A RANS approach for transfer function plot based on discrete fourier transform

References

• Bhushan S, Xing T, Carrica P, Stern F. 2009. Model and full-scale URANS simulations of Athena resistance, powering, seakeeping, and 5415 manoeuvring. J Ship Res. 53(4):179–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cakici F, Kahramanoglu E, Alkan AD. 2017. Numerical prediction of vertical ship motions and added resistance. R Inst Nav Archit. 159(Part A4):393–492.
   Google Scholar
• Cakici F, Kahramanoglu E, Duman S, Alkan AD. 2018. A new URANS based approach on the prediction of vertical motions of a surface combatant in head waves. Ocean Eng. 162:21–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrica PM, Wilson RV, Noack RW, Stern F. 2007. Ship motions using single-phase level set with dynamic overset grids. Comput Fluids. 36:1415–1433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrica PM, Wilson RV, Stern F. 2006. Unsteady RANS simulation of the ship forward speed diffraction problem. Comput Fluids. 35:545–570.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CD-Adapco. 2014. User guide STAR-CCM Version 9.0.2.
   Google Scholar
• Frank W. 1967. Oscillation of cylinders in or below the free surface of deep fluids. DTNSRDC Report No. 2375.
   Google Scholar
• Froude W. 1861. On the rolling of ships. Trans INA. 2:180–227.
   Google Scholar
• Hashimoto H, Yoneda S, Omura T, Umeda N, Matsuda A, Stern F, Tahara Y. 2019. CFD prediction of wave-induced forces on ships running in irregular stern quartering seas. Ocean Eng. 188:106277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirt CW, Nichols BD. 1981. Volume of fluid method for the dynamics of free boundaries. J Comput Phys. 39(1):2015–2225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hizir O, Kim M, Turan O, Day A, Incecik A, Lee Y. 2019. Numerical studies on non-linearity of added resistance and ship motions of KVLCC2 in short and long waves. Int J Naval Arch Ocean Eng. 11(1):143–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irvine M, Longo J, Stern F. 2008. Pitch and Heave tests and uncertainty assessment for a surface combatant in regular head waves. J Ship Res. 52(2):146–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ITTC, 2014. 7.5-03-02-03 Practical guidelines for ship CFD applications. Proceedings of the ITTC—Recommended Procedures and Guidelines.
   Google Scholar
• Jin Y, Chai S, Duffy J, Chin C, Bose N. 2018. URANS predictions on the hydrodynamic interaction of a conceptual FLNG-LNG offloading system in regular waves. Ocean Eng. 153:363–386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krylov AN. 1896. A new theory of pitching of ships on waves and of the stresses produced by this motion. Trans INA. 37:326–359.
   Google Scholar
• Lee CM, Yu JW, Choi JE, Lee I. 2019. Effect of bow hull forms on resistance performance in calm water and waves for 66k DWT bulk carrier. Int J Naval Arch Ocean Eng. 2:723–735.
   Google Scholar
• Mousaviraad SM, Carrica PM, Stern F. 2010. Development and validation of harmonic wave group single-run procedure for RAO with comparison to regular wave and transient wave group procedures using URANS. Ocean Eng. 37(8–9):653–666.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niklas K, Pruszko H. 2019. Full scale CFD seakeeping simulations for case study ship redesigned from V-shaped bulbous bow to X-bow hull form. Appl Ocean Res. 89:188–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozdemir YH, Barlas B. 2017. Numerical study of ship motions and added resistance in regular incident waves of KVLCC2 model. Int J Naval Arch Ocean Eng. 9(2):149–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Querard ABG, Temarel P, Turnock SR. 2009. The hydrodynamics of ship-like sections in heave, sway and roll motions predicted using an unsteady Reynolds averaged Navier-Stokes method. Proc Inst Mech Eng M, J Eng Maritime Environ. 223(2):227–238.
   Google Scholar
• Romanowski A, Tezdogan T, Turan O. 2019. Development of a CFD methodology for the numerical simulation of irregular sea-states. Ocean Eng. 192:106530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salvesen N, Tuck O, Faltinsen O. 1970. Ship motions and sea loads. Soc Nav Archit Marine Eng. 78:250–287.
   Google Scholar
• Sato Y, Miyata H, Sato T. 1999. CFD simulation of 3-dimensional motion of a ship in waves: application to an advancing ship in regular heading waves. J Mar Sci Technol. 4:108–116.
   Google Scholar
• Shen Z, Ye H, Wan D. 2014. URANS simulations of ship motion responses in long-crest irregular waves. J Hydrodynam. 26(3):436–446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shivachev E, Khorasanchi M, Day S, Turan O. 2020. Impact of trim on added resistance of KRISO container ship (KCS) in head waves: an experimental and numerical study. Ocean Eng. 211:107594.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simman. 2014. https://simman2014.dk/ship-data/us-navy-combatant/geometry-and-conditions-us-navy-combatant/.
   Google Scholar
• Simonsen CD, Otzen JF, Joncquez S, Stern F. 2013. EFD and CFD for KCS heaving and pitching in regular head waves. J Mar Sci Technol. 18(4):435–459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern F, Wilson RV, Coleman HW, Paterson EG. 2001. Comprehensive approach to verification and validation of CFD simulations—Part 1: methodology and procedures. J Fluids Eng. 123:793–802.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tasai F. 1959. On the damping force and added mass of ships heaving and pitching. Tech Rep, Res Ins Appl Mech, Kyushu Univ, Jpn. 105:47–56.
   Google Scholar
• Tezdogan T, Demirel YK, Kellett P, Khorasanchi M, Incecik A, Turan O. 2015. Full-scale unsteady RANS CFD simulations of ship behaviour and performance in head seas due to slow steaming. Ocean Eng. 97: 186–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uharek S, Cura-Hochbaum A. 2018. The influence of inertial effects on the mean forces and moments on a ship sailing in oblique waves Part B: numerical prediction using a RANS code. Ocean Eng. 165:264–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ursell F. 1949a. On the heaving motion of a circular cylinder on the surface of a fluid. Quart J Mech Appl Math. 2:218–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ursell F. 1949b. On the rolling motion of a circular cylinder in the surface of a fluid. Quart J Mech Appl Math. 2:335–353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weymouth GD, Wilson RV, Stern F. 2005. RANS computational fluid dynamics predictions of pitch and heave ship motions in head seas. J Ship Res. 49(2):80–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilcox DC. 2006. Turbulence modeling for CFD, 3rd ed. La Cãnada, CA: DCW Industries.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson RV, Ji L, Karman SL, Hyams DG, Sreenivas K, Taylor LK, Whitfield DL. 2008. Simulation of large amplitude ship motions for prediction of fluid-structure interaction. 27th symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics; Seoul.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson RV, Stern F, Coleman HW, Paterson EG. 2001. Comprehensive approach to verification and validation of CFD simulations—Part 2: application for rans simulation of a cargo/container ship. J Fluids Eng. 123:803–810.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar