References
- Forrester GS, Rodriguez A. Slip of the tongue: Implications for evolution and language development. Cognition. 2015;141:103–111. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2015.04.012.
- Diamond A. Close interrelation of motor development and cognitive development and of the cerebellum and prefrontal cortex. Child Development. 2000;71(1):44–56. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.2000.71.issue-1.
- Waters GS, Fouts RS. Sympathetic mouth movements accompanying fine motor movements in chimpanzees ( Pan troglodytes ) with implications toward the evolution of language. Neurological Research. 2013;24(2):174–180. doi:https://doi.org/10.1179/016164102101199585.
- Rizzolatti G, Arbib MA. Language within our grasp. Trends in Neurosciences. 1998;21(5):188–194. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-2236(98)01260-0.
- Rizzolatti G, Fogassi L, Gallese V. Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the understanding and imitation of action. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2001;2(9):661–670. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/35090060.
- Jamone L, Ugur E, Cangelosi A, et al. Affordances in psychology, neuroscience, and robotics: a survey. IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems. 2018;10(1):4–25. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/TCDS.2016.2594134.
- Rochat MJ, Caruana F, Jezzini A, et al. Responses of mirror neurons in area F5 to hand and tool grasping observation. Experimental Brain Research. 2010;204(4):605–616. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-010-2329-9.
- Hudak P. Para-functional programming. Computer. 1986;19(08):60–70. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.1986.1663309.
- Hudak P. Exploring parafunctional programming: separating the what from the how. IEEE Software. 1988;5(1):54–61. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/52.1994.
- De Niz Villaseñor D. Modeling functional and para-functional concerns In embedded real-time systems. Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University; 2004.
- Rajkumar R. Model-based development of embedded systems: the sysweaver approach. Next Generation Design and Verification Methodologies for Distributed Embedded Control Systems. 2007: 35–46. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6254-4_3.
- Crespi BJ. Autism as a disorder of high intelligence. Frontiers in Neuroscience. 2016;10:S110. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2016.00300.
- Calude CS, Longo G. The deluge of spurious correlations in big data. Foundations of Science. 2017;22(3):595–612. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-016-9489-4.
- Vallverdú J. Approximate and situated causality in Deep learning. Philosophies. 2020;5(1). doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies5010002.
- Vallverdú J. Biasing AI? BioNanoScience. 2021;11(2):633–636. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12668-020-00803-4.
- Taniguchi H, Sato H, Shirakawa T. A machine learning model with human cognitive biases capable of learning from small and biased datasets. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1). doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-25679-z.
- Vallverdú J. Bayesians versus frequentists: a philosophical debate on statistical reasoning. Berlin: Springer; 2015.
- Kahneman D. Thinking fast, thinking slow. In interpretation. London: Tavistock; 2011.
- Vallverdú J, Müller VC. Blended cognition: the robotic challenge. Berlin: Springer; 2019.
- Adamatzky A, Armstrong R, Jones J, et al. On creativity of slime mould. Int J Gen Syst. 2013;42(5):441–457. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03081079.2013.776206.
- Vallverdú J, Castro O, Mayne R, et al. Slime mould: The fundamental mechanisms of biological cognition. BioSystems. 2018;165:57–70. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystems.2017.12.011.
- Ibrahim MT, Anthony RJ, Eymann T, et al. Exploring adaptation & self-adaptation in autonomic computing systems. DEXA. 2006: 129–138. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/DEXA.2006.57.
- Bechtel W. Philosophy and the neurosciences: a reader. Blackwell Pub. 2001.
- Goller M, Tomforde S. On the stability of (self-)adaptive behaviour in continuously changing environments: A quantification approach. Array. 2021;11:1–9, 100069. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.array.2021.100069.
- Froese T, Ziemke T. Enactive artificial intelligence: investigating the systemic organization of life and mind. Artif Intell. 2009;173(3–4):466–500. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2008.12.001.
- Narendra T, Sankaran A, Vijaykeerthy D, et al. (2018). Explaining Deep learning models using causal inference. http://arxiv.org/abs/1811.04376.
- Pearl J, Mackenzie D. The book of why: the new science of cause and effect. London: Basic Books; 2018.
- Rojas-Carulla M, Schölkopf B, Turner R, et al. Invariant models for causal transfer learning. J Mach Learn Res. 2018;19(1).
- Schölkopf B. (2019). Causality for machine learning. http://arxiv.org/abs/1911.10500.
- Stewart J, Gapenne O, Di Paolo EA. (2010). Enaction: toward a new paradigm for cognitive science. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.
- Korbak T. Unsupervised learning and the natural origins of content. AVANT. The Journal of the Philosophical-Interdisciplinary Vanguard. 2019;10(3):1–14. doi:https://doi.org/10.26913/AVANT.2019.03.11.
- Korbak T. Computational enactivism under the free energy principle. Synthese. 2021;198(3):2743–2763. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/S11229-019-02243-4.
- Perconti P, Plebe A. Deep learning and cognitive science. Cognition. 2020;203.: 1–12, 104365.
- Mitra PP. Fitting elephants in modern machine learning by statistically consistent interpolation. Nature Machine Intelligence. 2021;3(5):378–386. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-021-00345-8.
- Theunissen MW, Davel MH, Barnard E. Benign interpolation of noise in deep learning. S Afr Comput J. 2020;32(2):80–101. doi:https://doi.org/10.18489/sacj.v32i2.833.
- Zhang C, Bengio S, Hardt M, et al. Understanding deep learning (still) requires rethinking generalization. Commun ACM. 2021;64(3):107–115. doi:https://doi.org/10.1145/3446776.
- Belkin M, Rakhlin A, Tsybakov AB. Does data interpolation contradict statistical optimality? PMLR Proceedings of machine llearning research). The 22nd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics H; 2019.,89, 1611–1619.
- Mitra PP, Sire C. Parameter-free statistically consistent interpolation: dimension-independent convergence rates for hilbert kernel regression. ArXiv. 2021: 1–30. https://arxiv.org/abs/2106.03354v1.
- Lake BM, Ullman TD, Tenenbaum JB, et al. Building machines that learn and think like people. Behav Brain Sci. 2017;40:1–72. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X16001837.
- Gomez-Robles A, Hopkins WD, Schapiro SJ, et al. Relaxed genetic control of cortical organization in human brains compared with chimpanzees. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2015;112(48):14799–14804. doi:https://doi.org/10.1073/PNAS.1512646112/-/DCSUPPLEMENTAL.
- Hrvoj-Mihic B, Bienvenu T, Stefanacci L, et al. Evolution, development, and plasticity of the human brain: from molecules to bones. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 2013;7(OCT). doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00707.
- Vallverdú J. Biasing AI? BioNanoScience. 2021;11(2):633–636. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12668-020-00803-4.
- Kuhn TS. The structure of scientific revolutions (Vol. 111). Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1970.
- Kuhn TS. Theory-change as structure-change: comments on the sneed formalism. Erkenntnis. 1976;10(2):179–199. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00204969
- Toulmin SE. Human understanding, volume I: The collective Use and evolution of concepts. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1977.
- Vallverdú J. (2005). Cómo finalizan las controversias? Un nuevo modelo de análisis: la controvertida historia de la sacarina. Revista CTS, 2, 19–50.
- Harding S. (1976). Can Theories be Refuted? Essays on the Duhem-Quine Thesis | Sandra Harding | Springer. Springer.
- Csikszentmihalyi M. Creativity: the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: Perennial; 1996.
- Csikszentmihalyi M. (2014). The systems model of creativity. In Springer. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9085-7_9.
- Miller AI. The artist in the machine. The world of AI powered creativity. Boston (MA): MIT Press; 2019.
- Hauser H, Ijspeert AJ, Füchslin RM, et al. Towards a theoretical foundation for morphological computation with compliant bodies. Biol Cybern. 2011;105(5):355–370. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/S00422-012-0471-0.
- Pfeifer R, Bongard J, Grand S. How the body shapes the way we think: a new view of intelligence. Boston (MA): MIT Press; 2007.
- M VC, H M. What Is morphological computation? On How the body contributes to cognition and control. Artif Life. 2017;23(1):1–24. doi:https://doi.org/10.1162/ARTL_a_00219.
- Lieto A, Bhatt M, Oltramari A, et al. The role of cognitive architectures in general artificial intelligence. Cognitive Systems Research. 2018;48:1–3. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2017.08.003.
- Chemero A. Radical embodied cognitive science. Boston (MA): MIT Press; 2009.
- Norman DA. Affordance, conventions, and design. Interactions. 1999;6(3):38–43.
- Vallverdú J, Trovato G. Emotional affordances for human–robot interaction. Adaptive Behavior. 2016;24(5):320–334. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1059712316668238.
- Wörgötter F, Ziaeetabar F, Pfeiffer S, et al. Humans predict action using grammar-like structures. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):1–11. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-60923-5.
- Yang Y, Li Y, Fermüller C, et al. Robot learning manipulation action plans by “watching” unconstrained videos from the world wide Web. Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 2015: 3686–3692.
- Boussard A, Fessel A, Oettmeier C, et al. Adaptive behaviour and learning in slime moulds: the role of oscillations. Philos Trans R Soc, B. 2021;376(1820. doi:https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2019.0757.
- Kim YS, Jeong JY, Kim MK, et al. Emotional engineering. Emotional Engineering: Service Development. 2011;20(11):179–206. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84996-423-4_10.
- Bardone E. Seeking chances: from biased rationality to distributed cognition. Berlin: Springer; 2011.
- Gibson EJ. Where Is the information for affordances? Ecol Psychol. 2000;12(1):53–56. doi:https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326969ECO1201_5.
- Wang C, Hindriks KV, Babuska R. Robot learning and use of affordances in goal-directed tasks). IEEE International Conference on intelligent robots and systems; 2013. 2288–2294. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS.2013.6696676
- Franzoni V, Milani A, Vallverdú J. Emotional affordances in human-machine interactive planning and negotiation). Proceedings - 2017 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web intelligence; 2017; WI 2017. doi:https://doi.org/10.1145/3106426.3109421
- Vallverdú J, Trovato G. Emotional affordances for human–robot interaction. Adapt Behav. 2016;24:320–334. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1059712316668238.
- Darwin C. The expression of the emotions in Man and animals, anniversary edition. London: John Murray; 1872.
- Damasio AR. Descartes’ error: emotion, rationality and the human brain. New York: Putnam; 1994. 352
- Pfeifer R, Heifer R. STRATEGIC CHOICES AND NICHE MOVEMENTS: A PROBABILISTIC MODEL OF ORGANIZATIONAL SELECTION AND MORTALITY. Academy of management Proceedings 1993 2d IEEE International Workshop on robot and human communication; 1993, 408–413. doi:https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.1993.10315156
- Vallverdú J, Talanov M, Distefano S, et al. A cognitive architecture for the implementation of emotions in computing systems. Biologically Inspired Cognitive Architectures. 2016;15:34–40. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bica.2015.11.002.
- Adúriz-Bravo A, Sans Pinillos A. Abduction as a mode of inference in science education. In: F Seroglou, V Koulountzos, editors. Re-introducing science sculpting the image of science for education and media in its historical and philosophical background. Athens: Grafima Publications; 2019. p. 265–271.
- Aliseda A. Abductive reasoning: challenges ahead. Theoria-Revista De Teoria Historia Y Fundamentos De La Ciencia. 2007;22(3):261–270. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3907-7.
- Bergadano F, Cutello V, Gunetti D. Abduction in machine learning. In: Abductive reasoning and learning. Dordrecht: Springer; 2000. p. 197–229.
- Raghavan S, Mooney RJ. (2010). Bayesian abductive logic programs. Proceedings of the AAAI-10 Workshop on Statistical Relational AI (Star-AI 10), 82–87. http://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/WS/AAAIW10/paper/viewPDFInterstitial/1974/24875Cnpapers2://publication/uuid/ED17DAD4-57B9-4052-B9C3-A2F342AE5329.
- Vallverdú J. The situated nature of informational ontologies. In: G Dodig-Crnkovic, M Burgin, editor. Philosophy and methodology of information. World Scientific; 2019. p. 353–365. doi:https://doi.org/10.1142/9789813277526_0016
- Beuls K, Steels L, Smith K, etal Agent-Based models of strategies for the emergence and evolution of grammatical agreement. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(3): 1–15, e58960. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0058960.
- Kanerva P. Hyperdimensional computing: An introduction to computing in distributed representation with high-dimensional random vectors. Cognit Comput. 2009: 139–159. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-009-9009-8.
- Kleyko D, Davies M, Frady EP, et al. (2021). Vector Symbolic Architectures as a Computing Framework for Nanoscale Hardware. https://arxiv.org/abs/2106.05268v1.
- Talanov M, Leukhin A, Lövheim H, et al. (2019). Springer series in cognitive and neural systems. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03104-6_6.
- Vallverdú J, Talanov M, Distefano S, et al. A cognitive architecture for the implementation of emotions in computing systems. Biologically Inspired Cognitive Architectures. 2016b;330. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bica.2015.11.002.
- Kriegman S, Blackiston D, Levin M, et al. Kinematic self-replication in reconfigurable organisms. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2021;118(49):e2112672118. doi:https://doi.org/10.1073/PNAS.2112672118/VIDEO-1.
- Heess N, Tb D, Sriram S, et al. Emergence of locomotion behaviours in rich environments. ArXiv. 2017. https://arxiv.org/abs/1707.02286v2.
- Calegari R, Ciatto G, Denti E, et al. Logic-based technologies for intelligent systems: state of the art and perspectives. Information. 2020;11(3):167). doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/info11030167.