Human dynamics with limited complexity

References

• Barabási A-L. The architecture of complexity: from network structure to human dynamics. IEEE Contr Syst Mag. 2007;27:33–42. doi: 10.1109/MCS.2007.384127
   Google Scholar
• Schneider CM, Belik V, Couronné T, et al. Unravelling daily human mobility motifs. J R Soc Interface. 2013;10:20130246. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2013.0246
   Google Scholar
• Brockmann D, Theis F. Money circulation, trackable items, and the emergence of universal human mobility patterns. IEEE Pervasive Comput. 2008;7:28–35. doi: 10.1109/MPRV.2008.77
   Google Scholar
• Mitnitski A, Song X, Rockwood K. Assessing biological aging: the origin of deficit accumulation. Biogerontology. 2013;14:709–717. doi: 10.1007/s10522-013-9446-3
   Google Scholar
• Galam S. Sociophysics: a review of Galam models. J Mod Phys C. 2008;19:409–440. doi: 10.1142/S0129183108012297
   Google Scholar
• Sen P, Chakrabarti BK. Sociophysics: an introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart JQ. The development of social physics. Am J Phys. 1950;18:239–253. doi: 10.1119/1.1932559
   Google Scholar
• Ball P. Why society is a complex matter: meeting twenty-first century challenges with a new kind of science. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan M. The social atom: why the rich get richer, cheats get caught and you neighbor usually looks like you. London: Cyan Books and Marshall Cavendish; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Pan RK, Sinha S. The statistical laws of popularity: universal properties of the box-office dynamics of motion pictures. New J Phys. 2010;12:115004 (23pp). doi: 10.1088/1367-2630/12/11/115004
   Google Scholar
• Chatterjee A, Mitrović M, Fortunato S. Universality in voting behavior: an empirical analysis. Nat Sci Rep. 2013;3:1049. doi: 10.1038/srep01049
   Google Scholar
• Pentland A. Social physics: how good ideas spread–the lessons from a new science. New York, NY: Penguin Press; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Eknoyan G. Adolphe Quetelet (1796 – 1874) – the average man and indices of obesity. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2008;23:47–51. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfm517
   Google Scholar
• Mantegna NR. Presentation of the English translation of Ettore Majorana's paper: the value of statistical laws in physics and social sciences. Quant Financ. 2005;5:133–140. doi: 10.1080/14697680500148174
   Google Scholar
• Iberall A. Contributions to a physical science for the study of civilization. J Soc Biol Struct. 1984;7:259–283. doi: 10.1016/S0140-1750(84)80037-8
   Google Scholar
• Weidlich W. Thirty years of sociodynamics. An integrated strategy of modelling in the social sciences: applications to migration and urban evolution. Chaos Solitons Fractals. 2005;24:45–56. doi: 10.1016/S0960-0779(04)00463-1
   Google Scholar
• Fenner T, Levene M, Loizou G. A model for collaboration networks giving rise to a power-law distribution with an exponential cutoff. Soc Networks. 2007;29:70–80. doi: 10.1016/j.socnet.2005.12.003
   Google Scholar
• Fenner T, Levene M, Loizou G. A discrete evolutionary model for chess players' ratings. IEEE Trans Comput Intel AI Games. 2012;4:84–93. doi: 10.1109/TCIAIG.2012.2190603
   Google Scholar
• Fenner T, Levene M, Loizou G. A stochastic evolutionary model for capturing human dynamics. J Stat Mech Theory Exp. Aug 2015;2015:P08015. doi: 10.1088/1742-5468/2015/08/P08015
   Google Scholar
• Simon HA. On a class of skew distribution functions. Biometrika. 1955;42:425–440. doi: 10.1093/biomet/42.3-4.425
   Google Scholar
• Albert R, Barabási A-L. Statistical mechanics of complex networks. Rev Mod Phys. 2002;74:47–97. doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.74.47
   Google Scholar
• Estrada E. The structure of complex networks: theory and applications. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Hedström P, Swedberg R. Social mechanisms: an introductory essay. In: Hedström P, Swedberg R, editors. Social mechanisms: an analytical approach to social theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1998, p. 1–31.
   Google Scholar
• Schelling TC. Social mechanisms and social dynamics. In: Hedström P, Swedberg R, editors. Social mechanisms: an analytical approach to social theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1998. p. 32–44.
   Google Scholar
• Tsoularis A, Wallace J. Analysis of logistic growth models. Math Biosci. 2002;179:21–55. doi: 10.1016/S0025-5564(02)00096-2
   Google Scholar
• Fenner T, Levene M, Loizou G. A bi-logistic growth model for conference registration with an early bird deadline. Cent Eur J Phys. 2013;11:904–909.
   Google Scholar
• Fenner T, Kaufmann E, Levene M, et al. A multiplicative process for generating a beta-like survival function with application to the UK 2016 EU referendum results. Int J Modern Phys C. 2017;28:1750132. doi: 10.1142/S0129183117501327
   Google Scholar
• Fenner T, Levene M, Loizou G. A multiplicative process for generating the rank-order distribution of UK election results. Qual Quant. 2018;52:1069–1079. doi: 10.1007/s11135-017-0504-9
   Google Scholar
• Mitzenmacher M. A brief history of generative models for power law and lognormal distributions. Internet Math. 2004;1:226–251. doi: 10.1080/15427951.2004.10129088
   Google Scholar
• Zanette DH. Multiplicative processes and city sizes. In Albeverio S, Andrey D, Giordano P, Vancheri A, editors. The dynamics of complex urban systems an interdisciplinary approach. Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag; 2008. p. 457–472.
   Google Scholar
• Sornette D, Knopoff L, Kagan YY, et al. Rank-ordering statistics of extreme events: application to the distribution of large earthquakes. J Geophys Res. 1996;101:13 8 13–883 –13–893. doi: 10.1029/96JB00177
   Google Scholar
• Kleinbaum DG, Klein M. Survival analysis, a self-learning text. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Springer Science+Business Media, LLC; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Lax PD. Hyperbolic partial differential equations. Courant Lecture Notes. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Charlesworth B. Evolution in age-structured populations. Cambridge studies in mathematical biology: 13. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Fenner T, Levene M, Loizou G. A stochastic evolutionary model generating a mixture of exponential distributions. Eur Phys J B. 2016;89:1–7. doi: 10.1140/epjb/e2016-60926-8
   Google Scholar
• Bentley RA, Hahn MW, Shennan SJ. Random drift and culture change. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B. 2004;271:1443–1450. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2004.2746
   Google Scholar
• Bentley A, Ormerod P. Agents, intelligence, and social atoms. In: Slingerland E, Collard M, editors. Creating consilience: integrating the sciences and the humanities. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2011. p. 205–222.
   Google Scholar
• Evans TS. Exact solutions for network rewiring models. Eur Phys J B. 2007;56:65–69. doi: 10.1140/epjb/e2007-00084-8
   Google Scholar
• Perc M. The Matthew effect in empirical data. J R Soc Interface. 2014;11:20140378. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2014.0378
   Google Scholar
• Johnson NL, Kotz S, Balkrishnan N. Continuous univariate distributions, volume 1. Chapter 13 normal distributions. Wiley series in probability and mathematical statistics. 2nd ed. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons; 1994. p. 80–206.
   Google Scholar
• Limpert E, Stahel WA, Abbt M. Log-normal distributions across the sciences: keys and clues. BioScience. 2001;51:341–352. doi: 10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0341:LNDATS]2.0.CO;2
   Google Scholar
• Laherrère J, Sornette D. Stretched exponential distributions in nature and economy: fat tails with characteristic scales. Eur Phys J B. 1998;2:525–539. doi: 10.1007/s100510050276
   Google Scholar
• Manning CD, Schütze H. Foundations of statistical natural language processing: section 1.4.3. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Brakman S, Garretsen H, Van Marrewijk C, et al. The return of Zipf: towards a further understanding of the rank-size distribution. J Reg Sci. 1999;39:183–213. doi: 10.1111/1467-9787.00129
   Google Scholar
• Chen C-C, Tseng C-Y, Telesca L, et al. Collective Weibull behavior of social atoms: application of the rank-ordering statistics to historical extreme events. Europhys Lett. 2012;97:48010-1–48010–6.
   Google Scholar
• Ross SM. Stochastic processes. 2nd ed. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Eeckhout J. Gibrat's law for (all) cities. Am Econ Rev. 2004;94:1429–1451. doi: 10.1257/0002828043052303
   Google Scholar
• Fenner T, Levene M, Loizou G. A stochastic evolutionary model for survival dynamics. Physica A. 2014;410:595–600. doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2014.05.038
   Google Scholar
• Barnes TJ, Wilson MW. Big data, social physics, and spatial analysis: the early years. Big Data Soc. 2014;1:1–14. doi: 10.1177/2053951714535365
   Google Scholar