Planing craft motion in oblique regular waves

References

• Akers RH. 1999. Dynamic analysis of planing hulls in the vertical plane. Proceedings of the society of naval architects and marine engineers, New England Section.
   Google Scholar
• Begovic E, Bertorello C, Pennino S. 2014. Experimental seakeeping assessment of a warped planing hull model series. Ocean Eng. 83:1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bi X, Shen H, Zhou J, Su Y. 2019. Numerical analysis of the influence of fixed hydrofoil installation position on seakeeping of the planing craft. Appl Ocean Res. 90:101863.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castiglione T, Sadat-Hosseini H, Stern F, Bova S. 2013. CFD simulation for sea keeping of Delft catamaran in regular head and oblique waves. Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Fast Sea Transportation (FAST 2013).
   Google Scholar
• CD-adapco. 2014. STAR CCM+ User’s Guide Version 9.06.
   Google Scholar
• Clement EP, Blount DL. 1963. Resistance tests of a systematic series of planing hull forms. Trans SNAME. 71:491–579.
   Google Scholar
• Dashtimanesh A, Tavakoli S, Kohansal A, Khosravani R, Ghassemzadeh A. 2020. Numerical study on a heeled one-stepped boat moving forward in planing regime. Appl Ocean Res. 96:102057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esfandiari A, Tavakoli S, Dashtimanesh A. 2020. Comparison between the dynamic behavior of the non-stepped and double-stepped planing hulls in rough water: a numerical study. J Ship Prod Design. 36:52–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fridsma G. 1969. A systematic study of the rough-water performance of planing boats.
   Google Scholar
• Ghadimi P, Dashtimanesh A, Djeddi SR, Maghrebi YF. 2013. Development of a mathematical model for simultaneous heave, pitch and roll motions of planing vessel in regular waves. Int J Sci World. 1:44–56.
   Google Scholar
• Ghadimi P, Dashtimanesh A, Faghfoor Maghrebi Y. 2013. Initiating a mathematical model for prediction of 6-DOF motion of planing crafts in regular waves. Int J Eng Math. 2013:1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Ghadimi P, Nazemian A, Ghadimi A. 2019. Numerical scrutiny of the influence of side hulls arrangement on the motion of a Trimaran vessel in regular waves through CFD analysis. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng. 41:1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong J, Yan S, Ma Q, Li Y. 2020. Added resistance and seakeeping performance of trimarans in oblique waves. Ocean Eng. 216:107721.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hicks JD, Troesch AW, Jiang C. 1995. Simulation and nonlinear dynamics analysis of planing hulls. J Offshore Mech Arct Eng. 117(1):38–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ITTC. 2011. Recommended procedures and guidelines. Practical Guidelines for Ship CFD Applications, Guidelines 75-03-02-03.
   Google Scholar
• ITTC. 2021. Recommended procedures and guidelines uncertainty analysis in CFD verification and validation methodology and procedures, Revision 75-03-01-01.1.
   Google Scholar
• ITTC Member Organisations. n.d. https://ittc.info/members/member-organisations/national-iranian-marine-laboratory-nimala/
   Google Scholar
• Lv H, Wei C, Liang X, Yi H. 2022. Optimisation of wave-piercing trimaran outrigger layout with comprehensive consideration of resistance and seakeeping. Ocean Eng. 250:111050.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin M. 1978. Theoretical prediction of motions of high-speed planing boats in waves. J Ship Res. 22:140–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niazmand Bilandi R, Tavakoli S, Dashtimanesh A. 2021. Seakeeping of double-stepped planing hulls. Ocean Eng. 236:109475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nowruzi L, Enshaei H, Lavroff J, Davis MR. 2020. Parametric study of seakeeping of a trimaran in regular oblique waves. Ships Offsh Struct. 15:S98–S109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park D-M, Lee J-H, Jung Y-W, Lee J, Kim Y, Gerhardt F. 2019. Experimental and numerical studies on added resistance of ship in oblique sea conditions. Ocean Eng. 186:106070.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruscelli D. 2009. Dynamics of high-speed craft [PhD thesis]. Genoa: University of Genoa.
   Google Scholar
• Sadati K, Zeraatgar H, Babuei S. 2021. Roll restoring coefficients of planing boats’ maneuver using 2D+ t approach. Scientia Iranica. Transaction B, Mechanical Engineering. 29(3):1197–1209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savitsky D. 1964. Hydrodynamic design of planing hulls. Marine Technol SNAME News. 1:71–95.
   Google Scholar
• Savitsky D, Brown PW. 1976. Procedures for hydrodynamic evaluation of planing hulls in smooth and rough water. Marine Technol SNAME News. 13:381–400.
   Google Scholar
• Sayeed TM. 2010. Numerical simulation of planing hull in regular waves. Memorial University of Newfoundland.
   Google Scholar
• Sebastiani L, Bruzzone D, Gualeni P, Rambaldi G, Ruscelli D, Viviani M. 2008. A practical method for the prediction of planing craft motions in regular and irregular waves. Proceedings of the International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering.
   Google Scholar
• Tahmasvand H, Zeraatgar H. 2021. A combined method to predict impact pressure on planing craft. Pol Marit Res. 28:4–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavakoli S, Dashtimanesh A, Mancini S, Mehr JA, Milanesi S. 2021. Effects of vertical motions on roll of planing hulls. J Offshore Mech Arct Engg. 143(4).
   Google Scholar
• Thomas G, Doctors LJ, Couser P, Hackett M. 2007. Catamaran motions in beam and oblique seas. Proceedings of the 9th Intl Conf on Fast Sea Transportation, Shanghai, China, September.
   Google Scholar
• Van Deyzen A. 2008. A nonlinear mathematical model of motions of a planing monohull in head seas. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on High Performance Marine Vehicles (HIPER’08).
   Google Scholar
• Zarnick EE. 1978. A nonlinear mathematical model of motions of a planing boat in regular waves.
   Google Scholar
• Zeraatgar H, Tahmasvand H. 2022. Analysis of planing boat behavior in oblique wave by numerical method. Iran J Mar Technol. 9:62–73.
   Google Scholar