Lines optimisation of an underwater vehicle using SMOTE and adaptive minimise LCB based dynamic surrogate models

References

• Balesdent M, Bérend N, Dépincé P, Chriette A. 2012. A survey of multidisciplinary design optimization methods in launch vehicle design. Struct Multidiscipl Optim. 45(5):619–642.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balling R, Sobieszczanski-Sobieski J. 1996. Optimization of coupled systems: A critical overview of approaches. AIAA J. 34(1):6–17.
   Google Scholar
• Braun RD. 1996. Collaborative optimization: an architecture for large-scale distributed design. Doctoral dissertation, Stanford University.
   Google Scholar
• Chawla N, Bowyer K, Hall L, Kegelmeyer WP. 2002. SMOTE: synthetic minority over-sampling technique. J Artif Intell Res. 16(1):321–357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• China Classification Society (CCS). 2018. Specification for classification of diving systems and submersibles. Beijing: China Communication Press, 20–29.
   Google Scholar
• Dennis JE, Torczon V. 1997. Managing approximation models in optimization. Multidiscip Des Optim: State-of-the-art. 5:330–347.
   Google Scholar
• Duan W, Tian L, Wang Z, Han W. 2014. Multidisciplinary optimization of etch process chamber on the basis of MCDM. J Mech Sci Technol. 28(11):4621–4633.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao M, Hong X, Chen S, Harris CJ. 2011. A combined SMOTE and PSO based RBF classifier for two-class imbalanced problems. Neurocomputing. 74(17):3456–3466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groves N, Huang T, Chang M. 1989. Geometric characteristics of DARPA (Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency) SUBOFF models (DTRC model numbers 5470 and 5471). Geometric characteristics of darpa suboff models.
   Google Scholar
• Han M, Den J. 2006. Improvement of collaborative optimization. J Mech Eng. 42(11):34–38.
   Google Scholar
• He Y, Wang D, Ali Z. 2020. A review of different designs and control models of remotely operated underwater vehicle. Meas Control. 53(9-10):1561–1570.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang HZ, Zhang X, Yuan W, Meng D, Zhang X. 2011. Collaborative reliability analysis under the environment of multidisciplinary design optimization. Concurrent Eng Res Appl. 19(3):245–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ji Z, Selamet A. 2000. Boundary element analysis of three-pass perforated duct mufflers. Noise Control Eng J. 48(5):151–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones D. 2001. A taxonomy of global optimization methods based on response surfaces. J Global Optim. 21(4):345–383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kikuta MY. 1999. A new preservation protocol for seawater ballast tanks in Naval applications. Mar Technol SNAME News. 36(01):11–21.
   Google Scholar
• Li X, Gong C, Gu L, Jing Z, Fang H, Gao R. 2019. A reliability-based optimization method using sequential surrogate model and Monte Carlo simulation. Struct Multidiscipl Optim. 59(2):439–460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu H, Huang T. 1998. Summary of DARPA suboff experimental program data. summary of darpa suboff experimental program data.
   Google Scholar
• Liu K, Luo W. 2016. Design of the lines of underwater vehicles based on collaborative optimization. J Mar Sci Technol. 21(4):1–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu X, Yuan Q, Zhao M, Cui W, Ge T. 2017. Multiple objective multidisciplinary design optimization of heavier-than-water underwater vehicle using CFD and approximation model. J Mar Sci Technol. 22(1):135–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo W, Guo X, Dai J, Rao T. 2021. Hull optimization of an underwater vehicle based on dynamic surrogate model. Ocean Eng. 230(1):1–13. Article ID: 109050.
   Google Scholar
• Luo W, Lyu W. 2015. An application of multidisciplinary design optimization to the hydrodynamic performances of underwater robots. Ocean Eng. 104:686–697.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meng Z, Zhang Z, Zhang D, Yang D. 2019. An active learning method combining Kriging and accelerated chaotic single loop approach (AK-ACSLA) for reliability-based design optimization. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 357(Dec.1):112570.1–112570.21.
   Google Scholar
• Muralidharan C, Anantharaman N, Deshmukh SG. 2001. Vendor rating in purchasing scenario: a confidence interval approach. Int J Oper Prod Manage. 21(10):1305–1326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roddy R. 1990. Investigation of the stability and control characteristics of several configurations of the DARPA suboff model (DTRC model 5470) from captive-model experiments.
   Google Scholar
• Schlichting H, Gersten K. 1979. Boundary-layer theory. 1979: boundary-layer theory.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson TW, Poplinski JD, Koch PN, Allen JK. 2001. Metamodels for computer-based engineering design: survey and recommendations. Eng Comput. 17(2):129–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Gelder L, Das P, Janssen H, Roels S. 2014. Comparative study of metamodelling techniques in building energy simulation: guidelines for practitioners. Simul Modell Practice Theory. 49:245–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang G. 2003. Adaptive response surface method using inherited latin hypercube design points. J Mech Des. 125(2):210–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Z, Wei H, Li Y. 2014. Multidisciplinary design optimization approach and its application to aerospace engineering. Chin Sci Bull. 59(36):5338–5353.
   Google Scholar
• Xiao M, Gao L, Qiu HB, Shao XY, Chu XZ. 2010. An approach based on enhanced collaborative optimization and kriging approximation in multidisciplinary design optimization. Adv Mat Res. 118-120:399–403.
   Google Scholar
• Xiao M, Gao L, Shao X, Qiu H, Jiang P. 2012. A generalised collaborative optimisation method and its combination with kriging metamodels for engineering design. J Eng Des. 23(5):379–399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xing J, Luo Y, Gao Z. 2020. A global optimization strategy based on the Kriging surrogate model and parallel computing. Struct Multidiscipl Optim. 62(1):405–417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Q, Wang Y, Liu K. 2010. Empirical formulas prediction and CFD calculations of torpedo's propulsion characteristics. J Shanghai Jiaotong Univ. 44(01):124–129.
   Google Scholar
• Yu H, Xie T, Paszczyñski S, Wilamowski BM. 2011. Advantages of radial basis function networks for dynamic system design. IEEE Trans Ind Electron. 58(12):5438–5450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang D, Song B, Wang P, Chen X. 2017. Multidisciplinary optimization design of a new underwater vehicle with highly efficient gradient calculation. Struct Multidiscipl Optim. 55(4):1483–1502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar