310
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Probabilistic failure envelopes of shallow foundations on soils with strength anisotropy under combined loading

ORCID Icon, , &
Pages 2150-2157 | Received 07 Apr 2021, Accepted 07 Sep 2021, Published online: 02 Oct 2021

References

  • Ahn J, Lee H, Kim YT. 2015. Finite element analysis of the holding capacity of shallow suction caisson anchors. Mar Georesour Geotechnol. 33(1):33–44. doi:10.1080/1064119X.2013.778377.
  • Butterfield R, Houlsby GT, Gottardi G. 1997. Standardized sign conventions and notation for generally loaded foundations. Géotechnique. 47(5):1051–1054. doi:10.1680/geot.1997.47.5.1051.
  • Cassidy MJ, Uzielli M, Tian Y. 2013. Probabilistic combined loading failure envelopes of a strip footing on spatially variable soil. Comput Geotech. 49:191–205. doi:10.1016/j.compgeo.2012.10.008.
  • Charlton TS, Rouainia M. 2016. Probabilistic capacity analysis of suction caissons in spatially variable clay. Comput Geotech. 80:226–236. doi:10.1016/j.compgeo.2016.06.001.
  • Der Kiureghian A, Ke JB. 1988. The stochastic finite element method in structural reliability. Probabilist Eng Mech. 3(2):83–91. doi:10.1016/0266-8920(88)90019-7.
  • Fenton GA, Vanmarcke EH. 1990. Simulation of random fields via local average subdivision. J Geotech Geoenviron Engng. 131(2):232–239. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2005)131:2(232).
  • Frydman S, Burd HJ. 1997. Numerical studies of bearing-capacity factor Nγ. J Geotech Geoenviron Engng. 123(1):20–29. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1997)123:1(20).
  • Gourvenec S. 2007. Shape effects on the capacity of rectangular footings under general loading. Géotechnique. 57(8):637–646. doi:10.1680/geot.2007.57.8.637.
  • Gourvenec S. 2008. Effect of embedment on the undrained capacity of shallow foundations under general loading. Géotechnique. 58(3):177–185. doi:10.1680/geot.2008.58.3.177.
  • Griffiths DV, Fenton GA, Manoharan N. 2002. Bearing capacity of rough rigid strip footing on cohesive soil: probabilistic study. J Geotech Geoenviron Engng. 128(9):743–755. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2002)128:9(743).
  • Hentati A, Selmi M, Kormi T, Ali NBH. 2018. Probabilistic HM failure envelopes of strip foundations on spatially variable soil. Comput Geotech. 102:66–78. doi:10.1016/j.compgeo.2018.06.001.
  • Hossain MS, Randolph MF. 2010. Deep-penetrating spudcan foundations on layered clays: numerical analysis. Geotechnique. 60(3):171–184. doi:10.1680/geot.8.P.040.
  • Jiang SH, Huang J. 2016. Efficient slope reliability analysis at low-probability levels in spatially variable soils. Comput Geotech. 75:18–27. doi:10.1016/j.compgeo.2016.01.016.
  • Jiang SH, Huang J. 2018. Modeling of non-stationary random field of undrained shear strength of soil for slope reliability analysis. Soils Found. 58(1):185–198. doi:10.1016/j.sandf.2017.11.006.
  • Jiang SH, Huang J, Qi XH, Zhou CB. 2020. Efficient probabilistic back analysis of spatially varying soil parameters for slope reliability assessment. Eng Geol. 271:105597. doi:10.1016/j.enggeo.2020.105597.
  • Jiang SH, Papaioannou I, Straub D. 2018. Bayesian updating of slope reliability in spatially variable soils with in-situ measurements. Eng Geol. 239:310–320. doi:10.1016/j.enggeo.2018.03.021.
  • Lee J, Eun J. 2009. Estimation of bearing capacity for multiple footings in sand. Comput Geotech. 36(6):1000–1008. doi:10.1016/j.compgeo.2009.03.009.
  • Li J, Cassidy M, Huang J, Zhang L, Kelly R. 2016. Probabilistic identification of soil stratification. Géotechnique. 66(1):16–26. doi:10.1680/jgeot.14.P.242.
  • Li J, Hu P, Uzielli M, Cassidy MJ. 2018. Bayesian predication of peak resistance of a spudcan penetrating sand-over-clay. Géotechnique. 68(10):905–917. doi:10.1680/jgeot.17.P.154.
  • Li J, Tian Y, Cassidy MJ. 2015. Failure mechanism and bearing capacity of footings buried at various depths in spatially random soil. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng. 141(2):04014099. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001219.
  • Li L, Li J, Huang J, Liu H, Cassidy MJ. 2017. The bearing capacity of spudcan foundations under combined loading in spatially variable soils. Eng Geol. 227:139–148. doi:10.1016/j.enggeo.2017.03.022.
  • Michalowski RL, Lei S. 1995. Bearing capacity of footings over two-layer foundation soils. J Geotech Geoenviron. 121(5):421–428.
  • Phoon KK, Huang SP, Quek ST. 2002. Implementation of Karhunen–Loeve expansion for simulation using a wavelet-Galerkin scheme. Probabilistic Engng Mech. 17(3):293–303. doi:10.1016/S0266-8920(02)00013-9.
  • Randolph MF. 2004. Characterization of soft sediments for offshore applications. In: Viana Da Fonseca A., Mayne P.W., editors. Geotechnical & geophysical site characterization, Vol. 1 (proc. ISC-2, porto). Rotterdam: Millpress; p. 209–232.
  • Rezazadeh S, Eslami A. 2020. Skirted semi-deep foundations behaviour on deposits with variable undrained shear strength. Ships Offshore Stru. 15(5):492–502. doi:10.1080/17445302.2019.1661622.
  • Selmi M, Kormi T, Hentati A, Bel Hadj Ali N. 2019. Capacity assessment of offshore skirted foundations under HM combined loading using RFEM. Comput Geotech. 114:103148. doi:10.1016/j.compgeo.2019.103148.
  • Shu S, Gao Y, Wu Y. 2020. Probabilistic bearing capacity analysis of spudcan foundation in soil with linearly increasing mean undrained shear strength. Ocean Eng. 204:106800. doi:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.106800.
  • Wang J, Liu R, Yang X, Chen G. 2020. An optimised failure envelope approach of bucket foundation in undrained clay. Ships Offshore Struct. doi:10.1080/17445302.2020.1846917.
  • Wu K, Fan Q, Zheng J. 2015. Effect of strength anisotropy on failure envelope of offshore shallow foundations under combined loading. J Coastal Res. 73:521–526. doi:10.2112/SI73-091.1.
  • Yang S, Leshchinsky B, Cui K, Zhang F, Gao Y. 2019. Unified approach toward evaluating bearing capacity of shallow foundations near slopes. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng. 145(12):04019110. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002178.
  • Zhang Y, Bienen B, Cassidy MJ, Gourvenec S. 2011. The undrained bearing capacity of a spudcan foundation under combined loading in soft clay. Mar Struct. 24(4):459–477. doi:10.1016/j.marstruc.2011.06.002.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.