Numerical investigation of the hull girder ultimate strength under realistic cyclic loading derived from long-term hydroelastic analysis

References

• Abaqus. 2019. Dassault systemes simulia corp. Johnston, RI, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Adamchak JC. 1982. ULSTR: a program for estimating the collapse moment of a ship’s hull under longitudinal bending. Technical Report. David W Taylor Naval Ship Research and Development Center Bethesda MD.
   Google Scholar
• American Bureau of Shipping (ABS). 2020. Guidance notes on nonlinear finite element analysis of marine and offshore structures.
   Google Scholar
• Amlashi HK, Moan T. 2008. Ultimate strength analysis of a bulk carrier hull girder under alternate hold loading condition–a case study: Part 1: Nonlinear finite element modelling and ultimate hull girder capacity. Mar. Struct. 21:327–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bureau Veritas. 2019a. Guidance for long-term hydro-structure calculations.
   Google Scholar
• Bureau Veritas. 2019b. Mars 2000 – 2D ship structural assessment software. User’s Guide.
   Google Scholar
• Bureau Veritas. 2021. Structural rules for container ships NR625.
   Google Scholar
• Caldwell J. 1965. Ultimate longitudinal strength. Trans. RINA. 107:411–430.
   Google Scholar
• Chaboche JL. 1986. Time-independent constitutive theories for cyclic plasticity. Int J Plast. 2:149–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaboche JL. 2008. A review of some plasticity and viscoplasticity constitutive theories. Int J Plast. 24:1642–1693.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaboche JL, Dang-Van K, Cordier G. 1979. Modelization of the strain memory effect on the cyclic hardening of 316 stainless steel. in: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on SMiRT, Div. L, Berlin, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Sun W, Chan TM. 2014. Cyclic stress-strain behavior of structural steel with yieldstrength up to 460 N/mm2. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng. 8(2):178–186.
   Google Scholar
• Cui HW, Yang P. 2018. Ultimate strength and failure characteristics research on steel box girders under cyclic-bending moments. J Mar Sci Technol. 23(4):926–936.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cummins W. 1962. The impulse response function and ship motions. Technical Report. David Taylor Model Basin Washington DC.
   Google Scholar
• Darie I, Roerup J, Wolf V. 2013. Ultimate strength of a cape size bulk carrier under combined global and local loads, in: Proc 12th Symp Practical Design of Ships and Other Floating Structures, pp. 1173–1180.
   Google Scholar
• De Lauzon J, Grgic M, Derbanne Q, Malenica S. 2015. Improved generalized wagner model for slamming, in: Proceedings of 7th international conference on hydroelasticity in marine technology, Split, Croatia, pp. 561–574.
   Google Scholar
• Derbanne Q, Bigot F, de Hauteclocque G. 2012. Comparison of design wave approach and short term approach with increased wave height in the evaluation of whipping induced bending moment. In International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering (Vol. 44892, pp. 299–308). American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Fujikubo M, Tatsumi A. 2017. Progressive collapse analysis of a container ship under combined longitudinal bending moment and bottom local loads, in: Progress in the Analysis and Design of Marine Structures. CRC Press, pp. 235–242.
   Google Scholar
• Fujikubo M, Yanagihara D, Setoyama Y, Olaru DV. 2003. Isum approach for collapse analysis of double-bottom structures in ships. Int J Offshore Polar Eng, 13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fukumoto Y, Kusama H. 1985. Cyclic bending tests of thin-walled box beams. Doboku Gakkai Ronbunshu. 1985(356):141–151.
   Google Scholar
• IACS. 2001. Standard wave data rec. 34, Rev. 1.
   Google Scholar
• IACS. 2015. Longitudinal strength standard for container ships (UR S11A).
   Google Scholar
• Iijima K, Fujikubo M. 2018. Hydro-elastoplastic behaviour of vlfs under extreme vertical bending moment by segmented beam approach. Mar. Struct. 57:1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iijima K, Kimura K, Xu W, Fujikubo M. 2011. Hydroelasto-plasticity approach to predicting the post-ultimate strength behavior of a ship’s hull girder in waves. J Mar Sci Technol. 16:379–389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ISSC. 2018. Committee III. 1: ultimate strength. In Proceedings of the 20th International Ship and Offshore Structures Congress. IOS Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jagite G, Bigot F, Derbanne Q, Malenica Š, Le Sourne H, de Lauzon J, Cartraud P. 2019a. Numerical investigation on dynamic ultimate strength of stiffened panels considering real loading scenarios. Ships Offshore Struct. 1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jagite G, Bigot F, Derbanne Q, Malenica Š, Le Sourne H, de Lauzon J, Cartraud P. 2020a. A parametric study on the dynamic ultimate strength of a stiffened panel subjected to wave- and whipping-induced stresses. Ships Offshore Struct. 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jagite G, Le Sourne H, Cartraud P, Bigot F, Derbanne Q, Malenica Š. 2019b. Examination of the dynamic effects on the hull girder ultimate strength of ultra large container ships, in: Trends in the Analysis and Design of Marine Structures: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Marine Structures (MARSTRUCT), Dubrovnik, Croatia, CRC Press. pp. 137–149.
   Google Scholar
• Jagite G, le Sourne H, Cartraud P, Bigot F, Derbanne Q, Malenica Š. 2020b. Dynamic ultimate strength of a container ship under sagging condition. In ASME 2020 39th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering.
   Google Scholar
• Jia Z, Yang Y, He Z, Ma H, Ji F. 2019. Mechanical test study on corroded marine high performance steel under cyclic loading. Appl Ocean Res. 93:101942.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalnins A, Rudolph J, Willuweit A. 2015. Using the nonlinear kinematic hardening material model of Chaboche for elastic–plastic ratcheting analysis. J. Press. Vessel Technol. 137(3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krolo P, Grandić D, Smolčić Ž. 2016. Experimental and numerical study of mild steel behaviour under cyclic loading with variable strain ranges. Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehmann E. 2006. Discussion on report of Committee III. 1: ultimate strength. Proceedings of 16th ISSC, Southampton, UK, 2006. 3:121–131.
   Google Scholar
• Lemaitre J, Chaboche JL. 1994. Mechanics of solid materials. Cambridge university press.
   Google Scholar
• Li S, Hu Z, Benson S. 2020. Progressive collapse analysis of ship hull girders subjected to extreme cyclic bending. Mar. Struct. 73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin YC, Chen XM, Chen G. 2011. Uniaxial ratcheting and low-cycle fatigue failure behaviors of AZ91D magnesium alloy under cyclic tension deformation. J Alloys and Compd. 509(24):6838–6843.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindemann T, Kaeding P. 2017. Application of the idealized structural unit method for ultimate strength analyses of stiffened plate structures. Ship Technol Res. 64:15–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu B, Soares CG. 2020. Ultimate strength assessment of ship hull structures subjected to cyclic bending moments. Ocean Eng. 215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma H, Yang Y, He Z, Jia Z, Zhang Y. 2018. Experimental study on constitutive relation of the high performance marine structural steel under extreme cyclic loads. Ocean Eng. 168:204–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsumoto T, Shigemi T, Kidogawa M, Ishibashi K, Sugimoto K. 2016. Examination of effect of lateral loads on the hull girder ultimate strength of large container ships, in: ASME 2016 35th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Paik JK. 2018. Ultimate limit state design of steel-plated structures. 2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Paik JK, Kim D, Park D, Kim H, Mansour A, Caldwell J. 2013. Modified paik-mansour formula for ultimate strength calculations of ship hulls. Ships Offshore Struct. 8:245–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paik JK, Lee DH, Noh SH, Park DK, Ringsberg JW. 2020. Full-scale collapse testing of a steel stiffened plate structure under cyclic axial-compressive loading. Mar. Struct. J. 26:996–1009. Elsevier.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paik JK, Mansour AE. 1995. A simple formulation for predicting the ultimate strength of ships. J Mar Sci Technol. 1:52–62.
   Google Scholar
• Paik JK, Thayamballi AK, Che J, Pedersen P, Mansour A. 1996. Ultimate strength of ship hulls under combined vertical bending, horizontal bending, and shearing forces. discussion. authors’ closure. Trans.-Society of Nav Archit Mar Eng. 104:31–59.
   Google Scholar
• Pei Z, Iijima K, Fujikubo M, Tanaka S, Okazawa S, Yao T. 2015. Simulation on progressive collapse behaviour of whole ship model under extreme waves using idealized structural unit method. Mar. Struct. 40:104–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith CS. 1977. Influence of local compressive failure on ultimate longitudinal strength of a ship’s hull. Proc. Int. Sym. on Practical Design in Shipbuilding. 73–79.
   Google Scholar
• Taleb L, Cailletaud G. 2011. Cyclic accumulation of the inelastic strain in the 304L SS under stress control at room temperature: ratcheting or creep? Int J Plast. 27(12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanaka Y, Ando T, Hashizume Y, Tatsumi A, Fujikubo M. 2017. Experimental study on cumulative buckling deformation of stiffened panel subjected to cyclic loading. In Progress in the Analysis and Design of Marine Structures: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Marine Structures (MARSTRUCT), Lisbon, Portugal, CRC Press. pp. 319.
   Google Scholar
• Tanaka Y, Ogawa H, Tatsumi A, Fujikubo M. 2015. Analysis method of ultimate hull girder strength under combined loads. Ships Offshore Struct. 10:587–598.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tatsumi A, Fujikubo M. 2020. Ultimate strength of container ships subjected to combined hogging moment and bottom local loads part 1: nonlinear finite element analysis. Mar. Struct. 69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuitman J, Malenica Š. 2009. Fully coupled seakeeping, slamming, and whipping calculations. proceedings of the institution of mechanical engineers. Part M: J Eng for the Mar Environ. 223:439–456.
   Google Scholar
• Ueda Y, Sherif R. 1974. An ultimate transverse strength analysis of ship structure. J the Soc of Naval Archi of Japan. 309–324.
   Google Scholar
• Wójcik M, Skrzat A. 2021. Identification of chaboche–lemaitre combined isotropic–kinematic hardening model parameters assisted by the fuzzy logic analysis. Acta Mech. 232(2):685–708.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xia T, Yang P, Li C, Hu K. 2019. Numerical research on residual ultimate strength of ship hull plates under uniaxial cyclic loads. Ocean Eng. 172:385–395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yao T, Nikolov PI. 1990. Buckling/plastic collapse of plates under cyclic loading. J the Society of Naval Archit of Japan. 1990:449–462.
   Google Scholar
• Yao T, Nikolov PI. 1992. Progressive collapse analysis of a ship’s hull under longitudinal bending (2nd report). J the Society of Naval Archit of Japan. 437–446.
   Google Scholar