Optimisation of passenger ship structures in concept design stage

References

• Avi E, Lillemäe I, Romanoff J, Niemelä A. 2015. Equivalent shell element for ship structural design. Ships Offshore Struct. 20(3):239–255. doi: 10.1080/17445302.2013.819689
   Google Scholar
• Bendsoe MP, Sigmund O. 1999. Material interpolation schemes in topology optimization. Arch Appl Mech. 69:635–654. doi: 10.1007/s004190050248
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruggi M. 2008. On an alternative approach to stress constraints relaxation in topology optimization. Struct Multi Optim. 36:125–141. doi: 10.1007/s00158-007-0203-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burger M, Stainko R. 2006. Phase-field relaxation of topology optimization with local stress constrains. SIAM J Control Optim. 45(4):1447–1466. doi: 10.1137/05062723X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caprace J-D, Bair F, Rigo P. 2010. Least weight and least cost optimization of cruise ships. Ship Technol Res – Schiffstechnik. 57(3):210–220. doi: 10.1179/str.2010.57.3.006
   Google Scholar
• DNV. 2014. Pt.3 Ch.1 hull structural design – ships with length 100 meters and above. Høvik.
   Google Scholar
• DNV-GL. 2015. Finite element analysis. DNVGL-CG-0127.
   Google Scholar
• DNV-GL. 2016. Direct strength analysis of hull structures in passenger ships. DNVGL-CG-0138.
   Google Scholar
• Duddeck F. 2008. Multidisciplinary optimization of car bodies. Struct Multidiscip Optim. 35:375–389. doi: 10.1007/s00158-007-0130-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duysinx P, Bendsoe MP. 1998. Topology optimization of continuum structures with local stress constraints. Int J Numer Methods Eng. 43:1453–1478. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19981230)43:8<1453::AID-NME480>3.0.CO;2-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehlers S. 2010. A procedure to optimize ship side structures for crashworthiness. J Eng Marit Environ. 224:1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fransman J. 1988. The influence of passenger ship superstructures on the response of the hull girder. Trans RINA. 131:1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Heder M, Ulfvarsson A. 1991. Hull beam behavior of passenger ships. Marine Struct. 4:17–34. doi: 10.1016/0951-8339(91)90022-4
   Google Scholar
• Hirakawa S, Kitamura M, Maki M. 2011. Application of genetic algorithm to structural design of 150 KDWT tanker using PrimeShip-HULL rule calculation software. Proceedings of the 21st International Offshore and Polar Engineering conference, Maui (HI). p. 845–851.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes OF. 1988. Ship structural design: a rationally-based, computer-aided, optimization approach. Jersey City (NJ): Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes OF, Mistree F, Zanic V. 1980. A practical method for the rational design of ship structures. J Ship Res. 24:101–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ISSC. 1997. Committee II.1 – quasi-static response. Proceedings of the 13th International Ship and Offshore Structures Congress; 1997 Aug 18–22; Trondheim, Norway. Oxford (England): Elsevier Science. p. 158–165.
   Google Scholar
• Jalkanen J. 2006. Palvelualgoritmi kantavien rakenteiden optimoinnissa [Particle swarm optimization algorithm in load carrying structures design]. Raken Mek. 39(2):23–35. Finnish.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy J, Eberhart R. 1995. Particle swarm optimization. IEEE Conf. of neural networks, Piscataway (NJ). p. 1942–1948.
   Google Scholar
• Klanac A, Ehlers S, Jelovica J. 2009. Optimization of crashworthy marine structures. Marine Struct. 22(4):670–690. doi: 10.1016/j.marstruc.2009.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marklund PO, Nilsson L. 2001. Optimization of a car body component subjected to side impact. Struct Multidiscip Optim. 21:383–392. doi: 10.1007/s001580100117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Na SS, Karr DG. 2013. An efficient stiffness method for the optimum design of ship structures based on common structural rules. Ships Offshore Struct. 8(1):29–44. doi: 10.1080/17445302.2012.669213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naar H, Varsta P, Kujala P. 2004. A theory of coupled beams for strength assessment of passenger ships. Marine Struct. 17(8):590–611. doi: 10.1016/j.marstruc.2005.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NX Nastran 7. 2013. Element Library Reference.
   Google Scholar
• Prebeg P, Zanic V, Vazic B. 2014. Application of a surrogate modeling to the ship structural design. Ocean Eng. 84:259–272. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2014.03.032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reddy JN. 2004. Mechanics of laminated composite plates and shells – theory and analysis, 2nd ed. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Richir T, Caprace J-D, Losseau N, Bay M, Parsons MG, Patay S, Rigo P. 2007. Multicriterion scantling optimization of the midship section of a passenger vessel considering IACS requirements. Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium of Practical Design of Ships and Other Floating Structures, Sep 30–Oct 5, Houston (TX). p. 758–763.
   Google Scholar
• Rigo P. 2009. Least-cost structural optimization oriented preliminary design. J Ship Prod. 22(4):202–215.
   Google Scholar
• Ringsberg JW, Saglam H, Sarder MA, Ulfvarson A. 2012. Lightweight design of offshore platform marine structures – optimization of weight to strength utilization of corrugated shell plating. Ships Offshore Struct. 9(1):38–53. doi: 10.1080/17445302.2012.712005
   Google Scholar
• Romanoff J. 2014. Optimization of web-core steel sandwich decks at concept design stage using envelope surface for stress assessment. Eng Struct. 66:1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.01.042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romanoff J, Klanac A. 2008. Design optimization of steel sandwich hoistable car decks applying homogenized plate theory. J Ship Prod. 24(2):108–115.
   Google Scholar
• Romanoff J, Remes H, Varsta P, Jelovica J, Klanac A, Niemelä A, Bralic S, Naar H. 2013. Hull-superstructure interaction in optimized passenger ships. Ships Offshore Struct. 8(6):612–620. doi: 10.1080/17445302.2012.675196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romanoff J, Varsta P. 2007. Bending response of web-core sandwich plates. Compos Struct. 81:292–302. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2006.08.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sekulski Z. 2009. Least-weight topology and size optimization of high speed vehicle-passenger catamaran structure by genetic algorithm. Marine Struct. 22:671–711. doi: 10.1016/j.marstruc.2009.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun L, Wang D. 2011. A new rational-based optimal design strategy of ship structure based on multi-level analysis and super-element modeling method. J Marine Sci Appl. 10:272–280. doi: 10.1007/s11804-011-1069-y
   Google Scholar
• Vasta J. 1958. Lessons learned from full-scale ship structural tests. SNAME Trans. 66:165–243.
   Google Scholar
• Whitney JM, Pagano NJ. 1970. Shear deformation in heterogeneous anisotropic plates. J Appl Mech. 37(4):1031–1036. doi: 10.1115/1.3408654
   Google Scholar
• Zanic V, Andric J, Prebeg P. 2007. Decision support methodology for concept design of multi-deck ship structures. Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium of Practical Design of Ships and Other Floating Structures, Sep 30-Oct 5, Houston (TX). p. 468–476.
   Google Scholar
• Zanic V, Andric J, Prebeg P. 2013. Design synthesis of complex ship structures. Ships Offshore Struct. 8:383–403. doi: 10.1080/17445302.2013.783455
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar