Evaluation of the structural complexity of organisations and products in naval-shipbuilding projects

References

• Ahn S, Shokri S, Lee S, Haas CT, Haas RCG. 2017. Exploratory study on the effectiveness of interface-management practices in dealing with project complexity in large-scale engineering and construction projects. J Manag Eng. 33(2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antoniadis DN, Edum-Fotwe FT, Thorpe A. 2011. Socio-organo complexity and project performance. Int J Proj Manag. 29(7):808–816.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baccarini D. 1996. The concept of project complexity – a review. Int JProj Manag. 14(4):201–204.
   Google Scholar
• Balaban AT. 1987. Graph theory and Topology in Chemistry. Amsterdam: Elsevier. Numerical Modelling of Chemical Structures: Local Graph Invariants and Topological Indices; p. 159–176.
   Google Scholar
• Balaban AT, Ivanciuc O. 1999. Topological indices and related descriptors in QSAR and QSPAR. Amsterdam: Gordon and Breach Science Publishers. Historical Development of Topological Indices; p. 21–57.
   Google Scholar
• Bonacich P. 1987. Power and centrality: a family of measures. Am J Sociol. 92:1170–1182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonchev D, Rouvray DH. 2005. Complexity in Chemistry, Biology, and Ecology. Mathematical and Computational Chemistry. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bosch-Rekveldt M, Jongkind Y, Mooi H, Bakker H, Verbraeck A. 2011. Grasping project complexity in large engineering projects: the TOE (technical, organizational and environmental) framework. Int J Proj Manag. 29:728–739.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosch-Rekveldt M, Mooi H, Verbraeck A, Bakker H. 2011. Evaluating a complexity network - a practitioners view on project complexity. Project Perspectives 2012, the annual publication of International Project Management Association. Vol. XXXIV. ISSN 1455-4178..
   Google Scholar
• Csardi G, Nepusz T. 2006. The igraph software package for complex network research. InterJournal of Complex Systes. 1695(5):1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Dehmer M, Sivakumar L, Varmuza K. 2012. Uniquely discriminating molecular structures using novel eigenvalue-based descriptors. MATCH Commun. Math Comput. Chem., 67:147-172.
   Google Scholar
• Diudea MV, Gutman I, Jantschi L. 2001. Molecular topology. New York: Nova.
   Google Scholar
• Dobrynin AA, Entringer R, Gutman I. 2001. Wiener index of trees: theory and applications. Acta Appl Math. 66(3):211–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engwall M. 2003. No project is an island: linking projects to history and context. Res Policy. 32(5):789–808.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Estrada E. 2000. Characterization of 3D molecular structure. Chem Phys Lett. 319:713–718.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Estrada E, Torres L, Rodríguez L, Gutman I. 1998. An atom-bond connectivity index: modelling the enthalpy of formation of alkanes. Indian J Chem. 37A:849–855.
   Google Scholar
• Fath-Tabar GH, Ashrafi AR, Gutman I. 2009. Note on Estrada and L-Estrada indices of graphs. Acad Serbe Sci Arts Glas. CXXXIX(34):1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg B, Bruzelius N, Rothengatter W. 2003. Megaprojects and risk, an anatomy of ambition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman LC. 1979. Centrality in social networks I: conceptual clarification. Soc Netw. 1:215–239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gentleman R, Whalen E, Huber W, Falcon S. 2017. graph: A package to handle graph data structures. R package version 1.56.0. http://www.bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/graph.html.
   Google Scholar
• Geraldi J, Maylor H, Williams T. 2011. Now, let’s make it really complex (complicated). Int J Proj Manag. 31(9):966–990.
   Google Scholar
• Gidado K. 1993. Numerical index of complexity in building construction with particular consideration to its effect on production time [dissertation]. University of Brighton.
   Google Scholar
• Gregory S. 2010. Finding overlapping communities in networks by label propagation. New J Phys. 12(10):103018.
   Google Scholar
• Guillen-Torres J. 2013. Modelo de dirección de proyectos complejos: Aplicación a la gestión integrada de la comunidad de regantes Lasesa (Huesca) [dissertation]. Madrid: Universidad Politécnica de Madrid – Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros agrónomos.
   Google Scholar
• Gutman I, Zhou B. 2006. Laplacian energy of a graph. Linear Algebra Its Appl. 414(1):29–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall PG. 1981. Great planning disasters. London: Weidenfeld and Nicholson.
   Google Scholar
• Helbrough B. 1995. Computer assisted collaboration the fourth dimension of project management? Int J Proj Manag. 13:329–333.
   Google Scholar
• Hobday M. 1998. Product complexity, innovation and industrial organization. Res Policy. 26(6):689–710.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IEA, International Energy Agency. 2006. https://www.iea.org/newsroom/news/2006/.
   Google Scholar
• Jones RE, Deckro RF. 1993. The social psychology of project management conflict. Eur J Oper Res. 64(2):216–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim J, Wilemon D. 2003. Sources and assessment of complexity in NPD projects. R D Manag. 33(1):15–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim J, Wilhelm T. 2008. What is a complex graph? Physica A. 387(11):2637–2652.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luke DA. 2015. A user’s guide to network analysis in R. London. England: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Maylor H, Vidgen R, Carver S. 2008. Managerial complexity in project-based operations: a grounded model and its implications for practice. Int J Proj Manag. 39(S1):S15–S26.
   Google Scholar
• McKenna MG, Wilczynski H, VanDerSchee D. 2006. Capital project execution in the Oil and Gas Industry. Houston: Booz Allen Hamilton.
   Google Scholar
• Mueller LAJ, Schutte M, Kugler KG, Dehmer M. 2010. QuACN: an R package for analyzing complex biological networks quantitatively. Bioinformatics. 27(1):140–141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mueller LAJ, Schutte M, Kugler KG, Dehmer M. 2014. QuACN: quantitative analyze of complex networks. Technical report.
   Google Scholar
• Nassar K, Hegab M. 2006. Developing a complexity measure for project schedules. J Constr Eng Manage. 132(6):554–561.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naval Technologies. Aegis ballistic missile defense (BMD) system. [accessed 2018 March]. https://www.naval-technology.com/projects/aegis-ballistic-missile-defence-bmd.
   Google Scholar
• Neleman J. 2006. Shell gaat diep. FEM Business. 9:30–34.
   Google Scholar
• Newman MEJ. 2004. Detecting community structure in networks. Eur Phys J B. 38(2):321–330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman MEJ. 2006. Modularity and community structure in networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U.S.A. 103(23):8577–8582.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qureshi SM, Kang CK. 2015. Analysing the organizational factors of project complexity using structural equation modelling. Proj Manag J. 33:165–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Remington K, Pollack J. 2007. Tools for complex projects. Aldershot, England: Gower.
   Google Scholar
• Salazar-Aramayo JL, Rodrigues-da-Silveira R, Rodrigues-de-Almeida M, de Castro-Dantas TN. 2013. A conceptual model for project management of exploration and production in the oil and gas industry: the case of a Brazilian company. Int J Proj Manag. 31:589–601.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaffer RL, Kloehn HG. 1991. Design of the NFR-90. Nav Eng J. 103(2):29–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott J, Carrington PJ. 2011. The SAGE handbook of social network analysis. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Shenhar AJ. 1998. From theory to practice: toward a typology of project management styles. IEEE Trans Eng Manage. 45:33–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shenhar AJ, Dvir D. 1996. Toward a typological theory of project management. Res Policy. 25(4):607–632.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shenhar AJ, Dvir D. 2007. Reinventing project management: the diamond approach to successful growth and innovation. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shenhar AJ, Dvir D, Lechler T, Poli M. 2002. One size does not fit all: true for projects, true for frameworks. In Proceedings of the PMI Research Conference 2002: Frontiers of Project Management Research and Applications; Jul 14–17; Seattle, Washington. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute. p. 99–106.
   Google Scholar
• Skorobogatov VA, Dobrynin AA. 1988. Metrical analysis of graphs. MATCH Commun Math Comput Chem. 23:105–155.
   Google Scholar
• Stopford M. 2009. Maritime Economics. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Temperley HNV. 1981. Graph theory and Applications. England: Ellis Horwood Chichester.
   Google Scholar
• Turner JR, Cochrane RA. 1993. Goals-and-methods matrix: coping with projects with ill defined goals and/or methods of achieving them. Int J Proj Manag. 11(2):93–98.
   Google Scholar
• Vidal L, Marle F. 2008. Understanding project complexity: implications on project management. Kybernetes. 37(8):1094–1110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vidal LA, Marle F, Bocquet JC. 2011. Measuring project complexity using the analytic hierarchy process. Int J Proj Manag. 29(6):718–727.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitty SJ, Maylor H. 2009. And then came complex project management. Int J Proj Manag. 27:304–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiener H. 1947. Structural determination of paraffin boiling points. J Am Chem Soc. 69(1):17–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams T. 1999. The need for new paradigms for complex projects. Int J Proj Manag. 17(5):269–273.
   Google Scholar
• Xia W, Lee G. 2003. Complexity of information systems development projects: conceptualization and measurement development. J Manage Inform Syst. 22(1):45–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xia W, Lee G. 2004. Grasping the complexity of IS development projects. Commun ACM. 47(5):68–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou B, Gutman I, Furtula B, Du Z. 2009. On two types of geometric-arithmetic index. Chem PhysLett. 482:153–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar