Geometrical effects on the local joint flexibility of three-planar tubular Y-joints in substructures of offshore wind turbines

References

• Ahmadi H, Akhtegan M. 2022. Effects of geometrical parameters on the local joint flexibility (LJF) of three-planar tubular T-joints in offshore structures. Ships Offsh Struct. 17(7):1604–1615.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmadi H, Mayeli V. 2018. Probabilistic analysis of the local joint flexibility in two-planar tubular DK-joints of offshore jacket structures under in-plane bending loads. Appl Ocean Res. 81:126–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmadi H, Mayeli V. 2019. Development of a probability distribution model for the LJF factors in offshore two-planar tubular DK-joints subjected to OPB moment loading. Marine Struct. 63:196–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmadi H, Mohammadpourian Janfeshan N. 2021. Local joint flexibility of multi-planar tubular TT-joints: study of geometrical effects and the formulation for offshore design practice. Appl Ocean Res. 113(8):102758.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmadi H, Ziaei Nejad A. 2017a. A study on the local joint flexibility (LJF) of two-planar tubular DK-joints in jacket structures under in-plane bending loads. Appl Ocean Res. 64:1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmadi H, Ziaei Nejad A. 2017b. Geometrical effects on the local joint flexibility of two-planar tubular DK-joints in jacket substructure of offshore wind turbines under OPB loading. Thin Walled Struct. 114:122–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmadi H, Ziaei Nejad A. 2017c. Local joint flexibility of two-planar tubular DK-joints in OWTs subjected to axial loading: parametric study of geometrical effects and design formulation. Ocean Eng. 136(5):1–10.
   Google Scholar
• American Welding Society (AWS). 2002. Structural welding code: AWS D 1.1. Miami, FL: American Welding Society, US.
   Google Scholar
• Bomel Consulting Engineers. 1994. Assessment of SCF equations using Shell/KSEPL finite element data. C5970R02.01 REV C.
   Google Scholar
• Bouwkamp JG, Hollings JP, Masion BF, Row DG. 1980. Effect of joint flexibility on the response of offshore structures. In Offshore technology conference (OTC). Houston; p. 455–464.
   Google Scholar
• Buitrago J, Healy BE, Chang TY. 1993. Local joint flexibility of tubular joints. In: International conference on ocean, offshore & Arctic engineering (OMAE). Glasgow; p. 405–417.
   Google Scholar
• Chang E, Dover WD. 1996. Stress concentration factor parametric equations for tubular X and DT joints. Int J Fatigue. 18:363–387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang E, Dover WD. 1999. Parametric equations to predict stress distributions along the intersection of tubular X and DT-joints. Int J Fatigue. 21:619–635.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen B, Hu Y, Tan M. 1990. Local joint flexibility of tubular joints of offshore structures. Marine Struct. 3:177–197.
   Google Scholar
• Chen B, Hu Y, Xu H. 1993. Theoretical and experimental study on the local flexibility of tubular joints and its effect on the structural analysis of offshore platforms. In: Proceedings of the 5th international symposium on tubular structures, Nottingham, UK; p. 543−550.
   Google Scholar
• Chen TY, Zhang HY. 1996. Stress analysis of spatial frames with consideration of local flexibility of multiplanar tubular joint. Eng Struct. 18:465–471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choo YS, Qian XD, Wardenier J. 2006. Effects of boundary conditions and chord stresses on static strength of thick-walled CHS K-joints. J Constr Steel Res. 62:316–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Det Norske Veritas. 1977. Rules for the design, construction and inspection of offshore structures. Bærum, Norway: DNV.
   Google Scholar
• Efthymiou M. 1985. Local rotational stiffness of un-stiffened tubular joints. RKER report; p. 185−199.
   Google Scholar
• Efthymiou M. 1988. Development of SCF formulae and generalized influence functions for use in fatigue analysis. Offshore Tubular Joints. 88:1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Fessler H, Mockford PB, Webster JJ. 1986a. Parametric equations for the flexibility matrices of multi-brace tubular joints in offshore structures. Proc Inst Civil Eng. 81:675–696.
   Google Scholar
• Fessler H, Mockford PB, Webster JJ. 1986b. Parametric equations for the flexibility matrices of single brace tubular joints in offshore structures. Proc Inst Civil Eng. 81:659–673.
   Google Scholar
• Gao F, Hu B. 2015. Local joint flexibility of completely overlapped tubular joints under out-of-plane bending. J Constr Steel Res. 115:121–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao F, Hu B, Zhu HP. 2013. Parametric equations to predict LJF of completely overlapped tubular joints under lap brace axial loading. J Constr Steel Res. 89:284–292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao F, Hu B, Zhu HP. 2014. Local joint flexibility of completely overlapped tubular joints under in-plane bending. J Constr Steel Res. 99:1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golafshani AA, Kia M, Alanjari P. 2013. Local joint flexibility element for offshore platforms structures. Marine Struct. 33:56–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoshyari I, Kohoutek R. 1993. Rotational and axial flexibility of tubular T-joints. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference (ISOPE), Singapore; p. 192−198.
   Google Scholar
• Hu Y, Chen B, Ma J. 1993. An equivalent element representing local flexibility of tubular joints in structural analysis of offshore platforms. Comput Struct. 47:957–969.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lie ST, Lee CK, Wong SM. 2001. Modeling and mesh generation of weld profile in tubular Y-joint. J Constr Steel Res. 57:547–567.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan MR, Lee MMK. 1998. Prediction of stress concentrations and degrees of bending in axially loaded tubular K-joints. J Constr Steel Res. 45:67–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nassiraei H. 2019. Local joint flexibility of CHS X-joints reinforced with collar plates in jacket structures subjected to axial load. Appl Ocean Res. 93:101961.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nassiraei H. 2020a. Geometrical effects on the LJF of tubular T/Y-joints with doubler plate in offshore wind turbines. Ships Offsh Struct. 17(3):481–491.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nassiraei H. 2020b. Local joint flexibility of CHS T/Y-connections strengthened with collar plate under in-plane bending load: parametric study of geometrical effects and design formulation. Ocean Eng. 202:107054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nassiraei H, Rezadoost P. 2021a. Local joint flexibility of tubular T/Y-joints retrofitted with GFRP under in-plane bending moment. Marine Struct. 77:102936.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nassiraei H, Rezadoost P. 2021b. Local joint flexibility of tubular X-joints stiffened with external ring or external plates. Marine Struct. 80:103085.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nassiraei H, Yara A. 2022a. Local joint flexibility of tubular K-joints reinforced with external plates under IPB loads. Marine Struct. 84:103199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nassiraei H, Yara A. 2022b. Local joint flexibility of tubular K-joints reinforced with external plates under out of plane bending moments. Ships Offsh Struct. https://doi.org/10.1080/17445302.2022.2140508
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smedley P, Fisher P. 1991. Stress concentration factors for simple tubular joints. In: Proceedings of the International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference (ISOPE), Edinburgh, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Ueda Y, Rashed SMH, Nakacho K. 1990. An improved joint model and equations for flexibility of tubular joints. Offshore Mech Arctic Eng. 112:157–168.
   Google Scholar
• UK Department of Energy (DoE). 1983. Background notes to the fatigue guidance of offshore tubular joints. London: Department of Energy.
   Google Scholar
• Underwater Engineering Group (UEG). 1985. Design of tubular joint for offshore structures. London: UEG/CIRIA.
   Google Scholar