Numerical analysis of pipe–soil interaction between SCR and nonlinear seabed based on co-rotational approach

References

• Antonio LM, Pavanello R, Barros PLDA. 2018. Marine pipeline–seabed interaction modeling based on Kerr-type foundation. Appl Ocean Res. 80:228–239. doi:10.1016/j.apor.2018.09.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aubeny CP, Biscontin G. 2009. Seafloor-riser interaction model. Int J Geomech. 9(3):133–141. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1532-3641(2009)9:3(133).
   Google Scholar
• Battini JM, Pacoste C. 2002. Co-rotational beam elements with warping effects in instability problems. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 191(17–18):1755–1789. doi:10.1016/S0045-7825(01)00352-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belytschko T, Glaum LW. 1979. Applications of higher order corotational stretch theories to nonlinear finite element analysis. Comput Struct. 10(1–2):175–182. doi:10.1016/0045-7949(79)90085-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belytschko T, Hsieh BJ. 2010. Non-linear transient finite element analysis with convected co-ordinates. Int J Numer Methods Eng. 7(3):255–271. doi:10.1002/nme.1620070304.
   Google Scholar
• Bridge C, Howells H, Toy N, Parke GAR, Woods R. 2003. Full-scale model tests of a steel catenary riser. WIT Trans Built Environ. 71:107–116.
   Google Scholar
• Bridge C, Willis N. 2002. Steel catenary risers – results and conclusions from large scale simulations of seabed interaction. In: Annual Deep Offshore Technology International Conference & Exhibition. Surrey: 2H Offshore Engineering Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Chatterjee S, Randolph MF, White DJ. 2012. The effects of penetration rate and strain softening on the vertical penetration resistance of seabed pipelines. Geotechnique. 62(7):573–582. doi:10.1680/geot.10.P.075.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng Y, Tang L, Fan T. 2020. Dynamic analysis of deepwater steel lazy wave riser with internal flow and seabed interaction using a nonlinear finite element method. Ocean Eng. 209:107498. doi:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.107498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crisfield MA. 1990. A consistent co-rotational formulation for non-linear, three-dimensional, beam-elements. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 81(2):131–150. doi:10.1016/0045-7825(90)90106-V.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crisfield MA, Cole G. 1990. Co-rotational beam elements for two- and three-dimensional structures. Discret Methods Struct Mech. 1–2. http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0037533932&partnerID=tZOtx3y1.
   Google Scholar
• Crisfield MA, Moita GF. 1996. A co-rotational formulation for 2-D continua including incompatible modes. Int J Numer Methods Eng. 39(15):2619–2633. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19960815)39:15<2619::AID-NME969>3.0.CO;2-N.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kordkheili SAH, Bahai H. 2008. Non-linear finite element analysis of flexible risers in presence of buoyancy force and seabed interaction boundary condition. Arch Appl Mech. 78:765–774. doi:10.1007/s00419-007-0190-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunert HG, Otegui JL, Marquez A. 2012. Nonlinear FEM strategies for modeling pipe–soil interaction. Eng Fail Anal. 24:46–56. doi:10.1016/j.engfailanal.2012.03.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langford T, Dyvik R, Cleave R. 2007. Offshore pipeline and riser geotechnical model testing: practice and interpretation. In: International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering. San Diego; p. 443–452. doi:10.1115/OMAE2007-29458.
   Google Scholar
• Leister P, Barros A, Pavanello R, Mesquita E, Morooka CK. 2009. SCR-seafloor interaction model and WINKLER, PASTERNAK and KERR elastic basis beam theories. In: International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering. Honolulu; p. 1–7. http://www.asme.org/about-asme/terms-of-use.
   Google Scholar
• Oran C. 1973. Tangent stiffness in space frames. J Struct Div. 99(6):987–1001.
   Google Scholar
• Oran C, Kassimali A. 1976. Large deformations of framed structures under static and dynamic loads. Comput Struct. 6(6):539–547. doi:10.1016/0045-7949(76)90050-X.
   Google Scholar
• Randolph M, Quiggin P. 2009. Nonlinear hysteretic seabed model for catenary pipeline contact. In: International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering. Honolulu; p. 1–10. http://www.asme.org/about-asme/terms-of-use.
   Google Scholar
• Randolph MF, White DJ. 2008. Pipeline embedment in deep water: processes and quantitative assessment. In: Offshore Technology Conference. Houston; p. 5–8.
   Google Scholar
• Ruan W, Shang Z, Wu J. 2019. Effective static stress range estimation for deepwater steel lazy-wave riser with vessel slow drift motion. Ships Offshore Struct. 14(8):899–909. doi:10.1080/17445302.2019.1578101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruan W, Shi J, Sun B, Qi K. 2021. Study on fatigue damage optimization mechanism of deepwater lazy wave risers based on multiple waveform serial arrangement. Ocean Eng. 228:108926. doi:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.108926.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi JB, Liu ZY, Hong JZ. 2017. The co-rotational formulation for flexible multibody dynamics. Chinese Q Mech. 38(2):197–214. doi:10.15959/j.cnki.0254-0053.2017.02.002.
   Google Scholar
• Shiri H. 2014. Response of steel catenary risers on hysteretic non-linear seabed. Appl Ocean Res. 44:20–28. doi:10.1016/j.apor.2013.10.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang YQ, Du EF, Wang JQ, Qi JN. 2020. A co-rotational curved beam element for geometrically nonlinear analysis of framed structures. Structures. 27(3):1202–1208. doi:10.1016/j.istruc.2020.07.030.
   Google Scholar
• Thethi M. 2001. Soil interaction effects on simple catenary riser response. Pipes Pipelines Int. 46(3):15–24.
   Google Scholar
• Trapper PA. 2020a. Feasible numerical analysis of steel lazy-wave riser. Ocean Eng. 195:106643. doi:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.106643.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trapper PA. 2020b. Static analysis of offshore pipe-lay on flat inelastic seabed. Ocean Eng. 213:107673. doi:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.107673.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trapper PA. 2020c. Feasible numerical analysis of steel lazy-wave riser. Ocean Eng. 195:106643. doi:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.106643.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang D, White DJ, Randolph MF. 2010. Large-deformation finite element analysis of pipe penetration and large-amplitude lateral displacement. Can Geotech J. 47(8):842–856. doi:10.1139/T09-147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang J, Duan M, Fan J, Liu Y. 2013. Static equilibrium configuration of deepwater steel lazy-wave riser. Proceedings of International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, Anchorage, AK. Vol. 9, p. 995–998.
   Google Scholar
• Wang L, Zhang J, Yuan F, Li K. 2014. Interaction between catenary riser and soft seabed: large-scale indoor tests. Appl Ocean Res. 45:10–21. doi:10.1016/j.apor.2013.12.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Duan M, Gu J. 2019. Analytical model for transfer process of deepwater steel lazy-wave riser on elastic seabed. J Mar Sci Technol. 24(1):123–133. doi:10.1007/s00773-018-0540-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Duan M, Zhang Y. 2017. Experimental and numerical investigation of vertical pipe–soil interaction considering pipe velocity. Ships Offshore Struct. 12(1):77–85. doi:10.1080/17445302.2015.1112178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wempner G. 1969. Finite elements, finite rotations and small strains of flexible shells. Int J Solids Struct. 5(2):117–153.
   Google Scholar
• Willis NRT, West PTJ. 2001. Interaction between deepwater catenary risers and a soft seabed: large scale sea trials. Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE). Houston; p. 1–9. doi:10.4043/13113-ms.
   Google Scholar
• You J, Biscontin G, Aubeny C. 2008. Seafloor interaction with steel catenary risers. Proceedings of Eighteenth International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, Vancouver; p. 110–117.
   Google Scholar
• You JH. 2012. Numerical modeling of seafloor interaction with steel catenary riser. Texas A&M University.
   Google Scholar
• Yuan Y, Zheng M, Xue H, Duan Z, Tang W. 2022. Fatigue analysis of a steel catenary riser at touchdown zone with seabed resistance and hydrodynamic forces. Ocean Eng. 244:110446. doi:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.110446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zargar E, Kimiaei M, Randolph M. 2019. A new hysteretic seabed model for riser-soil interaction. Mar Struct. 64:360–378. doi:10.1016/j.marstruc.2018.08.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang ZG, Shen AX, Zhang CP, Pan YT, Wu ZT. 2021. Analytical solution to initial intrusion static equilibrium of steel catenary riser in touchdown zone on seabed based on nonlinear Pasternak foundation model. Yantu Lixue/Rock Soil Mech. 42(9):2355–2374. doi:10.16285/j.rsm.2021.0295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao L, Wang D, Tian Y. 2020. Finite element modelling for as-laid embedment of pipeline in clayey sediments. Ocean Eng. 217:107963. doi:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.107963.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao L, Zhou Z, Wang D, Chen L. 2021. Numerical modeling approach for steel catenary riser behavior at touchdown zone. J Geotech Geoenvironmental Eng. 147(6):04021033. doi:10.1061/(asce)gt.1943-5606.0002510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu B, Dai J, Kong D. 2020. Modelling T-bar penetration in soft clay using large-displacement sequential limit analysis. Geotechnique. 70(2):173–180. doi:10.1680/jgeot.18.P.160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar