223
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Mechanical analysis of coiled tubing in the process of hydrate and wax plugs removal in subsea pipelines

, , , &
Pages 620-631 | Received 29 Jan 2020, Accepted 30 Apr 2020, Published online: 20 May 2020

References

  • Aiyejina A, Chakrabarti DP, Pilgrim A, Sastry MKS. 2011. Wax formation in oil pipelines: a critical review. Int J Multiphase Flow. 37(7):671–694. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2011.02.007
  • Al-Yaari M. 2011. Paraffin wax deposition: mitigation & removal techniques. Society of Petroleum Engineers, (SPE 155412), 1–10.
  • Bhalla K, Gong L. 2010. The feasibility of mini coiled tubing to cleanout a plugged umbilical. Proceeding of The ASME 2010 29th International Conference on International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering; 9–11 Jun, Shanghai, China.
  • Chen YC, Cheatham JB. 1990. Wall contact forces on helically buckled tubulars in inclined wells. Journal of Energy Resources Technology. 112(2):142–144. doi:10.1115/1.2905721.
  • Chen Y, Wang X, Wang W, Wang W, Zhang S. 2017. Study on the mechanics of a coiled tubing within a marine ‘pipe-in-pipe’ system with a low diameter ratio. Ships Offsh Struct. 13(4):385–391. doi: 10.1080/17445302.2017.1394251
  • Chen Y, Zhang S, Wang W, Xiong M, Zhang H. 2016. Experimental study on axial load transfer behavior of a coiled tubing stuck in a steel catenary riser: At the stage of the coiled tubing un-helical buckled. Proc Inst Mech Engs, Part M: J Eng Marit Environ. 231(2):355–363.
  • Dai XD, Liu JB, Li D, Shi YH. 2017. An overview on current status of oil and gas pipeline pigging technology at homeand abroad. 43(01):1-5+17. (in Chinese).
  • Delebecque L, Sibaud E, Scocard M, Rueda C, Delbene P. 2009. Active heating technologies for flowlines in deep water field developments. The Offshore Mediterranean Conference and Exhibition in Ravenna; Mar 25–27, Italy.
  • Falser S, Bridge C, Palmer AC. 2010. Interaction between a compliant guide and a coiled tubing during sub-sea well intervention in deep water. Appl Ocean Res. 32(4):454–459. doi: 10.1016/j.apor.2010.10.001
  • Gong Y, Ai Z, Sun X, Fu B, Xu J. 2016. The effects of boundary conditions and friction on the helical buckling of coiled tubing in an inclined wellbore. PLOS ONE. 11(9):e0162741. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0162741.
  • Guan F, Duan M, Ma W, Zhou Z, Yi X. 2014. An experimental study of mechanical behavior of coiled tubing in pipelines. Appl Ocean Res. 44(1):13–19. doi: 10.1016/j.apor.2013.10.009
  • Guan F, Qin H, An C, Jiang QF, Liu SH, Ma WG, Yang T, Wu JW. 2019. The helical buckling analysis of coiled tubing in offshore pipelines. Ships Offsh Struct. 14(2):193–203. doi: 10.1080/17445302.2018.1489203
  • Huang Q, Wang W, Li W, Ren Y, Zhu F. 2017. A pigging model for wax removal in pipes. SPE Prod Oper. 32(04):469–475.
  • Ji G. 2009. The buckling behavior of pipe string and its influence on the axial force transfer in vertical wells. Well Testing. 18(5):11–16. (in Chinese).
  • Johancsik CA, Friesen DB, Dawson R. 1984. Torque and Drag in Directional Wells-Prediction and Measurement. Journal of Petroleum Technology. 36(06):987–992. doi:10.2118/11380-PA.
  • Kuru E, Martinez A, Miska S, Qiu W. 1999. The buckling behavior of pipes and its influence on the axial force transfer in directional wells. The 1999 SPE/IADC Drilling Conference; Mar 9–11, Amsterdam, Holland.
  • Lubinski A. 1950. A study of the buckling of rotary drilling strings, drilling & production practice. API, 178.
  • Maxwell P, Savenkova A, Hampson R, van Wonderen M. 2016. High-strength coiled tubing intervention to set sand plugs in an extended reach well in the Dutch North Sea. SPE/ICoTA Coiled Tubing and Well Intervention Conference and Exhibition; Mar 22–23, Houston, Texa, USA.
  • Miska S, Qiu W, Volk L, Cunha JC. 1996. An improved analysis of axial force along coiled tubing in inclined/horizontal wellbores. The 1996 SPE International Conference on Horizontal Well Technology; Nov 18–20, Calgary, Canada.
  • Mitchell RF. 2006. Tubing buckling—the state of the art. The 2006 SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition; Sep 24–27; San Antonio. Richardson: SPE 104267.
  • Mitchell RF. 1982. Buckling behavior of well tubing: the packer effect. Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal. 22(05):616–624. doi:10.2118/9264-PA.
  • Nepomiluev M, Streletskaya V. 2014. Subsea gas pipeline coiled tubing intervention for hydrate plug removal. SPE Russian Oil and Gas Exploration & Production Technical Conference and Exhibition; Oct 14–16, Moscow, Russia.
  • Nesje P. 2016. Complex subsea to subsea pigging operations of pipelines. Offshore Technology Conference Asia 2016; OTCA 2016 Mar, 777–790. Malaysia, 22–25 2016 Mar.
  • Pelucchi M, Mantica DB, Piemontese M, Restuccia G, Mackenzie H. 2017. Successful sand blockage removal from sealine using an innovative plastic coiled tubing. SPE/ICoTA Coiled Tubing and Well Intervention Conference and Exhibition; Oct 9–11, Texas, USA.
  • Qiu W. 1998. Prediction of contact force for drill pipe/coiled tubing. The 1998 SPE Eastern Reginal Meeting; Nov 9–11; Pennsylvania, USA.
  • Sorenson KG, Cheatham JB. 1986. Post-buckling behavior of a circular rod constrained within a circular cylinder. Journal of Applied Mechanics. 53(4):929–934. doi:10.1115/1.3171883.
  • Wang W, Chen Y, Li H, Xiong M. 2016. Axial load transfer characteristics of SCR pipe-in-pipe vibration system with different diameter ratio. The ASME 2016 35th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering; Jun 19–24, Busan, South Korea.
  • Wang W, Li H, Chen Y, Peng H. 2018. Experimental and theoretical study on the effect of inclined angle in the SCR pipe-in-pipe system. Ocean Eng. 154:389–395. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2018.01.072
  • Wu J. 1992. Buckling behaviour of pipes in directional and horizontal wells (PhD dissertation). Texas A&M University.
  • Wu J, Juvkam-Wold HC. 1995. Coiled tubing buckling implication in drilling and completing horizontal wells. SPE Drilling & Completion. 10(01):16–21. doi:10.2118/26336-PA.
  • Yue QB, Liu JB, Zhang LG, Zhang Q. 2018. The posting-buckling analysis and evaluations of limit drilling length for coiled tubing in the sidetrack horizontal well. J Pet Sci Eng. 164:559–570. doi: 10.1016/j.petrol.2018.01.061

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.