CFD-based predictions of hydrodynamic forces in ship-tug boat interactions

References

• Broberg L, Regnström B, Östberg M. 2007. SHIPFLOW theoretical manual, FLOWTECH international AB. Sweden: Gothenburg.
   Google Scholar
• Chen HC, Lin WM, Hwang WY. 2002. Validation and application of chimera RANS method for ship-ship interactions in shallow water and restricted waterway, Proceedings of the 24th Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics, Fukuoka, Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Eça L, Vas G, Hoekstra M. 2010. A verification and validation exercise for the flow over a backward facing step, Proceedings of the V European Conference on Computational Fluid Dynamics, ECCOMAS CFD 2010, Eds. Pereira J.C.F., Sequoia A., Lisbon, Portugal.
   Google Scholar
• Fonfach JMA, Sutulo S, Guedes Soares C. 2011. Numerical study of ship-to-ship interaction forces on the basis of various flow models. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Ship Manoeuvring in Shallow and Confined Water, Trondheim, Norway, 18–20.
   Google Scholar
• Geerts S, Vantorre M, Eloot K, Huijsmans R, Fierens N. 2011. Interaction forces in tug operations. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Ship Manoeuvring in Shallow and Confined Water, Trondheim, Norway, 153–163.
   Google Scholar
• Jahra F, Islam M, Thanyamanta W, Molyneux D. 2015. Investigation of hydrodynamic loads and flow patterns near an escort tug in oblique flows. Proceedings of ASME 2015 34th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, St. John’s, Newfoundland, Canada, OMAE2015–41407.
   Google Scholar
• Jayarathne BN, Ranmuthugala D, Chai S, Fei J. 2014. Accuracy of potential flow methods to solve real-time ship-tug interaction effects within ship handling simulators. Trans Nav: Int J Mar Nav Saf Sea Transp. 8(4):497–504.
   Google Scholar
• Lataire E, Vantorre M, Delefortrie G, Candries M. 2012. Mathematical modelling of forces acting on ships during lightering operations. Ocean Eng. 55(15):101–115. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2012.07.029
   Google Scholar
• Minter FR. 1993. Zonal two equation k-ω turbulence models for aerodynamic flows, Proceedings of the 24th Fluid Dynamics Conference, Orlando, AIAA paper 93–2906.
   Google Scholar
• Molyneux D, Bose N. 2008. Escort tug at large yaw angle: comparison of CFD predictions with experimental data. Int J Spacecr Technol – Roy Inst Nav Archit Trans. 150(B1):45–60.
   Google Scholar
• Molyneux D, Xu J, Bose N. 2009. Measurements of flow around an escort tug model with a yaw angle. Mar Technol. 46(3):140–154.
   Google Scholar
• Mousaviraad SM, Sadat-Hosseini SH, Carrica PM, Stern F. 2016. Ship–ship interactions in calm water and waves. part 2: URANS validation in replenishment and overtaking conditions. Ocean Eng. 111:627–638. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.10.039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regnström B, Bathfield N. 2006. Drag and wake prediction for ships with appendages using an overlapping grid method. Proceedings of the 26th Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics, Rome, Italy, pp. 243–258.
   Google Scholar
• Roache PJ. 1998. Verification and validation in computational science and engineering. Albuquerque: Hermosa Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Simonsen CD, Nielsen CK, Otzen JF, Agdrup K. 2011. CFD based prediction of ship-ship interaction forces on a tug beside a tanker. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Ship Manoeuvring in Shallow and Confined Water, Trondheim, Norway, 329–338.
   Google Scholar
• Smoker B. 2012. Escort Tug Performance Prediction: A CFD Method, Doctoral dissertation, University of Victoria.
   Google Scholar
• Sutulo S, Soares CG, Otzen JF. 2012. Validation of potential-flow estimation of interaction forces acting upon ship hulls in parallel motion. J Ship Res. 56(3):129–145. doi: 10.5957/JOSR.56.3.100031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiang X, Skejic R, Faltinsen OM, Berg TE. 2011. Hydrodynamic interaction loads between two ships during lightering operation in calm water, Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Ship Manoeuvring in Shallow and Confined Water, Trondheim, Norway, 383–392.
   Google Scholar
• Yuan ZM, He S, Kellett P, Incecik A, Turan O, Boulougouris E. 2015. Ship-to-ship interaction during overtaking operation in shallow water. J Ship Res. 59(3):172–187. doi: 10.5957/JOSR.59.3.150004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zou L, Larsson L. 2013a. Numerical predictions of ship-to-ship interaction in shallow water. Ocean Eng. 72(7):386–402. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2013.06.015
   Google Scholar
• Zou L, Larsson L. 2013b. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) prediction of bank effects including verification and validation. J Mar Sci Technol. 18(3):310–323. doi: 10.1007/s00773-012-0209-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zou L, Larsson L, Orych M. 2010. Verification and validation of CFD predictions for a manoeuvring tanker. J Hydrodynamics Ser B. 22(5):438–445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar