The dynamic ultimate strength of stiffened panels under axial impact loading

References

• Ao L, Wang DY. 2016. Ultimate torsional strength of cracked stiffened box girders with a large deck opening. Int J Nav Architect Ocean Eng. 8(4):360–374. doi:10.1016/j.ijnaoe.2016.04.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ao L, Wang DY, Wu JM. 2019. A modified formula for predicting the ultimate strength of stiffened panels under longitudinal compression. Int J Offshore Polar Eng, ISOPE. 29(2):228–236. doi:10.17736/ijope.2019.ty04.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ari-Gur J, Simonetta SR. 1997. Dynamic pulse buckling of rectangular composite plates. Comp Part B. 28(B):301–308. doi:10.1016/S1359-8368(96)00028-5.
   Google Scholar
• Chen BQ, Soares CG. 2016. Effects of plate configurations on the weld induced deformations and strength of fillet-welded plates. Mar Struct. 50:243–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheong HK, Hao H, Cui S. 2000. Experimental investigation of dynamic post-buckling characteristics of rectangular plates under fluid-solid slamming. Eng Struct. 22(8):947–960. doi:10.1016/j.marstruc.2016.09.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowper GR, Symonds PS.. 1957. Strain-hardening and strain-rate effects in the impact loading of cantilever beams. Brown University, Division of Applied Mechanics, Report No. 28.
   Google Scholar
• Cui S, Cheong HK, Hao H. 1999. Experimental study of dynamic buckling of plates under fluid–solid slamming. Int J Impact Eng. 22(7):675–691. doi:10.1016/S0734-743X(99)00022-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui S, Hao H, Cheong HK. 2001. Numerical analysis of dynamic buckling of rectangular plates subjected to intermediate-velocity impact. Int J Impact Eng. 25(2):147–167. doi:10.1016/S0734-743X(00)00035-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujikubo M, Harada M, Yao T, Khedmati MR, Yanagihara D. 2005a. Estimation of ultimate strength of continuous stiffened panel under combined transverse thrust and lateral pressure, part 2: continuous stiffened panel. Mar Struct. 18:411–427. doi:10.1016/j.marstruc.2006.01.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujikubo M, Yao T. 1999. Elastic local buckling strength of stiffened plate considering plate/stiffener interaction and welding residual stress. Mar Struct. 12:543–564.
   Google Scholar
• Fujikubo M, Yao T, Khedmati MR, Harada M, Yanagihara D. 2005b. Estimation of ultimate strength of continuous stiffened panel under combined transverse thrust and lateral pressure, part 1: continuous plate. Mar Struct. 18:383–410. doi:10.1016/j.marstruc.2005.08.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordo JM, Soares GC. 2014. Experimental analysis of the effect of frame spacing variation on the ultimate bending moment of box girders. Mar Struct. 37:111–134. doi:10.1016/j.marstruc.2014.03.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iijima K, Fujikubo M. 2018. Hydro-elastoplastic behaviour of VLFS under extreme vertical bending moment by segmented beam approach. Mar Struct. 57:1–17. doi:10.1016/j.marstruc.2017.09.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iijima K, Kimura K, Xu WJ, Fujikubo M. 2011. Hydroelasto-plasticity approach to predicting the post-ultimate strength behavior of a ship's hull girder in waves. J Mar Sci Technol. 16(4):379–389. doi:10.1007/s00773-011-0142-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jagite G, Bigot F, Derbanne Q, Malenica S, Sourne HL, Cartraud P. 2021. A parametric study on the dynamic ultimate strength of a stiffened panel subjected to wave-and whipping-induced stresses. Ships Offshore Struct. 16(9):1025–1039. doi:10.1080/17445302.2020.1790985.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jagite G, Bigot F, Derbanne Q, Malenica S, Sourne HL, Lauzon J, Cartraud P. 2019. Numerical investigation on dynamic ultimate strength of stiffened panels considering real loading scenarios. Ships Offshore Struct. 14(sup1):374–386. doi:10.1080/17445302.2019.1601329.
   Google Scholar
• Ji ZH, Wang DY. 2014. Influence of load shape on dynamic response of cross-stiffened deck subjected to in-plane impact. Thin-Walled Struct. 82:212–220. doi:10.1016/j.tws.2014.04.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu W, Suzuki K, Shibanuma K. 2014. Nonlinear dynamic response and structural evaluation of container ship in large freak waves. J Offshore Mech Arct Eng. 137(1):011601. doi:10.1115/1.4028506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paik JK. 2018. Ultimate limit state analysis and design of plated structures. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons; p. 302–305.
   Google Scholar
• Paik JK, Amlashi H, Boon B, Branner K, Caridis P, Das P, Fujikubo M, Huang CH, Josefson L, Kaeding P, et al. 2012. Committee III.1 Ultimate Strength. Proceedings of the 18th International Ship and Offshore Structures Congress, Rostock, Germany, ISSC2012; p. 285–363.
   Google Scholar
• Paik JK, Kim DK, Kim MS. 2009. Ultimate strength performance of Suezmax tanker structures: pre-CSR versus CSR designs. Int J Marit Eng. 151(A2):39–58.
   Google Scholar
• Paik JK, Lee DH, Noh SH, Park DK, Ringsberg JW. 2020a. Full-scale collapse testing of a steel stiffened plate structure under axial-compressive loading triggered by brittle fracture at cryogenic condition. Ships Offshore Struct. 15(sup1):S29–S45. doi:10.1080/17445302.2020.1787930.
   Google Scholar
• Paik JK, Lee DH, Noh SH, Park DK, Ringsberg JW. 2020b. Full-scale collapse testing of a steel stiffened plate structure under cyclic axial-compressive loading. Struct. 26:996–1009. doi:10.1016/j.istruc.2020.05.026.
   Google Scholar
• Paik JK, Seo JK. 2009a. Nonlinear finite element method models for ultimate strength analysis of steel stiffened-plate structures under combined biaxial compression and lateral pressure actions—part I: plate elements. Thin-Walled Struct. 47(8):1008–1017. doi:10.1016/j.tws.2008.08.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paik JK, Seo JK. 2009b. Nonlinear finite element method models for ultimate strength analysis of steel stiffened-plate structures under combined biaxial compression and lateral pressure actions—part II: stiffened panels. Thin-Walled Struct. 47(8):1008–1017. doi:10.1016/j.tws.2008.08.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paik JK, Sohn JM. 2012. Effects of welding residual stresses on high tensile steel plate ultimate strength: nonlinear finite element method investigations. J Offshore Mech Arct Eng. 134(2). doi:1401.10.1115/1.4004510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paik JK, Thayamballi AK. 2000. Buckling strength of steel plating with elastically restrained edges. Thin-Walled Struct. 37(1):27–55. doi:10.1016/S0263-8231(00)00009-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paik JK, Thayamballi AK. 2003. An experimental investigation on the dynamic ultimate compressive strength of ship plating. Int J Impact Eng. 28(7):803–811. doi:10.1016/S0734-743X(02)00154-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ringsberg JW, Darie I, Nahshon K, Shilling G, Vaz MA, Benson S, Brubak L, Feng G, Fujikubo M, Gaiotti M, et al. 2021. The ISSC 2022 committee III. 1-ultimate strength benchmark study on the ultimate limit state analysis of a stiffened plate structure subjected to uniaxial compressive loads. Mar Struct. 79:103026. doi:10.1016/j.marstruc.2021.103026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith CS. 1977. Influence of local compressive failure on ultimate longitudinal strength of a ship's hull. PRADS.Tokyo, Japan. 73–79.
   Google Scholar
• Smith CS, Davidson PC, Chapman JC. 1988. Strength and stiffness of ships' plating under in-plane compression and tension. R Inst Nav Archit Trans. 130:277–296.
   Google Scholar
• Tekgoz M, Garbatov Y, Soares GC. 2018. Strength assessment of an intact and damaged container ship subjected to asymmetrical bending loadings. Mar Struct. 58:172–198. doi:10.1016/j.marstruc.2017.11.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ueda Y, Rashed SMH. 1984. The idealized structural unit method and its application to deep girder structures. Comput Struct. 18:277–293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiong YF, Wang DY. 2021. An empirical formula for predicting the dynamic ultimate strength of stiffened panels under longitudinal impact. Int J Offshore Polar Eng. 31(02):230–242. doi:10.17736/ijope.2021.ty10.
   Google Scholar
• Xu MC, Soares CG. 2013a. Experimental study on the collapse strength of narrow stiffened panels. J Offshore Mech Arct Eng. 135(2):021402. doi:10.1115/1.4007566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu MC, Soares GC. 2013b. Experimental study on the collapse strength of wide stiffened panels. Mar Struct. 30:33–62. doi:10.1016/j.marstruc.2012.10.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu MC, Soares GC. 2013c. Comparisons of calculations with experiments on the ultimate strength of wide stiffened panels. Mar Struct. 31(4):82–101. doi:10.1016/j.marstruc.2013.01.003.
   Google Scholar
• Xu W, Iijima K, Wada R, Fujikubo M. 2012. Experimental evaluation of the post-ultimate strength behavior of a ship’s hull girder in waves. J Mar Sci Appl. 11(1):34–43. doi:10.1007/s11804-012-1103-8.
   Google Scholar
• Yang B, Soares GC, Wang DY. 2018. An empirical formulation for predicting the dynamic ultimate strength of rectangular plates under in-plane compressive loading. Int J Mech Sci. 141:213–222. doi:10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.04.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang B, Soares GC, Wang DY. 2019. Dynamic ultimate compressive strength of simply supported rectangular plates under impact loading. Mar Struct. 66:258–271. doi:10.1016/j.marstruc.2019.05.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang B, Wang DY. 2016. Dynamic buckling of stiffened plates with elastically restrained edges under in-plane impact loading. Thin-Walled Struct. 107:427–442. doi:10.1016/j.tws.2016.06.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang B, Wang DY. 2017. Buckling strength of rectangular plates with elastically restrained edges subjected to in-plane impact loading. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part C. 231(20):3743–3752. doi:10.1177/0954406216652171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang B, Wang DY. 2018. Dynamic ultimate hull girder strength analysis on container ship under impact bending moments. Int J Offshore Polar Eng. 28(01):105–111. doi:10.17736/ijope.2018.ty02.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang N, Zong Z. 2011. The effect of rigid-body motions on the whipping response of a ship hull subjected to an underwater bubble. J Fluids Struct. 27(8):1326–1336. doi:10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2011.05.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar