Experimental and numerical investigation of hydrodynamic coefficients of subsea manifolds

References

• An S, Faltinsen OM. 2013. An experimental and numerical study of heave added mass and damping of horizontally submerged and perforated rectangular plates. J Fluids Struct. 39:87–101. doi: 10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2013.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bai Y, Ruan W, Yuan S, He X, Fu J. 2014. 3D mechanical analysis of subsea manifold installation by drill pipe in deep water. Ships Offsh Struct. 9(3):333–343. doi: 10.1080/17445302.2013.783538
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhattacharyya SK, Cheliyan AS. 2019. Optimization of a subsea production system for cost and reliability using its fault tree model. Reliab Eng Syst Saf. 185:213–219. doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2018.12.030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchner B, Bunnik T, Honig D, Meskers G. 2003. A new simulation method for the installation of subsea structures from the splash zone to the ultra deep. Proceedings of the 15th Deep Offshore Technology Conference; Nov 19–21; Marseille, France.
   Google Scholar
• Bunnik T, Buchner B. 2004. Experimental investigation of subsea structures during installation and the related wave loads, added mass and damping. Proceedings of the 14th International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference; May 23–28; Toulon, France.
   Google Scholar
• Cha J-H, Roh M-I, Lee K-Y. 2010. Dynamic response simulation of a heavy cargo suspended by a floating crane based on multibody system dynamics. Ocean Eng. 37(14):1273–1291. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2010.06.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Araújo Neto ED, Jacovazzo BM, Correa FN, Jacob BP. 2019. Numerical evaluation of a subsea equipment installation method designed to avoid resonant responses. Appl Ocean Res. 88:288–305. doi: 10.1016/j.apor.2019.03.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Det Norske Veritas. 2011. DNV-RP-H103 “modelling and analysis of marine operations.” Høvik, Norway.
   Google Scholar
• Fluent Theory Guide, 2012. Ansys Inc., Canonsburg, PA.
   Google Scholar
• Gadelho JFM, Rodrigues JM, Lavrov A, Guedes Soares C. 2018. Heave and sway hydrodynamic coefficients of ship hull sections in deep and shallow water using Navier-Stokes equations. Ocean Eng. 154:262–276. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2018.02.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao Q, Vassalos D. 2012. Numerical study of damage ship hydrodynamics. Ocean Eng. 55:199–205. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2012.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao T, Wang Y, Pang Y, Chen Q, Tang Y. 2018. A time-efficient CFD approach for hydrodynamic coefficient determination and model simplification of submarine. Ocean Eng. 154:16–26. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2018.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrido-Mendoza CA, Thiagarajan KP, Souto-Iglesias A, Colagrossi A, Bouscasse B. 2015. Computation of flow features and hydrodynamic coefficients around heave plates oscillating near a seabed. J Fluids Struct. 59:406–431. doi: 10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2015.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gu H, Stansby P, Stallard T, Carpintero Moreno E. 2018. Drag, added mass and radiation damping of oscillating vertical cylindrical bodies in heave and surge in still water. J Fluids Struct. 82:343–356. doi: 10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2018.06.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho PY, Gibson MM. 1993. Interactive aerofoil calculations with a Reynolds-stress model of turbulence. Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Engineering Turbulence Modelling and Measurements; May 31–June 2; Florence, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Hong C, Estefen SF, Wang Y, Lourenço MI. 2018. An integrated optimization model for the layout design of a subsea production system. Appl Ocean Res. 77:1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.apor.2018.05.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jagadeesh P, Murali K, Idichandy VG. 2009. Experimental investigation of hydrodynamic force coefficients over AUV hull form. Ocean Eng. 36(1):113–118. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2008.11.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koo W, Kim J-D. 2015. Simplified formulas of heave added mass coefficients at high frequency for various two-dimensional bodies in a finite water depth. Int J Naval Architec Ocean Eng. 7(1):115–127. doi: 10.1515/ijnaoe-2015-0009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam CY. 1988. An eddy viscosity turbulence model. Int Commun Heat Mass Transfer. 15(3):355–363. doi: 10.1016/0735-1933(88)90036-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavrov A, Rodrigues JM, Gadelho JFM, Guedes Soares C. 2017. Calculation of hydrodynamic coefficients of ship sections in roll motion using Navier-Stokes equations. Ocean Eng. 133:36–46. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2017.01.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li J, Liu S, Zhao M, Teng B. 2013. Experimental investigation of the hydrodynamic characteristics of heave plates using forced oscillation. Ocean Eng. 66:82–91. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2013.04.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li J, Qu Y, Chen Y, Hua H. 2018. Investigation of added mass and damping coefficients of underwater rotating propeller using a frequency-domain panel method. J Sound Vib. 432:602–620. doi: 10.1016/j.jsv.2018.06.060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu T, Ruan W, Qiao H, Su F, Fu J. 2015. Mathematical model of PLEM installation in deepwater. Proceedings of the ASME 2015 34th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering.
   Google Scholar
• Mao D, Zhong C, Zhang L, Chu G. 2015. Dynamic response of offshore jacket platform including foundation degradation under cyclic loadings. Ocean Eng. 100:35–45. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.03.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mavrakos SA. 2004. Hydrodynamic coefficients in heave of two concentric surface-piercing truncated circular cylinders. Appl Ocean Res. 26(3):84–97. doi: 10.1016/j.apor.2005.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McIver M, McIver P. 2016. The added mass for two-dimensional floating structures. Wave Motion. 64:1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.wavemoti.2016.02.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mork H, Lunde J. 2007. A cost-effective and safe method for transportation and installation of Subsea structures - the pencil buoy method. Offshore Europe; 2007/1/1/; Aberdeen, Scotland, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Nam BW, Kim NW, Hong SY. 2017. Experimental and numerical study on coupled motion responses of a floating crane vessel and a lifted subsea manifold in deep water. Int J Naval Archit Ocean Eng. 9(5):552–567. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnaoe.2017.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orcina. 2009. OrcaFlex Manual. Version 9.3a, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Pan Y-c, Zhang H-x, Zhou Q-d. 2012. Numerical prediction of submarine hydrodynamic coefficients using CFD simulation. J Hydrodyn Ser B. 24(6):840–847. doi: 10.1016/S1001-6058(11)60311-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park J-Y, Kim N, Shin Y-K. 2017. Experimental study on hydrodynamic coefficients for high-incidence-angle maneuver of a submarine. Int J Naval Archit Ocean Eng. 9(1):100–113. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnaoe.2016.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Persi E, Petaccia G, Fenocchi A, Manenti S, Ghilardi P, Sibilla S. 2019. Hydrodynamic coefficients of yawed cylinders in open-channel flow. Flow Meas Instrum. 65:288–296. doi: 10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2019.01.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarpkaya T. 2010. Wave forces on offshore structures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tang M-F, Dong G-H, Xu T-J, Zhao Y-P, Bi C-W, Guo W-J. 2018. Experimental analysis of the hydrodynamic coefficients of net panels in current. Appl Ocean Res. 79:253–261. doi: 10.1016/j.apor.2018.08.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian X, Liu Y, Liu G, Xie Y, Wang S. 2019. Experimental study on influencing factors of hydrodynamic coefficient for jack-up platform. Ocean Eng. 193:106588. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.106588
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang J, Duan M, Tong H, Cao J. 2014. Numerical solutions for nonlinear large deformation behaviour of deepwater steel lazy-wave riser. Ships Offsh Struct. 9(6):655–668. doi: 10.1080/17445302.2013.868622
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Tuo H, Li L, Zhao Y, Qin H, An C. 2018. Dynamic simulation of installation of the subsea cluster manifold by drilling pipe in deep water based on OrcaFlex. J Petroleum Sci Eng. 163:67–78. doi: 10.1016/j.petrol.2017.12.049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu S, Ma Q, Han D. 2017. Experimental study on inertial hydrodynamic behaviors of a complex remotely operated vehicle. Eur J Mech B Fluids. 65:1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.euromechflu.2017.01.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu Z, Qin H, Tsukrov I. 2018. Determination of hydrodynamic coefficients of the floating cage collar with forced oscillation experiments. Ocean Eng. 159:175–186. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2018.04.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu Y, Duan M, Sun C, Zhong Z, Liu H. 2017. A virtual reality simulation for coordination and interaction based on dynamics calculation. Ships Offsh Struct. 12(6):873–884. doi: 10.1080/17445302.2017.1293762
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang K, Duan M, Luo X, Hou G. 2017. A fuzzy risk matrix method and its application to the installation operation of subsea collet connector. J Loss Prev Process Ind. 45:147–159. doi: 10.1016/j.jlp.2016.11.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang S, Ishihara T. 2018. Numerical study of hydrodynamic coefficients of multiple heave plates by large eddy simulations with volume of fluid method. Ocean Eng. 163:583–598. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2018.03.060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Zou Z. 2013. Estimation of the hydrodynamic coefficients from captive model test results by using support vector machines. Ocean Eng. 73:25–31. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2013.07.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar