Gendered political space: civil society, contingency theory, and the substantive representation of women

References

• Alexander, J. (1998). Real civil societies, Dilemmas of institutionalisation. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, J. (2005). The civil sphere. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Annesley, C (2010). Gender, politics and policy change: The case of welfare reform under new labour. Government and Opposition, 45(1), 50–72. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-7053.2009.01304.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anzia, S. (2011). Election timing and the electoral influence of interest groups. The Journal of Politics, 73(2), 412–427. doi: 10.1017/S0022381611000028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bambra, C. (2004). The worlds of welfare: Illusory and gender blind? Social Policy & Society, 3, 201–211. doi: 10.1017/S147474640400171X
   Google Scholar
• Banazak, A. (2010). The women's movement inside and outside the state. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bee, C., & Guerrina, R. (2014). Participation, dialogue, and civic engagement: Understanding the role of organized civil society in promoting active citizenship in the European union. Journal of Civil Society, 10(1), 29–50. doi: 10.1080/17448689.2013.861651
   Google Scholar
• Beresford, P., & Croft, S. (1983). Welfare pluralism: The new face of Fabianism. Critical Social Policy, 3(9), 19–39. doi: 10.1177/026101838300300903
   Google Scholar
• Bhaskar, R. (1975/2008). A realist theory of science. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Blackburn, R. M., Browne, J., Brooks, B., & Jarman, J. (2002). Explaining gender segregation. British Journal of Sociology, 53(1), 513–536. doi: 10.1080/0007131022000021461
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonacker, T. (2006). Disclosing critique: The contingency of understanding in Adorno’s interpretive social theory. European Journal of Social Theory, 9(1), 369–392. doi: 10.1177/1368431006065718
   Google Scholar
• Bovey, W., & Hede, A. (2001). Resistance to organisational change: The role of defence mechanisms. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 16(7), 534–548. doi: 10.1108/EUM0000000006166
   Google Scholar
• Burnard, K., & Bhamra, R. (2011). Organisational resilience: Development of a conceptual framework for organisational responses. International Journal of Production Research, 49(1), 5581–5599. doi: 10.1080/00207543.2011.563827
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casey, J. (2004). Third sector participation in the policy process: A framework for comparative analysis. Policy & Politics, 32(2), 241–257. doi: 10.1332/030557304773558170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Celis, K., Childs, S., Kantola, J., & Krook, M. (2014). Constituting women’s interests through representative claims. Politics & Gender, 10(2), 149–174. doi: 10.1017/S1743923X14000026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaney, P. (2008a). Devolved governance and the substantive representation of women. Parliamentary Affairs: A Journal of Representative Politics, 61(2), 87–102. doi: 10.1093/pa/gsm063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaney, P. (2008b). Devolved governance and the substantive representation of women: The second term of the national assembly for Wales, 2003–2007. Parliamentary Affairs, 61(2), 272–290. doi: 10.1093/pa/gsm063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaney, P. (2014). The substantive representation of women—does issue salience matter? Party politicization and UK Westminster elections 1945–2010. The British Journal of Politics & International Relations, 16, 96–116. doi: 10.1111/1467-856X.12007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaney, P. (2015). The ‘complementarity conjecture’—does civil society engagement strengthen input legitimacy and shape policy delivery? The case of gender mainstreaming in India and Nepal 2005–15. Journal of Comparative Asian Development, 14(3), 377–413. doi: 10.1080/15339114.2015.1099827
   Google Scholar
• Chaney, P., & Wincott, D. (2014). Envisioning the third sector’s welfare role: Critical discourse analysis of ‘post-devolution’ public policy in the UK 1998–2012. Social Policy and Administration, 48(7), 757–781. doi: 10.1111/spol.12062
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2003). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Chattier, P. (2015). Women in the house (of parliament) in Fiji: What’s gender got to do with it? The Round Table—Commonwealth Journal of International Affairs, 104(2), 177–188. doi: 10.1080/00358533.2015.1017253
   Google Scholar
• Cheriet, B. (1996). Gender, civil society and citizenship in Algeria. Middle East Report, 26, 22–26. doi: 10.2307/3012871
   Google Scholar
• Childs, C., & Krook, M. L. (2009). Analysing women’s substantive representation: From critical mass to critical actors. Government and Opposition, 44(2), 125–145. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-7053.2009.01279.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Childs, S., & Lovenduski, J. (2012). Political representation. In G. Waylen, K. Celis, J. Kantola, & L. Weldon (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of gender and politics (pp. 49–53). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Childs, S., Webb, P., & Marthaler, S. (2010). Constituting and substantively representing women. Politics & Gender, 6(4), 199–223. doi: 10.1017/S1743923X10000048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Childs, S., & Withey, J. (2004). Women representatives acting for women: Sex and the signing of early day motions in the 1997 British parliament. Political Studies, 52(1), 552–564. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2004.00495.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J., & Arato, A. (1994). Civil society and political theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, R. (1961). Who governs? Democracy and power in an American city. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlerup, D. (1994). Learning to live with the state. State, market and civil society: Women’s need for state interventions in east and west. Women’s Studies International Forum, 17(2/3), 117–127. doi: 10.1016/0277-5395(94)90019-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denzin, K., & Lincoln, S. (2003). Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In N. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 1–32). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Deo, N. (2007). Structure and strategies: Two faces of civic activism in India. Journal of Civil Society, 3(2), 137–157. doi: 10.1080/17448680701580287
   Google Scholar
• Dobrowolsky, A., & Hart, V. (2003). Women making constitutions. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Dovi, S. (2002). Preferable descriptive representatives: Will just any woman, black, or Latino do? American Political Science Review, 96(4), 729–743. doi: 10.1017/S0003055402000412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dris-Aït-Hamadouche, L. (2007). Women in the Maghreb: Civil society’s actors or political instruments? Middle East Policy, 14(4), 115–133. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-4967.2007.00328.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn, K. (2011). Voice and trust in parliamentary representation. Electoral Studies, 31(2), 393–405. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2012.01.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, A., & Skinners, J. (2009). Research paradigms in qualitative sports research management. In A. Skinners (Ed.), Qualitative research in sports management (pp. 74–89). London: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, B., & McCarthy, J. (2004). Strategy matters: The contingent value of social capital in the survival of local social movement organizations. Social Forces, 83(2), 621–651. doi: 10.1353/sof.2005.0009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, M. (2009). Civil society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Egeberg, M. (2003). How bureaucratic structure matters: An organizational perspective. In B. G. Peters & J. Pierre (Eds.), Handbook of public administration (pp. 121–136). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Engen, M., Leeden, R., & Willemsen, T. (2001). Gender, context and leadership styles: A field study. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 74(5), 581–598. doi: 10.1348/096317901167532
   Google Scholar
• Esping Andersen, G. (1990). Three worlds of welfare capitalism. Cambridge and Princeton, NJ: Polity Press and Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eto, M. (2012). Reframing civil society from gender perspectives: A model of a multi-layered seamless world. Journal of Civil Society, 8(2), 101–121. doi: 10.1080/17448689.2012.686738
   Google Scholar
• Fennema, M., & Tillie, J. (1999). Political participation and political trust in Amsterdam: Civic communities and ethnic networks. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 25(4), 703–726. doi: 10.1080/1369183X.1999.9976711
   Google Scholar
• Ferree, M. (2003). Resonance and radicalism: Feminist framing in the abortion debates of the United States and Germany. American Journal of Sociology, 109(2), 304–344. doi: 10.1086/378343
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finkel, S., Muller, E., & Opp, K. (1989). Personal influence, collective rationality and mass political action. The American Political Science Review, 83(1), 885–903. doi: 10.2307/1962065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser, D. (1997). The evolution of the British welfare state: A history of social policy since the industrial revolution. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Fredman, S. (2001). Discrimination law. Clarendon Law Series. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fredman, S. (2008). Human rights transformed: Positive rights and positive duties. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, G., & Payer, S. (2007). Women’s NGOs in EU governance. Problems of finance and access. In D. Obradovic & H. Pleines (Eds.), The capacity of central and East European interest groups to participate in EU governance (pp. 163–181). Stuttgart: Ibidem Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Gamson, W. (1975). The strategy of social protest. Homewood, IL: Dorsey.
   Google Scholar
• George, G. (2007). Interpreting gender mainstreaming by NGOs in India: A comparative ethnographic approach. Gender, Place & Culture: A Journal of Feminist Geography, 14(6), 679–701. doi: 10.1080/09663690701659143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerrits, L., & Verweij, S. (2013). Critical realism as a meta-framework for understanding the relationships between complexity and qualitative comparative analysis. Journal of Critical Realism, 12(2), 166–182. doi: 10.1179/rea.12.2.p663527490513071
   Google Scholar
• Gherardi, S. (1995). Gender, symbolism and organizational cultures. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the prison notebooks ( Q. Hoare and G. N. Smith, Trans. and Ed.). New York, NY: International Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Greenwood, R., & Hinings, C. (1976). Contingency theory and public bureaucracies. Policy and Politics, 5(2), 159–180. doi: 10.1332/030557376782842986
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, P., & Taylor, R. (1996). Political science and the three new institutionalisms. Political Studies, 44(5), 936–957. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb00343.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halsaa, B. (1999). A strategic partnership for women’s policies in Norway. In G. Lyclama a Nijeholt, V. Vargas, & S. Wieringa (Eds.), Women’s movements and public policy in Europe (pp. 157–169). New York, NY: Garland.
   Google Scholar
• Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2000). Empire. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haussman, M., & Sauer, B. (Eds.). (2007). Gendering the state in the age of globalization: Women’s movements and state feminism in post-industrial democracies. Boulder, CO: Rowman and Litdefield.
   Google Scholar
• Holli, A., & Kantola, J. (2005). A politics for presence: Finland in state feminism and political representation. In A. M. Holli & J. Kantola (Eds.), State feminism and political representation (pp. 62–84). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Honneth, A. (2005). Struggles for recognition: The moral grammar of social conflicts. Oxford: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Howell, J. (2005). Gender and civil society. In G. Marlies, M. Kaldor, & H. Anheier (Eds.), Global civil society 2005/6 ( Chapter 1, pp. 38–63). London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Howell, J. (2008). Gender and civil society: Time for cross-border dialogue. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State and Society, 14(4), 415–436. doi: 10.1093/sp/jxm023
   Google Scholar
• Inglehart, R., & Norris, P. (2001). Cultural obstacles to equal representation. Journal of Democracy, 12(3), 126–140. doi: 10.1353/jod.2001.0054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inglehart, R., & Norris, P. (2003). Rising tide: Gender equality and cultural change around the world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jahanshahrad, H. (2012). A genuine civil society and its implications for the Iranian women’s movement. Women’s History Review, 21(2), 233–252. doi: 10.1080/09612025.2012.657883
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, H., & Kas, W. (2005). Watching over the rights of women. Social Policy and Society, 5(1), 127–136. doi: 10.1017/S1474746405002800
   Google Scholar
• Jones, J. P., & Hanham, R. (1995). Contingency, realism, and the expansion method. Geographical Analysis, 27(2), 185–207.
   Google Scholar
• Kabeer, N. (2005). Gender equality and women’s empowerment: A critical analysis of the third millennium development goal. Gender and Development, 13(1), 13–24. doi: 10.1080/13552070512331332273
   Google Scholar
• Kang, A. (2014). How civil society represents women: Feminists, Catholics, and mobilization strategies in Africa. In M. Escobar-Lemmon & M. Taylor-Robinson (Eds.), Representation: The case of women ( Chapter 8, pp. 87–109). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kantola, J., & Squires, J. (2012). From state feminism to market feminism? International Political Science Review, 33(4), 382–400. doi: 10.1177/0192512111432513
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katuna, B., & Holzer, E. (2015). Unobtrusively stretching law: Legal education, activism, and reclaiming title IX. Social Movement Studies, 14, 1–21. doi: 10.1080/14742837.2013.870883
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keane, J. (Ed.). (1988). Civil society and the state: New European perspectives. London: University of Westminster Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kenny, M. (2007). Gender, institutions, and power: A critical review. Politics, 27(2), 91–100. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9256.2007.00284.x
   Google Scholar
• Korolczuk, E. (2014). Promoting civil society in contemporary Poland: Gendered results of institutional changes. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 25(4), 949–967. doi: 10.1007/s11266-013-9388-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Limnios, M., Alexandra, E. Mazzarol, T., Ghadouani, A., & Schilizzi, S. (2014). The resilience architecture framework: Four organizational archetypes. European Management Journal, 32(1), 104–116. doi: 10.1016/j.emj.2012.11.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lister, R. (2012). Citizenship and gender. In K. Nash & A. Scott (Eds.), The Wiley-Blackwell Companion to Political Sociology (1st ed., Chapter 33, pp. 372–382). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Lombardo, E., Meier, P., & Verloo, M. (Eds.). (2009). The discursive politics of gender equality: Stretching, bending and policymaking. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Loseke, D. (2011). Thinking about social problems: An introduction to constructionist perspectives. Piscataway, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Lovenduski, J., & Karam, A. (2002). Women in parliament: Making a difference. In A. Karam (Ed.), Women in parliament, Chapter 5. Stockholm: Idea. Retrieved from http://www.idea.int
   Google Scholar
• Lovenduski, J., & Norris, P. (2003). Westminster women: The politics of presence. Political Studies, 51, 84–102. doi: 10.1111/1467-9248.00414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowndes, V. (2004). Getting on or getting by? Women, social capital and political participation. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 6, 45–64. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-856X.2004.00126.x
   Google Scholar
• Lowndes, V., & Wilson, D. (2001). Social capital and local governance: Exploring the institutional design variable. Political Studies, 49, 629–647. doi: 10.1111/1467-9248.00334
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowri, T. (1971). Four systems of policy, politics, choice. Syracuse, NY: Inter-university Case Program.
   Google Scholar
• Lühiste, K. (2006). Explaining trust in political institutions: Some illustrations from the Baltic states. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 39(1), 475–496. doi: 10.1016/j.postcomstud.2006.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luthans, F., Avey, J. Avolio, B., Norman, S., & Combs, G. (2006). Psychological capital development: Toward a micro-intervention. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(1), 387–393. doi: 10.1002/job.373
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansbridge, J. (1992). A deliberative perspective on neocorporatism. Politics & Society, 20(1), 493–505. doi: 10.1177/0032329292020004007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• March, J. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71–87. doi: 10.1287/orsc.2.1.71
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• March, J., & Olsen, J. (1984). The new institutionalism: Organisational factors in political life. American Political Science Review, 78(1), 732–749.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, M., Ferree, W., Gamson, W., Gerhards, J., & Rucht, D. (2002). Four models of the public sphere in modern democracies. Theory and Society, 31, 289–324. doi: 10.1023/A:1016284431021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maundeni, Z. (Ed.). (2005). Civil society and democracy in Botswana. In Z. Maundeni (Ed.), Forty years of democracy in Botswana 1965–2005 ( Chapter 10, pp. 177–190). Gaborone: Mmegi Publishing House.
   Google Scholar
• Mazur, A. (2013). Does Feminist policy matter in post industrial democracies? A proposed analytical roadmap, contribution to ‘Policymaking: Insights and challenges from gender and other equality perspectives’ edited by Emanuela Lombardo, Petra Meier and Mieke Verloo. Special Issue— Journal of Women, Politics and Policy—forthcoming. Retrieved April 28, 2015, from http://www.csbppl.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/Does-Feminist-Policy-Matter-in-Post-Industrial-Democracies.pdf
   Google Scholar
• McAdam, D., McCarthy, J., & Zald, M. (Eds.). (1996). Comparative perspectives on social movements. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McBride, D., & Mazur, A. (2010). The politics of state feminism: Innovation in comparative research. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, J., & Zald, M. (2002). The enduring vitality of the resource mobilization theory of social movements. In J. H. Turner (Ed.), Handbook of sociological theory (pp. 533–565). New York, NY: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Meredith, M. (2009). The strategic timing of direct democracy. Economics and Politics, 21, 159–177. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0343.2008.00342.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishler, W., & Rose, R. (2001). What are the origins of political trust? Testing institutional and cultural theories in post-communist societies. Comparative Political Studies, 34(1), 30–62. doi: 10.1177/0010414001034001002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moon, S. (2002). Carving out space: Civil society and the women’s movement in South Korea. The Journal of Asian Studies, 61(2), 473–500. doi: 10.2307/2700298
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nezhina, T., & Ibrayeva, A. (2013). Explaining the role of culture and traditions in functioning of civil society organizations in Kazakhstan. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 24(2), 335–358. doi: 10.1007/s11266-011-9256-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ntseane, D. (2005). Women in party politics. In Z. Maundeni (Ed.), Forty years of democracy in Botswana 1965–2005 ( Chapter 13, pp. 222–238). Gaborone: Mmegi Publishing House.
   Google Scholar
• Olsen, J. (2009). Change and continuity: An institutional approach to institutions of democratic government. European Political Science Review, 1(1), 3–32. doi: 10.1017/S1755773909000022
   Google Scholar
• Olsen, J. (2013). The institutional basis of democratic accountability. West European Politics, 36(1), 447–473. doi: 10.1080/01402382.2012.753704
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pascall, G., & Lewis, J. (2004). Emerging gender regimes and policies for gender equality in a wider Europe. Journal of Social Policy, 33(3), 373–394. doi: 10.1017/S004727940400772X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez-Díaz, V. (2014). Civil society: A multi-layered concept. Sociology Review, 62(6), 812–830.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, G. (2012). Institutional theory in political science. London, NY: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, S. (2005). Civil society and healing: Theorizing women’s social activism in post-soviet Ukraine. Ethnos: Journal of Anthropology, 70(4), 489–514. doi: 10.1080/00141840500419766
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitkin, H. (1972). The concept of representation. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, F. (2007). The politics of civil society. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Price, V., & Romantan, A. (2004). Confidence in institutions before, during, and after ‘indecision 2000’. The Journal of Politics, 66(3), 939–956. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2508.2004.00284.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prouteau, L., & Tabariés, M. (2010). Female leadership in French voluntary associations. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 21(4), 497–524. doi: 10.1007/s11266-010-9139-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putnam, R., Leonardi, R., & Nanetti, R. (1993). Making democracy work: Traditions in modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rucht, D. (2009). Von Zivilgesellschaft zu Zivilität: Konzeptuelle Überlegungen und Möglichkeiten der empirischen Analyse. In C. Frantz & H. Kolb (Eds.), Zivilgesellschaftliche Verständigungsprozesse (pp. 75–101). Münster: Waxmann.
   Google Scholar
• Sabatier, P. A. (1993). Policy change over a decade or more. In P. A. Sabatier & H. C. Jenkins-Smith (Eds.), Policy change and learning an advocacy coalition approach (pp. 13–39). New York: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sabatier, P., & Jenkins-Smith, H. (1999). The advocacy coalition framework: An assessment. In P. A. Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of the policy process (pp. 117–166). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sabatier, P., & Jenkins-Smith, H. (Eds.). (1993). Policy change and learning. An advocacy coalition approach. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Salamon, L., & Anheier, H. (1992). In search of the nonprofit sector I: The question of definitions. Voluntas—International Journal of Third Sector Research, 3(2), 125–115.
   Google Scholar
• Salmenniemi, S. (2005). Civic activity—feminine activity? gender, civil society and citizenship in post-soviet Russia. Sociology, 39(4), 735–753. doi: 10.1177/0038038505056030
   Google Scholar
• Saward, M. (2006). The representative claim. Contemporary Political Theory, 5(1), 297–318. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.cpt.9300234
   Google Scholar
• Saward, M. (2010). The representative claim. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sayer, A. (1992). Method in social science: A realist approach (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sayer, A. (2000). Realism and social science. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Schlozman, K., & Tierney, A. (1986). Organized interests and American democracy. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
   Google Scholar
• Sener, T. (2014). Civic and political participation of women and youth in Turkey: An examination of perspectives of public authorities and NGOs. Journal of Civil Society, 10(1), 69–81. doi: 10.1080/17448689.2013.862083
   Google Scholar
• Shepherd, L. (2015). Constructing civil society: Gender, power and legitimacy in united nations peacebuilding discourse. European Journal of International Relations, 21(4), 887–910. doi: 10.1177/1354066115569319
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skocpol, T. (1997). The tocqueville problem: Civic engagement in American democracy. Social Science History, 21(4), 455–479. doi: 10.1017/S0145553200017818
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sloat, A. (2005). The rebirth of civil society: The growth of women’s NGOs in central and eastern Europe. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 12(4), 437–452. doi: 10.1177/1350506805057100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Squires, J. (2008). The constitutive representation of gender: Extra-parliamentary re-presentations of gender relations. Representation, 44(2), 187–204. doi: 10.1080/00344890802080464
   Google Scholar
• Stetson, D. & Mazur, A. (1995). Introduction. In D. M. Stetson & A. G. Mazur (Eds.), Comparative state feminism (pp. 1–23). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1994). Grounded theory methodology. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research, (Chapter 7, pp. 34–41). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Tarrow, S., & Tilly, C. (Eds.). (2001). Silence and voice in the study of contentious politics. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, C. (1992). Multiculturalism and the politics of recognition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tilly, C. (1978). From mobilization to revolution. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Tilly, C. (1995). Popular contention in Great Britain, 1758–1834. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tsebelis, G. (1995). Decision making in political systems: Veto players in presidentialism, parliamentarism, multicameralism and multipartyism. British Journal of Political Science, 25(3), 289–325. doi: 10.1017/S0007123400007225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tully, J. (1995). Strange multiplicity: Constitutionalism in an age of diversity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Twigg, J. (2009). Characteristics of a disaster resilient community. University College London UCL Hazard Research Centre. Retrieved July 4, 2015, from www.abuhrc.org/research/dsm/Pages/project_view.aspx?project=13
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. (2013). The premise and promise of UN women’s partnerships with civil society. New York, NY: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Von Doepp, P. (2002). Liberal visions and actual power in grassroots civil society: Local churches and women’s empowerment in rural Malawi. The Journal of Modern African Studies, 40(2), 273–301. doi: 10.1017/S0022278X02003919
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walzer, M. (1990). Kritik und gemeinsinn. Berlin: Fischer.
   Google Scholar
• Waylen, G. (2008). Gendering governance. In G. Goertz & A. Mazur (Eds.), Politics, gender, and concepts: Theory and methodology (pp. 114–136). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wiegman, R. (1999). Feminism, institutionalism, and the idiom of failure. Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies, 11(3), 107–135. doi: 10.1215/10407391-11-3-107
   Google Scholar
• Young, I. (1990). Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Young, I. (2000). Inclusion and democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar