A synthetic biology approach for the design of genetic algorithms with bacterial agents

References

• Hatwágner MF, Horváth A. Maintaining genetic diversity in bacterial evolutionary algorithm. Annales Univ. Sci. Budapest., Sect. Comp. 2012;37:175–194.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey I. The microbial genetic algorithm,” in 10th European Conference, ECAL 2009, Advances in Artificial Life. Darwin Meets von Neumann, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Part II. LNCS 5778, Berlin. Springer Verlag, G. Kampis, I. Karsai, and E. Szathmáry, Eds., Budapest, Hungary, 2011, pp. 126–133.
   Google Scholar
• Anandaraman C, Madurai Sankar AV, Natarajan R. A new evolutionary algorithm based on bacterial evolution and its application for scheduling a flexible manufacturing system. Jurnal Teknik Industri. 2012;14:1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Perales-Gravan C, Lahoz-Beltra R. An AM radio receiver designed with a genetic algorithm based on a bacterial conjugation genetic operator. IEEE Trans Evol Comput. 2008;12:129–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehrafsa A, Sokhandan A, Karimian G. A high performance genetic algorithm using bacterial conjugation operator (HPGA). Genet. Program. Evolvable Mach. 2013;14:395–427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh PK, Mondal SK, Maiti M. A hybridized chemotactic genetic algorithm for optimization. J Comp Sci Sys Biol. 2016;9:45–50.
   Google Scholar
• Passino KM. Biomimicry of bacterial foraging for distributed optimization and control. IEEE Control Syst Mag. 2002;22:52–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Botzheim J, Cabrita C, Kóczy LT, et al. Fuzzy rule extraction by bacterial memetic algorithms. Int J Intell Syst. 2009;24:312–339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron E, Bashor CJ, Collins JJ. A brief history of synthetic biology. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2014;12:381–390.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacDonald IC, Deans TL. Tools and applications in synthetic biology. Adv Drug Del Rev. 2016;105:20–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie M, Fussenegger M. Designing cell function: assembly of synthetic gene circuits for cell biology applications. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2018;19:507–525. doi:10.1038/s41580-018-0024-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lahoz-Beltra R, Navarro J, Marijuan PC. Bacterial computing: a form of natural computing and its applications. Front Microbiol. 2014;5:101, DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00101,.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jang SS, Oishi KT, Egbert RG, et al. Specification and simulation of synthetic multicelled behaviors. ACS Synth Biol. 2012;1:365–374.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oishi K, Klavins E. A framework for implementing finite state machines in gene regulatory networks. ACS Synth Biol. 2014;3:652–665.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez M, Gregorio-Godoy P, Pérez Del Pulgar G, et al. A new improved and extended version of the multicell bacterial simulator gro. ACS Synth Biol. 2017;6:1496–1508.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorochowski TE. Agent-based modelling in synthetic biology. Essays Biochem. 2016;60:325–336.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matyjaszkiewicz A, Fiore G, Annunziata F, et al. BSim 2.0: An advanced agent-based cell simulator. ACS Synth Biol. 2017;6:1969–1972.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen RJ, Waclaw B. Bacterial growth: a statistical physicist’s guide. Rep Prog Phys. 2019;82:016601; doi:10.1088/1361-6633/aae546.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris V, Zemirline A, Amar P, et al. Computing with bacterial constituents, cells and populations: from bioputing to bactoputing. Theory Biosci 2011;130:211–228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dekel E, Alon U. Optimality and evolutionary tuning of the expression level of a protein. Nature. 2005;436:588–592.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hariharan P, Balasubramaniam D, Peterkofsky A, et al. Thermodynamic mechanism for inhibition of lactose permease by the phosphotransferase protein IIAGlc. PNAS. 2015;112:2407–2412.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumgardner J, Acker K, Adefuye O, et al. Solving a Hamiltonian path problem with a bacterial computer. J Biol Eng. 2009;3:1–11.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Poet JL, Campbell AM, Eckdahl TT, et al. Bacterial computing. XRDS. 2010;17:10–15.
   Google Scholar
• Kari L, Kitto R, Gloor G. A computer scientist’s guide to molecular biology. Soft comput. 2001;5:95–101.
   Google Scholar
• Hunter L. Molecular biology for computer scientists. In: L Hunter, editor. Artificial Intelligence and molecular biology. Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press/MIT Press; 1993. p. 1–46.
   Google Scholar
• Lahoz-Beltra R, Gargantilla Becerra A. “A genetic algorithm designed with bacterial agents (BAGA)”. figshare. Software. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.13396544.v1, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Villa TG, Feijoo-Siota L, Sánchez-Pérez A, et al. Horizontal gene transfer in bacteria, an overview of the mechanisms involved. In: T Villa, M Viñas, editor. Horizontal gene transfer. Cham: Springer; 2019. p. 3–76.
   Google Scholar
• Gresham D, Hong J. The functional basis of adaptive evolution in chemostats. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2015;39:2–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dykhuizen DE. Experimental studies of natural selection in bacteria. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 1990;21:373–398.
   Google Scholar
• Santos-Moreno J, Schaerli Y. Using synthetic biology to engineer spatial patterns. Advanced Biosystems. 2019;3(4). 1800280.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Umesh P, Naveen F, Maheswara Rao CU, et al. Programming language for synthetic biology. Syst Synth Biol 2010;4:265–269.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Condon A, Kirchner H, Larivière D, et al. Will biologists become computer scientists? EMBO Rep. 2018;19:e46628:1–6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schwille P, Sundmacher K. “Synthetic Biology: Life, Remixed,” Available: https://www.mpg.de/8219292/synthetic_biology, Accessed on: Mar. 6, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Peisajovich SG. Evolutionary synthetic biology. ACS Synth Biol. 2012;1:199–210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen AAK, Der BS, Shin J, et al. Genetic circuit design automation. Science. 2016;352(6281), aac7341, doi:10.1126/science.aac7341.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dragosits M, Mattanovich D. Adaptive laboratory evolution – principles and applications for biotechnology. Microb. Cell. Fact. 2013;12:64), doi:10.1186/1475-2859-12-64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wakabayashi K, Yamamura M. A design for cellular evolutionary computation by using bacteria. Nat Comput. 2005;4:275–292.
   Google Scholar