Numerical investigation into motion responses of the intact and damaged DTMB 5415 based on the AMR method in regular waves

References

• Acanfora M, De Luca F. 2017. An experimental investigation on the dynamic response of a damaged ship with a realistic arrangement of the flooded compartment. Appl Ocean Res. 69:191–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Begovic E, Day AH, Incecik A, Mancini S, Pizzirusso D. 2015. Roll damping assessment of intact and damaged ship by CFD and EFD methods. Proceeding of 12th international Conference on the Stability of Ships and Ocean Vehicles, 13-19 June, glasgow, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Bu SX, Gu M. 2019. Study on the damaged ship motion coupled with damaged flow based on the unified viscous/potential prediction model. Proceeding of the 17th international ship stability workshop, 20-12 June, Helsinki, Finland.
   Google Scholar
• Celik IB, Ghia U, Roache PJ, Freitas CJ, Coleman H, Raad PE. 2008. Procedure for estimation and reporting of uncertainty due to discretization in CFD applications. J Fluids Eng. 130(7):078001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao Z, Wang Y, Su Y. 2020. On damaged ship motion and capsizing in beam waves due to sudden water ingress using the RANS method. Appl Ocean Res. 95:102047.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gokce MK, Kinaci OK. 2018. Numerical simulations of free roll decay of DTMB 5415. Ocean Eng. 159:539–551.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Handschel S, Köllisch N, Soproni JP, Abdel-Maksoud M. 2012. A numerical method for estimation of ship roll damping for large amplitudes 29th Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics Gothenburg. 26-31 August, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Haro MPE, Seo J, Sadat-Hosseini H, Seok W, Rhee SH, Stern F. 2017. Numerical simulations for the safe return to port of a damaged passenger ship in head or following seas. Ocean Eng. 143:305–318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ITTC Procedures and Guidelines. 2011. Practical Guidelines for Ship CFD Applications. 7.5-03-02-03.
   Google Scholar
• ITTC Procedures and Guidelines. 2021. Uncertainty Analysis in CFD Verification and Validation Methodology and Procedures 7.5-03-01-01 Rev 04.
   Google Scholar
• Kim JW, O’Sullivan J, Read A. 2012. Ringing Analysis on a Vertical Cylinder by Euler Overlay Method. OMAE, 84091.
   Google Scholar
• Lee S, You JM, Lee HH, Lim T, Rhee SH, Rhee KP. 2012. Preliminary tests of a damaged ship for CFD validation. International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering. 4:172–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee YG, Kim C, Park JH, Kim H, Lee I, Jin B. 2019. Numerical simulations of added resistance in regular head waves on a container ship. Brodogradnja/Shipbuilding. 2(70):61–86.
   Google Scholar
• Lim T, Seo J, Park ST, Rhee SH. 2015. Free-running model tests of a damaged ship in head and following seas. Proceeding of 12th international Conference on the Stability of Ships and Ocean Vehicles, 13-19 June, glasgow, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Mancini S, Begovic E, Day AH, Incecik A. 2018. Verification and validation of numerical modelling of DTMB 5415 roll decay. Ocean Eng. 162:209–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodrigues JM, Lavrov A, Hinostroza MA, Soares CG. 2018. Experimental and numerical investigation of the partial flooding of a barge model. Ocean Eng. 169:586–603.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruponen P, Kurvinen P, Saisto I, Harras J. 2013. Air compression in a flooded tank of a damaged ship. Ocean Eng. 57:64–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadat-Hosseini H, Kim D, Carrica PM, Rhee SH, Stern F. 2016. Urans simulations for a flooded ship in calm water and regular beam waves. Ocean Eng. 120:318–330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siddiqui MA, Greco M, Lugni C, Faltinsen OM. 2019. Experimental studies of a damaged ship section in forced heave motion. Appl Ocean Res. 88:254–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern F, Wilson RV, Coleman HW, Paterson EG. 2001. Comprehensive approach to verification and validation of CFD simulations—part 1: Methodology and procedures. J Fluids Eng. 123:793–802.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson RV, Carrica PM, Stern F. 2006. Unsteady RANS method for ship motions with application to roll for a surface combatant. Comput Fluids. 35:501–524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang XL, Li P, Mancini S. 2021b. Numerical investigation into the resistance performance for the damaged DTMB 5415 ship in calm water and regular waves. Ships Offshore Struct. 2000264. https://doi.org/10.1080/17445302.2021.2000264
   Google Scholar
• Zhang XL, Lin Z, Li P, Liu DK, Li Z, Pang ZW, Wang MQ. 2020. A numerical investigation on the effect of symmetric and asymmetric flooding on the damage stability of a ship. J Mar Sci Technol. 25(4):1151–1165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang XL, Lin Z, Mancini S, Pang Z, Li P, Liu F. 2021a. Numerical investigation into the effect of the internal opening arrangements on motion responses of a damaged ship. Appl Ocean Res. 117:102943.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar