The promise for democratic deepening: the effects of participatory processes in the interaction between civil society and local governments

References

• Abers, R. (1998). From clientelism to cooperation: Local government. Participatory Policy, and Civic Organizing in Porto Alegre, Brazil, Politics and Society, 26, 511–537.
   Google Scholar
• Abers, R. N. (2007). Organizing for governance: Building collaboration in Brazilian river basins. World Development, 35(8), 1450–1463. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2007.04.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aguiar, F., & Navarro, C. J. (2000). Democracia y participación ciudadana en los municipios: ¿un mercado político de trastos. Revista Internacional de Sociología, 91, 89–111.
   Google Scholar
• Alarcón, P., & Font, J. (2014). Where are the boundaries of deliberation and participation? A transatlantic debate. Journal of Public Deliberation, 10(2), Article 11.
   Google Scholar
• Anduiza, E., Font, J., Mas, P., & De Maya, S. (2008). The electoral impact of direct-democratic practices. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 32(2), 473–491. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2427.2007.00764.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baiocchi, G., & Ganuza, E. (2014). Participatory budgeting as if emancipation mattered. Politics & Society, 42(1), 29–50. doi: 10.1177/0032329213512978
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baiocchi, G., & Ganuza, E. (in press). Popular democracy. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baiocchi, G., Heller, P., & Silva, M. K. (2008). Making space for civil society: Institutional reforms and local democracy in Brazil. Social Forces, 86(3), 911–936. doi: 10.1353/sof.0.0015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baiocchi, G., Heller, P., & Silva, M. K. (2011). Bootstrapping democracy: Transforming local governance and civil society in Brazil. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, G. (1999). The taming of the idea of civil society. Democratization, 6(3), 1–29. doi: 10.1080/13510349908403619
   Google Scholar
• Bauhr, M., & Grimes, M. (2014). Indignation or resignation: The implications of transparency for societal accountability. Governance, 27(2), 291–320. doi: 10.1111/gove.12033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanco i Fillola, I. (2013). De la experimentación participativa a la radicalidad democrática. Crisis, movimientos sociales y participación ciudadana en el ámbito local. Documentación social, 168, 159–178.
   Google Scholar
• Fagotto, E., & Fung, A. (2006). Empowered participation in urban governance: The Minneapolis neighbourhood revitalization program. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 30(3), 638–655. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2006.00685.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fagotto, E., & Fung, A. (2009). Sustaining public engagement: Embedded deliberation in local communities. East Hartford, CT: Everyday Democracy & Kettering Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Ferejohn, J. A. (1974). Pork barrel politics: Rivers and harbors legislation (1947–1968). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Font, J., della Porta, D., & Sintomer, Y. (2014). Participatory democracy in Southern Europe: Causes, characteristics and consequences. London: Rowman & Littlefield International.
   Google Scholar
• Font, J., Pasadas, S., & Smith, G. (2016). Tracing the impact of proposals from participatory processes: Methodological challenges and substantive lessons. Journal of Public Deliberation, 12(1), Article 3.
   Google Scholar
• Fung, A. (2009). Empowered participation: Reinventing urban democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Galais, C., Font, J., Alarcón, P., & Sesma, D. (2012). Methodological challenges for the large N study of local participatory experiences: Combining methods and databases. Revista Internacional de Sociología, 70( extra 2), 65–87. doi: 10.3989/ris.2012.04.04
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganuza, E., Nez, H., & Morales, E. (2014). The struggle for a voice: Tensions between associations and citizens in participatory budgeting. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 38(6), 2274–2291. doi: 10.1111/1468-2427.12059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García Espín, P., & Jiménez Sánchez, M. (2015). Los efectos de los procesos participativos en la sociedad civil. La opinión de los expertos, Informes y documentos de trabajo, IESA-CSIC. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10261/114833
   Google Scholar
• García Espín, P., & Jiménez Sánchez, M. (in press). Participatory processes as democracy enhancers. Effects, mechanisms, and evidences in civil society and its interaction with the state.
   Google Scholar
• Hernández-Medina, E. (2010). Social inclusion through participation: The case of the participatory budget in São Paulo. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 34(3), 512–532. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2010.00966.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiménez Sánchez, M. (2005). El impacto político de los movimientos sociales: un estudio de la protesta ambiental en España (No. 214). CIS.
   Google Scholar
• Kuklinski, J. H., & Stanga, J. (1979). Political participation and government responsiveness: The behavior of California superior courts. American Political Science Review, 73(4), 1090–1099. doi: 10.2307/1953991
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, C. W., McQuarrie, M., & Walker, E. T. (2015). Democratizing inequalities: Dilemmas of the new public participation. New York, NY: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Martín Criado, E. (1998). Los decires y los haceres. Papers: Revista de Sociologia, 56, 57–71.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Montambeault, F. (2011). Overcoming clientelism through local participatory institutions in Mexico: What type of participation? Latin American Politics and Society, 53(1), 91–124. doi: 10.1111/j.1548-2456.2011.00110.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nabatchi, T., Gastil, J., Weiksner, G. M., & Leighninger, M. (Eds.). (2012). Democracy in motion: Evaluating the practice and impact of deliberative civic engagement. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Navarro, C. J. (1999). El sesgo participativo. Madrid: CSIC.
   Google Scholar
• Parkinson, J. (2004). Why deliberate? The encounter between deliberation and new public managers. Public Administration, 82(2), 377–395. doi: 10.1111/j.0033-3298.2004.00399.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Polletta, F. (2013). Participatory democracy in the new millennium. Contemporary Sociology: A Journal of Reviews, 42(1), 40–50. doi: 10.1177/0094306112468718b
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selznick, P. (1948). Foundations of the theory of organization. American Sociological Review, 13(1), 25–35. doi: 10.2307/2086752
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sintomer, Y., & Ganuza, E. (2011). Democracia participativa y modernización de los servicios públicos: Una investigación sobre las experiencias de presupuestos participativos en Europa. Ámsterdam: Paris TNI/La Découverte.
   Google Scholar
• Wampler, B. (2004). Expanding accountability through participatory institutions: Mayors, citizens, and budgeting in three Brazilian municipalities. Latin American Politics and Society, 46(2), 73–99. doi: 10.1353/lap.2004.0027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wampler, B. (2007). Can participatory institutions promote pluralism? Mobilizing low-income citizens in Brazil. Studies in Comparative International Development, 41(4), 57–78. doi: 10.1007/BF02800471
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar