Tests on the incline rectification of suction bucket foundation installation under local cyclic shock loading

References

• Byrne BW, Houlsby GT. 2004. Experimental investigations of the response of suction caissons to transient combined loading. J Geotech Geoenvironmental Eng. 130(3):240–253. doi:10.1061/(asce)1090-0241(2004)130:3(240).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaudhuri B, Muzzio FJ, Tomassone MS. 2010. Experimentally validated computations of heat transfer in granular materials in rotary calciners. Powder Technol. 198(1):6–15. doi:10.1016/j.powtec.2009.09.024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dash HK, Sitharam TG. 2016. Effect of frequency of cyclic loading on liquefaction and dynamic properties of saturated sand. Int J Geotech Eng. 10(5):487–492. doi:10.1080/19386362.2016.1171951.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derakhshani A. 2017. Estimating uplift capacity of suction caissons in soft clay: a hybrid computational approach based on model tree and GP. Ocean Eng. 146(April):1–8. doi:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2017.09.025.
   Google Scholar
• Dyson BGJ, Randolph MF. 2001. M Onotonic L Ateral L Oading in. Manager. 50(APRIL):346–352.
   Google Scholar
• Gao Y, Qiu Y, Li B, Li D, Sha C, Zheng X. 2013. Experimental studies on the anti-uplift behavior of the suction caissons in sand. Appl Ocean Res. 43:37–45. doi:10.1016/j.apor.2013.08.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo Z, Wang L, Yuan F, Li L. 2012. Model tests on installation techniques of suction caissons in a soft clay seabed. Appl Ocean Res. 34:116–125. doi:10.1016/j.apor.2011.09.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harireche O, Mehravar M, Alani AM. 2013. Suction caisson installation in sand with isotropic permeability varying with depth. Appl Ocean Res. 43:256–263. doi:10.1016/j.apor.2013.10.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houlsby GT, Byrne BW. 2005. Design procedures for installation of suction caissons in sand. Proc Inst Civil Eng: Geotech Eng. 158(3):135–144. doi:10.1680/geng.2005.158.3.135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu R, Zhang P, Ding H, Le C. 2018. Numerical analysis of seepage field of bucket foundations for offshore wind turbines. Ships Offsh Struct. 13(8):822–834. doi:10.1080/17445302.2018.1464892.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jafarian Y, Javdanian H, Haddad A. 2018. Dynamic properties of calcareous and siliceous sands under isotropic and anisotropic stress conditions. Soils Found. 58(1):172–184. doi:10.1016/j.sandf.2017.11.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin J, Cui H, Liang L, Li S, Zhang P. 2018. Variation of pore water pressure in tailing sand under dynamic loading. Shock Vib. 2018:1–13. doi:10.1155/2018/1921057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lian J, Chen F, Wang H. 2014. Laboratory tests on soil-skirt interaction and penetration resistance of suction caissons during installation in sand. Ocean Eng. 84:1–13. doi:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2014.03.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shamy El U, Zeghal M. 2007. A micro-mechanical investigation of the dynamic response and liquefaction of saturated granular soils. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng. 27(8):712–729. doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2006.12.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sochacki W. 2008. The dynamic stability of a simply supported beam with additional discrete elements. J Sound Vib. 314(1–2):180–193. doi:10.1016/j.jsv.2007.12.037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taslagyan KA, Chan DH, Morgenstern NR. 2015. Effect of vibration on the critical state of dry granular soils. Granular Matter. 17(6):687–702. doi:10.1007/s10035-015-0589-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tjelta TI. 1995. Geotechnical experience from the Installation of the Europipe jacket with bucket foundations. Proceedings of the Annual Offshore Technology Conference. 1995-May:897–908. doi:10.4043/7795-ms
   Google Scholar
• Tran MN, Randolph MF. 2008. Variation of suction pressure during caisson installation in sand. Géotechnique. 58(1):1–11. doi:10.1680/geot.2008.58.1.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villalobos FA. 2010. Discussion of “CPT-based method for the installation of suction caissons in sand” by Marc Senders and Mark F. Randolph. J Geotech Geoenvironmental Eng. 136(12):1732–1734. doi:10.1061/(asce)gt.1943-5606.0000145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang X, Yang X, Zeng X. 2017. Centrifuge modeling of lateral bearing behavior of offshore wind turbine with suction bucket foundation in sand. Ocean Eng. 139:140–151. doi:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2017.04.046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang X, Zeng X, Wang X. 2018. Lateral-Moment loading capacity and bearing behavior of suction bucket foundations for offshore wind turbines in sand. Int J Geomech. 18(11):04018152. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Cao J, Huang S. 2019. Experimental study on the effects of initial shear stress and vibration frequency on dynamic strength of saturated sands. Adv Mater Sci Eng. 2019:1–9. doi:10.1155/2019/3758527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar