Application of NARX neural network for predicting marine engine performance parameters

References

• Adjallah KH, Yang H, Mathew J, Ma L. 2007. Basis pursuit-based intelligent diagnosis of bearing faults. J Qual Maint Eng. 13:152–162. doi: 10.1108/jqme.2007.15413baa.001
   Google Scholar
• Aizenberg I, Sheremetov L, Villa-Vargas L, Martinez-Muñoz J. 2016. Multilayer neural network with multi-valued neurons in time series forecasting of oil production. Neurocomputing. 175:980–989. doi: 10.1016/j.neucom.2015.06.092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aladag CH. 2017. Advances in time series forecasting. Vol. 2. Sharjah, United Arab Emirates: Bentham Science Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Basurko OC, Uriondo Z. 2015. Condition-based maintenance for medium speed diesel engines used in vessels in operation. Appl Therm Eng. 80:404–412. doi: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2015.01.075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bocaniala CD, Jain LC, Palade V. 2006. Computational intelligence in fault diagnosis. London, UK: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• BS. 1993. Glossary of terms used in terotechnology. BS 3811:1993. London: British Standards Institute (BSI).
   Google Scholar
• Burmeister H-C, Bruhn W, Rødseth ØJ, Porathe T. 2014. Autonomous unmanned merchant vessel and its contribution towards the e-navigation implementation: the MUNIN perspective. Int J e-Navi Marit Econ. 1:1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Caccia M, Robino R, Bateman W, Eich M, Ortiz A, Drikos L, Todorova A, Gaviotis I, Spadoni F, Apostolopoulou V. 2010. MINOAS a Marine INspection rObotic Assistant: system requirements and design. IFAC Proc Vol. 43:479–484. doi: 10.3182/20100906-3-IT-2019.00083
   Google Scholar
• Chatfield C. 1993. Calculating interval forecasts. J Bus Econ Stat. 11:121–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatfield C. 1995. Model uncertainty, data mining and statistical inference. J R Stat Soc Ser A. 158:419–466. doi: 10.2307/2983440
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatfield C. 2000. Time-series forecasting. FL, USA: Chapman & Hall/CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cipollini F, Oneto L, Coraddu A, Murphy AJ, Anguita D. 2018. Condition-based maintenance of naval propulsion systems with supervised data analysis. Ocean Eng. 149:268–278. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2017.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demuth H, Beale M. 2002. Neural network toolbox-for use with MATLAB user’s guide version 4. MA, USA: The MathWorks Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Firestone M, Fenner-Crisp P, Barry T, Bennett D, Chang S, Callahan M, Burke A, Michaud J, Olsen M, Cirone P. 1997. Guiding principles for Monte Carlo analysis. Washington, DC: US Environmental Protection Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Gkerekos C, Lazakis I, Theotokatos G. 2017. Implementation of a self-learning algorithm for main engine condition monitoring. Maritime Transportation and Harvesting of Sea Resources: Proceedings of the 17th International Maritime Association of the Mediterranean (IMAM).
   Google Scholar
• Hipel KW, McLeod AI. 1994. Time series modelling of water resources and environmental systems. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• IMO. 1993. International Safety Management (ISM) Code, Resolution A741(18). London, UK.
   Google Scholar
• INCASS. 2015a. Deliverable D5.4 ‘Data exchange’. UK.
   Google Scholar
• INCASS. 2015b. Deliverable D8.1 Exploitation Plan. UK.
   Google Scholar
• Kayri M. 2016. Predictive abilities of Bayesian regularization and Levenberg–Marquardt algorithms in artificial neural networks: a comparative empirical study on social data. Math Comput Appl. 21:2–20.
   Google Scholar
• Laboissiere LA, Fernandes RAS, Lage GG. 2015. Maximum and minimum stock price forecasting of Brazilian power distribution companies based on artificial neural networks. Appl Soft Comput. 35:66–74. doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2015.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazakis I, Ölçer A. 2016. Selection of the best maintenance approach in the maritime industry under fuzzy multiple attributive group decision-making environment. Proc Inst Mech Eng, Part M: J Eng Marit Environ. 230:297–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu H, Tian H-q, Liang X-f, Li Y-f. 2015. Wind speed forecasting approach using secondary decomposition algorithm and Elman neural networks. Appl Energy. 157:183–194. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.08.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maier HR, Dandy GC. 2000. Neural networks for the prediction and forecasting of water resources variables: a review of modelling issues and applications. Environ Model Softw. 15:101–124. doi: 10.1016/S1364-8152(99)00007-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohd Noor CW, Mamat R, Najafi G, Mat Yasin MH, Ihsan CK, Noor MM. 2016. Prediction of marine diesel engine performance by using artificial neural network model. J Mech Eng Sci. 10:1917–1930. doi: 10.15282/jmes.10.1.2016.15.0183
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nasr MS, Moustafa MAE, Seif HAE, El Kobrosy G. 2012. Application of Artificial Neural Network (ANN) for the prediction of EL-AGAMY wastewater treatment plant performance-EGYPT. Alexandria Eng J. 51:37–43. doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2012.07.005
   Google Scholar
• Okut H. 2016. Bayesian regularized neural networks for small n big p data. In: Artificial neural networks-models and applications. London, UK: InTech.
   Google Scholar
• Pascual DG. 2015. Artificial intelligence tools: decision support systems in condition monitoring and diagnosis. FL, USA: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Prajapati A, Bechtel J, Ganesan S. 2012. Condition based maintenance: a survey. J Qual Maint Eng. 18:384–400. doi: 10.1108/13552511211281552
   Google Scholar
• Raptodimos Y, Lazakis I. 2018. Using artificial neural network-self-organising map for data clustering of marine engine condition monitoring applications. Ships Offsh Struct. 13:649–656. doi: 10.1080/17445302.2018.1443694
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raza J, Liyanage JP. 2009. Application of intelligent technique to identify hidden abnormalities in a system: a case study from oil export pumps from an offshore oil production facility. J Qual Maint Eng. 15:221–235. doi: 10.1108/13552510910961156
   Google Scholar
• Saltelli A, Ratto M, Andres T, Campolongo F, Cariboni J, Gatelli D, Saisana M, Tarantola S. 2008. Global sensitivity analysis: the primer. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Shields MD, Zhang J. 2016. The generalization of Latin hypercube sampling. Reliab Eng Syst Saf. 148:96–108. doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2015.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shine P, Murphy MD, Upton J, Scully T. 2018. Machine-learning algorithms for predicting on-farm direct water and electricity consumption on pasture based dairy farms. Comput Electron Agric. 150:74–87. doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2018.03.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stopford M. 2009. Maritime economics, 3rd ed. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan GP, Pugh R, Melendez AP, Hunt WD. 2010. Operations & maintenance best practices – a guide to achieving operational efficiency, 3rd ed. Washington, DC: UDo Energy, translator.
   Google Scholar
• Szoplik J. 2015. Forecasting of natural gas consumption with artificial neural networks. Energy. 85:208–220. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2015.03.084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamilselvan P, Wang P. 2013. Failure diagnosis using deep belief learning based health state classification. Reliab Eng Syst Saf. 115:124–135. doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2013.02.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan WL, Nor NM, Abu Bakar MZ, Ahmad Z, Sata SA. 2012. Optimum parameters for fault detection and diagnosis system of batch reaction using multiple neural networks. J Loss Prev Process Ind. 25:138–141. doi: 10.1016/j.jlp.2011.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor DA. 1996. Introduction to marine engineering. Oxford, UK: Elsevier Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Tian Z, Wong L, Safaei N. 2010. A neural network approach for remaining useful life prediction utilizing both failure and suspension histories. Mech Syst Signal Process. 24:1542–1555. doi: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2009.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tinsley D. 2016. Dawning of new era in asset maintenance. Marine Power & Propulsion Supplement 2016.
   Google Scholar
• UNCTAD. 2017. Review of maritime transport 2017. Geneva, Switzerland: U Nations.
   Google Scholar
• Wei P, Lu Z, Yuan X. 2013. Monte Carlo simulation for moment-independent sensitivity analysis. Reliab Eng Syst Saf. 110:60–67. doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2012.09.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaman I, Pazouki K, Norman R, Younessi S, Coleman S. 2017. Challenges and opportunities of big data analytics for upcoming regulations and future transformation of the shipping industry. Procedia Eng. 194:537–544. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.08.182
   Google Scholar
• Zhou J, Xu L. 2010. The fault diagnosis of marine engine cooling system based on artificial neural network (ANN). Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Computer and Automation Engineering (ICCAE).
   Google Scholar
• Zhu J. 2009. Marine diesel engine condition monitoring by use of BP Neural Network. Proceedings of the International MultiConference of Engineers and Computer Scientists.
   Google Scholar