Do associations support authoritarian rule? Evidence from Algeria, Mozambique, and Vietnam

References

• Banks, N., & Hulme, D. (2012). The role of NGOs and civil society in poverty reduction (Working Paper 171). Brooks World Poverty Institute. Retrieved from http://www.civil20.org/upload/iblock/9b1/rolengo.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Berman, S. (2003). Islamism, revolution and civil society. Perspectives on Politics, 1(2), 257–272. doi: 10.1017/S1537592703000197
   Google Scholar
• Bui, H. (2013). Pluralism unleashed: The politics of reforming the Vietnamese constitution. Journal of Vietnamese Studies, 9(4), 1–32.
   Google Scholar
• Cavatorta, F. (2013). Civil society activism under authoritarian constraints. In F. Cavatorta (Ed.), Civil society activism under authoritarian rule (pp. 1–2). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cavatorta, F. (2015). Civil society after the uprisings: The case of Algeria (Singapore Middle East Papers 15). National University of Singapore. Retrieved from https://mei.nus.edu.sg/themes/site_themes/agile_records/images/uploads/SMEP_15_-_Cavatorta.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Collier, D. (2011). Understanding process tracing. PS: Political Science and Politics, 44(4), 823–830.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donati, P. (2011). Relational sociology: A new paradigm for the social sciences. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, B., & Foley, M. (1996). The paradox of civil society. Journal of Democracy, 7(3), 38–52. doi: 10.1353/jod.1996.0048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiege, K. (2014). Zivilgesellschaft in Mosambik zwischen Staat, internationaler Gebergemeinschaft und Selbstfindung. In W. Eberlei (Ed.), Zivilgesellschaft in Subsahara Afrika (pp. 105–136). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Froissart, C. (2014). The ambiguities between contention and political participation: A study of civil society development in authoritarian regimes. Journal of Civil Society, 10(3), 219–222. doi: 10.1080/17448689.2014.944758
   Google Scholar
• Gerschewski, J. (2013). The three pillars of stability: Legitimation, repression, and co-optation in autocratic regimes. Democratization, 20(1), 13–38. doi: 10.1080/13510347.2013.738860
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giersdorf, S., & Croissant, A. (2011). Civil society and competitive authoritarianism in Malaysia. Journal of Civil Society, 7(1), 1–21. doi: 10.1080/17448689.2011.553401
   Google Scholar
• Göbel, C. (2011). Authoritarian consolidation. European Political Science, 11, 90–176.
   Google Scholar
• Hallmann, T. (2009). Lokale Zivilgesellschaft, Drogen und öffentlicher Raum. Eine Fallstudie zu Politischer Kultur und Kommunikation am Beispiel des Diskurses der Drogenpolitik und Drogenszene in Münster (Doctoral dissertation). University of Münster.
   Google Scholar
• Hyden, G. (2010). Civil society in Africa: Constraints and opportunities for democratic change. In C. G. Shabbir & V. Popowski (Eds.), Engaging civil society: Emerging trends in democratic governance (pp. 249–264). Tokyo: United Nations University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. (2008). State power. A strategic-relational approach. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kößler, R. (1994). Postkoloniale Staaten: Elemente eines Bezugsrahmens. Hamburg: DÜI.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, D. (2013). Civil society and the authoritarian state: Cooperation, contestation, and discourse. Journal of Civil Society, 9(3), 325–340. doi: 10.1080/17448689.2013.818767
   Google Scholar
• Liverani, A. (2008). Civil society in Algeria: The political functions of associational life. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lukes, S. (1974 [2005]). Power. A radical view. Houndsmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Mann, M. (1984). The autonomous power of the state: Its origins, mechanisms and results. European Journal of Sociology, 25(2), 185–213. doi: 10.1017/S0003975600004239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercer, C. (2002). NGOs, civil society and democratization: A critical review of the literature. Progress in Development Studies, 2(1), 5–22. doi: 10.1191/1464993402ps027ra
   Google Scholar
• Pereira, J. (2011). Slow progress towards democratic ownership in Mozambique. Police Brief. Alliance 2015.Retrieved from http://alliance2015.org/fileadmin/Texte__Pdfs/Text_Documents/Alliance2015_Democratic_Ownership_Mozambique_2011.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Poulantzas, N. (1978). State, power, socialism. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Roth, R. (2004). Die dunklen Seiten einer Zivilgesellschaft. Grenzen einer zivilgesellschaftlichen Fundierung der Demokratie. In A. Klein, K. Kern, B. Geißel, & M. Berger (Eds.), Zivilgesellschaft und Sozialkapital. Herausforderungen politischer und sozialer Integration (pp. 41–64). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Rueschemeyer, D. (2010). On the state and prospects of comparative democratization research. Comparative Democratization (APSA-CD, 8(3), 1. 3–7.
   Google Scholar
• Sauer, B. (2001). Die Asche des Souveräns. Staat und Demokratie in der Geschlechterdebatte. Frankfurt/Main: Campus Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Sauer, B. (2011). ‘Only paradoxes to offer?’ Feministische Demokratie- und Repräsentationstheorie in der ‘Postdemokratie’. Österreichische Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft, 40(2), 125–138.
   Google Scholar
• Selznick, P. (1949). TVA and the grass roots: A study in the sociology of formal organization. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stenner, K. (2005). The authoritarian dynamic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thayer, C. (2009). Vietnam and the challenge of political civil society. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 31(1), 1–27. doi: 10.1355/CS31-1A
   Google Scholar
• Warren, M. (2001). Democracy and association. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wischermann, J. (2011). Governance and civil society action in Vietnam: Changing the rules from within-potentials and limits. Asian Politics & Policy, 3(3), 383–411. doi: 10.1111/j.1943-0787.2011.01277.x
   Google Scholar