Civil society: Bringing the family back in

References

• Abbott, P., & Wallace, C. (1992). The family and the new right. London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, G. (Ed.). (1999). The sociology of the family: A reader. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Barber, B. R. (1998). A place for us: How to make society civil and democracy strong. New York, NY: Hill and Wang.
   Google Scholar
• Bengtson, V. L., Biblarz, T. J., & Roberts, R. E. (2002). How families still matter: A longitudinal study of youth in two generations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bryson, A., & Davies, R. (2017, forthcoming). Age, place and the intergenerational transmission of trade union membership.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, S. L. (1999). Civility: Manners, morals, and the etiquette of democracy. New York, NY: Harper Perennial.
   Google Scholar
• Coffé, H., & Voorpostel, M. (2010). Young people, parents and radical right voting. The case of the Swiss people’s party. Electoral Studies, 29(3), 435–443. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2010.03.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. L., & Arato, A. (1994). Civil society and political theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davidoff, L., Doolittle, M., Fink, J., & Holden, K. (1999). The family story: Blood, contract and intimacy. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Donzelot, J. (1979). Policing the family. London: Hutchinson.
   Google Scholar
• Eberly, D. E. (Ed.). (2000a). The essential civil society reader: The classic essays. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Eberly, D. E. (2000b). The meaning, origins and applications of civil society. In D. E. Eberly (Ed.), The essential civil society reader: The classic essays (pp. 3–29). Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Eberly, D. E., & Streeter, R. (2002). The soul of civil society: Voluntary associations and the public value of moral habits. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Eto, M. (2012). Reframing civil society from gender perspectives: A model of a multi-layered seamless world. Journal of Civil Society, 8(2), 101–121. doi: 10.1080/17448689.2012.686738
   Google Scholar
• Fensham-Smith, A. (2017). New technologies, knowledge, networks and communities in home-education’? (PhD Thesis). Cardiff University, Cardiff.
   Google Scholar
• Foley, M. W., & Edwards, B. (1998). Beyond tocqueville: Civil society and social capital in comparative perspective. American Behavioral Scientist, 42(1), 5–20. doi: 10.1177/0002764298042001002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser, N. (1989). Unruly practices: Power, discourse and gender in contemporary social theory. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, N. (1997). Justice interruptus: Critical reflections on the “postsocialist” condition. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ginsborg, P. (2008). “Only connect”: Family, gender, and civil society in twentieth-century Europe and North America. In K. Hagemann, S. Michel, & G. Budde (Eds.), Civil society and gender justice: Historical and comparative perspectives (pp. 153–189). New York, NY: Berghahn Book.
   Google Scholar
• Glasius, M. (2004). ‘Who is the real civil society? Women’s groups versus pro-family groups at the international criminal court negotiations’. In J. Howell & D. Mulligan (Eds.), Gender and civil society: Transcending boundaries (pp. 222–242). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An enquiry into a category of bourgeois society (T. Burger with F. Lawrence, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press (Original work published 1962).
   Google Scholar
• Halsey, A. H., & Young, M. (1997). The family and social justice. In A. H. Halsey, H. Lauder, P. Brown, & A. S. Wells (Eds.), Education: Culture, economy, society (pp. 784–798). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hodgkinson, V. A., & Weitzman, M. S. (1992). Giving and volunteering in the United States. Washington, DC: Independent Sector.
   Google Scholar
• Howell, J. (2006). Gender and civil society. In H. K. Anheier, M. Kaldor, & M. Glasius (Eds.), Global civil society 2005/6 (pp. 38–63). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Landes, J. B. (1988). Women and the public sphere in the Age of the French revolution. Ithica, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moen, P., Erickson, M. A., & Dempster-McClain, D. (1997). Their mother’s daughters? The intergenerational transmission of gender attitudes in a world of changing roles. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 59, 281–293. doi: 10.2307/353470
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mustillo, S., Wilson, J., & Lynch, S. M. (2004). Legacy volunteering: A test of two theories of intergenerational transmission. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 530–541. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2004.00036.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pateman, C. (1980). ‘The disorder of women’: Women, love, and the sense of justice. Ethics, 91(1), 20–34. doi: 10.1086/292200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penny, L. (2013, January 13). What does the SWP’s way of dealing with sexual assault allegations tell us about the left?. New Statesman. Retrieved from http://www.newstatesman.com/laurie-penny/2013/01/laurie-penny-what-does-swps-way-dealing-sexual-assault-allegations-tell-us-abou
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, A. (2002). Does feminism need a conception of civil society? In S. Chambers & W. Kymlicka (Eds.), Alternative conceptions of civil society (pp. 71–89). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Power, A. & Willmot, H. (2007). Social capital within the neighbourhood ( CASE report 38). London: CASE.
   Google Scholar
• Power, S. (2006). Markets and misogyny: Educational research on educational choice. British Journal of Educational Studies, 54(2), 175–188. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8527.2006.00340.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quintelier, E. (2015). Intergenerational transmission of political participation intention. Acta Politica, 50(3), 279–296. doi: 10.1057/ap.2014.19
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherkat, D. E., & Blocker, T. J. (1994). ‘The political development of sixties’ activists: Identifying the influence of class, gender, and socialization on protest participation. Social Forces, 72(3), 821–842.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walzer, M. (2002). Equality and civil society. In S. Chambers & W. Kymlicka (Eds.), Alternative conceptions of civil society (pp. 34–49). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilhelm, M. O., Brown, E., Rooney, P. M., & Steinberg, R. (2008). The intergenerational transmission of generosity. Journal of Public Economics, 92(10-11), 2146–2156. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2008.04.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, I. M. (1997). Intersecting voices: Dilemmas of gender, political philosophy, and policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Young, I. M. (2000). Inclusion and democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmer, A., & Freise, M. (2007). Bringing society back in: Civil society, social capital and the third sector. In W. A. Maloney & J. W. van Deth (Eds.), Civil society and governance in Europe’ (pp. 19–42). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar