for multi-deck ships in concept design phase. Ocean Eng. 37(8–9):688–704. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2010.01.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bajic D. 2015. Structural design of passenger cruise ships – an introduction to classification requirements. Ships Offsh Struct. 10(3):232–238. doi: 10.1080/17445302.2014.913759
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford L. 1950. Theory of long ships’ superstructures. Trans SNAME. 58:693–732.
   Google Scholar
• Fricke W, Gerlach B. 2014. Effect of large openings without and with windows on the shear stiffness of side walls in passenger ships. Ships Offshore Struct. 10(3):256–271. doi: 10.1080/17445302.2014.912048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IACS. 2016. Common structural rules for bulk carriers and oil tankers. London: International Association of Classification Societies.
   Google Scholar
• Kitarović S, Andrić J, žanić V. 2010. Extended IACS incremental-iterative method for calculation of hull girder ultimate strength in analysis and design. ASDEPP 2010. In: International Workshop “Advanced Ship Design for Pollution Prevention”; Nov 23–24; Split.
   Google Scholar
• Mackney M, Ross C. 1999. Superstructure effectiveness in the preliminary assessment of the hull behavior. Mar Technol. 36(1):29–44.
   Google Scholar
• Morshedsolouk F, Khedmati MR. 2011. An extension of coupled beam method and its application to study ship's hull-superstructure interaction problems. Lat Am J Solids Struct. 8(8):265–290. doi: 10.1590/S1679-78252011000300005
   Google Scholar
• Morshedsoluk F, Khedmati MR. 2016. Ultimate strength of composite ships’ hull girders in the presence of composite superstructures. Thin-Walled Struct. 102:122–138. doi: 10.1016/j.tws.2016.01.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naar H. 2006. Ultimate strength of hull girder for passenger ships [dissertation]. Aalto: Helsinki University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Naar H, Varsta P, Kujala, P. 2004. A theory of coupled beams for strength assessment of passenger ships. Mar Struct. 17(8):590–611. doi: 10.1016/j.marstruc.2005.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paik JK, Amlashi H, Boon B, Branner K, Caridis P, Das P, Fujikubo M, Huang C, Josefson L, Kaeding P, et al. 2012. ISSC 2012. In: 18th International Ship And Offshore Structures Congress; Sep 9–13; Rostock.
   Google Scholar
• Romanoff J, Remes H, Varsta P, Jelovica J, Klanac A, Niemelä A, Bralic S, Naar H. 2012. Hull-superstructure interaction in optimised passenger ships. Ships Offshore Struct. 8(6):1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi GJ, Wang DY. 2012. Ultimate strength model experiment regarding a container ship's hull structures. Ships Offsh Struct. 7(2):165–184. doi: 10.1080/17445302.2010.536391
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terazawa K, Yagi J. 1956. Report No.1 bending theory of superstructure with consideration of shear lag Effects. J Zosen Kiokai. 1956(100):121–127.
   Google Scholar
• Wang FH, Wang W, Zhu SC, Gu XK. 2005. Study on hull girder strength calculation methods of large naval ship. J Ship Mech. 9(3):48–59.
   Google Scholar
• Yao T, Brunner E, Cho SR, Choo YS, Czujko J, Estefen SF, Gordo JM, Hess PE, Naar H, Pu Y, et al. 2006a. ISSC 2006. In: 16th International Ship And Offshore Structures Congress; Aug 20–25; Southampton.
   Google Scholar
• Yao T, Brunner E, Cho SR, Choo YS, Czujko J, Estefen SF, Gordo JM, Hess PE, Naar H, Pu Y, et al. 2006b. Ultimate Strength (Committee III.1). 16th International Ship and Offshore Structures Congress. International Ship and Offshore Structures Congress.
   Google Scholar