Participatory enthusiasms: a recent history of citizen engagement initiatives

References

• AmericaSpeaks. (2002). The AmericaSpeaks model: Taking democracy to scale. www.americaspeaks.org/history.html
   Google Scholar
• Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216–224. doi: 10.1080/01944366908977225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baiocchi, G., & Ganuza, E. (2014). Participatory budgeting as if emancipation mattered. Politics and Society, 42(1), 29–50. doi: 10.1177/0032329213512978
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barber, B. R. (1998). Three scenarios for the future of technology and strong democracy. Political Science Quarterly, 113(4), 573–589. doi: 10.2307/2658245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, M., Newman, J., Knops, A., & Sullivan, H. (2003). Constituting ‘the public’ in public participation. Public Administration, 81(2), 379–399. doi: 10.1111/1467-9299.00352
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonabeau, E. (2009). Decisions 2.0: The power of collective intelligence. MIT Sloan Management Review, 50(2), 45–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brabham, D. C. (2013). Crowdsourcing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, K., & Schultz, S. (2010). “ … a certain amount of engineering involved”: Constructing the public in participatory governance arrangements. Public Understanding of Science, 19(4), 403–419. doi: 10.1177/0963662509347814
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castells, M. (2013). Networks of outrage and hope: Social movements in the Internet age. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, K. K. (2009). Enabling creative chaos: The organization behind the burning man event. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cooke, B., & Kothari, U. (2001). Participation: The new tyranny. London: Zed.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlberg, L. (2001). The Internet and democratic discourse: Exploring the prospects of online deliberative forums extending the public sphere. Information, Communication & Society, 4(4), 615–633. doi: 10.1080/13691180110097030
   Google Scholar
• Fishkin, J. S. (1997). The voice of the people: Public opinion and democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hagendijk, R., & Irwin, A. (2006). Public deliberation and governance: Engaging with science and technology in contemporary Europe. Minerva, 44(2), 167–184. doi: 10.1007/s11024-006-0012-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helling, A. (1998). Collaborative visioning: Proceed with caution! Results from evaluating Atlanta’s vision 2020 project. Journal of the American Planning Association, 64(3), 335–349. doi: 10.1080/01944369808975990
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, C., Lipsky, M., & Marshall, D. R. (1994). Citizen participation in urban politics: Rise and routinization. In G. E. Peterson (Ed.), Big-city politics, governance, and fiscal constraints (pp. 153–199). Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
   Google Scholar
• ImagineNY. 2002. Imagine New York: The people’s visions. Summary Report. www.imagineny.org/resources/inysummaryreport.html
   Google Scholar
• Irwin, A. (2006). The politics of talk: Coming to terms with the ‘New’ scientific governance. Social Studies of Science, 36(2), 299–320. doi: 10.1177/0306312706053350
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kadlec, A., & Friedman, W. (2007). Deliberative democracy and the problem of power. Journal of Public Deliberation, 3(1), article 8.
   Google Scholar
• Kohler-Koch, B., & Finke, F. (2007). The institutional shaping of EU–society relations: A contribution to democracy via participation? Journal of Civil Society, 3(3), 205–221. doi: 10.1080/17448680701775630
   Google Scholar
• Kreiss, D. (2012). Taking Our country back: The crafting of networked politics from Howard dean to Barack Obama. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, C. W. (2015). Do-it-yourself democracy: The rise of the public engagement industry. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, C. W., McQuarrie, M., & Walker, E. (Eds) (2015) Democratizing inequalities: Pitfalls and unrealized promises of the New public participation. New York, NY: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, C. W., & Polletta, F. (2009). Dialogue and deliberation practitioners survey. http://sites.lafayette.edu/ddps/
   Google Scholar
• Lehoux, P., Daudelin, G., & Abelson, J. (2012). The unbearable lightness of citizens within public deliberation processes. Social Science & Medicine, 74(12), 1843–1850. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.02.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leighninger, M. (2006). The next form of democracy: How expert rule is giving Way to shared governance. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mansbridge, J., Hartz-Karp, J., Amengual, M., & Gastil, J. (2006). Norms of deliberation: An inductive study. Journal of Public Deliberation, 2(1), article 7.
   Google Scholar
• Mansuri, G., & Rao, V. (2012). Localizing development: Does participation work? Washington, DC: The World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, G. P. (2008). ‘Ordinary people only’: Knowledge, representativeness, and the publics of public participation in healthcare. Sociology of Health and Illness, 30(1), 35–54. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2007.01027.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melo, M. A., & Baiocchi, G. (2006). Deliberative democracy and local governance: Towards a new agenda. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 30(3), 587–600. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2006.00686.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michel, A. (2014). Participation and self-entrapment: A twelve-year ethnography of Wall Street participation practices’ diffusion and evolving consequences. The Sociological Quarterly, 55(3), 514–536. doi: 10.1111/tsq.12064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montambeault, F. (2016). Participatory citizenship in the making? The multiple citizenship trajectories of participatory budgeting participants in Brazil. Journal of Civil Society. doi:10.1080/17448689.2016.1213508.
   Google Scholar
• Morrill, C., & Owen-Smith, J. (2002). The emergence of environmental conflict resolution: Subversive stories and the construction of collective action frames and organizational fields. In A. J. Hoffman, & M. Ventresca (Eds.), Organizations, policy and the natural environment: Institutional and strategic perspectives (pp. 90–118). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nabatchi, T., Gastil, G., Weiksner, M., & Leighninger, M. (Eds) (2012). Democracy in motion: Evaluating the practice and impact of deliberative civic engagement. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pateman, C. (2012). Participatory democracy revisited. Perspectives on Politics 10(1), 7–19. doi: 10.1017/S1537592711004877
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedersen, M. C. (2002). Missing persons: Who will—and won’t—be deciding what gets built at the World Trade Center site. Metropolis, 21(6), 20–30.
   Google Scholar
• Polletta, F. (2002). Freedom is an endless meeting: Democracy in American social movements. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Polletta, F. (2014). Participatory democracy’s moment. Journal of International Affairs, 68(1), 79.
   Google Scholar
• Polletta, F., & Wood, L. (2005). Public deliberation after 9/11. In F. Foner (Ed.), Wounded city: The social effects of the world trade center attack on New York City (pp. 231–248). New York, NY: Russell Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Quet, M. (2013). Science to the people! (and experimental politics): Searching for the roots of participatory discourse in science and technology in the 1970s in France. Public Understanding of Science, 23(6), 628–645. doi: 10.1177/0963662512469011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shirky, C. (2008). Here comes everybody: The power of organizing without organizations. New York, NY: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Sirianni, C., & Friedland, L. (2001). Civic innovation in America: Community empowerment, public policy, and the movement for civic renewal. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Slater, P., & Bennis, W. (1964). Democracy is inevitable. Harvard Business Review, 42(2), 51–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smilde, D. (2011). Introduction. In D. Smilde & D. Hellinger (Eds.), Venezuela’s Bolivarian democracy: Participation, politics, and culture under Chávez (pp. 1–27). Durham, NC: Duke University Press. doi: 10.1215/9780822394310-001
   Google Scholar
• Smith, G. (2009). Democratic innovations: Designing institutions for citizen participation. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sorkin, M. (2002). Power plays at ground zero: Backroom schemes, laptop democracy, and a howl of protest. Architectural Record, 109(9), 67.
   Google Scholar
• Surowiecki, J. (2005). The wisdom of crowds. New York, NY: Anchor Books.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, K. C. (2008). Talking about race: Community dialogues and the politics of difference. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar