Efficient derivation of extreme non-Gaussian stochastic structural response using the finite-memory nonlinear system (FMNS_NL). Part 1: model development

References

• Abdel Raheem SE. 2014. Study on nonlinear response of steel fixed offshore platform under environmental loads. Arab J Sci Eng. 39(8):6017–6030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abu Husain MK. 2013. Prediction of extreme offshore structural response – an efficient time simulation approach. Deutschland, Germany: LAMBERT Academic Publication.
   Google Scholar
• Abu Husain MK, Mohd Zaki NI, Johari MB, Najafian G. 2016. Extreme response prediction for fixed offshore structure by Monte Carlo time simulation technique. ASME 35th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering.
   Google Scholar
• Adcock TAA. 2015-06-21. The second order contribution to wave crest amplitude-Random simulations and NewWave. Proceedings of the 25th International Ocean and Polar Engineering Conference, June 21-27, Kona, Hawaii Big Island.
   Google Scholar
• Aeran A, Siriwardane SC, Mikkelsen O, Langen I. 2017. A framework to assess structural integrity of ageing offshore jacket structures for life extension. Mar Struct. 56:237–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agarwal P, Manuel L. 2011. Incorporating irregular nonlinear waves in coupled simulation and reliability studies of offshore wind turbines. Appl Ocean Res. 33(3):215–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alberello A, Chabchoub A, Gramstad O, Babanin A, Toffoli A. 2014. Statistics of wave orbital velocities in random directional sea states. In 19th Australasian Fluid Mechanics Conference, 8–11. Melbourne, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• American Bureau of Shipping. 2020. Guidance notes on air gap and wave impact analysis for semi-submersibles. Spring: Incorporated by Act of Legislature of the State of New York 1862.
   Google Scholar
• Bai Y, Jin W. 2015. Marine structural design. 2nd ed. Waltham, USA: Butterworth-Heinemann; Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Bendat JS, Piersol AG. 2010. Random data: analysis and measurement procedures. 4th ed. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Billings SA. 1985. Introduction to nonlinear systems analysis and identification. Research Report. White Rose Research Online.
   Google Scholar
• Carmenes RS. 1996. Nonlinear regression. In: Signal treatment and signal analysis. Vol. 18. Amsterdam, The Netherland: Rutledge DN; Elsevier B.V; p. 68–99.
   Google Scholar
• Catelani M, Ciani L, Rossin S, Venzi M. 2014. Failure rates sensitivity analysis using Monte Carlo simulation. 13th IMEKO TC10 Workshop on Technical Diagnostics; Advanced Measurement Tools in Technical Diagnostics for System Reliability and Safety. p. 195–200.
   Google Scholar
• Chakrabarti SK. 2005. Handbook of offshore engineering. Vol. I. 1st ed. Amsterdam, The Netherland: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Chapra SC, Canale RP. 2010. Numerical methods for engineers. 6th ed. Avenue of the Americas, New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Chen J. 2014. Nonlinear wave loads on offshore wind support structure. A thesis awarded for master of science, Norwegian university of science and technology.
   Google Scholar
• Deo DMC. 2013. Waves and structures. Powai: Indian Institution of Technology Bombay.
   Google Scholar
• DNV GL. 2020. Sesam: software suite for hydrodynamic and structural analysis of ships and offshore structures. DNV GL – Digital Solution.
   Google Scholar
• Edvard. 2013, September 25. Most common offshore oil and gas production facility types. Energy and Power, Oil and Gas Article. https://electrical-engineering-portal.com/5-most-common-offshore-oil-and-gas-production-facility-types
   Google Scholar
• Forristall GZ. 2002. Nonlinear wave calculations for engineering application. J Offshore Mech Arct Eng. 124:28–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grice JR, Taylor PH, Eatock Taylor R. 2015. Second-order statistics and ‘designer’ waves for violent free-surface motion around multi-column structures. Philos Trans R Soc A. 373(2033):1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Hafez KA, Aboul-Fadl W, Leheta HW. 2012. Comparative dynamic response analysis of a fixed offshore platform using deterministic and spectral wave approaches. Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, Brazil. p. 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Hagen O. 1996. Guideline for offshore structural reliability analysis: application to jacket platforms. Det Norske Veritas, report. Technical Report.
   Google Scholar
• Holmager M. 2010. Offshore book: an introduction to the offshore industry. Esbjerg, Denmark: Offshore Center Danmark.
   Google Scholar
• Irina A, Sergejs A. 2007. Application of ordinary least square method in nonlinear models. Vol. 1. Lisboa: International Statistical Institute, p. 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Isobe M. 2013. Review: evolution of basic equations for nearshore wave field. Proc Jpn Acad Ser B. 89:34–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jusoh I. 2018. Base shear and overturning moment on jacket structure with Marine growth. Int J Eng Trends Technol (IJETT). 58(1):10–13.
   Google Scholar
• Li Y, Xu B, Zhang D, Shen X, Zhang W. 2020. Numerical analysis of combined wave radiation on a floating barge. Journal in Water. 12(1):205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mallahzadeh H, Wang Y, Abu Husain MK, Mohd Zaki NI, Najafian G. 2014. Accurate estimation of the 100-year responses from the probability distribution of extreme surface elevations. In ASME 33rd International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, San Francisco, California, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Mat Soom E, Abu Husain MK, Mohd Zaki NI, Ayob MS, Najafian G. 2015. Global Ultimate Strength Assessment (GUSA) for lifetime extension of ageing offshore structures. 25th International Ocean and Polar Engineering Conference, Hawaii, USA. p. 431–435.
