Negations and negativity as linguistic devices in policy discourse of intercultural cities

References

• Ambridge, B. 2013. How do children restrict their linguistic generalizations? An (un-) grammaticality judgment study. Cognitive Science 37, no. 3: 508–543. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12018
   Google Scholar
• Amin, A. 2002. Ethnicity and the multicultural city: living with diversity. Environment and Planning A 34, no. 6: 959–980. doi: 10.1068/a3537
   Google Scholar
• Anscombre, J.C. 1994. L'Insoutenable légèreté morphologique du préfixe négatif in- dans la formation d'adjectifs. LINX 5: 299–321. doi: 10.3406/linx.1994.1302
   Google Scholar
• Autry, K.S., and W.H. Levine. 2012. Activation of negated and non-negated entities. Journal of Pragmatics 44, no. 11: 1474–1485. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2012.06.014
   Google Scholar
• Azer, H.A. 1985. The expression of negation in Egyptian colloquial Arabic (ECA). Studies in African Linguistics (supplement) 9: 15–18.
   Google Scholar
• Baltazani, M. 2006. Intonation and pragmatic interpretation of negation in Greek. Journal of Pragmatics 38, no. 10: 1658–1676. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2005.03.016
   Google Scholar
• Bauböck, R. 2008. Beyond culturalism and statism. Liberal responses to diversity. Eurosphere Working Paper Series, online working paper 6. http://eurospheres.org/files/2010/08/plugin-Eurosphere_Working_Paper_6_Baubock.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Beltran, D., I. Orenes, and C. Santamaria. 2008. Context effects on the spontaneous production of negation. Intercultural Pragmatics 5, no. 4: 409–419. doi: 10.1515/IPRG.2008.020
   Google Scholar
• Beukeboom, C.J., C. Finkenauer, and D.H.J. Wigboldus. 2010. The negation bias: When negations signal stereotypic expectancies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 99, no. 6: 978–992. doi: 10.1037/a0020861
   Google Scholar
• Blommaert, J., and B. Rampton. 2011. Language and superdiversity. Diversities 23, no. 2: 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Bremen, I. 2014. Palliatieve zorg: waarover en hoe informeren Nederlandse en Vlaamse academische ziekenhuizen op hun websites? PhD diss., Katholieke Universiteit Leuven.
   Google Scholar
• Buradyidi, M. ed. 2000. Urban planning in a multicultural society. Westport: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Burgers, C., C.J. Beukeboom, and L. Sparks. 2012. How the doc should (not) talk: When breaking bad news with negations influences patients’ immediate responses and medical adherence intentions. Patient Education and Counseling 89, no. 2: 267–273. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2012.08.008
   Google Scholar
• Cantle, T. 2012. Interculturalism: For the Era of cohesion and diversity. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Cap, P. 2013. Proximization theory and critical discourse studies: A promising connection? International Review of Pragmatics 5, no. 2: 293–317. doi: 10.1163/18773109-13050208
   Google Scholar
• Cap, P. 2014. Applying cognitive pragmatics to critical discourse studies: A proximization analysis of three public space discourses. Journal of Pragmatics 70: 16–30. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2014.05.008
   Google Scholar
• Cartoni, B., and M.A. Lefer. 2011. Negation and lexical morphology across languages: Insights from a trilingual translation corpus. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 47, no. 4: 795–843.
   Google Scholar
• Christiansen, T., K.E. Jorgensen, & A. Wiener, ed. 2001. The social construction of Europe. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Council of Europe. 2013. The intercultural city step by step. Practical guide for applying the urban model of intercultural integration. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Diez, T. 2001. Speaking ‘Europe’: The politics of integration discourse. In The social construction of Europe, ed. T. Christiansen, K.E. Jörgensen, and A. Wiener, 85–100. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Drozd, K.F. 1995. Child English pre-sentential negation as metalinguistic exclamatory sentence negation. Journal of Child Language 22, no. 3: 583–610. doi: 10.1017/S030500090000996X
   Google Scholar
• Eskildsen, S.W. 2012. L2 negation constructions at work. Language Learning 62, no. 2: 335–372. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00698.x
   Google Scholar
• Evans, J.S.B.T., J. Clibbens, and B. Rood. 1996. The role of implicit and explicit negation in conditional reasoning bias. Journal of Memory and Language 35, no. 3: 392–409. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1996.0022
   Google Scholar
• Fløttum, K. 2010. EU discourse: Polyphony and unclearness. Journal of Pragmatics 42, no. 4: 990–999. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2009.08.014
   Google Scholar
• Galatanu, O. 2009. L'analyse du discours dans la perspective de la sémantique des possibles argumentatifs: les mécanismes sémantico-discursifs de construction du sens et de reconstruction de la signification lexicale. In L'analyse linguistique des corpus discursifs. Des théories aux pratiques, des pratiques aux théories, ed. N. Garri and J. Longhi, 49–68. Clermont-Ferrand: Presses Universitaires Blaise-Pascal.
   Google Scholar
• JanMohamed, A.R. 1990. Negating the negation as a form of affirmation in minority discourse: The construction of Richard Wright as subject. In The nature and context of minority discourse, ed. A.R. JanMohamed and D. Lloyd, 102–123. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jou, J. 1988. The development of comprehension of double negation in Chinese children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 45, no. 3: 457–471. doi: 10.1016/0022-0965(88)90042-2
   Google Scholar
• Juncos-Rabadan, O. 1992. The processing of negative sentences in fluent aphasics: Semantic and pragmatic aspects. Brain and Language 43, no. 1: 96–106. doi: 10.1016/0093-934X(92)90023-8
   Google Scholar
• Khovanova-Rubicondo, K., and D. Pinelli. 2012. Evidence of the economic and social advantages of Intercultural Cities approach. Meta-analytic assessment for the Council of Europe. Strasburg: Council of Europe. http://www.coe.int/t/dg4/cultureheritage/culture/Source/Cities/Review.doc.
   Google Scholar
• Lähdesmäki, T. 2014. The role of space in the politics of intercultural dialogue. In Cultural encounter. The Mosaic of urban identities, eds. E.-N. Burdus¸el, O. Matiu, D. Preda, and A. Tomus¸, 28–42. UNeECC Forum vol. 6. Sibiu: University Network of the European Capitals of Culture.
   Google Scholar
• Lähdesmäki, T., and A. Wagener. 2015. Discourses on governing diversity in Europe: Critical analysis of the White Paper on Intercultural Dialogue. International Journal of Intercultural Relations 44: 13–28. doi: 10.1016/j.ijintrel.2014.11.002
   Google Scholar
• Levey, G.B. 2012. Interculturalism vs. multiculturalism: A distinction without a difference? Journal of Intercultural Studies 33, no. 2: 217–224. doi: 10.1080/07256868.2012.649529
   Google Scholar
• Light, D., and C. Young. 2009. European Union enlargement, post-accession migration and imaginative geographies of the ‘New Europe’: media discourses in Romania and the United Kingdom. Journal of Cultural Geography 26, no. 3: 281–303. doi: 10.1080/08873630903322205
   Google Scholar
• Low, S., D. Taplin, and S. Scheld, ed. 2005. Rethinking urban parks: Public space & cultural diversity. Austin: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maillat, D., & S. Oswald. 2009. Defining manipulative discourses: The pragmatics of cognitive illusions. International Review of Pragmatics 1, no. 2: 348–370. doi: 10.1163/187730909X12535267111651
   Google Scholar
• Meinhof, U.H., & A. Triandafyllidou. 2006. Transcultural Europe: An introduction to cultural policy in a changing Europe. In Transcultural Europe. Cultural policy in a changing Europe, ed. U.H. Meinhof and A. Triandafyllidou, 3–23. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Modood, T., & N. Meer. 2012. How does interculturalism contrast with multiculturalism? Journal of Intercultural Studies 33, no. 2: 175–196. doi: 10.1080/07256868.2012.649531
   Google Scholar
• Mouffe, C. 2005. On the political. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Palmer, R. 2009. Foreword. In Intercultural cities: Towards a model for intercultural integration, ed. P. Wood, 11–12. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Patel, K.K. 2013. Introduction. In The cultural politics of Europe. European capitals of culture and European Union since the 1980s, ed. K.K. Patel, 1–15. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Prado, J., and I.A. Noveck. 2007. How reaction time measures elucidate the matching bias and the way negations are processed. Thinking & Reasoning 12, no. 3: 309–328. doi: 10.1080/13546780500371241
   Google Scholar
• Risse, T. 2004. Social constructivism and European integration. In European integration theory, ed. T. Diez and A. Wiener, 159–176. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-García, D. 2010. Beyond assimilation and multiculturalism: A critical review of the debate on managing diversity. Migration & Integration 11, no. 3: 251–271. doi: 10.1007/s12134-010-0140-x
   Google Scholar
• Rokach, L., R. Romano, and O. Maimon. 2008. Negation recognition in medical narrative reports. Information Retrieval 11, no. 6: 499–538. doi: 10.1007/s10791-008-9061-0
   Google Scholar
• Rosamond, B. 1999. Discourses of globalization and the social construction of European identities. Journal of European Public Policy 6, no. 4: 652–668. doi: 10.1080/135017699343522
   Google Scholar
• Sandercock, L. 1998. Towards cosmopolis: Planning for multicultural cities. London: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Sassatelli, M. 2009. Becoming Europeans. Cultural identity and cultural policies. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Saukkonen, P. 2007. Politiikka monikulttuurisessa yhteiskunnassa (Politics in a multicultural society). Helsinki: WSOY.
   Google Scholar
• Sze, F., and D. Powell. 2004. Introduction. In Interculturalism: Exploring critical issues, ed. F. Sze and D. Powell, 1–2. Oxford: Interdisciplinary Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, C. 2012. Interculturalism or multiculturalism? Philosophy & Social Criticism 38, no. 4–5: 413–423. doi: 10.1177/0191453711435656
   Google Scholar
• Vermeiren, H. 1994. La Rhetorique de la negation. LINX 5: 331–341. doi: 10.3406/linx.1994.1304
   Google Scholar
• Vermeulen, M. 2010. Negaties in de plenaire vergaderingen van het Vlaams Parlement. PhD diss., Katholieke Universiteit Leuven.
   Google Scholar
• Vertovec, S. 2007. New Complexities of cohesion in Britain: Super-diversity, Transnationalism and Civil-integration. In Commission on integration and cohesion. Wetherby: Communities and Local Government Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Wagener, A. 2014. Creating identity and building bridges between cultures: The case of 9gag. International Journal of Communication 8: 2488–2502.
   Google Scholar
• Wiesand, A., I. Heiskanen, R. Mitchell, D. Cliché, M. Fisher, & L. Marsio. 2008. Sharing diversity. National approaches to intercultural dialogue in Europe. Study for the European commission. Bonn: European Institute for Comparative Cultural Research.
   Google Scholar
• Wieviorka, M. 2012. Multiculturalism: A concept to be redefined and certainly not replaced by the extremely vague term of interculturalism. Journal of Intercultural Studies 33, no. 2: 225–231. doi: 10.1080/07256868.2012.649530
   Google Scholar
• Wood, P. ed. 2009. Intercultural cities: Towards a model for intercultural integration. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing. https://www.coe.int/t/dg4/cultureheritage/culture/Cities/ICCModelPubl_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wood, P., and C. Landry. 2008. The intercultural city: Planning for diversity advantage. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar