Performance analysis of two generations of heaving point absorber WECs in farms of hexagon-shaped array layouts

References

• Babarit A. 2010. Impact of long separating distances on the energy production of two interacting wave energy converters. Ocean Eng. 37(8-9):718–729. doi:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2010.02.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babarit A. 2013. On the park effect in arrays of oscillating wave energy converters. Renew Energy. 58:68–78. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2013.03.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgarino B, Babarit A, Ferrant P. 2012. Impact of wave interactions effects on energy absorption in large arrays of wave energy converters. Ocean Eng. 41:79–88. doi:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2011.12.025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budal K. 1977. Theory for absorption of wave power by a system of interacting bodies. J Ship Res. 21(4):248–254. doi:10.5957/jsr.1977.21.4.248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castro-Santos L, Martins E, Soares CG. 2016a. Methodology to calculate the costs of a floating offshore renewable energy farm. Energies. 9(5):324. doi:10.3390/en9050324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castro-Santos L, Martins E, Soares CG. 2016b. Cost assessment methodology for combined wind and wave floating offshore renewable energy systems. Renew Energy. 97:866–880. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2016.06.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Child BFM, Venugopal V. 2010. Optimal configurations of wave energy device arrays. Ocean Eng. 37(16):1402–1417. doi:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2010.06.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costello R, Pecher A. 2017. Economics of WECs. Handbook Ocean Wave Energ. 101–137.
   Google Scholar
• Devolder B, Stratigaki V, Troch P, Rauwoens R. 2018. CFD simulations of floating point absorber wave energy converter arrays subjected to regular waves. Energies. 11(3):641. doi:10.3390/en11030641.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DNV. 2023. Home page of DNV Sesam software. Available at: https://www.dnv.com/services/strength-assessment-of-offshore-structures-sesam-software-1068?&utm_campaign=structure_sesam&utm_source=google&utm_medium=cpc&gad=1&gclid=Cj0KCQjw7uSkBhDGARIsAMCZNJvPMybW5BYmxHGl8h1q54cJt_uNVB8_1-ufAkafk5_qIYRCJyI7kIIaAhQ3EALw_wcB&gclsrc=aw.ds.
   Google Scholar
• Engström J, Eriksson M, Göteman M, Isberg J, Leijon M. 2013. Performance of large arrays of point absorbing direct-driven wave energy converters. J Appl Phys. 114(20):204502. doi:10.1063/1.4833241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falcao AFD. 2010. Wave energy utilization: a review of the technologies. Renew Sust Energy Rev. 14(3):899–918. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2009.11.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falnes J. 1980. Radiation impedance matrix and optimum power absorption for interacting oscillators in surface waves. Appl Ocean Res. 2(2):75–80. doi:10.1016/0141-1187(80)90032-2.
   Google Scholar
• Falnes J. 2007. A review of wave-energy extraction. Mar Struct. 20(4):185–201. doi:10.1016/j.marstruc.2007.09.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GeniE. 2023. Home page of GeniE. Available at: https://www.dnv.com/services/conceptual-modelling-of-offshore-and-maritime-structures-genie-89128.
   Google Scholar
• Giassi M. 2020. Numerical and experimental modelling for wave energy arrays optimization. Department of electrical engineering. Uppsala, Sweden: Uppsala University, 85.
   Google Scholar
• Giassi M, Castellucci V, Göteman M. 2020. Economical layout optimization of wave energy parks clustered in electrical subsystems. Appl Ocean Res. 101:102274. doi:10.1016/j.apor.2020.102274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golbaz D, Asadi R, Amini E, et al. 2022. Layout and design optimization of ocean wave energy converters: A scoping review of state-of-the-art canonical, hybrid, cooperative, and combinatorial optimization methods. Energy Rep. 8:15446–15479. doi:10.1016/j.egyr.2022.10.403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Göteman M, Engström J, Eriksson M, Isberg J. 2014. Methods of reducing power fluctuations in wave energy parks. J Renew Sustain Energy. 6(4): 43103 doi:10.1063/1.4889880.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Göteman M, Giassi M, Engström J, Isberg J. 2020. Advances and challenges in wave energy park optimization—a review. Front Energy Res. 8:26. doi:10.3389/fenrg.2020.00026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HydroD. 2023. Home page of HydroD. Available at: https://www.dnv.com/services/hydrodynamic-analysis-and-stability-analysis-software-hydrod-14492.
   Google Scholar
• Katsidoniotaki E, Shahroozi Z, Eskilsson C, Palm J, Engström J, Göteman M. 2023. Validation of a CFD model for wave energy system dynamics in extreme waves. Ocean Eng. 268:113320. doi:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.113320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuznecovs A, Ringsberg JW, Yang S-H, Johnson E, Andersson A. 2019. A methodology for design and fatigue analysis of power cables for wave energy converters. Int J Fatigue 122:61–71. doi:10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.01.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson M, Yu Y-H, Ruehl K, Michelén Ströfer CA. 2014. Development and demonstration of the WEC-Sim wave energy converter simulation tool. The 2nd marine energy technology symposium. Seattle, WA.
   Google Scholar
• Lee H, Poguluri S, Bae Y. 2018. Performance analysis of multiple wave energy converters placed on a floating platform in the frequency domain. Energies. 11(2):406. doi:10.3390/en11020406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li X, Xiao Q, Zhou Y, Ning D, Incecik A, Nicoll R, McDonald A, Campbell D. 2022. Coupled CFD-MBD numerical modeling of a mechanically coupled WEC array. Ocean Eng. 256:111541. doi:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.111541.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magkouris A, Bonovas M, Belibassakis K. 2020. Hydrodynamic analysis of surge-type wave energy devices in variable bathymetry by means of BEM. Fluids. 5(2):99. doi:10.3390/fluids5020099.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliveira-Pinto S, Rosa-Santos P, Taveira-Pinto F. 2019. Electricity supply to offshore oil and gas platforms from renewable ocean wave energy: Overview and case study analysis. Energy Convers Manage 186:556–569. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2019.02.050.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pecher A, Kofoed JP. 2017. Handbook of ocean wave energy. Springer Nature.https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-319-39889-1
   Google Scholar
• Raghavan V, Lavidas G, Metrikine A, Mantadakis N, Loukogeorgaki E. 2022. A comparative study on BEM solvers for Wave Energy Converters. Trends Renew Energ Offshore. 441–447. doi:10.1201/9781003360773-50.
   Google Scholar
• Riflex. 2023. Home page of Riflex. Available at: https://www.dnv.com/services/riser-analysis-software-for-marine-riser-systems-riflex-2312.
   Google Scholar
• Ringsberg JW, Jansson H, Örgård M, Yang S-H, Johnson E. 2020a. Design of mooring solutions and array systems for point absorbing wave energy devices—methodology and application. J Offshore Mech Arct Eng. 142(3): 31101. doi:10.1115/1.4045370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ringsberg JW, Yang S-H, Lang X, Johnson E, Kamf J. 2020b. Mooring forces in a floating point-absorbing WEC system – a comparison between full-scale measurements and numerical simulations. Ships Offsh Struct. 15:S70–S81. doi:10.1080/17445302.2020.1746122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandberg A, Klementsen E, Muller G, De Andres A, Maillet J. 2016. Critical factors influencing viability of wave energy converters in off-grid luxury resorts and small utilities. Sustainability. 8(12):1274. doi:10.3390/su8121274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sergent P, Baudry V, Bonviller AD, Michard B, Dugor J. 2020. Numerical assessment of onshore wave energy in France: wave energy, conversion and cost. J Mar Sci Eng. 8(11):947. doi:10.3390/jmse8110947.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shao X. 2023. Analysis of power performance and mooring fatigue damage for wave energy parks. Licentiate Engineering Thesis, Report No. 2023:10. Chalmers University of Technology, Department of Mechanics and Maritime Sciences, Division of Marine Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Shao X, Ringsberg, JW, Yao H-D, Li Z, Johnson E, Fredriksson G. 2023. A comparison of two wave energy converters’ power performance and mooring fatigue characteristics – one WEC vs many WECs in a wave park with interaction effects. J Ocean Eng Sci. In press. doi:10.1016/j.joes.2023.07.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sima. 2023. Home page of Sima. Available at: https://www.dnv.com/services/marine-operations-and-mooring-analysis-software-sima-2324?&utm_campaign=structure_sesam&utm_source=google&utm_medium=cpc&gad=1&gclid=Cj0KCQjw7uSkBhDGARIsAMCZNJtY8MYtw7vXY5YoQmqO9oDoG2VprKLvJ9YI8NmVtW1oP9domuEFQdkaAm9fEALw_wcB&gclsrc=aw.ds.
   Google Scholar
• Simo. 2023. Home page of Simo. Available at: https://www.dnv.com/services/complex-multibody-calculations-simo-2311.
   Google Scholar
• Stallard T, Stansby PK and Williamson AJ. 2008. An experimental study of closely spaced point absorber arrays. The Eighteenth International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference. OnePetro, ISOPE-I-08-202.
   Google Scholar
• Teixeira-Duarte F, Clemente D, Giannini G, Rosa-Santos P, Taveira-Pinto F. 2022. Review on layout optimization strategies of offshore parks for wave energy converters. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 163:112513. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2022.112513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wadam. 2023. Frequency domain hydrodynamic analysis of stationary vessels - Wadam. Available at: https://www.dnv.com/services/frequency-domain-hydrodynamic-analysis-of-stationary-vessels-wadam-2412.
   Google Scholar
• Weller SD, Stallard TJ, Stansby PK. 2010. Experimental measurements of irregular wave interaction factors in closely spaced arrays. IET Renew Power Gener. 4(6):628–637. doi:10.1049/iet-rpg.2009.0192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang B, Wu S, Zhang H, Liu B, Shu H, Shan J, Ren Y, Yao W. 2022. Wave energy converter array layout optimization: a critical and comprehensive overview. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 167:112668. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2022.112668.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang S-H. 2018. Analysis of the fatigue characteristics of mooring lines and power cables for floating wave energy converters. Doctoral (PhD) Thesis, Report No 16:163. Chalmers University of Technology, Department of Shipping and Marine Technology, Division of Marine Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Yang S-H, Ringsberg JW, Johnson E. 2018. Parametric study of the dynamic motions and mechanical characteristics of power cables for wave energy converters. J Mar Sci Technol. 23(1):10–29. doi:10.1007/s00773-017-0451-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang S-H, Ringsberg JW, Johnson E. 2020a. Wave energy converters in array configurations—Influence of interaction effects on the power performance and fatigue of mooring lines. Ocean Eng. 211:107294. doi:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.107294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang S-H, Ringsberg JW, Johnson E, Hu Z. 2020b. Experimental and numerical investigation of a taut-moored wave energy converter: a validation of simulated mooring line forces. Ships Offsh Struct. 15:S55–S69. doi:10.1080/17445302.2020.1772667.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar