Maritime operational risk management using dynamic barriers

References

• Astrup OC, King T, Wahlstrøm AM. 2015. A framework addressing major accident risk in the Maritime industry. Proceedings of the 5th World Maritime Technology Conference (WMTC2015); Providence, Rhode Island, US: The Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers, November 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Cadwallader LC. 1996. Reliability estimates for selected sensors in fusion applications. Idaho Falls: Idaho National Engineering Laboratory.
   Google Scholar
• Cruise Ship Safety Forum (CSSF). Online library of CSSF eecommendations. [cited 2020 Mar 26]. Available from: https://cssf.cruising.org/home.
   Google Scholar
• De Ruijter A, Guldenmund F. 2016. The bowtie method: A review. Saf Sci. 88:211–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobie G, Whitehead J, Stan D, Kidston H, Collins S. 2018. Safety and shipping review 2018: an annual review of trends and developments in shipping losses and safety. Munich, Germany: Allianz Global Corporate & Specialty. June 2018.
   Google Scholar
• European Maritime Safety Agency (EMSA). 2019. Annual overview of marine casualties and incidents 2019. [cited 2020 Mar 26]. Available from: http://www.emsa.europa.eu/damage-stability-study/tagged/85-annual-overview.html.
   Google Scholar
• Goerlandt F, Montewka J. 2015. Maritime transportation risk analysis: review and analysis in light of some foundational issues. Reliab Eng Syst Saf. 138:115–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollnagel E, Woods DD, Leveson N. 2006. Resilience engineering: concepts and precepts, 1st ed. Aldershot Hampshire, UK: Ashgate Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Hu J, Khan F, Zhang L. 2020. Dynamic resilience assessment of the Marine LNG offloading system. Reliab Eng Syst Saf. (Article in Press). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2020.107368
   Google Scholar
• International Maritime Organization (IMO). 2006a. Reg. II-1/7 as adopted in IMO Res. MSC 216(82). SOLAS Consolidated Edition 2009; London: International Maritime Organization.
   Google Scholar
• International Maritime Organization (IMO). 2006b. Reg. II-1/5-1.2 as adopted in IMO Res. MSC 216(82). SOLAS Consolidated Edition 2009; London: International Maritime Organization.
   Google Scholar
• International Maritime Organization (IMO). 2006c. Reg. II-1/21 as adopted in IMO Res. MSC 216(82). SOLAS Consolidated Edition 2009; London: International Maritime Organization.
   Google Scholar
• International Maritime Organization (IMO). 2011. Guidance for watertight doors on passenger ships. London: IMO MSC.1/Circ.1380.
   Google Scholar
• Karolius BK. 2019. Risk-based, sensor-fused detection of flooding casualties for emergency response [PhD Thesis]. Maritime Safety Research Centre (MSRC), University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Karolius BK, Cichowicz J, Vassalos D. 2019. Modelling of compartment connectivity and probabilistic assessment of progressive flooding stages for a damaged ship. Proceedings of the 17th International Ship Stability Workshop (ISSW); Helsinki, Finland, 10–12 June 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Karolius BK, Cichowicz J, Vassalos D. 2020. Risk-based, sensor-fused detection of flooding casualties for emergency response. Ships Offshore Struct. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17445302.2020.1735846.
   Google Scholar
• Khakzad N, Khan F, Amyotte P. 2012. Dynamic risk analysis using bow-tie approach. Reliab Eng Syst Saf. 104:36–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King T, Van Welter C, Svensen TE. 2016. Stability barrier management for large passenger ships. Ocean Eng. 125:342–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulovaara H. 2015. Safety & stability through innovation in cruise ship design. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on the Stability of Ships and Ocean Vehicles (STAB); Glasgow, UK, 14–19 June 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Lim GJ, Cho J, Bora S, Biobaku T, Parsaei H. 2018. Models and computational algorithms for maritime risk analysis: a review. Ann Oper Res. 271:765–786.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naval Surface Warfare Centre (NSWC). 2010. Handbook of reliability prediction procedures for mechanical equipment. West Bethesda: Naval Surface Warfare Centre Carderock Division.
   Google Scholar
• Norwegian Coastal Administration (NCA). 2019. Automated calculation of risk related to ship traffic: Risk calculation method and data sources. Rev. 5, Date: 20/11/2019. Report.
   Google Scholar
• Ozbas B. 2013. Safety risk analysis of maritime transportation: review of the literature. Transp Res Rec: J Transp Res Board. 2326:32–38.
   Google Scholar
• Paterson D, Atzampos G. 2017. Analysis of onboard data with regards to probabilities of initial draughts. report No. eSAFE- D1.2.1, Rev. 5.0 of work package WP1, deliverable D1.2.1 from the Enhanced Stability after a flooding event (eSAFE) research project (Joint industry project on damage stability for cruise ships).
   Google Scholar
• Pitblado R, Fisher M, Nelson B, Fløtaker H, Molazemi K, Stokke A. 2016. Concepts for dynamic barrier management. J Loss Prev Process Ind. 43:741–746.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sklet S. 2006. Safety barriers: definition, classifications, and performance. J Loss Prev Process Ind. 19(5):494–506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith DJ. 2005. Reliability and maintainability and risk, 7th ed. Oxford: Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Yang X, Haugen S. 2015. Classification of risk to support decision-making in hazardous processes. Saf Sci. 80:115–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang X, Haugen S, Paltrinieri N. 2018. Clarifying the concept of operational risk assessment in the oil and gas industry. Saf Sci. 108:259–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaraphonitis G, Bulian G, Hamann R, Eliopoulou E, Cardinale M, Luhmann H. 2017. Description of Methodology – WP2 Deliverable D2.1.1. Enhanced Stability after a flooding event (eSAFE) Joint Industry Research Project on Damage Stability for cruise ships, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Zaraphonitis G, Bulian G, Lindroth D, Hamman R, Luhmann H, Cardinale M, Routi AL, Bertin R, Harper G. 2015. Evaluation of risk from raking damages due to grounding. Lisbon: European Maritime Safety Agency. Available from: http://www.emsa.europa.eu/damage-stability-study/download/3548/2421/23.html.
   Google Scholar