Simulation of a ship operating in an open-water ice channel

References

• Celik IB, Ghia U, Roache PJ, Freitas CJ. 2008. Procedure for estimation and reporting of uncertainty due to discretization in CFD applications. J Fluids Eng. 130(7):078001. doi: 10.1115/1.2960953
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gourlay TP, Ha JH, Mucha P, Uliczka K. 2015. Sinkage and trim of modern container ships in shallow water. In: Australasian Coasts & Ports Conference 2015: 22nd Australasian Coastal and Ocean Engineering Conference and the 15th Australasian Port and Harbour Conference.: Engineers Australia and IPENZ; p. 344.
   Google Scholar
• Guo C, Xie C, Zhang J, Wang S, Zhao D. 2018. Experimental investigation of the resistance performance and heave and pitch motions of ice-going container ship under pack ice conditions. China Ocean Eng. 32(2):169–178. doi: 10.1007/s13344-018-0018-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinonen T. 2010. Kokeellinen tutkimus nopeuden vaikutuksesta laivan jäävastukseen [master thesis]. Helsinki University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Hirt CW, Nichols BD. 1981. Volume of fluid (VOF) method for the dynamics of free boundaries. J Comput Phys. 39(1):201–225. doi: 10.1016/0021-9991(81)90145-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang L, Li M, Igrec B, Cardiff P, Stagonas D, Thomas G. 2019a. Simulation of a ship advancing in floating ice floes. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Port and Ocean Engineering Under Arctic Conditions.
   Google Scholar
• Huang L, Ren K, Li M, Tuković Ž, Cardiff P, Thomas G. 2019b. Fluid-structure interaction of a large ice sheet in waves. Ocean Eng. 182:102–111. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.04.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang L, Thomas G. 2019. Simulation of wave interaction with a circular ice floe. J Offshore Mech Arct Eng. 141(4):041302. doi: 10.1115/1.4042096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang L, Tuhkuri J, Igrec B, Li M, Stagonas D, Toffoli A, Cardiff P, Thomas G. 2019c. Ship resistance when operating in floating ice floes: a combined CFD&DEM approach. arXiv preprint arXiv:190910018.
   Google Scholar
• ITTC. 2017. Uncertainty Analysis in CFD Verification and Validation Methodology and Procedures. Recommended Procedures and Guidelines.
   Google Scholar
• Jeong S-Y, Jang J, Kang K-J, Kim H-S. 2017. Implementation of ship performance test in brash ice channel. Ocean Eng. 140:57–65. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2017.05.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juva M, Riska K. 2002. On the power requirement in the Finnish-Swedish ice class rules. Winter navigation Research Board, Res Rpt. 53.
   Google Scholar
• Kim WJ, Van SH, Kim DH. 2001. Measurement of flows around modern commercial ship models. Exp Fluids. 31(5):567–578. doi: 10.1007/s003480100332
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitazawa T, Ettema R. 1985. Resistance to ship-hull motion through brash ice. Cold Reg Sci Technol. 10(3):219–234. doi: 10.1016/0165-232X(85)90034-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konno A, Nakane A, Kanamori S. 2013. Validation of numerical estimation of brash ice channel resistance with model test. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Port and Ocean Engineering Under Arctic Conditions.
   Google Scholar
• Konno A, Saitoh O, Watanabe Y. 2011. Numerical investigation of effect of channel condition against ships resistance in brash ice channels. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Port and Ocean Engineering Under Arctic Conditions.
   Google Scholar
• Koskinen P, Savikurki J. 1993. A propulsion system based on azimuth thrusters and its possibilities in icebreaking technology. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Port and Ocean Engineering Under Arctic Conditions.
   Google Scholar
• Laxon SW, Giles KA, Ridout AL, Wingham DJ, Willatt R, Cullen R, Kwok R, Schweiger A, Zhang J, Haas C. 2013. CryoSat-2 estimates of Arctic sea ice thickness and volume. Geophys Res Lett. 40(4):732–737. doi: 10.1002/grl.50193
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leiviskä T, Tuhkuri J, Riska K. 2001. Model test on resistance in ice-free ice channels. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Port and Ocean Engineering Under Arctic Conditions.
   Google Scholar
• Melia N, Haines K, Hawkins E. 2017. Future of the sea: implications from opening arctic sea routes. Foresight–Future of the Sea Evidence Review London: Government Office of Science.
   Google Scholar
• Menter F. 1993. Zonal two equation kw turbulence models for aerodynamic flows. In: 23rd fluid dynamics, plasmadynamics, and lasers conference.
   Google Scholar
• Mucha P. 2019. Fully-Coupled CFD-DEM for simulations of ships advancing through brash ice. In: SNAME Maritime Convention: The Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Mucha P, Deng G, Gourlay T, Moctar E, Ould B. 2016. Validation studies on numerical prediction of ship squat and resistance in shallow water. In: 4th MASHCON-International Conference on Ship Manoeuvring in Shallow and Confined Water with Special Focus on Ship Bottom Interaction.
   Google Scholar
• Mucha P, el Moctar O. 2014. Numerical prediction of resistance and squat for a containership in shallow water. In: Proceedings of the 17th Numerical Towing Tank Symposium.
   Google Scholar
• Mucha P, el Moctar O, Dettmann T, Tenzer M. 2018. An experimental study on the effect of confined water on resistance and propulsion of an inland waterway ship. Ocean Eng. 167:11–22. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2018.08.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips TS, Roy CJ. 2016. A new extrapolation-based uncertainty estimator for computational fluid dynamics. J Verif Valid Uncertain Quantification. 1(4):041006. doi: 10.1115/1.4035666
   Google Scholar
• Skene DM, Bennetts LG, Meylan MH, Toffoli A. 2015. Modelling water wave overwash of a thin floating plate. J Fluid Mech. 777. doi:10.1017/jfm.2015.378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith LC, Stephenson SR. 2013. New trans-arctic shipping routes navigable by midcentury. In: P Natl A Sci. 110(13). [ place unknown]: E1191–E1195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stroeve JC, Kattsov V, Barrett A, Serreze M, Pavlova T, Holland M, Meier WN. 2012. Trends in arctic sea ice extent from CMIP5, CMIP3 and observations. Geophys Res Lett. 39(16). doi:10.1029/2012GL052676.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Terziev M, Tezdogan T, Oguz E, Gourlay T, Demirel YK, Incecik A. 2018. Numerical investigation of the behaviour and performance of ships advancing through restricted shallow waters. J Fluids Struct. 76:185–215. doi: 10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2017.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tezdogan T, Incecik A, Turan O. 2016. A numerical investigation of the squat and resistance of ships advancing through a canal using CFD. J Mar Sci Technol. 21(1):86–101. doi: 10.1007/s00773-015-0334-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vantorre M, Delefortrie G, Eloot K, Laforce E. 2003. Experimental investigation of ship-bank interaction forces. In: International Conference MARSIM.
   Google Scholar
• Versteeg HK, Malalasekera W. 2007. An introduction to computational fluid dynamics: the finite volume method. London: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Wadhams P. 2017. A farewell to ice: a report from the Arctic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang Z, Liu H, Zhu S, Zhao F. 2006. Application of CFD in ship engineering design practice and ship hydrodynamics. Journal of Hydrodynamics. 18(1):308–315. doi: 10.1007/BF03400465
   Google Scholar