   Google Scholar
• Mohd Zaki NI, Abu Husain MK, Mukhlas NA, Najafian G. 2016. Prediction of offshore structural response extreme values by modified finite-memory nonlinear system modeling. Proceedings of the International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, Busan, South Korea.
   Google Scholar
• Mohd Zaki NI, Abu Husain MK, Najafian G. 2013b. Comparison of extreme responses from wheeler and vertical stretching methods. Open Civil Eng J. 7:273–281.
   Google Scholar
• Mohd Zaki NI, Abu Husain MK, Najafian G, Wang Y. 2013a. Short-term distribution of the extreme values of offshore structural response by modified finite-memory nonlinear system modeling. Proceeding of the ASME 32nd International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, Nantes, France.
   Google Scholar
• Mukhlas NA. 2017. Efficient derivation of extreme offshore structural response exposed to random wave load [Master of Philosophy thesis]. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.
   Google Scholar
• Mukhlas NA, Mohd Zaki NI, Abu Husain MK. 2016. Prediction of the 100-year responses by advanced MFMNS. International Conference on Ocean, Mechanical and Aerospace for Scientist and Engineer.
   Google Scholar
• Mukhlas NA, Mohd Zaki NI, Abu Husain MK, Najafian G. 2018. Efficient derivation of extreme offshore structural response exposed to random wave loads. J Ships Offshore Struct. 13(7):719–733.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukhlas NA, Mohd Zaki NI, Abu Husain MK, Najafian G. 2019. Efficient methods for the prediction of non-gaussian stochastic response of offshore structure. 7th International Conference on Marine Structures, Dubrovnik, Croatia.
   Google Scholar
• Mukhlas NA, Mohd Zaki NI, Abu Husain MK, Syed Ahmad SZA, Najafian G. 2021. Efficient derivation of extreme non-Gaussian stochastic structural response using finite-memory nonlinear system. Part 2: Model validation. Ships Offshore Struct. https://doi.org/10.1080/17445302.2021.1898127
   Google Scholar
• Najafian G. 2007a. Application of system identification techniques in efficient modelling of offshore structural response. Part I: model development. Appl Ocean Res. 29(1–2):1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Najafian G. 2007b. Application of system identification techniques in efficient modelling of offshore structural response. Part II: model validation. Appl Ocean Res. 29(1–2):17–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Najafian G, Mohd Zaki NI. 2008. Finite-memory nonlinear system modelling of offshore structures. 27th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, Estoril, Portugal.
   Google Scholar
• Natarajan A. 2014. Influence of second-order random wave kinematics on the design loads of offshore wind turbine support structures. Renewable Energy. 68:829–841.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norouzi M. 2012. An efficient method to assess reliability under dynamic stochastic loads [Doctor of Philosophy in Engineering]. Mechanical Engineering, University of Toledo.
   Google Scholar
• Rahrooh A, Buchana WW, Seker R. 2013. Linear model estimation of nonlinear systems using least-squares algorithm linear model. 120th ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. American Society for Engineering Education, Atlanta.
   Google Scholar
• RP2A, A. P. I. 2014. Recommended practice for planning, designing and construction of fixed offshore platform working stress design. API RP2A-WSD. 22nd ed.
   Google Scholar
• Saeedfar S, Abd Wahab AK. 2015. An evaluation of the depth of similarity between linear and non-linear wave theories. 3rd International Conference on Water Resources, Langkawi, Malaysia. p. 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma JN, Dean RG. 1979. Second-order directional seas and associated wave forces. Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, Texas. p. 2505–2510.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma JN, Dean RG. 1981. Second-order directional seas and associated wave forces. Soc Petrol Eng J. 21(1):129–140.
   Google Scholar
• Siddique M. 2018. Wave theory and wave propagation. In: Introduction to coastal engineering. Lecture Note 0401444, Department of Civil and Environment Engineering. University of Sharjah, United Arab, Emirates.
   Google Scholar
• Stob M. 2011. Non-linear curve fitting. In: Mathematics 241: nonlinear models. Lecture Note, Engineering Statistics. Calvin University, Burton Street, USA. p. 1–3.
   Google Scholar
• Swain JJ, Schmeiser BW. 1987. Monte Carlo estimation of the sampling distribution of nonlinear model parameter estimators. Ann Operat Res. 8:245–256.
   Google Scholar
• Technip. 2014. Offshore platform-facility provider. Texas, USA: Technip USA, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Teknomo K. 2017. Non-linear transformation.
   Google Scholar
• Teng B, Ning DZ. 2009. A simplified model for extreme-wave kinematics In deep sea. J Mar Sci Appl. 8(1):27–32.
   Google Scholar
• Varma KK. 2014. Finite amplitude ocean waves: waves with peaked crests and broad troughs. Resonance. 19:1047–1057.
   Google Scholar
• Zheng XY. 2013. Nonlinear stochastic response of offshore structures: with focus on spectral analysis. CESOS Highlight Conference & AMOS Vision, Trondheim, Norway.
   Google Scholar