Gender, religion and identity: discursive constructions of ‘non-veiling’ among non-veiled Malaysian Muslim women

References

• Abdul Fatah, Farhana. 2019. “Discourses of the Non-veiled: Exploring Discursive Identity Constructions among Malaysian Muslim Women Who Do Not Veil”. PhD diss., University of Warwick.
   Google Scholar
• Abdul Fatah, F., and S. Schnurr. 2020. “Negotiating Gender, Religious and Professional Identities: Exploring Some of the Challenges of Non-veiled Muslim Women at Work.” Yearbook of the Poznań Linguistic Meeting 6 (1): 243–267. https://doi.org/10.14746/yplm.2020.6.9.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed, Z. S., and I. Yilmaz. 2021. “Islamists and the Incremental Islamisation of Pakistan: The Case of Women’s Rights.” Commonwealth & Comparative Politics 59 (3): 275–295. https://doi.org/10.1080/14662043.2021.1948661.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almunajjed, M. 1997. “The Veil.” In Women in Saudi Arabia Today, Chapter 4, 47–57. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Alvi, Sajida, Homa Hoodfar, and Sheila McDonough. 2003. The Muslim Veil in North America: Issues and Debates. Toronto, ON: Women’s Press.
   Google Scholar
• Aziz, A., and A. B. Shamsul. 2004. “The Religious, the Plural, the Secular and the Modern: A Brief Critical Survey on Islam in Malaysia.” Inter-Asia Cultural Studies 5 (3): 341–356. doi: 10.1080/1464937042000288651.
   Google Scholar
• Barr, M. D., and A. R. Govindasamy. 2010. “The Islamisation of Malaysia: Religious Nationalism in the Service of Ethnonationalism.” Australian Journal of International Affairs 64 (3): 293–311. doi: 10.1080/10357711003736469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baxter, J. 2002. “A Juggling Act: A Feminist Post-structuralist Analysis of Girls’ and Boys’ Talk in the Secondary Classroom.” Gender and Education 14 (1): 5–19. doi: 10.1080/09540250120098843.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baxter, J. 2003. Positioning Gender in Discourse: A Feminist Methodology. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Baxter, J. 2008. “Feminist Post-Structuralist Discourse Analysis: A New Theoretical and Methodological Approach?” In Gender and Language Research Methodologies, edited by Kate Harrington, Lia Litosseliti, Helen Sauntson, and Jane Sunderland, 243–255. London: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Beh, L. S., and J. Y. Folk. 2013. “A Study of Filial Piety Practice in Malaysia: Relationship Between Financial Well-Being and Filial Piety.” African Journal of Business Management 7 (38): 3895–3902. doi: 10.5897/AJBM10.424.
   Google Scholar
• Beta, A. R. 2014. “Hijabers: How Young Urban Muslim Women Redefine Themselves in Indonesia.” International Communication Gazette 76 (4–5): 377–389. doi:10.1177/1748048514524103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bucholtz, M., and K. Hall. 2005. “Identity and Interaction: A Sociocultural Linguistic Approach.” Discourse Studies 7 (4–5): 585–614. doi:10.1177/1461445605054407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chew, P. G. L. 2014. “Language Choice and Religious Identities in Three Singaporean Madrasahs.” International Journal of the Sociology of Language 2014 (229): 49–65.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, A. D., and S. Q. Jensen. 2012. “Doing Intersectional Analysis: Methodological Implications for Qualitative Research.” NORA – Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research 20 (2): 109–125. doi:10.1080/08038740.2012.673505.
   Google Scholar
• Darquennes, J., and W. Vandenbussche. 2011. “Language and Religion as a Sociolinguistic Field of Study: Some Introductory Notes.” Sociolinguistica 25 (1): 1–11. doi:10.1515/9783110236262.1.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Statistics Malaysia. 2020. “Population by Religion.” Key Findings Population and Housing Census of Malaysia. Accessed November 19 2022. https://www.mycensus.gov.my/index.php/media-2/newsletter-infographics/125-newsletter-infographics/343-infografik#gallery6d2b70fcaf-5.
   Google Scholar
• Droogsma, R. A. 2007. “Redefining Hijab: American Muslim Women’s Standpoints on Veiling.” Journal of Applied Communication Research 35 (3): 294–319. Doi: 10.1080/00909880701434299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dwyer, S. C., and J. L. Buckle. 2009. “The Space Between: On Being an Insider-Outsider in Qualitative Research.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 8 (1): 54–63. doi: 10.1177/160940690900800105.
   Google Scholar
• Fadil, N. 2011. “Not-/Unveiling as an Ethical Practice.” Feminist Review 98 (1): 83–109. doi: 10.1057/fr.2011.12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P. 2014. An Introduction to Discourse Analysis: Theory and Method. 4th ed. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Glapka, E. 2018. “‘If You Look at Me Like at a Piece of Meat, Then That’s a Problem’ – Women in the Center of the Male Gaze. Feminist Poststructuralist Discourse Analysis as a Tool of Critique.” Critical Discourse Studies 15 (1): 87–103. doi:10.1080/17405904.2017.1390480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goddard, C. 1994. “The Meaning of lah: Understanding “Emphasis” in Malay (Bahasa Melayu).” Oceanic Linguistics 33 (1): 145–165. https://doi.org/10.2307/3623004.
   Google Scholar
• Gould, R. 2014. “Hijab as Commodity Form: Veiling, Unveiling, and Misveiling in Contemporary Iran.” Feminist Theory 15 (3): 221–240. doi:10.1177/1464700114544610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haddad, Y. Y. 2007. “The Post-9/11 Hijab as Icon.” Sociology of Religion: A Quarterly Review 68 (3): 253–267. doi: 10.1093/socrel/68.3.253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassim, N. 2017. “Glocalizing the Hijab: A Malaysian Perspective.” SHS Web of Conferences 33: 1–6. doi: 10.1051/shsconf/20173300016.
   Google Scholar
• Hochel, S. 2013. “To Veil or Not to Veil: Voices of Malaysian Muslim Women.” Intercultural Communication Studies 22 (2): 40–57.
   Google Scholar
• Hoodfar, H. 1992. “The Veil in Their Minds and on Our Heads: The Persistence of Colonial Images of Muslim Women.” Resources for Feminist Research 22 (3/4): 5–18.
   Google Scholar
• Ishak, S. Z. A. 2011. “Cultural Hybridity: Adapting and Filtering Popular Culture in Malaysian Television Programmes.” Malaysian Journal of Media Studies 13 (1): 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Ivanič, R. 1998. Writing and Identity – The Discoursal Construction of Identity in Academic Writing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Izharuddin, A. 2018. ““Free Hair”: Narratives of Unveiling and the Reconstruction of Self.” Journal of Women in Culture and Society 44 (1): 155–176. Doi: 10.1086/698281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaspal, R., and A. Coyle. 2010. ““Arabic Is the Language of the Muslims – That’s How It Was Supposed to Be”: Exploring Language and Religious Identity through Reflective Accounts from Young British-Born South Asians.” Mental Health, Religion and Culture 13 (1): 17–36. doi: 10.1080/13674670903127205.
   Google Scholar
• Jefferson, G. 2004. “Glossary of Transcript Symbols with an Introduction.” In Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation, edited by Gene H. Lerner, 13–31. Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Jule, Allyson, ed. 2005. Gender and the Language of Religion. London: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Jule, Allyson. 2007. “Introduction.” In Language and Religious Identity: Women in Discourse, edited by Allyson Jule, 1–6. London: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kamada, L. D. 2009. “Mixed-Ethnic Girls and Boys as Similarly Powerless and Powerful: Embodiment of Attractiveness and Grotesqueness.” Discourse Studies 11 (3): 329–352. doi: 10.1177/1461445609102447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kandiyoti, D. 1991. “Identity and Its Discontents: Women and the Nation.” Millennium 20 (3): 429–443. doi: 10.1177/03058298910200031501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaya, A. 2015. “Islamisation of Turkey under the AKP Rule: Empowering Family, Faith and Charity.” South European Society and Politics 20 (1): 47–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/13608746.2014.979031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalid, R., and M. O’Connor. 2011. “The Hijab: Representation among the Muslim Women in Malaysia.” Paper Presented at The Second Asian Conference on Arts and Humanities, Osaka, Japan: The International Academic Forum (IAFOR), May 27–30.
   Google Scholar
• Koh, Ann Sweesun. 1990. “Topics in Colloquial Malay.” PhD Diss., University of Melbourne.
   Google Scholar
• Litosseliti, Lia. 2006. Gender and Language: Theory and Practice. London: Hodder Education.
   Google Scholar
• Litosseliti, L., and Jane Sunderland, eds. 2002. Gender Identity and Discourse Analysis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• López, L. A., and C. Edfeldt. 2007. “The Role of Language in the Construction of Gender and Ethnic-Religious Identities in Brazilian-Candomblé Communities.” In Language and Religious Identity: Women in Discourse, edited by Allyson Jule, 149–171. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, D. 2014. “Gender, Malayness and the Ummah: Cultural Consumption and Malay- Muslim Identity.” Asian Studies Review 38 (3): 403–421. Doi: 10.1080/10357823.2014.929635.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meer, Nasar. 2010. Citizenship, Identity and the Politics of Multiculturalism. London: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Mouser, A. E. 2007. “Defining “Modern” Malay Womanhood and the Coexistent Messages of the Veil.” Religion 37 (2): 164–174. doi: 10.1016/j.religion.2007.06.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nainee, S., T. S. Aun, and T. C. Seng. 2016. “Role of Reciprocal Filial Piety in the Relationship Between Parental Involvement and Filial Behavior among Malaysian Adolescents.” Journal of Techno Social 8 (2): 25–32.
   Google Scholar
• Nieves, N. R., and R. D. Rosati. 2007. “The Interplay of Language, Religion, Ethnicity, and Gender: A Case Study of Hispanic Churches in Lancaster, Pennsylvania.” In Language and Religious Identity: Women in Discourse, edited by Allyson Jule, 29–49. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Omoniyi, T., and Joshua A Fishman, eds. 2006. Explorations in the Sociology of Language and Religion. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Ong, Kian Ming. 2014. “Malaysian Political Parties and Coalitions.” In Routledge Handbook of Contemporary Malaysia, edited by Meredith Weiss, 22–36. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Othman, N. 2006. “Muslim Women and the Challenge of Islamic Fundamentalism/Extremism: An Overview of Southeast Asian Muslim Women’s Struggle for Human Rights and Gender Equality.” Women’s Studies International Forum 29 (4): 339–353. doi: 10.1016/j.wsif.2006.05.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peacock, Andrew Charles Spencer. 2017. Islamisation: Comparative Perspectives from History. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peek, L. 2005. “Becoming Muslim: The Development of a Religious Identity.” Sociology of Religion 66 (3): 215–242. doi: 10.2307/4153097.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peletz, M. G. 2013. “Malaysia’s Syariah Judiciary as Global Assemblage: Islamization, Corporatization, and Other Transformations in Context.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 55 (3): 603–633. doi:10.1017/S0010417513000261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Read, J. G., and J. P. Bartkowski. 2000. “To Veil or Not to Veil? A Case Study of Identity Negotiation among Muslim Women in Austin, Texas.” Gender and Society 14 (3): 395–417. doi: 10.1177/089124300014003003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riswan, Y. 2021. “Hijab as Migration: Embracing and Leaving Hijab in Contemporary Indonesia.” In (Re-) Claiming Bodies Through Fashion and Style, edited by Viola Thimm, 151–172. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Saat, N. 2016. “Exclusivist Attitudes in Malaysian Islam Have Multifarious Roots”. ISEAS Yusof Ishak Institute, July 5. Accessed August 21, 2021. https://iseas.edu.sg/images/pdf/ISEAS_Perspective_2016_39.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Saldana, Johnny. 2009. The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Shi-Xu. 2016. “Cultural Discourse Studies through the Journal of Multicultural Discourses: 10 years on.” Journal of Multicultural Discourses 11 (1): 1–8. doi: 10.1080/17447143.2016.1150936.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shirazi-Mahajan, F. 1993. “The Politics of Clothing in the Middle East: The Case of Hijab in Post-revolution Iran.” Critique: Journal of Critical Studies of Iran & the Middle East 2 (2): 54–63. doi:10.1080/10669929308720032.
   Google Scholar
• Skerrett, A. 2017. “The Role of Language in Religious Identity Making.” Literacy Research: Theory, Method, and Practice 66 (1): 325–340. Doi: 10.1177/2381336917718176.
   Google Scholar
• Souza, A. 2016. Language and Religious Identities. Oxfordshire: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Staunæs, D. 2003. “Where Have all the Subjects Gone? Bringing Together the Concepts of Intersectionality and Subjectification.” NORA - Nordic Journal of Feminist Gender Research 11 (2): 101–110. doi: 10.1080/08038740310002950.
   Google Scholar
• Stirling, N., S. Shaw, and P. Short. 2014. “Sifting, Negotiating and Remaking Religious Identities: A Redefining of Lived Religion among Muslim Migrant Women.” International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences 4 (8 (1)): 17–29.
   Google Scholar
• Sunderland, J. 2004. Gendered Discourses. London: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Sunderland, J. 2007. “Preface”.” In In Language and Religious Identity: Women in Discourse, edited by Allyson Jule, xi–xiii. London: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Suratman, S. 2011. “Tudung Girls: Unveiling Muslim Women’s Identity in Singapore.” In Melayu: The Politics, Poetics and Paradoxes of Malayness, edited by Maznah Mohamad, and Syed Muhd Khairudin Aljunied, 168–194. Singapore: NUS Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tan, C., S. A. Tan, S. Nainee, A. W. H. Ong, and K. H. Yeh. 2019. “Psychometric Evaluation of the Malay Filial Piety Scale (FPS-M) for Adolescents in Malaysia.” Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology 13 (E8): 1–6. doi:10.1017/prp.2018.29.
   Google Scholar
• Tay, L. T., M. Y. Chan, N. T. Yap, and B. E. Wong. 2016. “Discourse Particles in Malaysian English: What Do They Mean?” Bijdragen tot de taal-, land- en volkenkunde/Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences of Southeast Asia 172: 479–509. doi: 10.1163/22134379-17204002.
   Google Scholar
• Thimm, Viola, ed. 2021. (Re-) Claiming Bodies Through Fashion and Style. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Tong, J. K. C., and B. S. Turner. 2008. “Women, Piety and Practice: A Study of Women and Religious Practice in Malaysia.” Contemporary Islam 2 (1): 41–59. Doi: 10.1007/s11562-007-0038-3.
   Google Scholar
• Toosi, N. R., and N. Ambady. 2011. “Ratings of Essentialism for Eight Religious Identities.” International Journal for the Psychology of Religion 21 (1): 17–29. doi: 10.1080/10508619.2011.532441.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, W., R. Sen, R. Permanadeli, and C. S. Howarth. 2012. “The Veil and Muslim Women’s Identity: Cultural Pressures and Resistance to Stereotyping.” Culture and Psychology 18 (4): 521–541. doi: 10.1177/1354067X12456713.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wellfelt, E., and S. A. Djonler. 2019. “Islam in Aru, Indonesia: Oral Traditions and Islamisation Processes from the Early Modern Period to the Present.” Indonesia and the Malay World 47 (138): 160–183. doi:10.1080/13639811.2019.1582895.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar