Quantitative risk modelling in the offshore petroleum industry: integration of human and organizational factors

References

• Aven T, Hauge S, Sklet S, Vinnem JE. 2006. Methodology for incorporating human and organizational factors in risk analysis for offshore installations. Int J Mater Struct Reliab. 4(1):1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Aven T, Heide B. 2009. Reliability and validity of risk analysis. Reliab Eng Syst Saf. 94:1862–1868. doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2009.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aven T, Sklet S, Vinnem JE. 2006. Barrier and operational risk analysis of hydrocarbon releases (BORA-release) part I. Method description. J Hazard Mater. 137(2):681–691. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.03.049
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellamy LJ, Geyer TAW, Wilkinson J. 2008. Development of a functional model which integrates human factors, safety management systems and wider organisational issues. Saf Sci. 46:461–492. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2006.08.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellamy LJ, Papazoglou IA, Hale AR, Aneziris ON, Ale BJM, Morris MI, Oh JIH. 1999. I-RISK- development of an integrated technical and management risk control and monitoring methodology for managing and quantifying on-site and off-site risks. Report. Main Report. Report No: ENVA-CT96-0243.
   Google Scholar
• Bento JP. 2001. Menneske - Teknologi - Organisasjon Veiledning for gjennomforing av MTO-analyser. Kurskompendium for Oljedirektoratet, Oversatt av Statoil, Oljedirektoratet, Stavanger, Norway.
   Google Scholar
• Berner C, Flage R. 2016. Strengthening quantitative risk assessments by systematic treatment of uncertain assumptions. Reliab Eng Syst Saf. 151:46–59. doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2015.10.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackman HS, Gertman DI. 1994. Human reliability and safety analysis data handbook. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Bye A, Laumann K, Blackett C,, Rasmussen M, Øie S, van de Merwe K, Øien K, Boring RL, Paltrinieri N, Wærø I, et al. 2017. The Petro-HRA guideline. Report. Norway: Institute for Energy Technology. Report No: IFE/HR/E-2017/001.
   Google Scholar
• Bye A, Laumann K, Taylor C, Rasmussen M, Øie S, van de Merwe K, Øien, K., Boring RL, Paltrinieri N, Wærø I, et al. 2016. Petro-HRA, a new method for human reliability analysis in the petroleum industry. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management (PSAM 13); Seoul, Korea.
   Google Scholar
• Cai BP, Liu YH, Liu ZK, Tian XJ, Zhang YZ, Ji RJ. 2018. Application of Bayesian networks in quantitative risk assessment of subsea blowout preventer operations. Risk Anal. 33(7):1293–1311. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01918.x
   Google Scholar
• Cai BP, Liu YH, Zhang YW, Fan Q, Liu ZK, Tian XJ. 2013. A dynamic Bayesian networks modelling of human factors on offshore blowouts. J Loss Prevent Proc. 26:639–649. doi: 10.1016/j.jlp.2013.01.001
   Google Scholar
• Cullen WD. 1990. The public inquiry into the piper alpha disaster. London: Hmso.
   Google Scholar
• Davoudian K, Wu JS, Apostolakis G. 1994. Incorporating organisational factors into risk assessment through the analysis of work processes. Reliab Eng Syst Saf. 45:85–105. doi: 10.1016/0951-8320(94)90079-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dempsey P, Wogalter M, Hancock P. 2006. Defining ergonomics/human factors. In: Healthcare I, Karwowski W, editors. International encyclopedia of ergonomics and human factors. London: CRC Press; p. 32–35.
   Google Scholar
• Duijm NJ. 2009. Safety-barrier diagrams as a safety management tool. Reliab Eng Syst Saf. 94(2):332–341. doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2008.03.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Embrey DE, Humphreys P, Rosa EA, Kirwan B, Rea K. 1984. SLIM-MA UD: an approach to assessing human error probabilities using structured expert judgment. Upton, NY: Brookhaven National Lab.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson H, Basra G, Kirwan B. 1998. Development of the CORE-DATA database. Birmingham: University of Birmingham.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin S. 2007. Human Factors in QRA. Report. International Association of Oil and Gas Producers.Rev.00: Det Norske Veritas Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon RPE. 1998. The contribution of human factors to accidents in the offshore oil industry. Reliab Eng Syst Saf. 61:95–108. doi: 10.1016/S0951-8320(98)80003-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gran BA, Bye R, Nyheim O, Okstad E, Seljelid J, Sklet S, Vatn J, Vinnem JE. 2012. Evaluation of the risk OMT model for maintenance work on major offshore process equipment. J Loss Prev Process Ind. 25(3):582–593. doi: 10.1016/j.jlp.2012.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gran BA, Nyheim OM, Seljelid J, Vinnem JE. 2012. A BBN risk model of maintenance work on major process equipment on offshore petroleum installations. In: Berenguer C, Grall A, Soares CG, editors. Advances in safety, reliability and risk management. Boca Raton: CRC Press; p. 1249–1257.
