Numerical study and acoustic analysis of propeller and hull surface vessel in self-propulsion mode

References

• Bagheri MR, Seif MS, Mahdigholi H. 2013. Hydrodynamic and acoustic analysis of underwater propellers by numerical method. J Maritime Tech. 9:1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Bagheri MR, Mehdigholi H, Seif MS. 2014. An analysis of hydrodynamics and noise behavior for submerged propeller in various conditions by experimental and numerical methods. Modares Tech. Eng. 14:15–25.
   Google Scholar
• Bagheri MR, Seif MS, Mehdigholi H, Yaakob O. 2017. Analysis of noise behaviour for marine propellers under cavitating and non-cavitating conditions. Ships Offshore Struct. 12(1):1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlton J. 2018. Marine propellers and propulsion. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Kerwin JE, Lee CS. 1978. Prediction of steady and unsteady marine propeller performance by numerical lifting-surface theory. 8.
   Google Scholar
• Kim J. 2021. Experimental data for KCS resistance, sinkage, trim, and self-propulsion. in. Numerical Ship Hydrodynamics (Springer). 94:53–59.
   Google Scholar
• Lighthill MJ. 1952. On sound generated aerodynamically I. General Theory. Proc R Soc Lond. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences. 211:564–587.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgut M, Nobile E. 2012. Influence of grid type and turbulence model on the numerical prediction of the flow around marine propellers working in uniform inflow. Ocean Eng. 42:26–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özden MC, Gürkan AY, Özden YA, Canyurt TG, Korkut E. 2016. Underwater radiated noise prediction for a submarine propeller in different flow conditions. Ocean Eng. 126:488–500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan YC, Zhang HX. 2013. Numerical prediction of marine propeller noise in non-uniform inflow. China Ocean Eng. 27:33–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park C, Seol H, Kim K, Seong W. 2009. A study on propeller noise source localization in a cavitation tunnel. Ocean Eng. 36:754–762.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhee SH, Joshi S. 2005. Computational validation for flow around a marine propeller using unstructured mesh based navier-Stokes solver. JSME Int. J. Ser. B. 48:562–570.
   Google Scholar
• Salio MP. 2015. Numerical assessment of underwater noise radiated by a cruise ship. Ships Offshore Struct. 10(3):308–327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seol H, Jung B, Suh JC, Lee S. 2002. Prediction of non-cavitating underwater propeller noise. J Sound Vib. 257:131–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seol H, Suh JC, Lee S. 2005. Development of hybrid method for the prediction of underwater propeller noise. J Sound Vib. 288:345–360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shayanpoor AA, Hajivand A, Moore M. 2020. Hydroelastic analysis of composite marine propeller basis fluid-structure interaction (FSI). International J Maritime Tech. 13:51–59.
   Google Scholar
• Streckwall H. 1986. A method to predict the extent of cavitation on marine propellers by lifting-surface-theory. In International Symposium on cavitation; Sendai, Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Wang Z. 2014. Study on the hydrodynamic characteristic and scale effect of a ship equipped with the hybrid CRP pod propulsion system [D]. Wuhan: Naval University of Engineering.
   Google Scholar
• Watanabe T, Kawamura T, Takekoshi Y, Maeda M, Shin Hyung R. 2003. Simulation of steady and unsteady cavitation on a marine propeller using a RANS CFD code. Proceedings of The fifth International Symposium on cavitation (Cav. citeseer).
   Google Scholar
• Ye JM, Xiong Y, Fang LI, Wang ZZ. 2012. Numerical prediction of blade frequency noise of cavitating propeller. J Hydrodynamics. Ser. B. 24:371–377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zou D, Zhang J, Liu G, Ta N, Rao Z. 2020. Study on characteristics of propeller exciting force induced by axial vibration of propulsion shafting: theoretical analysis. Ocean Eng. 202:106942. doi:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.106942.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zou D, Xu J, Zhang J, Lv F, Ta N, Rao Z. 2021. The hydroelastic analysis of marine propellers considering the effect of the shaft: theory and experiment. Ocean Eng. 221:108547. doi:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.108547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar