Influence of the offshore electrical platform on the dynamic responses of converter valve under sea waves and earthquakes

References

• Abdel Raheem SE. 2013. Nonlinear response of fixed jacket offshore platform under structural and wave loads. Coupled Syst Mech. 2:111–126.
   Google Scholar
• Abdel Raheem SE, Abdel Aal EM, Abdelshafy AGA, Fahmy MFM. 2021. Seismic response analysis of fixed jacket-type offshore structures based on power spectrum density driven input. Ships Offshore Struct. https://doi.org/10.1080/17445302.2021.1884808.
   Google Scholar
• Ekstrom A, Eklund L. 1987. HVDC thyristor valve development. IEEE Trans Power Electron. 2(3):177–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao B, Zhang W, Yu H, Liu G. 2018. Anti seismic design of a supported converter valve tower. Mach Des Manu Eng. 47(11):35–39.
   Google Scholar
• GB50260-2013. 2013. Code for seismic design of electrical installations. Beijing.
   Google Scholar
• Golafshani AA, Tabeshpour MR, Komachi Y. 2009. FEMA approaches in seismic assessment of jacket platforms (case study: Ressalat jacket of Persian gulf). J Constr Steel Res. 65(10-11):1979–1986.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gou R. 2019. Research on 1100kV/5500A ultra-high voltage thyristor valve key technology and its application. IEEE Trans Power Electron. 34(11):10524–10533.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hao W. 2017. Research on VSC-HVDC converter station application on offshore platform. S Energy Constr. 4(01):66–70.
   Google Scholar
• He C, Xie Q, Yang Z, Xue S. 2019. Seismic performance evaluation and improvement of ultra-high voltage wall bushing-valve Hall system. J Constr Steel Res. 154:123–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He X. 2009. Multi-Dimensional seismic response analysis and vibration control of offshore platform under ambient excitation. Dalian: Dalian University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Kaul MK. 1978. Stochastic characterization of earthquakes through their response spectrum. Earthquake Eng Struct D. 6(5):497–509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larder RA, Gallagher RP, Nilsson B. 2002. Innovative seismic design aspects of the intermountain power project converter stations. IEEE T Power Deliver. 4(3):1708–1714.
   Google Scholar
• Li S, Tsang H, Cheng Y, Lu Z. 2017. Considering seismic interaction effects in designing steel supporting structure for surge arrester. J Constr Steel Res. 132:151–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu S. 2021. Research on compact layout of large capacity offshore flexible DC converter station. S Energy Constr. 8(01):45–50.
   Google Scholar
• Liu X, Chen M, Liang C, Tang H, Zhang Q. 2020. Investigation on distribution of electro-thermal coupled field and improved design of ±1100 kV converter valve-side bushing. IET Sci Meas Technol. 14(2):188–197. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-smt.2019.0089.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammadi RK, Akrami V, Nikfar F. 2012. Dynamic properties of substation support structures. J Constr Steel Res. 78:173–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morison JR, Johnson JW, Schaaf SA. 1950. The force exerted by surface waves on piles, petroleum trans. J Pet Technol. 2(5):0–0.
   Google Scholar
• Mosalam KM, Günay S. 2014. Seismic performance evaluation of high voltage disconnect switches using real-time hybrid simulation: I. System development and validation. Earthquake Eng Struct D. 43(8):1205–1222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakagaki S, Uchida T. 1991. Studies on aseismic measure for multistage thyristor valves. IEEE T Power Deliver. 6(4):1819–1824.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ou J, Long X, Li Q, Xiao Y. 2007. Vibration control of steel jacket offshore platform structures with damping isolation systems. Eng Struct. 29(7):1525–1538.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park M, Koo W, Kawano K. 2012. Numerical analysis of the dynamic response of an offshore platform with a pile-soil Foundation system subjected to random waves and currents. J Waterway, Port, Coastal Ocean Eng. 138(4):275–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seismosoft. 2013. SeismoMatch v2.1 – a computer program for spectrum matching of earthquake records. USA.
   Google Scholar
• Shahi SK, Ba Ker JW. 2007. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center (PEER) – lifeline partnership 2. Univ Calif. 131(3):428–437.
   Google Scholar
• Shi Y, Wang Z. 2019. Calculating for surface electric field of converter valve shield system with fast multipole curved boundary element method. J Eng. 2019(16):1575–1579.
   Google Scholar
• Sun Z, Bi C, Zhao S, Dong G, Yu H. 2019a. Experimental analysis on dynamic responses of an electrical platform for an offshore wind farm under earthquake load. J Marine Sci Eng. 7(8):279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun Z, Jin W, Fang T, Tang Q, Yu H, Ma Y. 2019b. On the vibration comfortableness of offshore substation under ship impact conditions. Ocean Eng. 37(05):148–155.
   Google Scholar
• Wang S, Li H, Ji C, Jiao G. 2002. Energy analysis for TMD-structure systems subjected to impact loading. China Ocean Eng. 16(3):301–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang W, Gao Z, Li X, Moan T. 2017. Model test and numerical analysis of a multi-pile offshore wind turbine under seismic, wind, wave, and current loads. J Offshore Mech Arctic Eng. 139(3):V6T–V9T.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang W, Li X, Zhao H, Wang B, Li Y. 2020. Vibration control of a pentapod offshore wind turbine under combined seismic wind and wave loads using multiple tuned mass damper. Appl Ocean Res. 103:102254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei K, Myers AT, Arwade SR. 2017. Dynamic effects in the response of offshore wind turbines supported by jackets under wave loading. Eng Struct. 142:36–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Z, Xie Q, He C, Zhuo R. 2017. Vibration control Technology and seismic response of UHVDC converter valves. Proc CSEE. 37(23):6821–6828.
   Google Scholar
• Yang Z, Xie Q, Zhou Y, Mosalam KM. 2018. Seismic performance and restraint system of suspended 800 kV thyristor valve. Eng Struct. 169:179–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu Y. 1999. Random wave and its applications to engineering. Dalian: Dalian University of Technology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zareie S, Alam MS, Seethaler RJ, Zabihollah A. 2020. Stability control of a novel frame integrated with an SMA-MRF control system for marine structural applications based on the frequency analysis. Appl Ocean Res. 97:102091.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zareie S, Zabihollah A. 2020. A semi-active SMA-MRF structural stability element for seismic control in marine structures. Appl Ocean Res. 100:102161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang B, Han Q, Zhang X. 2017. Recent advances in vibration control of offshore platforms. Nonlinear Dynam. 89(2):755–771.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang D, Bi C, Wu G, Zhao S, Dong G. 2019. Laboratory experimental investigation on the hydrodynamic responses of an extra-large electrical platform in wave and storm conditions. Water-Sui. 11(10):2042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao S, Bi C, Sun Z. 2021. Engineering analysis of the dynamic characteristics of an electrical jacket platform of an offshore wind farm under seismic loads. Appl Ocean Res. 112:102692.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu R, Lin N, Dinavahi V, Liang G. 2020. An accurate and fast method for conducted EMI modeling and simulation of MMC-Based HVdc converter station. IEEE T Power Electron. 35(5):4689–4702.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu Y, Xie J, Gong P. 1995. Research on the applicability of various wave spectra in marine engineering. Acta Oceanol Sin. 17(06):126–131.
   Google Scholar