A new model for cloud elastic services efficiency

References

• Armbrust M, Fox A, Griffith R, et al. A view of cloud computing. Commun ACM. 2010;53:50–58.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta A, Milojicic D. Evaluation of HPC applications on cloud. In: Open cirrus summit (OCS). Atlanta, GA; 2011 Oct. p. 22–26.
   Google Scholar
• Tsaftaris SA. A scientist’s guide to cloud computing. Comput Sci Eng. 2014;16:70–76.
   Google Scholar
• Liu L, Zhang M, Lin Y, et al. A survey on workflow management and scheduling in cloud computing. In: 14th IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Cluster, Cloud and Grid Computing (CCGrid). Chicago, IL; 2014 May. p. 837–846.
   Google Scholar
• Evans E, Grossman R. Cyber security and reliability in a digital cloud. Washington (DC): US Department of Defense Science Board Study; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Herbst NR, Kounev S, Reussner R. Elasticity in cloud computing: what it is, and what it is not. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Autonomic Computing (ICAC 13); San Jose, CA: USENIX:2013. p. 23–27.
   Google Scholar
• Chen Q, Grosso P, van der Veldt K, et al. Profiling energy consumption of VMs for green cloud computing. In: 2011 IEEE Ninth International Conference on Dependable, Autonomic and Secure Computing. Sydney, NSW, Australia; 2011 Dec. p. 768–775.
   Google Scholar
• Amdahl GM. Validity of the single-processor approach to achieving large scale computing capabilities. In: AFIPS Conference Proceedings; Apr 18--20; Reston. VA. Vol. 30; Atlantic City, NJ: AFIPS Press; 1967. p. 483–485.
   Google Scholar
• Ristov S, Prodan R, Gusev M, et al. Elastic cloud services compliance with Gustafson’s and Amdahl’s laws. In: Third International Workshop on Sustainable Ultrascale Computing Systems (NESUS 2016); 2016 Dec. p. 1–9. Available from: http://e-archivo.uc3m.es/handle/10016/24223
   Google Scholar
• Gustafson JL. Reevaluating Amdahl’s law. Commun ACM. 1988;31:532–533.
   Google Scholar
• Gustafson J, Montry G, Benner R. Development of parallel methods for a 1024-processor hypercube. SIAM J Sci Stat Comput. 1988;9:532–533.
   Google Scholar
• Lehrig S, Eikerling H, Becker S. Scalability, elasticity, and efficiency in cloud computing: a systematic literature review of definitions and metrics. In: International ACM SIGSOFT Conference on Quality of Software Architectures, QoSA ’15. Montreal: ACM; 2015. p. 83–92.
   Google Scholar
• Ristov S, Gusev M, Velkoski G. Modeling the speedup for scalable web services. In: Bogdanova AM, Gjorgjevikj D, editors. ICT Innovations 2014. Vol. 311, Advances in intelligent systems and computing. Springer International Publishing; 2015. p. 177–186. Available from: http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-09879-1_18
   Google Scholar
• Gusev M, Ristov S, Koteska B, et al. Windows Azure: resource organization performance analysis. In: Villari M, Zimmermann W, Lau KK, editors. Service-oriented and cloud computing (ESOCC). Vol. 8745, LNCS. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer; 2014. p. 17–31.
   Google Scholar
• Microsoft, Picture gallery service; 2012 [cited 2017 Sep 9]. Available from: http://phluffyfotos.codeplex.com/
   Google Scholar
• Zhang L, Ma X, Lu J, et al. Environmental modeling for automated cloud application testing. Softw IEEE. 2012;29:30–35.
   Google Scholar
• Math R, Ristov S, Prodan R. Simulation of a workflow execution as a real cloud by adding noise. Simul Model Pract Theory. 79:37–53. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1569190X17301351
   Google Scholar
• Gusev M, Ristov S. A superlinear speedup region for matrix multiplication. Concurrency Comput: Pract Exp. 2013;26:1847–1868. DOI:10.1002/cpe.3102
   Google Scholar
• Ristov S, Prodan R, Gusev M, et al. Superlinear speedup in HPC systems: why and when? In: 2016 Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems (FedCSIS); Gdansk, Poland: IEEE; 2016 Sept. p. 889–898. Available from: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7733347/
   Google Scholar
• Suleiman B, Sakr S, Jeffery R, et al. On understanding the economics and elasticity challenges of deploying business applications on public cloud infrastructure. J Internet Serv Appl. 2012;3:173–193. DOI:10.1007/s13174-011-0050-y
   Google Scholar
• ISO/IEC. ISO/IEC 25010 – systems and software engineering – systems and software quality requirements and evaluation (SQuaRE) – system and software quality models (2010) by ISO/IEC. Technical report; 2010. Available from: https://www.iso.org/standard/35733.html
   Google Scholar
• US Defense Science Board, Cyber security and reliability in a digital cloud. US Department of Defense Science Board Study; 2013. Available from: http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a581218.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Miettinen AP, Nurminen JK. Energy efficiency of mobile clients in cloud computing. In: Proceedings of the 2Nd USENIX Conference on Hot Topics in Cloud Computing, HotCloud’10; Boston, MA: USENIX Association; 2010. p. 4–4. Available from: http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1863103.1863107
   Google Scholar
• Tsai WT, Huang Y, Shao Q. Testing the scalability of SaaS applications. In: Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE International Conference on Service-Oriented Computing and Applications, SOCA ’11. Irvine (CA): IEEE Computer Society; 2011. p. 1–4. DOI:10.1109/SOCA.2011.6166245
   Google Scholar
• Hwang K, Bai X, Shi Y, et al. Cloud performance modeling with benchmark evaluation of elastic scaling strategies. IEEE Trans Parallel Distrib Syst. 2016;27:130–143.
   Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Sun XH, Wu M. Algorithm-system scalability of heterogeneous computing. J Parallel Distrib Comput. 2008;68:1403–1412.
   Google Scholar