Structural analysis and design of a car carrier with composite sandwich deck panels

References

• Amatulli V, Biot M, Schiffrer L. 2007. The racking analysis in the early stage of the structural design. Proceedings of 1st International Conference on Marine Structure, (MARSTRUCT 2007), March 12–14, Glasgow, UK. (London): Taylor & Francis. pp. 117–126.
   Google Scholar
• Andric J, Piric K, Prebeg P, Andrisic J, Dmitrasinovic A. 2018. Structural design and analysis of a large ‘open type’ livestock carrier. Ships Offsh Struct. 13(S1):S167–S181. doi: 10.1080/17445302.2018.1429159
   Google Scholar
• Bureau Veritas (Marine & Offshore Division). 2012. Rule Note NR 546 DT R00 E: Hull in Composite Materials and Ply-wood, Material Approval, Design Principles, Construction and Survey.
   Google Scholar
• Bureau Veritas (Marine & Offshore Division). 2014. Rule Note NR 600 DT R00 E: Hull structure and arrangement for the classification of cargo ships less than 65m and non-cargo ships less than 90m.
   Google Scholar
• DNV. 2004. Classification Note No. 31.2 – Strength Analysis of Hull Structures in Roll on/ Roll of Ships, Ferry and Car Carriers. DET NORSKE VERITAS, June 2004.
   Google Scholar
• DNV. 2008. Rules for Classification of Ships, Part 3, Ch.1, Newbuildings, Hull structural Design, Ships with Length 100 meters and above, January 2008.
   Google Scholar
• DNVGL. 2016. DNVGL-CG-0137: Strength analysis of hull structure in RO/RO vessels, February 2016.
   Google Scholar
• FEMAP/NX Nastran. 2010. Software Documentation. Siemens Product Lifecycle Management Software.
   Google Scholar
• Gaiotti M, Rizzo CM. 2013. Finite element modeling strategies for sandwich composite laminates under compressive loading. Ocean Eng. 63:44–51. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2013.01.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaiotti M, Rizzo CM, Branner K, Berring P. 2014. A high order Mixed Interpolation Tensorial Components (MITC) shell element approach for modelling the buckling behaviour of delaminated composites. Compos Struct. 108:657–666. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godani M, Gaiotti M, Rizzo CM. 2014. Interlaminar shear strength of marine composite laminates: tests and numerical simulations. Compos Struct. 112:122–133. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.02.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hakansson M, Jonhson E, Ringsberg JW. 2017. Cost and weight of composite ship structures: a parametric study based on Det Norske Veritas rules. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part M J Eng Marit Environ. DOI: 10.1177/1475090217693419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes OF, Paik JK. 2013. Ship structural analysis and design. Alexandria, USA: The Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• LR. 2012. ShipRight, Structural Design Assessment-SDA: Primary Structure of Ro-Ro Ships, Lloyd Register, March 2012.
   Google Scholar
• MAESTRO Version 11.3. 2016. Program Documentation, Advanced Marine Technology Center, DRS Technologies Inc. (www.maestromarine.com).
   Google Scholar
• Rigo P, Ehlers S, Zanic V, Andric J. 2010. Design of innovative ship concepts using an integrated decision support system for ship production and operation. Brodogradnja. 61(4):367–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ringsberg JW. 2015. Steel or composite car deck structure – a comparison analysis of weight, strength and cost. In: Analysis and design of marine structure, (MARSTRUCT 2015). March 25–27, Southampton (London), UK: Taylor & Francis; p. 647–658.
   Google Scholar
• Soder C-J, Rosen A, Palmquist K. 2012. Motion-based monitoring of racking stresses in ro-ro ships. Ships Offsh Struct. 7(4):389–398. doi: 10.1080/17445302.2011.594297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tasdemir A, Nohut S. 2012. Fatigue analysis of ship structures with hinged deck design by finite element method. A case study: fatigue analysis of the primary supporting members of 4900 PCTC. Mar Struct. 25(1):1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.marstruc.2011.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torii Y, Hohga H, Nishimura K, Uetani H. 2004. Car carriers, Ch.34 in Ship design and construction, edited by Thomas Lamb and International Group of Authorities, Jersey: The Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Zanic V, Andric J, Prebeg P. 2009. Design environment for structural design: application to modern multi-deck ships. Proc Inst. Mech Eng Part M J Eng Marit Environ. 223(M1):105–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zanic V, Andric J, Stipcevic M, Prebeg P, Hadzic N. 2009. Structural optimization of Con-Ro ship superstructure – EU FP6 Project DeLight Transport. Proceedings of IMAM 2009 Congress; Istanbul, Turkey. Vol. 1. p. 92–102.
   Google Scholar
• Zanic V, Jancijev T, Andric J, Frank D, Bralic S, Sponza D, Dundara Đ. 2001. Racking analysis of car-truck carriers for 4300 cars. Brodogradnja. 49(2):181–190.
   Google Scholar