   Google Scholar
• Groen F, Mosleh A. 2006. An algorithm for the quantification of hybrid causal models. Proceedings of the eighth international conference on probabil- istic safety assessment and management (PSAM8); New Orleans, Louisiana.
   Google Scholar
• Groeneweg J. 1998. Controlling the controllable: the management of safety. Leiden: DSWO Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haugen S, Seljelid J, Sklet S, Vinnem JE, Aven T. 2007. Operational risk analysis-total analysis of physical and non-physical barriers. Report. H3.1 Generalization report, Rev 01.
   Google Scholar
• Hokstad P, Jersin E, Sten T. 2001. A risk influence model applied to North Sea helicopter transport. Reliab Eng Syst Saf. 74:311–322. doi: 10.1016/S0951-8320(01)00083-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollnagel E. 1998. Cognitive reliability and error analysis method: CREAM. Oxford: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• HSE. 2003. Organisational change and major hazards. HSE Books. http://www.hse.gov.uk/pubns/CHIS7.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• International Organization for Standardization. 1999. ISO 13702 petroleum and natural gas industries—control and mitigation of fires and explosions on offshore production installations—requirements andguidelines. 1st ed. Geneva: International Standards Organization.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs R, Haber S. 1994. Organizational processes and nuclear power plant safety. Reliab Eng Syst Safe. 45:75–83. doi: 10.1016/0951-8320(94)90078-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khakzad N, Khan F, Amyotte P. 2013. Quantitative risk analysis of drilling operations: a Bayesian approach. Safe Sci. 57:108–117. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2013.01.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirwan B. 1994. A guide to practical human reliability assessment. Boca Raton (FL): Taylor & Francis Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Kirwan, B. 1998. Human factors & human reliability in offshore systems. Course arranged at SINTEF; Trondheim.
   Google Scholar
• Kongsvik T, Almklov P, Fenstad J. 2010. Organisational safety indicators: some conceptual considerations and a supplementary qualitative approach. Saf Sci. 48:1402–1411. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2010.05.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohaghegh Z, Mosleh A. 2009. Incorporating organizational factors into probabilistic risk assessment of complex socio-technical systems: principles and theoretical foundations. Saf Sci. 47(8):1139–1158. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2008.12.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montara Commission of Inquiry. 2010. Report of the Montara commission of inquiry. Commissioner David Borthwick AO PSM. http://www.ret.gov.au/Department/Documents/MIR/Montara-Report.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Mosleh A, Chang YH. 2004. Model-based human reliability analysis: prospects and requirements. Reliab Eng Syst Saf. 83:241–253. doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2003.09.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NPD. 1981. Guidelines for safety evaluation of platform conceptual design. Oslo: Norwegian Petroleum Directorate.
   Google Scholar
• NPD. 1990. Regulations relating to implementation and use of risk analysis in the petroleum activities. Stavanger: Norwegian Petroleum Directorate.
   Google Scholar
• NPD. 2001. Regulations relating to management in the petroleum activities (the management regulations).
   Google Scholar
• NPD. 2002. Guidelines to Regulations relating to management in the petroleum activities (the management regulations).
   Google Scholar
• Øien K. 2001a. A framework for the establishment of organizational risk indicators. Reliab Eng Syst Saf. 74(2):147–167. doi: 10.1016/S0951-8320(01)00068-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Øien K. 2001b. Risk indicators as a tool for risk control. Reliab Eng Syst Saf. 74:129–145. doi: 10.1016/S0951-8320(01)00067-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Øien K, Sklet S. 2000. organisational risk indicators pilot study statjord A (in Norwegian). Report. Trondheim: SINTEF. Report No: STF38 A00421.
   Google Scholar
• PSA. 2005. Trends in risk levels—summary report phase 5. Stavanger: The Petroleum Safety Authority.
   Google Scholar
• Reason J. 1997. Managing the risks of organizational accidents. Burlington: Ashgate Publishing company.
   Google Scholar
• Røed W, Mosleh A, Vinnem JE, Aven T. 2009. On the use of the hybrid causal logic method in offshore risk analysis. Reliab Eng Syst Saf. 94(2):445–455. doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2008.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosness R. 1998. Risk influence analysis: a methodology for identification and assessment of risk reduction strategies. Reliab Eng Syst Saf. 60:153–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schönbeck M, Rausand M, Rouvroye J. 2010. Human and organisational factors in the operational phase of safety instrumented systems: a new approach. Saf Sci. 48(3):310–318. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2009.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SCI. 1998. Blast and fire engineering for topside systems, phase 2. Ascot: SCI. Report No: 253.
   Google Scholar
• Seljelid J, Haugen S, Sklet S, Vinnem JE. 2007. Operational risk analysis-total analysis of physical and non-physical barriers. BORA Handbook, Rev 00. Report. Norway. Report No: 200254-08.
   Google Scholar
• Sklet S. 2004. Storulykker i Norge de siste 20 arene. In: S. Lydersen, editor. Fra flis i fingeren til ragnarok. Trondheim: Tapir Akademisk Forlag; p. 133–161 [in Norwegian].
   Google Scholar
• Sklet S. 2005. Safety barriers on oil and gas platforms. Trondheim: NTNU.
   Google Scholar
• Sklet S. 2006. Safety barriers: definition, classification, and performance. J Loss Prev Process Ind. 19:494–506. doi: 10.1016/j.jlp.2005.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sklet S, Ringstad AJ, Steen SA, Tronstad L, Haugen S, Seljelid J, Kongsvik T, Wærø I. 2010. Monitoring of human and organizational factors influencing the risk of major accidents. Proceedings of SPE International conference on health, safety and environment in oil and gas exploration and production; Rio de Janeiro.
   Google Scholar
• Sklet S, Vinnem JE, Aven T. 2006. Barrier and operational risk analysis of hydro-carbon releases (BORA-release) part II: results from a case study. J Hazard Mater. 137:692–708. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.03.027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skogdalen JE, Vinnem JE. 2011. Quantitative risk analysis offshore—human and organizational factors. Reliab Eng Syst Saf. 96(4):468–479. doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2010.12.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Standard Norway. 2010. Risk and emergency preparedness analysis, Z–013. Oslo: Standard Norway.
   Google Scholar
• Stranks J. 2006. The manager’s guide to health and safety at work. London: Kogan Page Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Swain AD, Guttmann HE. 1983. Handbook of human reliability analysis with emphasis on nuclear power plant applications: Final report NUREG CR-1278, SAND80-200. Report. Albuquerque: Sandia National Laboratories Statistics Computing and Human Factors Division.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor C, Øie S, Paltrinieri N. 2017. Human reliability in the petroleum industry: a case study of the petro-HRA method. risk, reliability and safety: innovating theory and practice. Proceedings of the 26th European Safety and Reliability Conference, ESREL 2016; Glasgow, Scotland; 2016 September 25–29. Boca Raton: CRC Press. p. 1010–1017.
   Google Scholar
• The National Academies. 2010. Interim report on causes of the deepwater Horizon Oil rig blowout and ways to present such events. National Academy of Engineering and National Research Council. http://www.nationalacademies.org/includes/DH_Interim_Report_final.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Thomassen O, Sørum M. 2002. Mapping and monitoring the technical safety level. Proceedings of SPE International Conference on Health, Safety and Environment in Oil and Gas Exploration and Production; Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
   Google Scholar
• Vinnem JE. 2010. Risk indicators for major hazards on offshore installations. Saf Sci. 48:770–787. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2010.02.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinnem JE. 2013. On the development of failure models for hydrocarbon leaks during maintenance work in process plants on offshore petroleum installations. Reliab Eng Syst Saf. 113:112–121. doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2012.12.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinnem JE. 2014. Offshore risk assessment: principles, modelling and applications of QRA studies. 3rd ed. London: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Vinnem JE. 2018. FPSO Cidade de São Mateus gas explosion – lessons learned. Saf Sci. 101:295–304. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2017.09.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinnem JE, Aven T, Husebø T, Seljelid J, Tveit O. 2006. Major hazard risk indicators for monitoring of trends in the Norwegian offshore petroleum sector. Reliab Eng Syst Saf. 91(7):778–791. doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2005.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinnem JE, Aven T, Seljelid J, Sklet S. 2006. Integrated barrier analysis-a methodology to reveal weakness in offshore petroleum operations. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Probabilistic Safety assessment and management; New Orleans, Louisiana, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Vinnem JE, Bye R, Gran BA, Kongsvik T, Nyheim OM, Okstad EH, Seljelid J, Vatn J. 2012. Risk modelling of maintenance work on major process equipment on offshore petroleum installations. J Loss Prev Process Ind. 25(2):274–292. doi: 10.1016/j.jlp.2011.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinnem JE, Haugen S, Kongsvik T, Seljelid J, Steen S, Sklet S, Thomasssen O. 2007. Operational safety condition—concept development. Proceedings of ESREL 2007; Stavanger.
   Google Scholar
• Vinnem JE, Seljelid J, Haugen S, Aven T. 2009. Generalized methodology for operational risk analysis of offshore installations. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part O-J Risk Reliab. 223(1):87–97.
   Google Scholar
• Wang C, Mosleh A. 2005. Procedures for qualitative and quantitative analysis of risk models based on hybrid causal logic methodology. Technical report. University of Maryland: Centre for Risk and Reliability.
   Google Scholar
• Wilpert B. 2000. Organizational factors in nuclear safety. Proceedings of the International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management (PSAM 5); Osaka, Japan. Tokyo: University Academy Press. p. 1251–1265.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang JE, Cai BP, Mulenga K, Liu YL, Xie M. 2018. Bayesian network-based risk analysis methodology: a case of atmospheric and vacuum distillation unit. Process Saf Environ. 117:660–674. doi: 10.1016/j.psep.2018.06.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhen XW, Vinnem JE, Peng CY, Huang Y. 2018. Quantitative risk modelling of maintenance work on major offshore process equipment. J Loss Prevent Proc. 56:430–443. doi: 10.1016/j.jlp.2018.10.004
   Google Scholar