Charity without Politics? Exploring the Limits of ‘Politics’ in Charity Law

References

• Breen, O. B. (2012). Too political to be charitable? The Charities Act 2009 and the future of human rights organisations in Ireland. Public Law, 268–287.
   Google Scholar
• Bridge, R. (2002). The law of advocacy by charitable organisations: The case for change. Estates, Trusts & Pensions Journal, 21(2), 92–129.
   Google Scholar
• Buckles, J. R. (2007). Not even a peep? The regulation of political campaign activity by charities through federal tax law. University of Cincinnati Law Review, 75(3), 1071–1111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canada Revenue Agency. (2003). Policy statement – Political activities (CPS-022). Retrieved from http://www.cra-arc.gc.ca/chrts-gvng/chrts/plcy/cps/cps-022-eng.html
   Google Scholar
• Caplin, M. M., & Timbie, R. E. (1975). Legislative activities of public charities. Law and Contemporary Problems, 39(4), 183–210. doi: 10.2307/1191170
   Google Scholar
• Charity Commission for England and Wales. (2007). Charities working in the field of human rights (RS 16). Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/charities-working-in-the-field-of-human-rights-rs16
   Google Scholar
• Charity Commission for England and Wales. (2008). Guidance on campaigning and political activities by charities (CC9). Retrieved from http://www.charitycommission.gov.uk/publications/cc9.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Charity Commission for England & Wales. (2013). Public benefit: The public benefit requirement. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/351485/pb1_the_public_benefit_requirement.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Chia, J., Harding, M., & O'Connell, A. (2011). Navigating the politics of charity: Reflections on Aid/Watch Inc v Commissioner of Taxation. Melbourne University Law Review, 35(2), 353–393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn, A. (1999). Charity law as a political option for the poor. Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly, 50(3), 298–317.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, A. (2007). Hippocratic oath or Gordian knot? The politicisation of health care trustees and their role in campaigning. King's Law Journal, 18(3), 481–502.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, A. (2008a). Demanding service or servicing demand? Charities, regulation and the policy process. Modern Law Review, 71(2), 247–270. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2230.2008.00690.x
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, A. (2008b). Charities and restrictions on political activities: Developments by the Charity Commission for England and Wales in determining the regulatory barriers. International Journal of Not-for-Profit Law, 11(1), 51–66.
   Google Scholar
• Fridman, G. H. L. (1953). Charities and public benefit. Canadian Bar Review, 31, 537–552. doi: 10.1139/b53-042
   Google Scholar
• Harding, M. (2011). Finding the limits of Aid/Watch. Cosmopolitan Civil Societies Journal, 3(3), 34–45.
   Google Scholar
• Harding, M. (2015). An Antipodean view of political purposes and charity law. Law Quarterly Review, 131, 181–186.
   Google Scholar
• Ho, J., & Price, R. (2011). Reform of charity law in Hong Kong and Australia: What lessons can be learned from the United Kingdom? Asian Journal of Comparative Law, 6(1), 1–23. doi: 10.2202/1932-0205.1375
   Google Scholar
• Hong Kong Law Reform Commission. (2011). Charities sub-committee's consultation paper on charities. Retrieved from http://www.hkreform.gov.hk/en/docs/charities_e.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hong Kong Law Reform Commission. (2013). Charities sub-committee's report on charities. Retrieved from http://www.hkreform.gov.hk/en/docs/rcharities_e.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hsiao, M. (2012). The beginning and the end of an era of charitable public benefit in Hong Kong. The Conveyancer and Property Lawyer, 228–242.
   Google Scholar
• Jaconelli, J. (2013). Adjudicating on charitable status—A reconsideration of the elements. The Conveyancer and Property Lawyer, 96–112.
   Google Scholar
• Mullender, R. (2012). Charity law, education, and public benefit: An Oakeshottian analysis. Law Quarterly Review, 128, 188–192.
   Google Scholar
• Nobles, R. (1982). Politics, public benefit and charity. Modern Law Review, 45(6), 704–707.
   Google Scholar
• O'Halloran, K., & McGregor-Lowndes, M. (2011). Charity law, advocacy and the Aid/Watch decision: Compatibility of charitable purposes and political objects—The view from Australia. Charity Law and Practice Review, 13(1), 1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Parachin, A. (2008). Distinguishing charity and politics: The judicial thinking behind the doctrine of political purposes. Alberta Law Review, 45(4), 871–899.
   Google Scholar
• Parachin, A. (in press). Legal restrictions on advocacy by charities: Sound regulation or artificial constraint? In N. Mulé & G. DeSantis (Eds.), The shifting terrain: Public policy advocacy in Canada. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Picarda, H. Q. C. (2014). Charities Act 2011: Dog's breakfast or dream come true? A case for further reform. In M. Harding, A. O’Connell, & M. Stewart (Eds.), Not-for-profit law: Theoretical and comparative perspectives (pp. 134–158). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rickett, C. (1982). Charity and Politics. New Zealand Universities Law Review, 10, 169–177.
   Google Scholar
• Sheridan, L. A. (1973). Charity versus politics. Anglo-American Law Review, 2(1), 47–68.
   Google Scholar
• Turnour, M., & Turnour, E. (2014). Archimedes, Aid/Watch, constitutional levers and where we now stand. In M. Harding, A. O’Connell, & M. Stewart (Eds.), Not-for-profit law: Theoretical and comparative perspectives (pp. 37–60). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walton, C. (2014). McGovern v Attorney General: Constraints on judicial assessment of charitable benefit. The Conveyancer and Property Lawyer, 317–327.
   Google Scholar