Experimental and numerical investigation on axial load transfer across cracked tubular joint strengthened with grouted clamps of a jacket in under water condition

References

• American Welding Society. 2020. Structural welding code–steel. D1 1/D1 1M: 2020.
   Google Scholar
• API. 2014. API RP 2A Recommended practice for planning, designing and constructing fixed offshore platforms-working stress design. 22nd ed. American Petroleum Institute.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM. 2009. E8/ E8M: Standard test methods for tension testing of metallic materials. Pennsylvania, US: American Society for Testing, Materials.
   Google Scholar
• Banon H. 1994. Assessing fitness for purpose of offshore platforms. II: risk management, maintenance, and repair. J Struc Eng. 120(12):3613–3633.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Billington C, Gael Lewis HG. 1978. Lewis. In: The strength of large diameter grouted connections OTC, Houston: Offshore Technology Conference; p. 291–301.
   Google Scholar
• BIPM, IEC, ILAC IFCC, IUPAC ISO, and OIML IUPAP. 2008. (GUM 1995 with minor corrections) Evaluation of measurement data–Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement.
   Google Scholar
• British Standards 7910. 2013. Guide to methods for assessing the acceptability of flaws in metallic structures.
   Google Scholar
• British Standards. 2004. Eurocode 2: Design of concrete structures—. Part 1-1: General rules and rules for buildings.
   Google Scholar
• Burdekin F M 2002. The static strength of cracked joints in tubular members. UK: HSE.
   Google Scholar
• Bureau of Indian Standards, IS: 4031. 1988. Part 6: Methods of physical tests for hydraulic cement. New Delhi, India.
   Google Scholar
• Bureau of Indian Standards, IS: 5816. 1999. Method of test splitting tensile strength of concrete. New Delhi, India.
   Google Scholar
• Cheaitani MJ, Burdekin FM. 1994. Ultimate strength of cracked tubular joints. Proceedings of 6th International Symposium on Tubular Structures, Tubular Structures VI, Melbourne, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Chilvers CA. 1984. Analysis of the structural behaviour of grouted pile/sleeve connections for offshore structures. London, UK: City University London.
   Google Scholar
• CJ. Billington 1980. Research into composite tubular construction for offshore jacket structures. J Constr Steel Res. 1(1):18–26.
   Google Scholar
• Dassault Systémes Simulia. 2014. ABAQUS (6.14)/ Standard user’s manual. USA.
   Google Scholar
• Dier AF. 2004. Assessment of repair techniques for ageing or damaged structures. Doc Ref C357R001 Rev 1. MSL Engineering Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Elnashai AS, Carroll BC, Dowling PJ. 1985. A prestressed, high-strength grouted connection for offshore construction. Offshore Technology Conference.
   Google Scholar
• F M Burdekin. 2002. The static strength of cracked joints in tubular members. London, UK: Health Safety Executive.
   Google Scholar
• Harwood RG, Shuttleworth EP. 1988. Grouted and mechanical strengthening and repair of tubular steel offshore structures. London, UK: HM Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• Ibarra S, Reed RL, Smith JK, Pachniuk I, Grubbs CE. 1991. Underwater wet welding repair of an offshore platform in the North Sea. In: The First International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Krahl NW, Karsan DI. 1985. Axial strength of grouted pile-to-sleeve connections. J Struct Eng. 111(4):889–905.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee MMK, Dexter EM. 2004. Finite-element modelling of multi-planar offshore tubular joints. J Offshore Mech Arct Eng. 126(1):120–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu LH, de Winkel GD, Yu Y, Wardenier J. 1994. Deformation limit for the ultimate strength of hollow section joints. Tubular Struc. VI:341–347.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy F, Smith BL. 1993. The investigation and repair of defective joints on the Kinsale Alpha platform. In: Offshore Technology Conference.
   Google Scholar
• N Vignesh Chellappan, S Nallayarasu 2019. Residual Strength of Cracked Tubular Joint Using Nonlinear Finite Element Analysis. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference in Ocean Engineering (ICOE2018). p. 395–416.
   Google Scholar
• Rhee HC. 1989. Fatigue crack growth analyses of offshore structural tubular joint. J Offshore Mech Arct Eng. 111:49–55.
   Google Scholar
• Tao Z, Wang Z-B, Yu Q. 2013. Finite element modelling of concrete-filled steel stub columns under axial compression. J Constr Steel Res. 89:121–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner JW, Wisch DJ, Guynes SJ. 1994. A review of operations and mitigation methods for offshore platforms. Offshore Technology Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Yu Chen, Ran Feng, Lele Xiong. 2016. Experimental and numerical investigations on double-skin CHS tubular X-joints under axial compression. Thin-Walled Structures. 106:268–283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yura JA, Zettlemoyer NA, Edwards IF. 1980. Ultimate capacity equations for tubular joints. Offshore Technology Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao XL, Herion S, Packer JA, Puthli RS, Sedlacek G, Wardenier J, Weynand K, Van Wingerde AM, Yeomans NF. 2001. Design Guide 8-For CHS and RHS welded joints under fatigue loading. TUV-Verlag GmbH.
   Google Scholar