Civil society institutions or semi-public agencies? State regulation of parties and voluntary organizations in Norway

References

• Aars, J., & Ringkjøb, H.-E. (2005). Party politicisation reversed? Non-partisan alternatives in Norwegian local politics. Scandinavian Political Studies, 28(2), 161–181. doi: 10.1111/j.0080-6757.2005.00126.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allern, E. H. (2010). Political parties and interest groups in Norway. Colchester: ECPR Press.
   Google Scholar
• Allern, E. H., Heidar, K., & Karlsen, R. (2016). After the mass party. Continuity and change in political parties and representation in Norway. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Anheier, H. K., & Salamon, L. M. (2006). The nonprofit sector in comparative perspective. In W. W. Powell, & R. Steinberg (Eds.), The nonprofit sector. A research handbook (2nd ed., pp. 90–114). New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arnesen, D., & Sivesind, K. H. (2017). Finansiering og rammevilkår for frivillig sektor. Endringer, tilpasninger, konsekvenser. (Report 2017-7). Oslo: Centre for Research on Civil Society and Voluntary Sector. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/11250/2465083
   Google Scholar
• Bolleyer, N. (2014). The Regulation of Organizational Life in Advanced Democracies: Conceptual and Operational Challenges in Comparing ‘Organization-Relevant’ Regulation. Paper presented at the ECPR Joint Sessions of Workshops, Salamanca, April 10-15.
   Google Scholar
• Borz, G. (2014). The regulation of parties and pressure groups compared: Evidence from modern European constitutions. Paper presented at the ECPR Joint Sessions of Workshops, Salamanca, April 10-15.
   Google Scholar
• Borz, G. (2017). Justifying the constitutional regulation of political parties: A framework for analysis. International Political Science Review, 38(1), 99–113. doi: 10.1177/0192512116638543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovens, M., Schillemans, T., & Goodin, R. E. (2014). Public accountability. In M. Bovens, R. E. Goodin, & T. Schillemans (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of public accountability (pp. 1–20). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chari, R., Hogan, J., & Murphy, G. (2010). Regulating lobbying: A global comparison. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Council of Europe. (2003). Recommendation Rec 2003(4) of the Committee of Ministers to member states on common rules against corruption in the funding of political parties and electoral campaigns. Retrieved from https://search.coe.int/cm/Pages/result_details.aspx?Reference=Rec(2003)4
   Google Scholar
• Enyedi, Z. (2014). The discreet charm of political parties. Party Politics, 20(2), 194–204. doi: 10.1177/1354068813519959
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraussen, B., & Halpin, D. R. (2018). Political parties and interest organizations at the crossroads: Perspectives on the transformation of political organizations. Political Studies Review, 16(1), 25–37. doi: 10.1177/1478929916644868
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grendstad, G., Selle, P., Strømsnes, K., & Bortne, Ø. (2006). Unique environmentalism. A comparative perspective. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hazan, R. Y., & Rahat, G. (2010). Democracy within parties: Candidate selection methods and their political consequences. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Henriksen, T. (2011). Større åpenhet om finansieringen. Samfunnsspeilet, 25(3), 18–25.
   Google Scholar
• Janoski, T. (1998). Citizenship and civil society. A framework of rights and obligations in liberal, traditional, and social democratic regimes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jepperson, R. (2002). Political modernities: Disentangling two underlying dimensions of institutional differentiation. Sociological Theory, 20(1), 61–85. doi: 10.1111/1467-9558.00151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, R. S. (2002). The internal life of parties. In K. R. Luther, & F. Müller-Rommel (Eds.), Political parties in the New Europe (pp. 87–118). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, R. S., & Mair, P. (1995). Changing models of party organization and party democracy: The emergence of the cartel party. Party Politics, 1(1), 5–28. doi: 10.1177/1354068895001001001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhnle, S. (1981). The growth of social insurance programs in Scandinavia: Outside influence and international forces. In P. Flora, & A. J. Heidenheimer (Eds.), The development of welfare states in Europe and America (pp. 125–150). New Brunswick: Transaction Books.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhnle, S. (1983). Velferdsstatens utvikling – Norge i komparativt perspektiv. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhnle, S., & Selle, P. (1990). Meting needs in a welfare state: Relations between government and voluntary organizations in Norway. In A. Ware, & R. E. Goodin (Eds.), Needs and welfare (pp. 165–184). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhnle, S., & Selle, P. (1992). Government and voluntary organizations: A relational perspective. In S. Kuhnle, & P. Selle (Eds.), Government and voluntary organizations. A relational perspective (pp. 1–33). London: Avebury.
   Google Scholar
• Lorentzen, H. (2004). Fellesskapets fundament: sivilsamfunnet og individualismen. Oslo: Pax.
   Google Scholar
• Lorentzen, H. (2010). Statlige tilskudd til frivillige organisasjoner. En empirisk kartlegging. Report 2010:4, Oslo: Centre for Research on Civil Society and Voluntary Sector.
   Google Scholar
• Newton, K. (2007). Social and political trust. In R. J. Dalton, & H.-D. Klingemann (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political behavior (pp. 342–361). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• NOU 2001: 3. Velgere, valgordning, valgte. Report from the Electoral Reform Commission. Oslo: Ministry of Local Government and Regional Development.
   Google Scholar
• NOU 2004: 25. Penger teller, men stemmer avgjør. Report from the Democracy Financing Committee. Oslo: Ministry of Modernisation.
   Google Scholar
• NOU 2006: 15. Frivillighetsregister. Report on registration of non-profit organizations. Oslo: Ministry of Culture and Church Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Pierre, J., Svåsand, L., & Widfeldt, A. (2000). State subsidies to political parties: Confronting rhetoric with reality. West European Politics, 23(3), 1–24. doi: 10.1080/01402380008425381
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prop 140 L 2011–2012: Proposition to the storting (bill): Amendments to the Political Parties Act. Oslo: Ministry of Government Administration, Reform and Church Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Rattsøutvalget. (2006). Nye roller for frivillige organisasjoner i utviklingssamarbeidet. Report from a committee appointed by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, published 15. June 2006. Oslo: Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Rokkan, S. (1967). Geography, religion and social class: Crosscutting cleavages in Norwegian politics. In S. M. Lipset, & S. Rokkan (Eds.), Party systems and voter alignments (pp. 367–444). New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rothstein, B., & Trägårdh, L. (2007). The state and civil society in an historical perspective: The Swedish case. In L. Trägårdh (Ed.), State and civil society in Northern Europe. The Swedish model reconsidered (pp. 229–253). New York: Berghahn Books.
   Google Scholar
• Salamon, L. M. (1987). Of market failure, voluntary failure and third-party government: Toward a theory of government-nonprofit relations in the modern welfare state. Journal of Voluntary Action Research, 16, 29–49. doi: 10.1177/089976408701600104
   Google Scholar
• Salamon, L. M., & Anheier, H. K. (1998). Social origins of civil society: Explaining the nonprofit sector cross-nationally. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 9(3), 213–248. doi: 10.1023/A:1022058200985
   Google Scholar
• Salamon, L. M., Sokolowski, S. W., & Associates. (Eds.). (2004). Global civil society: Dimensions of the nonprofit sector, Volume II. Bloomfield, CT: Kumarian Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schofer, E., & Fourcade-Gourinchas, M. (2001). The structural contexts of civic engagement: Voluntary association membership in comparative perspective. American Sociological Review, 66(6), 806–828. doi: 10.2307/3088874
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selle, P. (1999). The transformation of the voluntary sector in Norway. In J. van Deth et al. (Ed.), Social capital and European democracy (pp. 144–166). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sivesind, K. H. (2007). Frivillig sektor i Norge 1997–2004. Frivillig arbeid, medlemskap, sysselsetting og økonomi. Report 2007:10. Oslo: Institute for Social Research.
   Google Scholar
• Sivesind, K. H. (2013). Ideella välfärdstjänster: en lösning på den skandinaviska modellens framtida utmaningar? In L. Trägårdh et al. (Ed.), Civilsamhället klämt mellan stat och kapital (pp. 75–88). Stockholm: SNS.
   Google Scholar
• Sivesind, K. H. (2015). Giving in Norway: An ambitious welfare state with a self-reliant nonprofit sector. In P. Wiepking, & F. Handy (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of global philanthropy (pp. 230–248). Basingstoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Sivesind, K. H. (2017). The changing roles of for-profit and nonprofit welfare provision in Norway, Sweden, and Denmark. In K. H. Sivesind, & J. Saglie (Eds.), Promoting active citizenship. Markets and choice in Scandinavian welfare (pp. 33–74). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Sivesind, K. H., Arnesen, D., Gulbrandsen, T., Nordø, Å. D., & Enjolras, B. (2018). An organizational landscape in transformation. In B. Enjolras, & K. Strømsnes (Eds.), Scandinavian civil society and social transformations: The case of Norway (pp. 67–116). Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft.
   Google Scholar
• Sivesind, K. H., Lorentzen, H., Selle, P., Wollebæk, D., Sokolowski, S. W., & Salamon, L. M. (2004). Norway. In L. M. Salamon, & S. W. Sokolowski, & Associates (Eds.), Global civil society: Dimensions of the nonprofit sector (Vol. II, pp. 261–275). Bloomfield, CT: Kumarian Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sivesind, K. H., & Selle, P. (2009). Does public spending ‘crowd out’ nonprofit welfare? Comparative Social Research, 26, 105–134. doi: 10.1108/S0195-6310(2009)0000026009
   Google Scholar
• Sivesind, K. H., & Selle, P. (2010). Civil society in the Nordic countries: Between displacement and vitality. In R. Alapuro, & H. Stenius (Eds.), Nordic associations in a European perspective (pp. 89–120). Baden-Baden: Nomos.
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Norway. (2017a). Table 05748: Deduction for gifts to voluntary organzations. Residents 17 years and older. Retrieved from http://statbank.ssb.no/statistikkbanken/
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Norway. (2017b). Table 10702: Funding, by source of finance and activity (ICNPO). Retrieved from http://ssb.no/orgsat
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Norway. (2017c). Political parties’ financing. Retrieved from http://ssb.no/en/valg/statistikker/partifin
   Google Scholar
• Stortinget. (2014). Innst. 145 S (2013–2014) Recommendation to the Storting from the Presidium. Oslo: Stortinget.
   Google Scholar
• Stortingsmelding nr. 39. (2006–2007). Frivillighet for alle. Oslo: Ministry of Culture and Church Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Strømsnes, K. (2013). Norsk frivillighetspolitik: ny och enhetlig? In L. Trägårdh et al. (Ed.), Civilsamhället klämt mellan stat och kapital (pp. 89–101). Stockholm: SNS.
   Google Scholar
• Svåsand, L. (1991). State subventions for political parties in Norway. In M. Wiberg (Ed.), The public purse and political parties (pp. 119–146). Helsinki: Finnish Political Science Association.
   Google Scholar
• Tranvik, T., & Selle, P. (2005). State and citizens in Norway: Organisational society and state–municipal relations. West European Politics, 28(4), 852–871. doi: 10.1080/01402380500216971
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations. (2003). Handbook on nonprofit institutions in the system of national accounts. New York: United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• Valen, H. (1988). Norway: Decentralization and group representation. In M. Gallagher, & M. Marsh (Eds.), Candidate selection in comparative perspective (pp. 210–235). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Valen, H., Narud, H. M., & Skare, A. (2002). Norway: Party dominance and decentralized decision-making. In H. M. Narud, M. Pedersen, & H. Valen (Eds.), Party sovereignty and citizen control (pp. 169–215). Odense: University Press of Southern Denmark.
   Google Scholar
• van Biezen, I. (2004). Political parties as public utilities. Party Politics, 10(6), 701–722. doi: 10.1177/1354068804046914
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Biezen, I., & Borz, G. (2012). Models of party democracy: Patterns of party regulation in post-war European constitutions. European Political Science Review, 4(3), 327–359. doi: 10.1017/S1755773911000294
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Biezen, I., & Kopecký, P. (2017). The paradox of party funding. The limited impact of state subsidies on party membership. In S. E. Scarrow, P. D. Webb, & T. Poguntke (Eds.), Organizing political parties. Representation, participation, and power (pp. 84–105). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• van Biezen, I., Mair, P., & Poguntke, T. (2012). Going, going, … gone? The decline of party membership in contemporary Europe. European Journal of Political Research, 51(1), 24–56. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2011.01995.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Biezen, I., & Piccio, D. R. (2013). Shaping intra-party democracy: On the legal regulation of internal party organization. In W. P. Cross, & R. S. Katz (Eds.), The challenges of intra-party democracy (pp. 27–48). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• van Biezen, I., & Poguntke, T. (2014). The decline of membership-based politics. Party Politics, 20(2), 205–216. doi: 10.1177/1354068813519969
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar