An efficient spatial semi-supervised learning algorithm

References

• Ambroise , C. , Dang , M. and Govaert , G. 1997 . geoENV I—Geostatistics for Environmental Applications , vol. 9 , 493 – 504 . Dordrecht : Kluwer Academic Publisher . Clustering of spatial data by the EM algorithm. Quantitative Geology and Geostatistics
   Google Scholar
• Besag , J. 1974 . Spatial interaction and the statistical analysis of lattice systems . Journal of Royal Statistical Society , 36 : 192 – 236 .
   Google Scholar
• Besag , J. 1986 . On the statistical analysis of dirty pictures . Journal of Royal Statistical Society , 48 ( 3 ) : 259 – 302 .
   Google Scholar
• Bilmes, J., 1997, A gentle tutorial on the em algorithm and its application to parameter estimation for gaussian mixture and hidden markov models, Technical Report, University of Berkeley, ICSI-TR-97-021
   Google Scholar
• Dempster , A. , Laird , N.M. and Rubin , B. 1977 . Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the em algorithm . Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B , 39 ( 1 ) : 1 – 38 .
   Google Scholar
• Duin , R. 2000 . “ Classifiers in almost empty spaces ” . In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Pattern Recognition vol. 2 , 1 – 7 . (Barcelona, Spain, Sep. 3–7), IEEEComputer Society Press
   Google Scholar
• Goldman , S. and Zhou , Y. 2000 . “ Enhancing supervised learning with unlabeled data ” . In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Machine Learning , 327 – 334 . San Francisco, CA : Morgan Kaufmann .
   Google Scholar
• Green , P.J. 1990 . On use of the em algorithm for penalized likelihood estimation . Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B , 52 ( 3 ) : 443 – 452 .
   Google Scholar
• Hu , T. and Sung , Y. 2005 . Clustering spatial data with a hybrid em approach . Pattern Analysis and Application , 8 ( 1 ) : 139 – 148 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen , J.R. 1996 . Introductory Digital Image Processing, A Remote Sensing Perspective , Upper Saddle River, NJ-07458 : Prentice Hall .
   Google Scholar
• Koperski , K. , Adhikary , J. and Han , J. 1996 . “ Spatial data mining: progress and challenges ” . In Workshop on Research Issues on Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery(DMKD'96) 1 – 10 . Montreal, Canada
   Google Scholar
• Mark, D., 1999, Geographical information science: Critical issues in an emerging cross-disciplinary research domain. NSF Workshop.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell , T. 1999 . “ The role of unlabeled data in supervised learning ” . In Proceedings of the Sixth International Colloquium on Cognitive Science San Sebastian, Spain
   Google Scholar
• Nigam , K. , McCallum , A.K. , Thrun , S. and Mitchell , M. 2000 . Text classification from labeled and unlabeled documents using EM . Machine Learning , 39 ( 2/3 ) : 103 – 134 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qian , W. and Titterington , D. 1991 . Estimation of parameters in hidden Markov models . Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A , 337 : 407 – 428 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qian , W. and Titterington , D. 1991 . Stochastic relaxations and em algorithms for Markov random fields . Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation , : 41
   Google Scholar
• Raudys , S.J. and Jain , K. 1991 . Small sample size effects in statistical pattern recognition: recommendations for practitioners . IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence , 13 ( 3 ) : 252 – 264 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roddick , J.F. and Spiliopoulou , M. 1999 . “ A bibliography of temporal, spatial and spatio-temporal data mining research ” . In ACM Special Interest Group on Knowledge Discovery in Data Mining (SIGKDD) Explorations
   Google Scholar
• Shahshahani , B. and Landgrebe , D. 1994 . The effect of unlabeled samples in reducing the small sample size problem and mitigating the hughes phenomenon . IEEE Transaction on Geoscience and Remote Sensing , 32 ( 5 )
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shekhar , S. , Chawla , S. , Ravada , S. , Fetterer , F. , Liu , X. and Lu , C. 1999 . Spatial databases: accomplishments and research needs . IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering , 11 ( 1 )
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shekhar , S. , Schrater , P. , Vatsavai , R. , Wu , W. and Chawla , S. 2002 . Spatial contextual classification and prediction models for mining geospatial data . IEEE Transaction on Multimedia , 4 ( 2 ) : 174 – 188 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solberg , A.H. , Taxt , T. and Jain , K. 1996 . A Markov random field model for classification of multisource satellite imagery . IEEE Transaction on Geoscience and Remote Sensing , 34 ( 1 ) : 100 – 113 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tadjudin , S. and Landgrebe , A. 1999 . Covariance estimation with limited training samples . IEEE Transactions on Geosciences and Remote Sensing , 37 ( 4 ) : 2113 – 2118 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vatsavai , R.R. , Shekhar , S. and Burk , E. 2005 . “ A semi-supervised learning method for remote sensing data mining ” . In ICTAI 207 – 211 .
   Google Scholar
• Vatsavai , R.R. , Shekhar , S. and Burk , T.E. 2006 . “ A spatial semi-supervised learning method for classification of multi-spectral remote sensing imagery ” . In Seventh International Workshop on Multimedia Data Mining, MDM/KDD
   Google Scholar
• Warrender , C.E. and Augusteijn , F. 1999 . Fusion of image classifications using Bayesian techniques with Markov rand fields . International Journal of Remote Sensing , 20 ( 10 ) : 1987 – 2002 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar