Modelling IoT devices communication employing representative operation modes to reveal traffic generation characteristics

References

• Andrews JG, Buzzi S, Choi W, et al. What will 5G be? IEEE J Sel Areas Commun. 2014;32(6):1065–1082. doi: 10.1109/JSAC.2014.2328098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cisco T. Cisco visual networking index: global mobile data traffic forecast update, 2010–2015. Growth Lakel. 2011;2011(4):2010–2015.
   Google Scholar
• Barakat B, Arshad K. Energy efficient carrier aggregation for LTE-advanced. IEEE 8th GCC Conference & Exhibition; 2015 Feb 1–4; Muscat, Oman. IEEE; 2015. p. 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Aramide SO, Barakat B, Wang Y, et al. Generalized proportional fair (GPF) scheduler for LTE-A. 9th Computer Science and Electronic Engineering (CEEC); 2017 Sept 27–29; Colchester. IEEE; 2017. p. 128–132.
   Google Scholar
• Barakat B, Arshad K. An adaptive hybrid scheduling algorithm for LTE-advanced. 22nd International Conference on Telecommunications (ICT); 2015 Apr 27–29; Sydney (NSW). IEEE; 2015. p. 91–95.
   Google Scholar
• Sharsheer M, Barakat B, Arshad K. Coverage and capacity self-optimisation in LTE-Advanced using active antenna systems. IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference; 2016 Apr 3–6; Doha, Qatar. IEEE; 2016. p. 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Barakat B, Arshad K. Energy efficient scheduling in LTE-advanced for machine type communication. International Conference and Workshop on Computing and Communication (IEMCON); 2015 Oct 15–17; Vancouver (BC). IEEE; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Fadlullah ZM, Fouda MM, Kato N, et al. Toward intelligent machine-to-machine communications in smart grid. IEEE Commun Mag. 2011;49(4):60–65. doi: 10.1109/MCOM.2011.5741147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bui N, Zorzi M. Health care applications: a solution based on the internet of things. Proceedings of the 4th international symposium on Applied Sciences in Biomedical and Communication Technologies; 2011 Oct 26–29; Barcelona, Spain. New York (NY): ACM; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Zanella A, Vangelista L, Bui N, et al. Internet of things for smart cities. IEEE Internet Things J. 2014;1(1):22–32. doi: 10.1109/JIOT.2014.2306328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perera C, Liu CHIH, Jayawardena S, et al. A survey on internet of things from industrial market perspective. IEEE Access. 2014;2:1660–1679. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2015.2389854
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pötsch T, Khan Marwat SN, Zakit Y, et al. Influence of future M2M communication on the LTE system. 6th Joint IFIP Wireless and Mobile Networking Conference (WMNC); 2013 Apr 23–25; Dubai, United Arab Emirates. IEEE; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Islam MT, Taha AEM, Akl S. A survey of access management techniques in machine type communications. IEEE Commun Mag. 2014;52(4):74–81. doi: 10.1109/MCOM.2014.6807949
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laya A, Alonso L, Alonso-Zarate J. Is the random access channel of LTE and LTE-A suitable for M2M communications? A survey of alternatives. IEEE Commun Surv Tutorials. 2014;16(1):4–16. doi: 10.1109/SURV.2013.111313.00244
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shafiq MZ, Ji L, Liu AX, et al. A first look at cellular machine-to-machine traffic: large scale measurement and characterization. ACM SIGMETRICS Perform Eval Rev. 2012;40(1):65–76. doi: 10.1145/2318857.2254767
   Google Scholar
• Ide C, Dusza B, Putzke M, et al. Influence of M2M communication on the physical resource utilization of LTE. Wireless Telecommunications Symposium; 2012 Apr 18–20; London. IEEE; 2012. p. 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Shirvanimoghaddam M, Li Y, Dohler M, et al. Probabilistic rateless multiple access for machine-to-machine communication. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun. 2015;14(12):6815–6826. doi: 10.1109/TWC.2015.2460254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gotsis AG, Lioumpas AS, Alexiou A. M2M scheduling over LTE: challenges and new perspectives. IEEE Veh Technol Mag. 2012;7(3):34–39. doi: 10.1109/MVT.2012.2204544
   Google Scholar
• Soltanmohammadi E, Ghavami K, Naraghi-Pour M. A survey of traffic issues in machine-to-machine communications over LTE. IEEE Internet Things J. 2016;3(6):865–884. doi: 10.1109/JIOT.2016.2533541
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barakat B, Keates S, Arshad K, et al. Deriving machine to machine (M2M) traffic model from communication model. Fifth International Symposium on Innovation in Information and Communication Technology (ISIICT); 2018 Oct 31–Nov 1; Amman, Jordan. IEEE; 2018. p. 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Erlang AK. The theory of probabilities and telephone conversations. Nyt Tidsskr Mat B. 1909;20:33–39.
   Google Scholar
• Nikaein N, Laner M, Zhou K, et al. Simple traffic modeling framework for machine type communication. 10th International Symposium on Wireless Communication Systems; 2013 Aug 27–30; Ilmenau, Germany. VDE; 2013. p. 783–787.
   Google Scholar
• Laner M, Svoboda P, Nikaein N, et al. Traffic models for machine type communications. 10th International Symposium on Wireless Communication Systems; 2013 Aug 27–30; Ilmenau, Germany. VDE; 2013. p. 651–655.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Khatib O, Hardjawana W, Vucetic B. Traffic modeling for machine-to-machine (M2M) last mile wireless access networks. IEEE Global Communications Conference; 2014 Dec 8–12; Austin (TX). IEEE; 2014. p. 1199–1204.
   Google Scholar
• Barakat B, Yassine H, Keates S, et al. How to measure the average and peak age of information in real networks? IEEE 25th European Wireless; 2019 May 2–4; Aarhus, Denmark. IEEE; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Barakat B, Keates S, Arshad K, et al. Adaptive status arrivals policy (ASAP) delivering fresh information (minimise peak age) in real world scenarios. In: Antona M, Stephanidis C, editors. Universal access in human-computer interaction. Multimodality and assistive environments. International conference on Human-Computer Interaction, HCII 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 11573. Cham: Springer; 2019. p. 419–430.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Khatib O, Member S, Hardjawana W, et al. Traffic modeling and optimization in public and private wireless access networks for smart grids. IEEE Trans Smart Grid. 2014;5(4):1949–1960. doi: 10.1109/TSG.2014.2304495
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Floyd S, Jacobson V. The synchronization of periodic routing messages. IEEE/ACM Trans Netw. 1994;2(2):122–136. doi: 10.1109/90.298431
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertsekas DP, Gallager RG, Humblet P. Data networks. Vol. 2. Englewood Cliffs (NJ): Prentice Hall; 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Gross D, Shortle JF, Thompson JM, et al. Fundamentals of queueing theory. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley & Sons; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Park K, Willinger W. Self-similar network traffic and performance evaluation. Vol. 53. New York (NY): John Wiley & Sons; 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Paxson V, Floyd S. Wide area trdfie: the failure of poisson modeling. IEEE/ACM Trans Netw. 1995;3(3):226–244. doi: 10.1109/90.392383
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jain R, Routhier S. Packet trains–measurements and a new model for computer network traffic. IEEE J Sel Areas Commun. 1986;4(6):986–995.
   Google Scholar
• Shafiq MZ, Ji L, Liu AX, et al. Large-scale measurement and characterization of cellular machine-to-machine traffic. IEEE/ACM Trans Netw. 2013;21(6):1960–1973. doi: 10.1109/TNET.2013.2256431
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston M, Modiano E. A new look at wireless scheduling with delayed information. IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT); 2015 Jun 14–19; Hong Kong, China. IEEE; 2015. p. 1407–1411.
   Google Scholar
• Aijaz A, Aghvami AH. Cognitive machine-to-machine communications for internet-of-things: a protocol stack perspective. IEEE Internet Things J. 2015;2(2):103–112. doi: 10.1109/JIOT.2015.2390775
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathworks. SimEvents: users guide. MATLAB manual; 2011. p. 1–458.
   Google Scholar