CFD investigation of pitch-type wave energy converter-rotor based on RANS simulations

References

• Bhattacharyya R, McCormick ME. 2003. Wave energy conversion. Elsevier ocean engineering book series. Oxford: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Chakrabarti SK. 2005. Handbook of offshore engineering. Vol. 1. Oxford: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Coiro DP, Troise G, Calise G, Bizzarrini N. 2016. Wave energy conversion through a point pivoted absorber: numerical and experimental tests on a scaled model. Renew Energ. 87:317–325. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2015.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruz J. 2008. Ocean wave energy: current status and future perspectives. Bristol: Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Enger S, Perić M, Monteiro H. 2014. Coupling of 3D numerical solution method based on Navier-Stokes equations with solutions based on simpler theories. Fortaleza, Brazil: CILAMCE.
   Google Scholar
• Evans DV. 1976. A theory for wave-power absorption by oscillating bodies. J Fluid Mech. 77(1):1–25. doi: 10.1017/S0022112076001109
   Google Scholar
• Ferziger JH, Perić M. 2002. Computational methods for fluid dynamics. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Folley M. 2016. Numerical modelling of wave energy converters: state-of-the-art techniques for single devices and arrays. Oxford: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hadzic H. 2005. Development and application of finite volume method for the computation of flows around moving bodies on unstructured. Overlapping grids [Ph.D Thesis]. Hamburg: Technical University Hamburg-Harburg.
   Google Scholar
• Higuera P, Lara LJ, Losada IJ. 2013. Realistic wave generation and active wave absorption for Navier-Stokes models application to OpenFOAM. Coast Eng. 71:102–118. doi: 10.1016/j.coastaleng.2012.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iturrioz A, Guanche R, Lara JL, Vidal C, Losada IJ. 2015. Validation of OpenFOAM® for oscillating water column three-dimensional modeling. Ocean Eng. 107:222–236. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.07.051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobsen NG, Fuhrman DR, Fredsøe J. 2012. A wave generation toolbox for the open-source CFD library: OpenFoam®. Int J Numer Meth Fluids. 70:1073–1088. doi: 10.1002/fld.2726
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim JW, Kyoung JH, Ertekin RC, Bai KJ. 2006. Finite-element computation of wave-structure interaction between steep stokes waves and vertical cylinders. J Waterw Port C-ASCE. 132(5):337–347. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-950X(2006)132:5(337)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim J, O’Sullivan J, Read A. 2012. Ringing analysis of a vertical cylinder by Euler overlay method. In: ASME 2012 31st international conference on ocean, offshore and Arctic engineering. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: ASME; p. 855–866.
   Google Scholar
• Kofoed JP, Tetu A, Ferri F, Margheritini L, Sonalier N, Larsen T. 2018. Real sea testing of a small scale Weptos WEC prototype. In: ASME 2018 37th international conference on ocean, offshore and Arctic engineering. Madrid, Spain: American Society of Mechanical Engineers; p. V010T09A022–V010T09A022.
   Google Scholar
• Launder BE, Spalding DB. 1983. The numerical computation of turbulent flows. In: Numerical prediction of flow, heat transfer, turbulence and combustion. Pergamon: Elsevier; p. 96–116.
   Google Scholar
• Muzaferija S, Peric M. 1999. Computation of free-surface flows using interface tracking and interface-capturing methods. Adv Fluid Mech. 24:59–100.
   Google Scholar
• Mynett AE, Serman DD, Mei CC. 1979. Characteristics of Salter’s cam for extracting energy from ocean waves. Appl Ocean Res. 1(1):13–20. doi: 10.1016/0141-1187(79)90004-X
   Google Scholar
• Pecher A, Kofoed JP. 2017. Handbook of ocean wave energy. London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Pecher A, Kofoed JP, Larsen T. 2015. The extensive R&D behind the Weptos WEC. Renewable energies offshore. 351.
   Google Scholar
• Pecher A, Kofoed JP, Larsen T, Marchalot T. 2012. Experimental study of the Weptos wave energy converter. In: ASME 31st international conference on ocean, offshore and Arctic engineering. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: ASME; p. 525–534.
   Google Scholar
• Peric M. 2017. Best practices for flow simulations with waves, Star global conference. Berlin: Siemens AG.
   Google Scholar
• Perić R, Abdel-Maksoud M. 2018. Analytical prediction of reflection coefficients for wave absorbing layers in flow simulations of regular free-surface waves. Ocean Eng. 147:132–147. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2017.10.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pizer D. 1994. Numerical modelling of wave energy absorbers. Edinburgh: Harwell Laboratory, Energy Technology Support Unit.
   Google Scholar
• Poguluri SK, Bae YH. 2018. A study on performance assessment of WEC rotor in the Jeju western waters. Ocean Syst Eng. 4:361–380.
   Google Scholar
• Poguluri SK, Bae YH, Cho IH. 2018. Effect of viscous damping on the performance of a pitch-type WEC rotor. In: Proceedings of the 28th international ocean and polar engineering conference. Sapporo, Japan: International Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers; p. 733–740.
   Google Scholar
• Poguluri SK, Cho IH, Bae YH. 2019. Performance assessment of pitch-type WEC-rotor based on time domain simulations. In: The 29th international ocean and polar engineering conference. Honolulu, Hawaii: International Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Salter SH. 1974. Wave power. Nature. 249(5459):720–724. doi: 10.1038/249720a0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skyner D. 1987. Solo duck linear analysis. Edinburgh wave power project.
   Google Scholar
• Tiao WC. 2013. Preliminary assessments of the anti-roll tank as a wave energy converter. Ships Offsh Struct. 8(5):488–496. doi: 10.1080/17445302.2012.718195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tu J, Yeoh GH, Liu C. 2018. Computational fluid dynamics: a practical approach. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Versteeg HK, Malalasekera W. 2007. An introduction to computational fluid dynamics: the finite volume method. Harlow: Pearson education.
   Google Scholar
• Wacławczyk T, Koronowicz T. 2008. Comparison of CICSAM and HRIC high-resolution schemes for interface capturing. J Theor Appl Mech. 46:325–345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei Y, Rafiee A, Henry A, Dias F. 2015. Wave interaction with an oscillating wave surge converter, part I: Viscous effects. Ocean Eng. 104:85–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Windt C, Davidson J, Akram B, Ringwood JV. 2018a. Performance assessment of the overset grid method for numerical wave tank experiments in the OpenFOAM environment. In: ASME 2018 37th international conference on ocean, offshore and Arctic engineering. Madrid, Spain: American Society of Mechanical Engineers; p. V010T09A006–V010T09A006.
   Google Scholar
• Windt C, Ringwood JV, Davidson J, Ransley EJ, Jakobsen M, Kramer M. 2018b. Validation of a CFD-based numerical wave tank of the Wavestar WEC. In Advances in renewable energies offshore: proceedings of the 3rd international conference on renewable energies offshore (RENEW 2018); Oct 8–10; Lisbon: CRC Press. p. 439.
   Google Scholar
• Yang J, Stern F. 2012. A simple and efficient direct forcing immersed boundary framework for fluid–structure interactions. J Comput Phys. 231:5029–5061. doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2012.04.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaleski S. 1996. Simulations of high Reynolds number breakup of liquid-gas interfaces. Lecture Series-van Kareman Institute for Fluid Dynamics. 2:L1–L31.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Yang J, Zhao W, Xiao L. 2016. Effects of wave excitation force prediction deviations on the discrete control performance of an oscillating wave energy converter. Ships Offsh Struct. 11(4):351–368. doi: 10.1080/17445302.2014.998858
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar