Bayesian and machine learning-based fault detection and diagnostics for marine applications

References

• Adegoke NA, Abbasi SA, Dawod ABA, Pawley MDM. 2019. Enhancing the performance of the EWMA control chart for monitoring the process mean using auxiliary information. Qual Reliab Eng Int [Internet]. [accessed 2019 Jul 13]. 35(4):920–933. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/qre.2436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amin T, Khan F, Imtiaz S. 2018, October. Fault detection and pathway analysis using a dynamic Bayesian network. Chem Eng Sci [Internet]. DOI:10.1016/j.ces.2018.10.024.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atoui MA, Verron S, Kobi A. 2015. Fault detection and diagnosis in a Bayesian network classifier incorporating probabilistic boundary. IFAC-PapersOnLine. 28(place unknown):670–675.
   Google Scholar
• Babaleye A, Kurt R. 2020. Safety analysis of offshore decommissioning operation through Bayesian network. Ships Offshore Struct. 15(1):99–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badodkar DN, Dwarakanath TA. 2017. Machines, mechanism and robotics. In: Badodkar DN, Dwarakanath TA, editors. Proceeding INA 2017 [Internet]. 1st ed. Mumbai: Springer; p. 841; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-981-10-8597-0.
   Google Scholar
• Bangalore P, Patriksson M. 2018. Analysis of SCADA data for early fault detection, with application to the maintenance management of wind turbines. Renew Energy [Internet]. [accessed 2019 Jan 25]. 115:521–532. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0960148117308340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayes Fusion LLC. 2019. GeNIe Modeler. Genie.:588.
   Google Scholar
• Bilmes J. 2004. On virtual evidence and soft evidence in Bayesian networks. Seattle. http://www.ee.washington.edu.
   Google Scholar
• Bowerman BL, O’Connell RT, Murphree ES. 2015. Regression analysis unified concepts, practical applications, and computer implementation. [place unknown].
   Google Scholar
• Cai B, Huang L, Xie M. 2017. Bayesian networks in fault diagnosis. IEEE Trans Ind Informatics. 13(5):2227–2240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai B, Liu H, Xie M. 2016. A real-time fault diagnosis methodology of complex systems using object-oriented Bayesian networks. Mech Syst Signal Process. 80:31–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campora U, Cravero C, Zaccone R. 2018. Marine gas turbine monitoring and diagnostics by simulation and pattern recognition. Int J Nav Archit Ocean Eng [Internet]. 10(5):617–628. DOI:10.1016/j.ijnaoe.2017.09.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çelik M, Dadaşer-Çelik F, Dokuz AŞ. 2011. Anomaly detection in temperature data using DBSCAN algorithm. INISTA 2011 – 2011 International Symposium on Innovations in Intelligent Systems and Applications. p. 91–95.
   Google Scholar
• Cheliotis M, Gkerekos C, Lazakis I, Theotokatos G. 2019. A novel data condition and performance hybrid imputation method for energy efficient operations of marine systems. Ocean Eng. 188. DOI:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.106220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheliotis M, Lazakis I, Theotokatos G. 2020. Machine learning and data-driven fault detection for ship systems operations. Ocean Eng [Internet]. 216(September):107968. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0029801820309203.
   Google Scholar
• Chen Z, Li YF. 2011. Anomaly detection based on enhanced DBScan algorithm. Procedia Eng [Internet]. [accessed 2019 Jun 26]. 15:178–182. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877705811015372.
   Google Scholar
• Chojnacki E, Plumecocq W, Audouin L. 2019. An expert system based on a Bayesian network for fire safety analysis in nuclear area. Fire Saf J [Internet]. 105(October 2018):28–40. DOI:10.1016/j.firesaf.2019.02.007.
   Google Scholar
• Coraddu A, Oneto L, Cipollini F, Kalikatzarakis M. 2021. Physical, data-driven and hybrid approaches to model engine exhaust gas temperatures in operational conditions. Ships Offshore Struct. 1–22. DOI:10.1080/17445302.2021.1920095.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diakaki C, Panagiotidou N, Pouliezos A, Kontes GD, Stavrakakis GS, Belibassakis K, Gerostathis TP, Livanos G, Pagonis DN, Theotokatos G. 2015. A decision support system for the development of voyage and maintenance plans for ships. Int J Decis Support Syst. 1:42–71.
   Google Scholar
• Dikis K, Lazakis I, Theotokatos G. 2015. Dynamic reliability analysis tool for ship machinery maintenance. Towar Green Mar Technol Transp. 619–626.
   Google Scholar
• EMSA. 2018. Annual overview of marine casualties and incidents 2018 [Internet]. Lisbon. http://www.emsa.europa.eu/publications/technical-reports-studies-and-plans/download/5425/3406/23.html.
   Google Scholar
• Gaonkar M, Sawant K. 2013. Auto Eps DBSCAN: DBSCAN with Eps automatic for large dataset. Int J Adv Comput Theory Eng. 2(2):11–16.
   Google Scholar
• Garoudja E, Harrou F, Sun Y, Kara K, Chouder A, Silvestre S. 2017. Statistical fault detection in photovoltaic systems. Sol Energy [Internet]. 150:485–499. DOI:10.1016/j.solener.2017.04.043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrou F, Nounou MN, Nounou HN, Madakyaru M. 2015. PLS-based EWMA fault detection strategy for process monitoring. J Loss Prev Process Ind [Internet]. [accessed 2019 Feb 7]. 36:108–119. DOI:10.1016/j.jlp.2015.05.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Homik W. 2010. Diagnostics, maintenance and regeneration of torsional vibration dampers for crankshafts of ship diesel engines. Polish Marit Res. 17(1):62–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horný M. 2014. Bayesian networks: A technical report. Commun ACM [Internet]. 53(5):15. http://www.bu.edu/sph/files/2014/05/bayesian-networks-final.pdf%0Ahttp://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=1859204.1859227.
   Google Scholar
• Hountalas DT. 2000. Prediction of marine diesel engine performance under fault conditions. Appl Therm Eng. 20(18):1753–1783.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isermann R. 2006. Fault-diagnosis systems. In: Isermann R, editor. An introduction from fault detection to fault tolerance [Internet]. Darmstadt: Springer; [accessed 2019 Jun 24]. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2F3-540-30368-5.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• ISO. 2008. ISO 3046-1:2002 Reciprocating internal combustion engines: performance: Part 1: declarations of power, fuel and lubricating oil consumptions, and test methods: additional requirements for engines for general use [Internet]; p. 40. https://www.iso.org/standard/28330.html.
   Google Scholar
• Jardine AKS, Lin D, Banjevic D. 2006. A review on machinery diagnostics and prognostics implementing condition-based maintenance. Mech Syst Signal Process. 20(7):1483–1510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karatug C, Arslanoglu Y. 2020. Importance of early fault diagnosis for marine diesel engines: a case study on efficiency management and environment. Ships Offshore Struct. 15:1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Karvelis P, Georgoulas G, Kappatos V, Stylios C. 2021. Deep machine learning for structural health monitoring on ship hulls using acoustic emission method. Ships Offshore Struct. 16(4):440–448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kobbacy KA. 2008. Complex system maintenance handbook. 1st ed. New Jersey: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Korb KB, Nicholson AE. 2010. Bayesian artificial intelligence. 2nd ed. New York: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Korczewski Z. 2016. Exhaust gas temperature measurements in diagnostics of turbocharged marine internal combustion engines Part II dynamic measurements. Polish Marit Res. 23(1):68–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotsiantis SB, Kanellopoulos D, Pintelas PE. 2006. Data preprocessing for supervised learning. Int J Comput Sci [Internet]. 1(2):111–117. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.132.5127&rep=rep1&type=pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Langseth H, Portinale L. 2007. Bayesian networks in reliability. Reliab Eng Syst Saf. 92(1):92–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law AM. 2009. How to build valid and credible simulation models. Proceedings – Winter Simulation Conference; p. 24–33.
   Google Scholar
• Lazakis I, Gkerekos C, Theotokatos G. 2018. Investigating an SVM-driven, one-class approach to estimating ship systems condition. Ships Offshore Struct. 14:432–441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazakis I, Turan O, Aksu S. 2010. Increasing ship operational reliability through the implementation of a holistic maintenance management strategy. Ships Offshore Struct [Internet]. [accessed 2020 Jan 22]. 5(4):337–357. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/17445302.2010.480899.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MAN B&W. 2014. Influence of ambient temperature conditions. Copenhagen: MAN Diesel and Turbo.
   Google Scholar
• MAN B&W. 2017. Operational and maintenance manual. Operating Manuals. 1(1):1438.
   Google Scholar
• Martinez-Guerra R, Luis Mata-Machuca J. 2013. In: Martinez-Guerra R, Luis Mata-Machuca J, editors. Understanding complex systems fault detection and diagnosis in nonlinear systems: A differential and algebraic viewpoint [Internet]. London: Springer; [accessed 2019 Jun 24]. http://www.springer.com/series/5394.
   Google Scholar
• McKee KK, Forbes GL, Mazhar I, Entwistle R, Howard I. 2014. Engineering Asset Management 2011: Proceedings of the Sixth World Congress on Engineering Asset Management. In: Lee J, Ni J, Sarangapani J, Mathew J, editors. 1st ed. London: Springer; p. 259–272.
   Google Scholar
• Mohanty AR. 2015. Machinery condtion monitoring. 1st ed. [place unknown]: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Mrad AB, Delcroix V, Maalej MA, Piechowiak S, Abid M. 2012. Communications in Computer and information science. In: Greco S, Bouchon-Meunier B, Coletti G, Fedrizzi M, Matarazzo B, Yager R, editors. Advances in Computational intelligence. Catania: Springer; p. 626.
   Google Scholar
• Müller AC, Guido S. 2015. Introduction to Machine Learning with Python and Scikit-Learn. 1st ed. Schanafelt D, editor. Sebastopol: O’Reily. http://kukuruku.co/hub/python/introduction-to-machine-learning-with-python-andscikit-learn.
   Google Scholar
• Nounou M, Nounou H, Mansouri M, Harkat MF, Al-khazraji A, Hajji M. 2018. Wavelet optimized EWMA for fault detection and application to photovoltaic systems. Sol Energy [Internet]. [accessed 2019 Feb 7]. 167:125–136. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0038092X18303050.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olive DJ. 2005. Linear regression. 1st ed. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Rahmah N, Sitanggang IS. 2016. Determination of Optimal Epsilon (Eps) value on DBSCAN Algorithm to Clustering Data on Peatland Hotspots in Sumatra. In: IOP Conference Series: Earth Environmental Science. Vol. 31. [place unknown]; p. 12012.
   Google Scholar
• Ranachowski Z, Bejger A. 2005. Fault diagnostics of the fuel injection system of a medium power maritime diesel engine with application of acoustic signal. Arch Acoust. 30(4):465–472.
   Google Scholar
• Raptodimos Y, Lazakis I. 2018. Using artificial neural network-self-organising map for data clustering of marine engine condition monitoring applications. Ships Offshore Struct [Internet]. 13(6):649–656. DOI:10.1080/17445302.2018.1443694.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riascos LAM, Simoes MG, Miyagi PE. 2007. A Bayesian network fault diagnostic system for proton exchange membrane fuel cells. J Power Sources [Internet]. [accessed 2019 Mar 5]. 165(1):267–278. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378775306025262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruggeri F, Faltin F, Kenett R. 2007. Bayesian networks. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Comput Stat [Internet]. 1(3):307–315. DOI:10.1002/wics.48.
   Google Scholar
• Saltelli A. 2004. Sensitivity analysis in practice: a guide to assessing scientific models (Google eBook) [Internet]. [place unknown]. http://books.google.com/books?id=NsAVmohPNpQC&pgis=1.
   Google Scholar
• Schlechtingen M, Santos IF. 2014. Wind turbine condition monitoring based on SCADA data using normal behavior models. part 2: application examples. Appl Soft Comput J [Internet]. [accessed 2019 Jan 25]. 14(PART C):447–460. DOI:10.1016/j.asoc.2013.09.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlechtingen M, Santos IF, Achiche S. 2013. Wind turbine condition monitoring based on SCADA data using normal behavior models. Part 1: system description. Appl Soft Comput J [Internet]. [accessed 2019 Jan 24]. 13(1):259–270. DOI:10.1016/j.asoc.2012.08.033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schubert E, Sander J, Ester M, Kriegel HP, Xu X. 2017. DBSCAN revisited, revisited: Why and how you should (still) use DBSCAN. ACM Trans Database Syst. 42(3):1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva AA, Gupta S, Bazzi AM, Ulatowski A. 2018. Wavelet-based information filtering for fault diagnosis of electric drive systems in electric ships. ISA Trans [Internet]. [accessed 2019 Sep 23]. 78:105–115. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S001905781730544X.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan Y, Niu C, Tian H, Lin Y, Zhang J. 2020. Decay detection of a marine gas turbine with contaminated data based on isolation forest approach. Ships Offshore Struct. 16(5):546–556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanasa D, Trousse B. 2004. Advanced data preprocessing for intersites Web usage mining. Intell Syst IEEE. 19(2):59–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tantele EA, Onoufriou T. 2009. Optimum preventative maintenance strategies using genetic algorithms and Bayesian updating. Ships Offshore Struct [Internet]. 5302. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/17445300903247162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thang TM, Kim J. 2011. The anomaly detection by using DBSCAN clustering with multiple parameters. 2011 Int Conf Inf Sci Appl ICISA 2011.:1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Theotokatos G, Tzelepis V. 2015. A computational study on the performance and emission parameters mapping of a ship propulsion system. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part M J Eng Marit Environ. 229(1):58–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turan O, Olcer AI, Lazakis I, Rigo P, Caprace JD. 2009. Maintenance/repair and production-oriented life cycle cost/earning model for ship structural optimisation during conceptual design stage. Ships Offshore Struct. 4(2):107–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang J, Wang Z, Stetsyuk V, Ma X, Gu F, Li W. 2019. Exploiting Bayesian networks for fault isolation: a diagnostic case study of diesel fuel injection system. ISA Trans [Internet]. 86:276–286. DOI:10.1016/j.isatra.2018.10.044.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Z, Zhiwei W, He S, Gu X, Yan ZF. 2017. Fault detection and diagnosis of chillers using Bayesian network merged distance rejection and multi-source non-sensor information. Appl Energy. 188:200–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodyard D. 2009. In: Butterworth Heineman, editor. Manire diesel engines and gas turbines. 9th ed. Oxford: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Yu J, Smith VA, Wang PP, Hartemink AJ, Jarvis ED. 2004. Advances to Bayesian network inference for generating causal networks from observational biological data. Bioinformatics. 20(18):3594–3603.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaher A, McArthur SDJ, Infield DG, Patel Y. 2009. Online wind turbine fault detection through automated SCADA data analysis. Wind Energy. 12(6):574–593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhan Y, Bin SZ, Shwe T, Wang XZ. 2007. Fault diagnosis of marine main engine cylinder cover based on vibration signal. In: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference Machine Learning and Cybernetics ICMLC 2007 [Internet]. Vol. 2. [place unknown]: IEEE; [accessed 2019 Jun 25]; p. 1126–1130. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4370313/.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao Y, Wen J, Xiao F, Yang X, Wang S. 2017. Diagnostic Bayesian networks for diagnosing air handling units faults – part I: faults in dampers, fans, filters and sensors. Appl Therm Eng. 111:1272–1286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng X, Yao W, Xu Y, Chen X. 2019. Improved compression inference algorithm for reliability analysis of complex multistate satellite system based on multilevel Bayesian network. Reliab Eng Syst Saf [Internet]. 189(March):123–142. DOI:10.1016/j.ress.2019.04.011.
   Google Scholar