Simulation of pedestrian behaviours in high-rise buildings based on Intelligence Decision P System

References

• Shields TJ, Boyce KE, McConnell N. The behaviour and evacuation experiences of WTC 9/11 evacuees with self-designated mobility impairments. Fire Safety J. 2009;44:881–893. doi: 10.1016/j.firesaf.2009.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou M, Dong H, Wen D, et al. Modeling of crowd evacuation with assailants via a fuzzy logic approach. IEEE Trans Intell Transp. 2016;17:2395–2407. doi: 10.1109/TITS.2016.2521783
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelechano N, Malkawi A. Evacuation simulation models: challenges in modeling high rise building evacuation with cellular automata approaches. Automat Constr. 2008;17:377–385. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2007.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma J, Song WG, Tian W, et al. Experimental study on an ultra high-rise building evacuation in China. Safety Sci. 2012;50:1665–1674. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2011.12.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cepolina EM. Phased evacuation: an optimisation model which takes into account the capacity drop phenomenon in pedestrian flows. Fire Safety J. 2009;44:532–544. doi: 10.1016/j.firesaf.2008.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kretz T, Grunebohm A, Schreckenberg M. Experimental study of pedestrian flow through a bottleneck. J Stat Mech-Theory E. 2006;10:1–27.
   Google Scholar
• Nicolas A, Bouzat S, Kuperman MN. Influence of selfish and polite behaviours on a pedestrian evacuation through a narrow exit: a quantitative characterisation. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Pedestrian and Evacuation Dynamics; 2016. p. 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Shi D, Zhang W, Wang B. Dynamics of panic pedestrians in evacuation. Physics. 2017: 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Tomonori S, Masanori Y, Hiroyuki K, et al. Human behavior in a staircase during a total evacuation drill in a high-rise building. Fire Mater. 2017;41:375–386. doi: 10.1002/fam.2388
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton GN, Lennon PF, Raw J. Human behaviour during evacuation of primary schools: Investigations on pre-evacuation times, movement on stairways and movement on the horizontal plane. Fire Safety J. 2017;91:937–946. doi: 10.1016/j.firesaf.2017.04.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slovic P, Fischhoff B, Lichtenstein S. Behavioral decision theory. Annu Rev Psychol. 1977;28:1–39. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ps.28.020177.000245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovreglio R. Modelling decision-making in fire evacuation using random utility theory. Milano: Politecnico di Bari; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Zakay D. The impact of time perception processes on decision making under time stress. In: Svenson O, Maule AJ, editors. Time pressure and stress in human judgment and decision making. Boston (MA): Springer; 1993. p. 59–72.
   Google Scholar
• Ben H, Breznitz SJ. The effect of time pressure on risky choice behavior. Acta Psychol. 1981;47:89–104. doi: 10.1016/0001-6918(81)90001-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuligowski ED. Human behavior in fire. New York (NY): Springer; 2016. p. 2070–2114.
   Google Scholar
• Wang L, Zheng J, Zhang X, et al. Pedestrians behavior in emergency evacuation: modeling and simulation. Chin Phys B. 2016;25:1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pereira L, Duczmal L, Cruz F. Congested emergency evacuation of a population using a finite automata approach. Saf Sci. 2013;51:267–272. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2012.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuen J, Lee E. The effect of overtaking behavior on unidirectional pedestrian flow. Safety Sci. 2012;50:1704–1714. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2011.12.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Păun G. Computing with membranes. J Comput Syst Sci. 2000;61:108–143. doi: 10.1006/jcss.1999.1693
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Díaz-Pernil D, Gutiérrez-Naranjo MA, Peng H. Membrane computing and image processing: a short survey. J Membr Comput. 2019;1:58–73. doi: 10.1007/s41965-018-00002-x
   Google Scholar
• Pan L, Păun G, Zhang G. Foreword: starting JMC. J Membr Comput. 2019;1:1–2. doi: 10.1007/s41965-019-00010-5
   Google Scholar
• Ionescu M, Păun G, Yokomori T. Spiking neural P systems. Fund Inform. 2006;71:279–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng X, Pan L, Pérez-Jiménez MJ. Small universal simple spiking neural P systems with weights. Sci China Inf Sci. 2014;57:1–11.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhang Z, Wu T, Păun A, et al. Universal enzymatic numerical P systems with small number of enzymatic variables. Sci China Technol Sci. 2018;61:1–12. doi: 10.1007/s11431-017-9187-y
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhang G, Rong H, Cheng J, et al. A population-membrane-system-inspired evolutionary algorithm for distribution network reconfiguration. Chinese J Electron. 2014;23:437–441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang G, Rong H, Neri F, et al. An optimization spiking neural P system for approximately solving combinatorial optimization problems. Int J Neural Syst. 2014;24:1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng H, Shi P, Wang J, et al. Multiobjective fuzzy clustering approach based on tissue-like membrane systems. Knowl-Based Syst. 2017;125:74–82. doi: 10.1016/j.knosys.2017.03.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Román G. Inference of bounded L systems with polymorphic P systems. J Membr Comput. 2019;1:52–57. doi: 10.1007/s41965-019-00007-0
   Google Scholar
• Orellana-Martín D, Valencia-Cabrera L, Riscos-Núñez A, et al. P systems with proteins: a new frontier when membrane division disappears. J Membr Comput. 2019;1:29–39. doi: 10.1007/s41965-018-00003-w
   Google Scholar
• Bottoni P, Labella A, Rozenberg G. Reaction systems with influence on environment. J Membr Comput. 2019;1:3–19. doi: 10.1007/s41965-018-00005-8
   Google Scholar
• Mayne R, Phillips N, Adamatzky A. Towards experimental P-systems using multivesicular liposomes. J Membr Comput. 2019;1:20–28. doi: 10.1007/s41965-018-00006-7
   Google Scholar
• Sánchez-Karhunen E, Valencia-Cabrera L. Modelling complex market interactions using PDP systems. J Membr Comput. 2019;1:40–51. doi: 10.1007/s41965-019-00008-z
   Google Scholar
• Barbuti R, Maggiolo-Schettini A, Milazzo P, et al. Spatial P systems. Nat Comput. 2011;10:3–16. doi: 10.1007/s11047-010-9187-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinze T, Weber LL, Hatnik U. Walking membranes: grid-exploring P systems with artificial evolution for multi-purpose topological optimisation of cascaded processes. CMC 2016: Membrane Computing; 2017. p. 251–271.
   Google Scholar
• Niu Y, Zhang Y, Zhang J, et al. Running cells with decision-making mechanism: intelligence decision P system for evacuation simulation. Int J Comput Commun. 2018;13:865–880. doi: 10.15837/ijccc.2018.5.3223
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y, Jia H. Pedestrian evacuation behavior analysis and simulation in multi-exits case. Int J Mod Phys C. 2017;28:1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding N, Zhang H, Chen T. Stair evacuation simulation based on cellular automata considering evacuees’ walk preferences. Chin Phys B. 2015;24:687–693.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding N, Zhang H, Chen T. Simulation-based optimization of emergency evacuation strategy in ultra-high-rise buildings. Nat Hazards. 2017;89:1167–1184. doi: 10.1007/s11069-017-3013-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Code of practice on building works for lifts and escalators. Building Authority HK; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Peacock R, Reneke P, Kuligowski E, et al. Movement on stairs during building evacuations. Fire Technol. 2017;53:845–871. doi: 10.1007/s10694-016-0603-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar