2,084
Views
36
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

When trust matters—a multilevel analysis of the effect of generalized trust on political participation in 25 European democracies

&

References

  • Almond, G., & Verba, S. (1963). The civic culture: Political attitudes and democracy in five nations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Bäck, M. (2011). Socialt kapital och politiskt deltagande i Europa [Social capital and political participation in Europe]. Åbo: Åbo Akademis förlag.
  • Barnes, S., Kaase, M., Allerback, K. R., Farah, B., Heunks, F., Inglehart, R., … Rosenmayr, L. (1979). Political action: Mass participation in five western democracies. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Benson, M., & Rochon, T. R. (2004). Interpersonal trust and the magnitude of protest: A micro and macro level approach. Comparative Political Studies, 37, 435–457. doi: 10.1177/0010414003262900
  • Brady, H. E. (1999). Political participation. In J. P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver, & L. S. Wrightsman (Eds.), Measures of political attitudes (pp. 737–801). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  • Christensen, H. S. (2013). Institutional incentives for political participation in the off-election democracy. In P. Esaiasson & H. M. Narud (Eds.), Between election democracy – The representative relationship after election day (pp. 103–126). Colchester: ECPR Press.
  • Dalton, R. J. (2004). Democratic challenges, democratic choices – The erosion of political support in advanced industrial democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • van Deth, J. (2001, September). The proof of the pudding: Social capital, democracy and citizenship. Paper presented for the EURESCO Conference, Exeter, United Kingdom.
  • van Deth, J. W., Montero, J. R., & Westholm, A. (Eds.). (2007). Citizenship and involvement in European democracies – A comparative analysis. London: Routledge.
  • Engström, K., Mattsson, F., Järleborg, A., & Hallqvist, J. (2008). Contextual social capital as a risk factor for poor self-rated health: A multilevel analysis. Social Science & Medicine, 66(11), 2268–2280. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.01.019
  • European Social Survey. (2008). Data file edition 4.0. Norwegian Social Science Data Services, Norway – Data Archive and distributor of ESS data.
  • Evans, G., & Letki, N. (2006). Understanding the relationship between social capital and political dissatisfaction in the new post-communist democracies. In M. Torcal & J. R. Montero (Eds.), Political disaffection in contemporary democracies (pp. 130–154). London: Routledge.
  • Fennema, M., & Tillie, J. (2001). Political participation and political trust in Amsterdam. Civic communities and ethnic networks. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 25(4), 703–726. doi: 10.1080/1369183X.1999.9976711
  • Field, J. (2003). Social capital. Key ideas. London: Routledge.
  • Freitag, M., & Bühlmann, M. (2009). Crafting trust: The role of political institutions in a comparative perspective. Comparative Political Studies, 42, 1537–1566. doi: 10.1177/0010414009332151
  • Hooghe, M., & Marien, S. (2013). A comparative analysis of the relation between political trust and forms of political participation in Europe. European Societies, 15(1), 131–152. doi: 10.1080/14616696.2012.692807
  • Howard, M. M., & Gilbert, L. (2008). A cross-national comparison of the internal effects of participation in voluntary organizations. Political Studies, 56(1), 12–32. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00715.x
  • Hox, J. (2010). Multilevel analysis – Techniques and applications (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Hustinx, L., & Denk, T. (2009). The black box problem in the study of participation. Journal of Civil Society, 5(3), 209–226. doi: 10.1080/17448680903351693
  • Inglehart, R., & Norris, P. (2003). Rising tide: Gender equality and cultural change around the world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Jackman, R. W., & Miller, R. A. (1998). Social capital and politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 1, 47–73. doi: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.1.1.47
  • Julious, S. A. (2004). Using confidence intervals around individual means to assess statistical significance between two means. Pharmaceutical Statistics, 3, 217–222. doi: 10.1002/pst.126
  • Kaase, M. (1999). Interpersonal trust, political trust and non-institutionalised political participation in Western Europe. West European Politics, 22(3), 1–21. doi: 10.1080/01402389908425313
  • Kawachi, I., Kennedy, B. P., & Glass, R. (1999). Social capital and self-rated health: A contextual analysis. American Journal of Public Health, 89(8), 1187–1193. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.89.8.1187
  • Kittilson, M., & Dalton, R. J. (2011). Virtual civil society: The new frontier of social capital?. Political Behavior, 33(4), 625–644. doi: 10.1007/s11109-010-9143-8
  • Krishna, A. (2002). Enhancing political participation in democracies: What is the role of social capital?. Comparative Political Studies, 35, 437–460. doi: 10.1177/0010414002035004003
  • Maloney, W. A., & van Deth, J. (Eds.). (2010). Civil society and activism in Europe – Contextualizing engagement and political orientations. London: Routledge.
  • Marien, S., & Christensen, H. S. (2013). Trust and openness: Prerequisites for democratic engagement?. In K. Demetriou (Ed.), Democracy in transition – Political participation in the European Union (pp. 109–134). Berlin: Springer.
  • van der Meer, J. (2003). Rain or fog? An empirical investigation of social capital’s rainmaker effects. In D. Stolle & M. Hooghe (Eds.), Generating social capital: Civil society and institutions in comparative perspective (pp. 133–151). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Muhlberger, P. (2003, August). Political trust vs. generalized trust in political participation. Paper presented for the 2003 annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia.
  • Nannestad, P. (2008). What have we learned about generalized trust, if anything. Annual Review of Political Science, 11, 413–436. doi: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.060606.135412
  • Newton, K. (2001). Trust, social capital, civil society, and democracy. International Political Science Review, 22(2), 201–214. doi: 10.1177/0192512101222004
  • Newton, K. (2006). Institutional confidence and social trust – Aggregate and individual relations. In M. Torcal & J. R. Montero (Eds.), Political disaffection in contemporary democracies (pp. 81–100). London: Routledge.
  • Newton, K., & Norris, P. (2000). Confidence in public institutions: Faith, culture or performance?. In S. Pharr & R. D. Putnam (Eds.), Disaffected democracies (pp. 52–72). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Norris, P. (2002). Democratic phoenix – Reinventing political activism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Offe, C. (1999). How can we trust our fellow citizens?. In M. Warren (Ed.), Democracy and trust (pp. 42–87). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Oskarsson, S. (2006). Valdeltagandets mekanismer [The mechanisms of electoral participation]. In P. Esaiasson & A. Westholm (Eds.), Deltagandets mekanismer. Det politiska engagemangets orsaker och konsekvenser [The mechanisms of participation: The causes and consequences of political engagement] (pp. 68–89). Malmö: Liber.
  • Pattie, C., Sayd, P., & Whiteley, P. (2003). Citizenship and civic engagement: Attitudes and behaviour in Britain. Political Studies, 51(3), 443–468. doi: 10.1111/1467-9248.00435
  • Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. In R. Leonardi & R. Nanetti (Eds.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone – The collapse and revival of American community. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
  • Putnam, R. D., Pharr, S., & Dalton, R. J. (2000). Introduction: What’s troubling the trilateral democracies?. In S. Pharr & R. D. Putnam (Eds.), Disaffected democracies (pp. 3–30). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Rasbach, J., Charlton, C., Browne, W. J., Healy, M., & Cameron, B. (2009). MLwiN version 2.1. Centre for Multilevel Modelling, University of Bristol.
  • Rasbach, J., Steele, F., Browne, W. J., & Goldstein, H. (2012). A User’s guide to MLwiN, v2.26. Centre for Multilevel Modelling, University of Bristol.
  • Rothstein, B. (2003). Sociala fällor och tillitens problem [Social traps and the problem of trust]. Stockholm: SNS förlag.
  • Sartori, G. (1970). Concept misformation in comparative politics. The American Political Science Review, 64(4), 1033–1053. doi: 10.2307/1958356
  • Snijders, T., & Bosker, R. (1999). Multilevel analysis – An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modelling. London: Sage.
  • Stolle, D. (2002). Trusting strangers – The concept of generalized trust in perspective. Österreichische Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft, 4, 397–412.
  • Teorell, J. (2003). Linking social capital to political participation: Voluntary associations and networks of recruitment in Sweden. Scandinavian Political Studies, 26(1), 49–66. doi: 10.1111/1467-9477.00079
  • Topf, R. (1995). Beyond electoral participation. In H. D. Klingemann & D. Fuchs (Eds.), Citizens and the state (pp. 52–91). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Torcal, M., & Montero, J. R. R. (Eds.). (2006). Political disaffection in contemporary democracies. London: Routledge.
  • Uslaner, E. (1999). Democracy and social capital. In M. E. Warren (Eds.), Democracy and trust (pp. 121–150). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Uslaner, E. (2002). The moral foundations of trust. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Uslaner, E., & Brown, M. (2005). Inequality, trust and civic engagement. American Politics Research, 33, 868–894. doi: 10.1177/1532673X04271903
  • van der Wel, K. A. (2007). Social capital and health – A multilevel analysis of 25 administrative districts in Oslo. Norwegian Journal of Epidemology, 17(1), 71–78.
  • Welzel, C., Inglehart, R., & Deutsch, F. (2005). Social capital, voluntary associations and collective action: Which aspects of social capital have the greatest ‘civic’ payoff?. Journal of Civil Society, 1(2), 121–146. doi: 10.1080/17448680500337475
  • Zmerli, S., & Hooghe, M. (2011). Political trust. Why context matters. Colchester: ECPR Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.