A nonlinear optimal control approach for underactuated offshore cranes

References

• Basseville M, Nikiforov M. 1993. Detection of abrupt changes: theory and applications. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Bock M, Kugi A. 2014. Real-time nonlinear model predictive path-following control of a laboratory tower crane. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol. 22(4):1461–1463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen H, Fang Y, Sun N. 2016. A swing constraint MPC algorithm for underactuated overhead cranes. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron. 21(5):2543–2544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen H, Zhang R, Liu W, Chen H. 2022. A time-optimal trajectory planning method for offshore cranes with ship roll motion. J Franklin Inst. 359(12):6099–6122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu Y, Li G, Hatledal LI, Holmeset FT, Zhang H. 2022. Coupling of dynamic reaction forces of a heavy load crane and ship motion responses in waves. Ships Offshore Struct. 16(sup1):58–67.
   Google Scholar
• Devos T, Levine J. 2006. A flatness-based nonlinear predictive approach for crane control. In: IFAC Workshop on Nonlinear Model Predictive Control for Fast Systems; Oct; Grenoble, France.
   Google Scholar
• Fang Y, Wang P. 2012. Advanced nonlinear control of an offshore boom crane. In: Proc. 2012 American Control Conference. IEEE ACC 2012; Jun; Montreal, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Fang Y, Wang P, Sun N, Zhang X. 2014. Dynamics analysis and nonlinear control of an offshore boom crane. IEEE Trans Indust Electron. 61(1):414–427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho T, Suzuki K, Tsume M, Tasaki R, Miyashi T, Terashima K. 2019. A switched optimal control approach to reduce transfering time, energy consumption and residua vibration of payload's skew rotation in crane systems. Control Eng Pract. 84:247–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim D, Park Y. 2015. Tracking control in xy-plane of an offshore boom crane. J Vib Control. 23(3):469–485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leban PA, Gonzalez JD, Parker GG, Zhao W. 2015. Inverse kinematic control of a dual crane system experiencing base motion. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol. 23(1):331–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu W, Du J, Li J, Li Z. 2022. Stabilization control of 3-DOF parallel vessel-borne platform with dynamic uncertainties and unknown disturbances. Appl Ocean Res. 120:103271–103281.
   Google Scholar
• Lu B, Fang Y, Lin J, Hao Y, Cao H. 2022. Nonlinear antiswing control for offshore boom cranes subject to ship roll and heave disturbances. Autom Construct. 131:103843–103855.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu B, Fang Y, Sun N, Wang X. 2018. Anti-swing control of offshore boom cranes with ship roll disturbances. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol. 26(2):740–747.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenzie RA, Irani RA. 2022. Motion compensation for maritime cranes during time-varying operations at the pendulum's natural frequency. Mech Mach Theory. 168:105573–104591.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neupert J, Arnold E, Schneider K, Sawodny O. 2010. Tracking and anti-swing control for boom cranes. Control Eng Pract. 18(1):31–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Njo QH, Nguyen WP, Nguyen CN, Tram TH, Ho QP. 2017. Fuzzy sliding-mode control of an offshore container crane. Ocean Eng. 140:125–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qian Y, Fang Y. 2018. Switching logic-based nonlinear feedback control of offshore ship-mounted tower-cranes: a disturbance observer-based approach. IEEE Trans Autom Sci Eng. 16(3):1125–1136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qian Y, Hu D, Chen Y, Fang Y. 2022. Programming-based optimal learning sliding-mode control for cooperative dual ship-mounted cranes against unmatched external disturbances. IEEE Trans Autom Sci Eng. 1–12. doi:10.1109/TASE.2022.3182720
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raja Ismail RMT, Ha QP. 2014. Trajectory tracking control for offshore boom cranes using higher-order sliding modes. In: Proc: 2013 Intl. Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction; Aug; Montreal, Canada. p. 996–1001.
   Google Scholar
• Raja Ismail RMT, That ND, Ha QP. 2015. Modelling and robust trajectory following for offshore boom crane systems. Autom Construct. 39:179–187.
   Google Scholar
• Rigatos G. 2011. Modelling and control for intelligent industrial systems: adaptive algorithms in robotcs and industrial engineering. Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Rigatos G. 2015. Nonlinear control and filtering using differential flatness approaches: applications to electromechanical systems. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Rigatos G. 2016. Intelligent renewable energy systems: modelling and control. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Rigatos G, Abbaszadeh M, Pomares J. 2022. Nonlinear optimal control for the 4-DOF underactuated robotic tower crane. Auton Intell Syst. 2(1):1–30. doi:10.1007/s43684-022-00040-4
   Google Scholar
• Rigatos G, Busawon K. 2018. Robotic manipulators and vehicles: control, estimation and filtering. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Rigatos G, Karapanou E. 2020. Advances in applied nonlinear optimal control. Newcastle, UK: Cambridge Scholars.
   Google Scholar
• Rigatos G, Siano P, Abbaszadeh M. 2017. Nonlinear H-infinity control for 4-DOF underactuated overhead cranes. Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rigatos G, Siano P, Wira P, Profumo F. 2015. Nonlinear H-infinity feedback control for asynchronous motors of electric trains. J Intell Indust Syst. 1(2):85–98.
   Google Scholar
• Rigatos G, Zhang Q. 2009. Fuzzy model validation using the local statistical approach. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 60:882–904.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rigatos GG, Tzafestas SG. 2007. Extended Kalman filtering for fuzzy modelling and multi-sensor fusion. Math Comput Modell Dyn Syst. 13(3):251–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su N, Fang Y, Chen H, Lu B, Fu Y. 2016. Slew / translation positioning and swing suppression for 4-DOF tower cranes with parametric uncertainties: design and hardware experimentation. IEEE Trans Indust Electron. 63(6):6407–6418.
   Google Scholar
• Sun YG, Qiang HY, Xu J, Dong DS. 2017. The nonlinear dynamics and anit-sway tracking control for offshore boom crane on a mobile harbor. J Marine Sci Technol. 25:656–665.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tho HD, Terashima K. 2019. Robust control design of payload's skew rotation in a boom crane system. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol. 27:1606–1621.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toussaint GJ, Basar T, Bullo F. 2000. H∞ optimal tracking control techniques for nonlinear underactuated systems. In: Proc. IEEE CDC 2000, 39th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control; Sydney, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Tuan LA, Cuang HM, Lee SG, Nho LC, Moon K. 2014. Nonlinear feedback control of boom crane mounted on elastic foundation with the flexibility of suspended cable. J Vib Control. 22(13):3067–3078.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu TS, Karkoub M, Yu WS, Chen CT, Her MG, Wu KW. 2016. Anti-sway tracking control of tower cranes with delayed uncertainty using a robust adaptive fuzzy control. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 290:118–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang T, Sun N, Chen H, Fang Y. 2019. Neural network-based adaptive antiswing control of an underactuated ship-mounted crane with roll motion and input dead zones. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst. 31(3):901–914.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhai M, Yang T, Sun N, Fang Y. 2022. Observer-based adaptive fuzzy control of underactuated offshore cranes for cargo stabilization with respect to ship decks. Mech Mach Theory. 175:104927–104943.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang R, Chen H. 2022. An adaptive tracking control method for offshore cranes with unknown gravity parameters. Ocean Eng. 260:11809–111820.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhen B, Li E, Zhao T, Wang C, Tang Z, Li Z. 2022. Dynamic characteristics of series-parallel hybrid rigid-flexible coupling double-mass underactuated system on floating platform. Mech Mach Theory. 179:2022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar