A geomorphic assessment to inform strategic stream restoration planning in the Middle Fork John Day Watershed, Oregon, USA

References

• Baxter, C. V., & Hauer, F. R. (2000). Geomorphololgy, hyporheic exchange, and selection of spawning habitat by bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus). Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 57, 1470–1481. doi:10.1139/f00-056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bean, J. R., Wilcox, A. C., Woessner, W. W., & Muhlfeld, C. C. (2014). Multiscale hydrogeomorphic influences on bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus) spawning habitat. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 72(4), 17. doi:10.1139/cjfas-2013-0534
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beechie, T., & Imaki, H. (2014). Predicting natural channel patterns based on landscape and geomorphic controls in the Columbia River basin, USA. Water Resources Research, 50, 39–57. doi:10.1002/2013WR013629
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beechie, T., Pess, G., Roni, P., & Giannico, G. (2008). Setting river restoration priorities: A review of approaches and a general protocol for identifying and prioritizing actions. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 28, 891–905. doi:10.1577/M06-174.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beechie, T., Sear, D. A., Olden, J. D., Pess, G. R., Buffington, J. M., Moir, H., … Pollock, M. M. (2010). Process-based principles for river restoration. Bioscience, 60(3), 209–222. doi:10.1525/bio.2010.60.3.7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beechie, T. J., & Sibley, T. H. (1997). Relationships between channel characteristics, woody debris, and fish habitat in northwestern Washington streams. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 126, 217–229. doi:10.1577/1548-8659(1997)126<0217:RBCCWD>2.3.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, S., Pess, G., Bouwes, N., Roni, P., Bilbly, R. E., Gallagher, S. P., … Greene, C. (2016). Progress and challenges of testing the effectiveness of stream restoration in the Pacific Northwest using Intensively Monitored Watersheds. Fisheries, 41(2), 92–103. doi:10.1080/03632415.2015.1127805
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beyer, H. L. (2012). Geospatial modelling environment (Version 0.7.2.1) (software) [software]. Retrieved from http://www.spatialecology.com/gme
   Google Scholar
• Blanchard, M. R. (2015). Using network models to predict steelhead abundance Middle Fork John Day, Oregon (Masters of science masters). Utah State University, Logan, UT.
   Google Scholar
• Box, J. B., Howard, J., Wolf, D., O Brien, C., Nez, D., & Close, D. (2006). Freshwater mussels (Bivalvia: Unionoida) of the Umatilla and Middle Fork John Day rivers in eastern Oregon. Northwest Science, 80(2), 95–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brierley, G., & Fryirs, K. (2005). Geomorphology and river management: Applications of the River Styles Framework. Victoria: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Brierley, G., Fryirs, K., Outhet, D., & Massey, C. (2002). Application of the River Styles Framework as a basis for river management in New South Wales, Australia. Applied Geography, 22(1), 31. doi:10.1016/S0143-6228(01)00016-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buffington, J. M., & Montgomery, D. R. (1999). A procedure for classifying textural facies in gravel-bed rivers. Water Resources Research, 35(6), 1903–1914. doi:10.1029/1999WR900041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buffington, J. M., & Montgomery, D. R. (2013). Geomorphic classification of rivers. Treatise on Geomorphology, 9, 730–767. Elsevier. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-374739-6.00263-3
   Google Scholar
• Butcher, D., Crown, J., Brannan, K., Kishida, K., & Hubler, S. (2010). John Day River basin Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) and Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP). Portland, OR: Oregon Department of Environmental Quality. DEQ 10-WQ-025.
   Google Scholar
• Church, M. (1992). Channel morphology and typology. In P. Callow & G. E. Petts (Eds.), The rivers handbook (pp. 126–143). Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Columbia Habitat Monitoring Program (CHaMP). (2012). Scientific protocol for salmonid habitat surveys within the Columbia Habitat Monitoring Program. Wauconda, WA. Retrieved from http://champmonitoring.org/Program/RetreiveProgramDocumentFile/1/Protocol%20Documents/1113376526
   Google Scholar
• Demarchi, L., Bizzi, S., & Piégay, H. (2016). Hierarchical object-based mapping of riverscape units and in-stream mesohabitats using LiDAR and VHR imagery. Remote Sensing, 8(2), 97. doi:10.3390/rs8020097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietrich, J. T. (2014). Applications of structure-from-motion photogrammetry to fluvial geomorphology (PhD). University of Oregon, Eugene, OR.
   Google Scholar
• Dietrich, J. T. (2016). Riverscape mapping with helicopter-based structure-from-motion photogrammetry. Geomorphology, 252, 144–157. doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.05.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fausch, K. D., Torgersen, C. E., Baxter, C. V., & Li, H. W. (2002). Landscapes to riverscapes: Bridging the gap between research and conservation of stream fishes. Bioscience, 52(6), 483–498. doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[0483:ltrbtg]2.0.co;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldhaus, J. W., Heppell, S. A., Hiram, L., & Mesa, M. G. (2010). A physiological approach to quantifying thermal habitat quality for redband rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss gairdneri) in the South Fork John Day River, Oregon. Environmental Biology of Fishes, 87, 277–290. doi: 10.1007/s10641-010-9580-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frissell, C. A., & Nawa, R. K. (1992). Incidence and causes of physical failure of artificial habitat structures in streams of Western Oregon and Washington. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 12(1), 15. doi:10.1577/1548-8675(1992)012<0182:IACOPF>2.3.CO;2
   Google Scholar
• Fryirs, K. (2015). Developing and using geomorphic condition assessments for river rehabilitation planning, implementation and monitoring. WIREs Water, 2(6), 649–667. doi:10.1002/wat2.1100
   Google Scholar
• Fryirs, K., Wheaton, J., & Brierley, G. J. (2016a). An approach for measuring confinement and assessing the influence of valley setting on river forms and processes. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms. doi:10.1002/esp.3893
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fryirs, K. A., & Brierley, G. J. (2016). Assessing the geomorphic recovery potential of rivers: forecasting future trajectories of adjustment for use in management. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water, 3(5), 727–748. doi:10.1002/wat2.1158
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fryirs, K. A., Wheaton, J. M., & Brierley, G. (2016b). An approach for measuring confinement and assessing the influence of valley setting on river forms and processes. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms. doi:10.1002/esp.3893
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert, J. T., Macfarlane, W. W., & Wheaton, J. M. (2016). The Valley Bottom Extraction Tool (V-BET): A GIS tool for delineating valley bottoms across entire drainage networks. Computers & Geosciences, 97, 1–14. doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2016.07.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, D. D., & Hubbard, L. E. (1982). Magnitude and frequency of floods in eastern Oregon. Retrieved from USGS Water-Resources Investigations Report.
   Google Scholar
• Hegeman, E. E., Miller, S. W., & Mock, K. E. (2014). Modeling freshwater mussel distribution in relation to biotic and abiotic habitat variables at multiple spatial scales. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 71(10), 1483–1497. doi: 10.1139/cjfas-2014-0110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holburn, E., Piety, L. A., Lyon, E. W., McAffee, R., & Callahan, D. (2008). Middle Fork and Upper John Day Tributary Assessments, Grant County, Oregon. Boise, Idaho: American Society of Civil Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Holburn, E., Turner, T., Piety, L., & Klinger, R. (2009). Habitat restoration on the Middle Fork John Day River. World environmental and water resources congress 2009: Great Rivers (pp. 1–12). Kansas City, MO: American Society of Civil Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• ISEMP/CHaMP. (2015). Combined integrated and status monitoring program and Columbia habitat monitoring program calendar year 2014 annual report. Prepared by ISEMP and CHaMP for the Bonneville Power Administration. B. P. Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Kasprak, A., Hough-Snee, N., Beechie, T., Bouwes, N., Brierley, G., Camp, R., … Wheaton, J. (2016). The blurred line between form and process: A comparison of stream channel classification frameworks. PLoS One, 11(3), e0150293. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0150293
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasprak, A., & Wheaton, J. (2012). Development of a rapid geomorphic assessment procedure for streams in the John Day River Watershed, Oregon. Logan, UT: Ecogeomorphology & Topographic Analysis Lab for Eco Logical Research, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Kellerhals, R., Church, M., & Bray, D. I. (1976). Classification and analysis of river processes. Journal of the Hydraulics Division-ASCE, 102(7), 813–829.
   Google Scholar
• Klingeman, P., Bogavelli, V., Coles, D., & Wright, M. (2002). Streamflow evaluations for river restoration planning and design. Retrieved from http://streamflow.engr.oregonstate.edu/index.htm
   Google Scholar
• Mann, C. C., & Plummer, M. L. (2000). Can science rescue salmon? Science, 289(5480), 716–719. doi:10.1126/science.289.5480.716
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May, C., Roering, J., Eaton, L. S., & Burnett, K. M. (2013). Controls on valley width in mountainous landscapes: The role of landsliding and implications for salmonid habitat. Geology, 41(4), 503–506. doi:10.1130/g33979.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May, C., Roering, J., Snow, K., Griswold, K., & Gresswell, R. (2017). The waterfall paradox: How knickpoints disconnect hillslope and channel processes, isolating salmonid populations in ideal habitats. Geomorphology, 277, 228–236. doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2016.03.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDowell, P. F. (2001). Spatial variations in channel morphology at segment and reach scales, Middle Fork John Day River, northeastern Oregon. In J. M. Dorava, D. R. Montgomery, B. B. Palcasak, & F. A. Fitzpatrick (Eds.), Geomorphic processes and riverine habitat ( Vol. water science and application volume 4; pp. 159–172). Washington, D.C.: American Geophysical Union.
   Google Scholar
• McHugh, P., Saunders, C., Bouwes, N., Wall, E., Bangen, S., Wheaton, J., … Jordan, C. (in press). Linking models across scales to assess the viability and restoration potential of a threatened population of steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss) in the Middle Fork John Day River, Oregon, USA. Ecological Modelling.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNyset, K., Volk, C., & Jordan, C. (2015). Developing an effective model for predicting spatially and temporally continuous stream temperatures from remotely sensed land surface temperatures. Water, 7(12), 6827–6846. doi:10.3390/w7126660
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mock, K. E., Box, J. C. B., Chong, J. P., Howard, J. K., Nez, D. A., Wolf, D., & Gardner, R. S. (2010). Genetic structuring in the freshwater mussel Anodonta corresponds with major hydrologic basins in the western United States. Molecular Ecology, 19(3), 569–591. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2009.04468.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montgomery, D. R. (2004). Geology, geomorphology, and the restoration ecology of salmon. GSA Today, 14(11), 4–12. doi:10.1130/1052-5173(2004)014<4:GGATRE>2.0.CO;2
   Google Scholar
• Montgomery, D. R., & Buffington, J. M. (1997). Channel-reach morphology in mountain drainage basins. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 109(5), 596–611. doi:10.1130/0016-7606(1997)109<0596:CRMIMD>2.3.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NMFS. (2008). Endangered Species Act – Section 7 Consultation Biological Opinion and Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act Essential Fish Habitat Consultation: Consultation on Remand for Operation of the Federal Columbia River Power System, 11 Bureau of Reclamation Projects in the Columbia Basin and ESA Section 10(a)(1)(A) Permit for Juvenile Fish Transportation Program. In N. M. F. Service (Ed.). Portland, Oregon: National Marine Fisheries Service.
   Google Scholar
• NOAA. (2013). Pacific salmonids: Major threats and impacts. Retrieved from http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/species/fish/salmon.htm
   Google Scholar
• Notebaert, B., & Piégay, H. (2013). Multi-scale factors controlling the pattern of floodplain width at a network scale: The case of the Rhône basin, France. Geomorphology, 200, 155–171. doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2013.03.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien, G. R., & Wheaton, J. M. (2015). River Styles report for the Middle Fork John Day Watershed, Oregon – example report for exploring leveraging the River Styles Framework in tributary habitat management for the Columbia River Basin. Logan, UT: Ecogeomorphology and Topographic Analysis Lab.
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien, G. R., Wheaton, J. M., & Bouwes, N. (2015). Synthesis & recommendations from Middle Fork John Day River Styles – leveraging the River Styles Framework in tributary habitat management for the Columbia River Basin. Logan, UT: Fluvial Habitats Center, Utah State University.
   Google Scholar
• Reclamation, U. S. B. o. (2010). Oxbow conservation area reach assessment, Middle Fork John Day River, Grant County, Oregon. Boise, Idaho: Pacific Northwest Regional Office.
   Google Scholar
• Reclamation, U. S. B. o. (2008). Middle Fork and Upper John Day River tributary assessments Grant County, Oregon. Boise, ID: Pacific Northwest Regional Office.
   Google Scholar
• Ries, KG,III. (2006). The national streamflow statistics program: A computer program for estimating streamflow statistics for ungaged sites. Reston, Virginia: U. S. G. Survey. Retrieved from U.S. Geological Survey Techniques and Methods Report TM Book 4, Chapter A6.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenfeld, J., & Hatfield, T. (2006). Information needs for assessing critical habitat of freshwater fish. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 63, 683–698. doi:10.1139/f05-242
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rucklehaus, M. H., Levin, P., Johnson, J. B., & Kareiva, P. M. (2002). The Pacific salmon wars: What science brings to the challenge of recovering species. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 33(Annual Reviews), 665–706. doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.33.010802.150504
   Google Scholar
• Schumm, S. A. (1977). The fluvial system. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Seaber, P. R., Kapinos, F. P., & Knapp, G. L. (1987). Hydrologic unit maps. (2294). United States Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Torgersen, C. E., Price, D. M., Li, H. W., & McIntosh, B. A. (1999). Multiscale thermal refugia and stream habitat associations of Chinook salmon in northeastern Oregon. Ecological Applications, 9(1), 301–319. doi:10.1890/1051-0761(1999)009[0301:MTRASH]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• USGS. (1999). National Elevation Dataset. Retrieved from http://ned.usgs.gov/
   Google Scholar
• USGS. (2007). National Hydrography Dataset. Retrieved from http://nhd.usgs.gov/
   Google Scholar
• Walker, G. W., & MacLeod, N. S. (Cartographer). (1991). Geologic map of Oregon. Retrieved from http://mrdata.usgs.gov/sgmc/or.html
   Google Scholar
• Wall, C. E., Bouwes, N., Wheaton, J. M., Saunders, W. C., & Bennett, S. N. (2015). Net rate of energy intake predicts reach-level steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss) densities in diverse basins from a large monitoring program. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 1–11. doi:10.1139/cjfas-2015-0290
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheaton, J., Bouwes, N., McHugh, P., Saunders, W. C., Bangen, S. G., Bailey, P. E., … Jordan, C. (2017). Upscaling site-scale ecohydraulic models to inform salmonid population-level life cycle modelling and restoration actions – lessons from the Columbia River Basin. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms. doi:10.1002/esp.4137
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheaton, J. M., Brasington, J., Darby, S. E., Merz, J., Pasternack, G. B., Sear, D., & Vericat, D. (2010). Linking geomorphic changes to salmonid habitat at a scale relevant to fish. River Research and Applications, 26(4), 469–486. doi:10.1002/rra.1305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheaton, J. M., Fryirs, K. A., Brierley, G. J., Bangen, S. G., Bouwes, N., & O’Brien, G. R. (2015). Geomorphic mapping and taxonomy of fluvial landforms. Geomorphology, 248, 273–295. doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.07.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, S. M., Justice, C., Kelsey, D. A., McCullough, D. A., & Smith†, T. (2017). Legacies of stream channel modification revealed using general land office surveys, with implications for water temperature and aquatic life. Elementa Science of the Anthropocene, 5(3). doi:10.1525/journal.elementa.192
   Google Scholar
• Wohl, E., & Merritt, D. M. (2008). Reach-scale channel geometry of mountain streams. Geomorphology, 93(3–4), 168–185. doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2007.02.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolman, M. G., & Miller, J. P. (1960). Magnitude and frequency of forces in geomorphic processes. Journal of Geology, 68, 54–74. doi: 10.1086/626637
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worthy, M. (2005). High-resolution total stream power estimates for the Cotter River, Namadgi National park, Australian Capital Territory. In I. C. Roach (Ed.), Regolith 2005 – ten years of the centre for resource and environment studies (pp. 338–343). Canberra: Australian National University.
   Google Scholar