Dynamic and whipping response of the surface ship subjected to underwater explosion: experiment and simulation

References

• Chung J, Shin YS. 2014. Simulation of dynamic behaviour of high-speed catamaran craft subjected to underwater explosion. Ships Offsh Struct. 9(4):387–403. doi: 10.1080/17445302.2013.793122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Civilian-Military Joint Investigation Group. 2010. Joint investigation report on the attack against ROK ship Cheonan, Ministry of National Defence Republic of Korea, Seoul, Korea (Republic of).
   Google Scholar
• Hammond L, Sanders D. 1997. The applicability of scaling laws to underwater shock tests. Melbourne (Victoria): Department of Defence (Australia). Report No.: DSTO-GD-0162.
   Google Scholar
• Hung CF, Hwangfu JJ. 2010. Experimental study of the behaviour of mini-charge underwater explosion bubbles near different boundaries. J Fluid Mech. 651:55–80. doi: 10.1017/S0022112009993776
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang YJ, Cho Y. 2019. Gravity-capillary jet-like surface waves generated by an underwater bubble. J Fluid Mech. 866:841–864. doi: 10.1017/jfm.2019.135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klaseboer E, Hung KC, Wang C, Wang CW. 2005. Experimental and numerical investigation of the dynamic of an underwater explosion bubble near a resilient/rigid structure. J Fluid Mech. 537:387–413. doi: 10.1017/S0022112005005306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwon JI, Lee SG, Chung JH. 2005. Shock response analysis of Mil-D-901D floating shock. J Soc Naval Arch Korea. 43(5):493–498.
   Google Scholar
• Lee SG. 2007. Studied the integrated structural dynamic response analysis considering the UNDEX shock wave and gas bubble pulse. J Soc Naval Arch Korea. 44(2):148–153. doi: 10.3744/SNAK.2007.44.2.148
   Google Scholar
• Moon SJ, Kwon JI, Park JW, Chung JH. 2017. Assessment of shock pressure acquisition from underwater explosion using uncertainty of measurement. Int J Naval Arch Ocean Eng. 9:589–597. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnaoe.2017.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murata K, Takahashi K, Kato Y. 1999. Precise measurements of underwater explosion phenomena by pressure sensor using fluoropolymer. J Mater Process Tech. 85(1-3):39–42. doi: 10.1016/S0924-0136(98)00251-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park JW. 2008. A coupled Runge Kutta Discontinuous Galerkin-Direct Ghost fluid (RKDG-DGF) method to near-field early-time underwater explosion (UNDEX) simulation [PhD thesis]. Blacksburg (VA): Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.
   Google Scholar
• Qiankun J, Gangyi D. 2011. A finite element analysis of ship sections subjected to underwater explosion. Int J Impact Eng. 38(7):558–566. doi: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2010.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin YS. 2004. Ship shock modeling and simulation for far-field underwater explosion. Comput Struct. 82(23-26):2211–2219. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2004.03.075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin YS. 2009. Naval ship shock and design analysis: course notes for underwater shock analysis. Daejeon, Republic of Korea: KAIST.
   Google Scholar
• Shin YS, Santiago LD. 1996. Surface ship shock modeling and simulation: two-dimensional analysis. Shock and Vibrations. 5(2):129–137. doi: 10.1155/1998/967539
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin YS, Schneider NA. 2003. Ship shock trial simulation of USS Winston S. Churchill (DDG 81): Modeling and simulation strategy and surrounding fluid volume effects. Proceedings of the 74th Shock and Vibration Symposium; Oct 27-31; San Diego, CA, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Wang Q, Liu S, Lou H. 2019. Calibration of numerical simulation methods for underwater explosion with centrifugal test. Shock Vib. 2019:1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webster KB. 2007. Investigation of close proximity underwater explosion effects on a ship-like structure using the multi-material arbitrary lagrangian eulerian finite element method [Master’s thesis]. Blacksburg (VA): Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang S, Wang SP, Zhang AM. 2016. Experimental study on the interaction between bubble and free surface using a high-voltage spark generator. Phys Fluids. 28(3):032109.1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang N, Zong Z. 2011. The effect of rigid-body motions on the whipping response of a ship hull subjected to an underwater explosion. J Fluids Struct. 27:1326–1336. doi: 10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2011.05.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar